本文へ移動
cccskills

「make」の検索結果

2,474 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

humanize

無料

Humanization Pipeline Orchestrator v3.1 - Multi-pass 4-layer transformation pipeline Orchestrates G5 (Auditor), G6 (Humanizer), F5 (Verifier) in sequential passes Enforces checkpoints between every pass with mandatory AskUserQuestion Supports conservative (L1-2), balanced (L1-3), balanced-fast (L1-3 merged), aggressive (L1-4) modes Rich Checkpoint v2.0: section-level scores, selective humanization, target auto-stop G5+F5 parallel execution, section-selective humanization Triggers: humanize, humanize my draft, humanize manuscript, make natural, remove AI patterns Korean triggers: 휴먼화, 자연스럽게, AI 패턴 제거

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

g6

無料

VS-Enhanced Academic Style Humanizer - Transforms writing patterns to achieve authentic scholarly voice Applies transformations from G5 analysis to create natural academic prose Use when: improving AI-assisted writing quality, preparing manuscripts, enhancing scholarly voice Triggers: humanize, transform, make natural, improve writing quality, improve style

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Start a new research project by conducting a structured interview to formalize a research idea, then generates research questions with identification strategies and a project spec. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to develop or document a new research idea — not to search for literature or data. Triggers include: "new project", "start research", "I have an idea", "help me develop this", "I want to study X", "help me formalize this idea", "what's my research question", "what identification strategy should I use", "write up my project idea", or when the user describes a topic they want to turn into a paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Structured literature review using a parallel fleet of Librarian agents. Searches top journals, working paper repositories (NBER, SSRN, IZA), and traces citation chains from key papers. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to survey existing research on a topic — not to find datasets or write a paper. Triggers include: "review the literature", "find related papers", "what's been done on X", "search for papers on", "do a lit review", "find papers about", "what papers should I cite", "who has written about this", "survey the literature", "find prior work on", or any request to locate and summarize academic publications on a topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Validate bibliography entries against citations in all source files. Find missing entries and unused references. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user has any concern about bibliography completeness or citation keys. Triggers include: "validate my bib", "check my citations", "find missing references", "I'm getting undefined citation errors", "are all my citations in the bib file", "check for unused references", "my bibliography is broken", "missing bib entries", "citation not found", or after adding new references from a lit review or before submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

proofread

無料

Run the proofreading protocol on academic writing — papers or manuscripts. Checks grammar, typos, layout issues, consistency, and academic writing quality. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants surface-level writing errors found — not substantive academic critique. Triggers include: "proofread", "check for typos", "grammar check", "look for errors in my draft", "proofread all", "polish this", "check my writing", "are there any mistakes", "proofread before I send this", or when the user wants a clean-up pass rather than feedback on arguments or methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Find and assess datasets for a research question. Dispatches Explorer agents to search across data source categories, then Explorer-Critic to stress-test each candidate. Produces a ranked list with feasibility grades. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to identify or evaluate data sources — not to search for papers or run analysis. Triggers include: "find data", "what data should I use", "find a dataset for this", "where can I get data on X", "assess datasets", "what datasets exist for", "help me find data", "is there data on this", "what are my data options", "I need data for this project", or any request to locate empirical data sources for a research question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Create concise policy briefs that translate research into actionable recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Draft a full academic paper manuscript from analysis outputs, project spec, and lit review. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to turn completed analysis into a written paper — not to run analysis or review existing writing. Triggers include: "write the paper", "draft the manuscript", "write up the results", "start the paper", "turn my results into a paper", "write the introduction", "draft the empirics section", "I have my results, now write the paper", "help me write this up", "write the abstract", or any request to produce academic prose from existing research outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

