「check」の検索結果

Auto-assembles a domain-specific expert panel (7–10 experts), scores any content or strategy artifact against a typed rubric, and iterates until the aggregate hits 90+ (max 3 rounds). Use as a quality gate on copy, email sequences, landing-page drafts, strategy docs, charts, titles, or recruiting evaluations — or when another skill needs a final review gate on its output. Triggers on "expert panel this", "score this", "rate these variants", "quality check this", "panel review", "expert score", "evaluate this copy/strategy/page". For variant generation and multi-round conversion optimization see autoresearch; for live-URL CRO auditing see conversion-ops; for the scripted content-production pipeline see content-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when adversarially reviewing a document that makes formal or technical claims — math derivations, physics papers, statistical analyses, benchmark reports, whitepapers. Inventories every equation and quantitative claim, verifies each AS NAMED in the text (never a paraphrase or a neighboring statement), and classifies VERIFIED / REFUTED / UNVERIFIABLE / VACUOUS. Triggers on "check this paper", "verify these claims", "is this derivation right", "review this proof", "audit this benchmark", "does the math hold up". For source-code review see code-review-and-quality; for skill/agent library audits see skill-library-review; for content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when implementing features, fixing bugs, or refactoring code that may invalidate existing docs. Detects stale documentation by matching the code diff against in-repo doc files and applies targeted updates. Relevant when code changes rename, remove, or add APIs, fields, config keys, or CLI flags. Also applies when the user says "update docs", "check docs", or "are the docs stale", or when reviewing a branch for documentation accuracy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan projects for credential leaks, secrets in code, insecure patterns, LLM API key exposure, PII leakage to external AI services, and .env/.gitignore misconfigurations. Especially useful for data and API integrations, regardless of implementation language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write or audit technical text against ASD-STE100 Simplified Technical English so a tired, non-native reader understands it on the first pass: 20-word procedural and 25-word descriptive sentence limits, imperative steps, condition before command, one word for one meaning, and only the approved modals can/will/must. Use for READMEs, runbooks, procedures, error messages, release notes, incident reports, API guides, UI copy, and agent instructions. Trigger on: "STE", "Simplified Technical English", "ASD-STE100", "controlled language", "plain English", "make this clearer", "write for non-native readers", "prep this for translation", "cut the fluff", or any request to check text for compliance. Prefer this over general copy-editing whenever the text instructs, documents, or warns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply these opinionated .NET 8 architecture conventions whenever structuring or reviewing a backend service: clean architecture layering and which direction dependencies point, when CQRS with MediatR is worth it, cross-cutting concerns as pipeline behaviours, minimal APIs grouped by feature, keeping DbContext in Infrastructure, health checks and structured logging, WebApplicationFactory integration tests, and when AOT pays off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add or review dygo Logs, Activity, Audit Logs, health checks, diagnostics, metrics, traces, and operator-visible failure states. Use when runtime behavior must become inspectable or diagnosable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares production launches. Use when preparing to deploy to production. Use when you need a pre-launch checklist, when setting up monitoring, when planning a staged rollout, or when you need a rollback strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write and debug spreadsheet formulas (Excel/Google Sheets), pivot tables, and array formulas; translate between dialects; use when users need working formulas with examples and edge-case checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user mentions Jira issues (e.g., "PROJ-123"), asks about tickets, wants to create/view/update issues, check sprint status, or manage their Jira workflow. Triggers on keywords like "jira", "issue", "ticket", "sprint", "backlog", or issue key patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect failing GitHub Actions checks on PRs, fetch detailed logs, summarize failures, create a fix plan, and implement fixes after user approval. For external CI systems, report details only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review any business decision, plan, or strategy through the minimalist entrepreneur lens. Use to gut-check decisions, simplify approaches, or evaluate options using core principles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare Azure environments and prerequisites before deployment. Use this skill when users ask for readiness checks, environment setup, or preflight planning. Covers landing zones, networking, identity, governance, and cost controls per Cloud Adoption Framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate Azure deployments against functional, security, performance, and operational criteria before production release. Use this skill when users ask for readiness checks, health verification, or production sign-off gates. Covers Well-Architected Framework validation, SLA verification, and release readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

6 production-ready AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect cell-ordering / enchainement problems in Jupyter notebooks (canonical-order slippage, misplaced or forgotten cells). Arguments: [target] [--severity HIGH|MED|LOW] [--json]

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search for code patterns in decompiled output using Weggli semantic matching. Use when finding vulnerable code constructs like unchecked memcpy, buffer operations, or specific function call patterns in pseudocode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find all locations where functions are called in a binary. Use when analyzing callers of a function, checking call relationships, or identifying which functions invoke a specific API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze data from randomized controlled trials. Use when user mentions: treatment effects, ITT analysis, LATE, TOT, compliance analysis, attrition, balance checks, heterogeneous effects, RCT results, experimental analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teacher mode — turn a session recap / article / docs / concept / piece of code / bug into an incremental mini-course with comprehension checks, quizzes, and an auto-saved summary note. Invoke /teach [topic or URL]. Triggers — "explain it like a teacher", "walk me through what we did", "turn this into a lesson", "quiz me", "teach me", "let's learn this together".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A gate before git push / deploy — assembled from your own tools (secret-grep + slop-scan + code-review + build/compile + optional worktree isolation), so AI junk (slop / bugs / secrets / uncompiled code) never reaches a remote or a production server. Turns "I hope it's clean" into a verifiable criterion. Branches: web/OSS (git push/PR) vs deploy-to-server service. Triggers — "check before push", "clean push", "gate before push", "finalize before commit", "run before deploy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove — or honestly fail to prove — a specific technical claim: "the fix works", "it's deployed", "the service is running", "the site is done", "there are no vulnerabilities". Atomizes the claim, picks the shortest decisive signal on the evidence ladder, and returns a verdict from a fixed vocabulary (pass / partial / fail / skip) with an explicit coverage boundary. NOT code review, NOT a fix, NOT orchestration — only "what is proven, and what we merely hope". Triggers — "prove it works", "is it really done?", "are you sure?", "we deployed — is it live?", "verify that", "did we actually check?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preventive hygiene audit of your own Claude Code configuration — memory files, project context (CLAUDE.md), rules, permissions, skills — a deterministic scan of sizes / broken links / stale entries / excessive permissions / junk + interpretation + targeted fixes by agreement. Keeps the setup from rotting before it breaks. Triggers — "check the system", "system health", "workflow hygiene", "what to clean up", "audit memory", "optimize the system".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever a task involves running parallel work on a git repository without conflicts — e.g. "fix this bug while I keep working on my feature", "run Claude on two branches at once", "work on this task in isolation", "create a throwaway branch for this experiment", or anything where two agents or sessions might edit the same files. Also trigger when the user asks to use worktrees directly, or when an agent needs its own isolated checkout so it can work without disturbing the main branch. Even if the user just says "do this in parallel" or "don't mess up my current work", consider worktrees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。