「quality」の検索結果

[Code Quality] Use when you need to review artifact quality (PBI, user story, test spec, design spec) before handoff. Supports --type={pbi|story|spec-tests|design}.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[DDD Quality] Use when you need to review domain entities and value objects for DDD design quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use when evaluating review feedback, requesting targeted code-quality review, or verifying completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when raising code quality or test coverage across a .NET, Java, or Python repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses the quality, composition, and usefulness of a lead list. Use when the user provides a lead list and wants completeness, distribution, quality issues, and recommended next actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improves Agent Skills via validate → rule-based eval cases → plugin-eval → prompt evals → bounded edits with held-out gates. Use when tuning skill quality, routing, or adopting Chrome/Microsoft T-named quality gates—not for bulk validate-only or SkillOpt automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish or audit a structural quality contract for any agent-operated engineering repository: app, library, CLI/tool, plugin, harness, or meta repo. Use when a repo needs charter clarity, docs/decision ownership, type-native validation gates, evidence paths, safe action policy, cold-start legibility, maturity proof, repair-loop routing, consumer/producer owner-boundary routing, command surface evolution, evolutionary simplicity (see references/evolutionary-simplicity.md), or a repo ecology pass to decide what should be compressed, merged, removed, updated, created, retired, or moved to checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications and the visual direction matters as much as the code quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

intake 全 JSON を統合したいとき、intake.md と intake.json を Jinja2 で render して quality_gate と cross_check を通したいときに使う。

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate custom quality checklists for validating requirements completeness and clarity. Use to create unit tests for English that ensure spec quality before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ネットワーク品質を総合的に診断し、ボトルネックの特定と根本原因の深堀りまで行うスキル。 接続情報、レイテンシ、ダウンロード速度、HTTP接続タイミング、経路解析を自動実行し、 品質閾値に基づく総合評価を日本語レポートとして出力する。 外部依存なし（OS標準ツールのみ使用）、macOSおよびLinux対応。 Use when diagnosing network quality, troubleshooting slow connections, identifying network bottlenecks, measuring latency/bandwidth/jitter, or generating network health reports. 「ネットワーク診断」「network diagnostics」「ネットワークが遅い」 「latency check」「bandwidth test」「traceroute analysis」

Convert Markdown documents to PDF. Two modes available — (1) Playwright-based conversion with Mermaid diagram support for technical documentation, and (2) fpdf2-based professional PDF generation with cover pages, themed styling, and business-quality table formatting for estimates, proposals, and reports. Use this skill when converting Markdown to PDF, generating business documents from Markdown, or converting Mermaid diagrams to images. Triggers on short phrases like "PDFに変換して", "markdownをpdfにして", "PDFにして", "PDF化して", "PDF出力して", "convert to PDF", "make a PDF", or any request involving converting content to PDF format.

Use this skill when you need to review presentation materials from an audience perspective to improve their quality and effectiveness. Evaluates content clarity, visual design, logical flow, engagement factors, and Marp technical compatibility. Triggers include "review my presentation", "check my slides", "presentation feedback", or when a user has completed a draft presentation and wants comprehensive quality review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review audit-related documents (control design documents, bottleneck analyses, requirements definitions, etc.) for quality, scoring them 0-100 with a severity-rated findings list. Use when reviewing audit documents, checking control design quality, or verifying cross-document consistency. Supports documents governed by US GAAP, IFRS, or J-GAAP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

エラーや例外シナリオを顧客体験(CX)の観点で体系的に分析し、改善優先度を付ける スキル。6軸評価（影響度・頻度・復旧容易性・メッセージ品質・感情的影響・ ビジネスコスト）でスコアリングし、Impact vs Effort マトリクスで改善施策を 優先順位付けする。Use when analyzing error scenarios from customer experience perspective, evaluating error message quality, prioritizing error UX improvements, or creating CX-focused error analysis reports. Triggers: "CXエラー分析", "error experience", "エラーUX改善", "customer experience error", "エラーメッセージ品質", "error scenario analysis", "顧客体験エラー評価"

ISO規格（ISO 9001品質、ISO 27001情報セキュリティ、ISO 22301事業継続等）の認証取得支援スキル。 ギャップ分析、文書化支援、内部監査、認証準備を提供。 Use when pursuing ISO certification, conducting gap analysis, or implementing ISO-compliant management systems. Triggers: "ISO 9001", "ISO 27001", "ISO 22301", "ISO certification", "quality management", "ISMS", "gap analysis".

Two-phase code quality skill: (1) review codebase for structural smells — file LOC, method LOC, accidental complexity, test readability — producing a structured report, then (2) fix all smells via provable refactorings with ACN micro commits and green-bar-at-all-times discipline. Use this skill when the user says 'sweep', 'code review', 'find code smells', 'check method lengths', 'review for complexity', 'tidy up the codebase', 'refactor smells', or asks about long methods, test readability, or accidental complexity. Also trigger when users ask to 'clean up' or 'improve code quality' across multiple files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory src/metainformant/longread/quality. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory scripts/quality. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory examples/quality. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory docs/quality. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

METAINFORMANT rules for directory config/quality. Use when editing, adding tests, or reviewing code under this path. Read the linked AGENTS.md first; use uv only, write outputs to output/, real implementations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。