review-r

無料

Run the R code review protocol on R scripts. Checks code quality, reproducibility, domain correctness, and professional standards. Produces a report without editing files. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants their existing R code evaluated or audited — not when they want new analysis written. Triggers include: "review my R script", "check my R code", "is my code replication-ready", "audit this R file", "does this code follow conventions", "will this reproduce", "check my analysis script", "code review", "review-r", or when the user has an existing .R file and wants quality feedback rather than new code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Deep consistency audit of the entire repository — launches 4 parallel specialist agents to find factual errors, code bugs, broken references, count mismatches, and cross-document inconsistencies, then fixes all issues and loops until clean. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants a comprehensive repository-wide check — not a targeted review of a single file. Triggers include: "audit", "deep audit", "find inconsistencies", "check everything", "run a full audit", "are there any broken references", "check the whole repo", "something feels off", "run the audit loop", or after making broad changes across multiple files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Interactive setup wizard that configures a new project for the social-science-research plugin. Asks the user questions about their field, institution, journals, datasets, key researchers, and R color palette, then writes the answers into references/domain-profile.md and CLAUDE.md. Make sure to use this skill first whenever a user is starting fresh or wants to configure the plugin. Triggers include: "set up my project", "configure the plugin", "run setup", "initialize this project", "I just installed the plugin", "set my field", "set my institution", "configure my domain profile", or any request to personalize the plugin for a specific research context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Comprehensive manuscript review covering argument structure, econometric specification, citation completeness, and potential referee objections. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants substantive academic feedback on a paper — not just surface edits. Triggers include: "review my paper", "give me feedback on this draft", "what would a referee say", "anticipate referee objections", "act as a referee", "check my identification strategy", "is my argument convincing", "review this manuscript", "critique my paper", "will this pass review", or any request for deep critique of academic writing beyond typos and grammar.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Detect and humanize AI-generated Chinese text. 20+ rule detection categories plus statistical features (sentence-length CV, short-sentence fraction, comma density, perplexity, GLTR, DivEye) plus scene-aware LR fusion (rule × 0.2 + LR × 0.8) trained on three scenes: general / academic / longform 长文本 (≥1500 字)。Unified CLI: ./humanize {detect,rewrite,academic,style,compare}. 8 style transforms (casual/zhihu/xiaohongshu/wechat/academic/literary/weibo/novel)。 Multi-paragraph rewriting (paragraph length CV、跨段 trigram 重复) plus best-of-N humanize (默认 N=10 取最低 LR)。165 replacement patterns + CiLin 同义词词林 38873 with collision blacklist。 Academic paper AIGC reduction for CNKI/VIP/Wanfang (知网/维普/万方 AIGC 检测降重)。 Pure Python, no dependencies, offline。v5.0.0 — HC3 fused 准确率 95%、学术 hero 100→35 (-65)、 工作汇报 96→13 (-83)、长篇博客 96→41 (-55)。 Use when user says: "去AI味", "降AIGC", "人性化文本", "humanize chinese", "AI检测", "AIGC降重", "去除AI痕迹", "文本改写", "论文降重", "知网检测", "维普检测", "AI写作检测", "让文字更自然", "detect AI text", "humanize text", "reduce AIGC score", "make text human-like", "去ai化", "改成人话", "去机器味", "降低AI率", "过AIGC检测", "长文本改写", "小说改写"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Audit and rewrite content to remove AI writing patterns ("AI-isms"). Use this skill when asked to "remove AI-isms," "clean up AI writing," "edit writing for AI patterns," "audit writing for AI tells," or "make this sound less like AI." Supports a detection-only mode that flags patterns without rewriting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

