「readiness」の検索結果

Knowledge base from the GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G). Use for program cost estimating: the four characteristics of a reliable estimate (comprehensive, well documented, accurate, credible) and the 18 best practices; the 12-step cost estimating process (purpose, plan, technical baseline, WBS, ground rules and assumptions, data, point estimate, sensitivity, risk/uncertainty, document, present, update); estimating methods (analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, learning curves); Monte Carlo risk/uncertainty analysis, confidence levels and contingency; auditing and validating an estimate against the characteristics; earned value management (EIA-748, BCWS/BCWP/ACWP, CPI/SPI/TCPI, EAC, PMB, IBR); and specialized techniques (software cost estimating, learning curves, Analysis of Alternatives, WBS templates, the Green Book internal-control framework). This is the cost-estimating companion to the GAO Schedule and Technology Readiness Assessment guides. Does not cover schedule estimating/risk in depth (see the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide), agency-specific cost models, or the full text of referenced standards (EIA-748, MIL-STD-881D, the Green Book) — these are named, not reproduced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA-STD-8729.1A — NASA's R&M (Reliability and Maintainability) standard covering spaceflight and support systems (Revision A, 2017-06-13). Use for NASA's objectives-driven R&M framework — the R&M objectives hierarchy (one Top Objective decomposed into four sub-objectives, paired with tailorable strategies), how R&M requirements are established inside the SMA Plan required by NPR 7120.5, the SMA Technical Authority concurrence/independent-evaluation governance, milestone vs. readiness review gates, the reliability/maintainability/availability vocabulary (Ai vs. Ao, the failure causal chain, risk as a triplet), and the R&M Evidentiary Methods catalogue (FMEA/FMECA, FTA, RBDA, RCM, LORA, plus the space-environment and parts-pedigree analyses). Scoped to NASA spaceflight and support systems and to assurance planning: it is an objectives-and-strategies standard, so it deliberately does NOT prescribe step-by-step analysis procedures (those live in the referenced NASA Preferred Reliability Practices) and is thin on facility R&M, detailed math/derivations, and non-NASA or commercial life cycles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7123.1D — Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements. Use for the 17 common SE processes (SE Engine), life-cycle reviews and entrance/success criteria, SEMP structure and content, ETA roles and tailoring/customizing rules, Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9), SE work product maturity terminology, contracted project oversight, and MOE/MOP/TPM measurement frameworks. Does not cover NASA programme financial management, human spaceflight medical standards, or software engineering requirements in depth (see NPR 7150.2 for the latter).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Motivational Interviewing (MI) according to Miller and Rollnick: OARS techniques, change talk, fostering readiness for change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a DRAFT internal audit pack from the audit plan: scope as stated, criteria with clauses quoted from the documents provided, document requests per auditee with due dates, open interview questions per process and role, previous findings to follow up and a readiness checklist. Never pre-judges conformity, writes findings or selects the sample; the lead auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the internal audit", "build the audit pack from this plan", "draft the document requests and interview questions" or "get us ready for the supplier audit". Do not use for evidence requests built from a control list, use control-evidence-request-pack instead; to chase actions from earlier audits, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make a WooCommerce plugin HPOS-compatible (High-Performance Order Storage, default-on in WC 10.x) — declare via FeaturesUtil::declare_compatibility on before_woocommerce_init, replace $wpdb->postmeta / WP_Query order code with wc_get_orders + WC_Order::get_meta / update_meta_data, gate runtime branches on OrderUtil::custom_orders_table_usage_is_enabled, build admin hook names dynamically with OrderUtil::get_order_admin_screen (HPOS = woocommerce_page_wc-orders, legacy = shop_order). Use when scaffolding an order-touching plugin, auditing existing code for HPOS readiness, or fixing post-WC-10 silent breakage. Triggers on shop_order, get_post_meta with order context, FeaturesUtil, OrderUtil, custom_order_tables, before_woocommerce_init.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational guide for WordPress.org submission readiness of NV oOS standalone plugins (nvoos-docs-hub live at 0.5.3; nvoos-content-graph live at 1.0.10 in the re-submission loop; nvoos-design-system next in the pipeline — issue #6811). Covers the 18 wp.org guidelines, the Plugin Check (PCP) gate in CI and Docker, PCP finding triage, the reviewer-reply loop (findings taxonomy from the real 0.4.3 review, related-issue sweep checklist, reply-email template), packaging exclusion tri-sync, readme.txt standards, .wordpress-org listing assets, and the NV oOS Complete checkout-flow disclosure discipline (docs-hub 0.5.3, content-graph). Use when preparing a wp.org submission, responding to a reviewer email, fixing the plugin-check CI job, triaging PCP findings, or capturing listing screenshots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit on-page SEO and GEO (generative engine optimization) signals across the site — title tags, meta descriptions, H1/H2/H3 hierarchy, canonical tags, Open Graph, structured data, content length, internal link density, and AI-citation readiness. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "audit SEO", "check metadata", "review titles and descriptions", "check heading structure", "run an SEO audit", "GEO audit", "check schema markup", "find SEO issues", or review any on-page signal affecting organic or AI-search visibility. Output is a prioritized issue list with per-page findings and fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Bing search visibility, Webmaster Tools evidence, and IndexNow readiness when authorized tools are available. Use for Bing indexing, link, crawl, or Microsoft search visibility work; not for Google indexing assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a site or page across technical SEO, on-page quality, content, structured data, performance, indexability, AI-search readiness and conversion-sensitive search experience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit on-page SEO" or "diagnose why a single page dropped"; scores titles, meta, header structure, keyword placement, links, and images with prioritized fixes. Not for E-E-A-T / publish-readiness scoring — use content-quality-auditor; not for crawl / CWV / indexing — use technical-seo-checker. 页面SEO审计/排名诊断

