789 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review code for quality, simplicity, and maintainability. Identifies unnecessary abstractions, duplicated logic, oversized functions, missing error handling, and naming issues — then fixes them automatically before presenting the result.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply to multi-step work (sweeps, migrations, runs of similar edits) and to how you stack commits and PRs. Break work into small units that each end in a verifiable state, check each before the next, and order delivery so the sequence proves itself to a reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply to any non-trivial work, not just bulk work: edits, migrations, analyses, checks. Build the tool that does it or proves it (codemod, script, generator, or a skill your subagents follow) instead of working by hand. The tool is the artifact a reviewer can rerun.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keep a reviewable decision trail for long-running or unattended work: a TSV log with one row per decision (what, why, evidence, result). Local by default; commit it when a reviewer needs the trail to trust the result. Use for /show-me-your-work, autonomous or multi-phase runs, or work a human reviews after stepping away.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for "interrogate", "adversarial review", "multi-model review", "challenge this", "stress test this code", "find blind spots", or "tear this apart". Multiple LLM reviewers challenge changes from independent angles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
技術記事の品質を「伝説の編集者」の視点で厳格にレビューするためのスキル。記事のドラフトが完成した際、既存記事のブラッシュアップ、または「この記事どうかな？」という漠然とした相談に対しても、このスキルを積極的に使用してください。5つの品質の柱（論理性、実用性、読みやすさ、独自性、明確性）に基づいた厳格な採点と、AI臭さを徹底的に排除した「魂の宿る記事」への改善案を提供します。
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
360 feedback register: reviewer, subject, review cycle, visibility, due date and score, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for 360 reviews or peer feedback cycles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Bitbucket Pr Reviews — bitbucket pull request review management including default reviewers, merge checks, branch permissions, and build status integration. Use when configuring or automating Bitbucket PR review workflows across repositories and workspaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Role subprocesses for Dev/Tester/Reviewer/Architect tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dispatch code-reviewer subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert en revue de code (PR reviews, patterns, anti-patterns, security, performance, readability)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Elite code review expert specializing in modern AI-powered code
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iteratively improve a Claude Code skill using the skill-reviewer agent until it meets quality standards. Use when improving a skill with multiple quality issues, iterating on a new skill until it meets standards, or automated fix-review cycles instead of manual editing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ship the day's work in one repo: triage new issues, review every open PR (description, visual recap, adversarial reviewer, shipping pre-flight and quality gate), merge only after GO, then post a status recap. Use for "ship it", "ship day", "merge the ready PRs", "end of work block".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a PR or git range needs a visual recap page for a reviewer, with a changed-files tree, per-file notes, a Verified vs Not verified table, risks, and optional before/after images. Local and informational; never posts to GitHub.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference for how BDB structures autonomous software engineering work — the seven-node dispatcher graph (Architect, TechLead, UI/UX, Engineering, Media/EventTech, Reviewer, Shipping) that /startcycle-graph actually runs. Use when you need the high-level lifecycle framing without inventing your own process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when running the autonomous multi-agent build pipeline after /bdbrainstorm or /grill-me, when the user types /startcycle-graph or "run a startcycle", or when a task needs durable state, a review repair loop and an automated quality gate. Routes to the startcycle-dispatch Dynamic Workflow, which reads production_artifacts/state.json and invokes Architect, TechLead, UI/UX, Engineering, Media/EventTech, Reviewer, and Shipping in turn per .agents/graph.md's edge table — the agents never invoke each other.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review resumes, cover letters, application packages, and evidence maps from an HR perspective. Use when the user asks for 자기소개서 리뷰, 자소서 검토, HR 검토, 제출 전 점검, unsupported-claim detection, company-name residue checks, or risk-focused revision advice before applying.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide reviewers through systematic, constructive peer review of a pull request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。