deslop

無料

Remove AI writing patterns from prose. Use this skill when writing, drafting, editing, reviewing, or revising any text to eliminate predictable AI tells, slop, and formulaic patterns. Trigger this skill whenever the user asks to "deslop", "de-AI", "make it sound human," "remove AI patterns," "remove AI tropes," "clean up AI writing," fix "slop," "deslop" text, or review prose for authenticity. Also use when the user asks you to write or draft anything and wants it to sound natural rather than AI-generated. Common use cases include scientific writing (manuscripts, abstracts, cover letters, grant narratives, discussion sections, peer review responses), blog posts, newsletters, memos, reports, and any other substantial prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from academic medical papers. Use when editing or reviewing manuscripts to make them sound more natural and professionally written. Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" guide, adapted for medical literature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Generate professional slide deck images from academic papers and content. Creates comprehensive outlines with style instructions, auto-detects figures from PDFs, then generates individual slide images. Use when user asks to "create slides", "make a presentation", "generate deck", or "slide deck" for papers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6272026年10月12日 更新

Use when asked to watch, babysit, audit, review, compare, or fix another agent's work from a Codex session ID, Claude Code session/transcript, chat/thread link, PR, branch, log, or pasted run summary. Monitor until the other agent is done or blocked, reconstruct what the user asked, independently investigate the same problem to form your own hypotheses and approach, inspect what the agent actually changed and verified, compare the two investigations, report gaps and add-on directions, and optionally make scoped fixes when the user authorizes repair.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BuilderIO/skills4,5832026年10月9日 更新

Use when the user wants to create, author, write, or design a new Agent Skill (a SKILL.md) — for OpenKnowledge or for their editors — including requests like 'help me write a skill', 'make a skill that…', 'turn this workflow into a skill', or improving an existing skill's triggering and discipline. Also use when capturing reusable agent guidance that should live as an installable skill rather than a one-off prompt. Covers choosing scope (project vs global), authoring inside a plugin or skills-distribution repo (write in the repo's own layout, never install), the SKILL.md frontmatter contract, progressive-disclosure structure, evaluating the skill, and installing it into the user's editors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inkeep/open-knowledge4,5782026年10月15日 更新

Records an architecture decision as a Nygard/MADR-shaped ADR under decisions/ — capturing the context that forced the choice, the options weighed, the decision itself, and its consequences in both directions, plus the supersedes chain that keeps a decision log honest. Read when asked to record an architecture decision, write an ADR, log the decision we made, document why we chose X over Y, capture this decision for the record, or supersede an old decision with a new one. Do NOT read to frame a proposal or explore an idea not yet decided (frame-a-proposal), to write a spec or implementation plan (write-a-spec), to write an incident postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or to judge whether a design is sound (review-a-design). This skill records a decision already made; it does not make one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

inkeep/open-knowledge4,5782026年10月15日 更新

Builds a consistent, filterable naming convention across your Google and Meta accounts based on your campaign types, objectives, targeting, and reporting needs. Makes filtering, reporting, and cross-platform analysis actually work instead of guessing what "Campaign_v3_Final_NEW" means. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4,5622026年10月13日 更新

Runs your conversion data through different attribution models side by side — last click, first click, linear, time decay, position based, and data-driven. Shows you how credit shifts between campaigns depending on the model so you can make better budget decisions instead of over-investing in last-touch campaigns. Platform: Google and Meta.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

irinabuht12-oss/marketing-skills4,5622026年10月13日 更新

Make game-ready 2D characters, creatures, props, icons and FX as master stills, sprite sheets or animation clips. Plan size, motion and finish; generate the art (image generation is the default, through generate2dmedia route_media.py - the API when a key is configured, else the local Codex or Grok CLI); approve one master still per character; then key, slice, register, scale, palette, QA and export frames for a game engine (Aseprite JSON, Godot SpriteFrames or Sprite3D). HD finish by default, pixel finish on request. Character animation is one image-to-video clip per action from the master (video2dsprite); sheets are for FX, icons and props. Use for sprites, masters, sheets, frame-by-frame animation and packaging frames from any source. Not for maps, tiles or backgrounds (generate2dmap), video clips (video2dsprite), code-drawn art (codeart2d, only on request) or calling an image or video API by itself (generate2dmedia).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

0x0funky/agent-sprite-forge4,4532026年10月6日 更新