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run my launch day", "build a launch day runbook / war room", or "decide CONTINUE or ROLLBACK after the push"; produces a pre-conditions gate check (launch-readiness-auditor SHIP verdict + the authoritative date in launch-registry — missing either stops the skill), a dated hour-blocked runbook with owners (morning irreversible pushes, daytime monitoring loop, evening consolidation), a forced observation-window verdict after every irreversible action against pre-declared kill criteria, a P0-P3 incident ladder with rollback playbooks, and T-0 status lines for the registry proposal protocol. Not for channel submission content and platform rules — use community-launch-runner; not for media replies — use press-media-relations. 发布日runbook/作战室/观察窗/回滚裁决/发布日指挥

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "log this launch", query a launch date/embargo, record a stage transition, or update submissions/outcomes; curates launch facts through the append-only launches event stream with optimistic revisions and derived dossier/calendar views. Not for RAMP scoring — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for planning tier/window — use launch-tier-planner. 发布台账/发布日历/阶段与禁运期记录

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and run product or feature launches from positioning and tiering through asset readiness, launch-day orchestration, feedback and momentum.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "audit our launch plan", "are we ready to launch", or evaluate launch execution/outcomes; runs one typed RAMP preflight, execution, or outcome profile without mixing time horizons. Not for recording launch state — use launch-registry; not for running launch day — use launch-day-conductor. 发布就绪审计/RAMP分阶段评估/发布前放行

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "optimize entity presence", reconcile an entity identity, or update canonical Knowledge Graph facts; audits and maintains machine-facing identity, sameAs, schema, disambiguation, and AI-recognition evidence through the entities registry. Not for page-level AI-citation readiness - use geo-content-optimizer; not for human-facing brand canon - use narrative-registry. 实体注册/知识图谱

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "optimize for AI citations"; improves citation readiness for ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Gemini, and Claude. Not for structural on-page SEO — use on-page-seo-checker; not for net-new drafting — use content-writer. AI引用优化/GEO优化/AI搜索

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "write SEO content", "draft a blog post / landing page", "update outdated content", or "fix traffic/ranking decay"; two modes — new drafts pages with keywords, headers, snippets, and evidence boundaries; refresh scores decay, prioritizes update work, and produces a republish plan with GEO guidance. Not for AI-citation/GEO readiness scoring — use geo-content-optimizer; not for publish-gate scoring — use content-quality-auditor. SEO文章写作/内容更新/排名恢复

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize for AI search, answer engines, GEO/AEO/LLMO and conventional search together. Use for citability, AI crawler access, entity/brand evidence, llms.txt evaluation, platform readiness and AI-answer visibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness; runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan. Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-checker; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor. 内容质量/EEAT评分

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Claude Ads contracts, scoring inputs, run bundles, capabilities, source freshness, safety, installation, uninstall, or release readiness. Use for ads validate, ads status, ads next, stale claims with missing tool access, maturity checks, ownership-manifest uninstall, preserving unrelated ads-* skills, checksum verification, preflight, QA, or release audits. Missing access must demote stale evidence for the run and block dependent release-current claims before recovery guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Amazon Ads profiles, regions, Sponsored Products, Sponsored Brands, Sponsored Display, DSP, portfolios, targeting, search terms, retail readiness, creative, budgets, ACOS, TACOS, reporting, and policy. Use for Amazon Ads, sponsored ads, Amazon PPC, ACOS, TACOS, ASIN advertising, Amazon DSP, or retail-media optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit Pinterest Ads measurement, Pinterest Tag and Conversions API, catalog and shopping readiness, visual creative, audiences, Performance+ intent, budgets, brand safety, and reporting. Use for Pinterest Ads, promoted Pins, shopping ads, catalog sales, Pinterest Tag, Pinterest Conversions API, or Pinterest Performance+.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-driven application audit protocol for security, authorization, privacy, concurrency, state integrity, reliability, performance, accessibility, visual consistency, responsive behavior, and release readiness. Use for incremental checks, pre-merge review, pre-launch audits, high-stakes deep audits, AI-generated code review, hardening, or release-gate design. Prefer this protocol over ad-hoc review when the user asks whether software is safe or ready to ship.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。