「ttl」の検索結果

Use when the user asks to "make everyone tell the same story", "write our elevator pitch ladder", or "build a spokesperson Q&A and approved boilerplate pack"; derives from the narrative-registry canon, message house, and brand voice a repeatable enablement kit — an elevator ladder (10-second / 30-second / 2-minute), a spokesperson Q&A (tough questions with on-canon answers), an approved boilerplate/bio pack (25 / 50 / 100-word), and a do/don't language sheet — so sales, support, founders, and partners repeat one consistent story. Not for the launch-day runbook — use launch-day-conductor; not for finished per-channel copy — use content-writer or each discipline creative builder; not for launch-window battle cards — use sales-enablement-kit; this kit never adjudicates a claim. 叙事赋能包/电梯梯度/发言人问答/审定样板/该说不该说

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design an early access program", "set up a waitlist and beta stages", or "define beta graduation criteria"; produces a waitlist→concept→alpha→beta→GA stage ladder with per-stage purpose and opt-in semantics, quantified graduation criteria per stage (labeled Estimated), a cohort-gating and invite-throttling plan, tester recruitment with launch-day social-proof prep, a feedback-loop spec where every status change notifies its subscribers, and a referral-loop mechanism spec (invite codes, anti-abuse). Not for waitlist acquisition strategy or the capture-flow spec — use list-growth-designer; not for the canonical stage record — use launch-registry. waitlist/内测阶梯/抢先体验/毕业标准/反馈闭环

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to create competitor comparison or alternative pages for SEO and sales enablement. Also use when the user mentions 'alternative page,' 'vs page,' 'competitor comparison,' 'comparison page,' '[Product] vs [Product],' '[Product] alternative,' 'competitive landing pages,' 'how do we compare to X,' 'battle card,' or 'competitor teardown.' Use this for any content that positions your product against competitors. Covers four formats: singular alternative, plural alternatives, you vs competitor, and competitor vs competitor. For sales-specific competitor docs, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to research, profile, or analyze competitors from their URLs. Also use when the user mentions 'competitor profile,' 'competitor research,' 'competitor analysis,' 'profile this competitor,' 'analyze competitor,' 'competitive intelligence,' 'competitor deep dive,' 'who are my competitors,' 'competitor landscape,' 'competitor dossier,' 'competitive audit,' or 'research these competitors.' Input is a list of competitor URLs. Output is structured competitor profile markdown files. For creating comparison/alternative pages from profiles, see competitors. For sales-specific battle cards, see sales-enablement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect undefined or inconsistent cache strategies (layers, consistency, invalidation, TTL, failure handling) in design documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Covers Flutter testing across all three layers: unit tests (business logic, ViewModels, repositories), widget tests (UI rendering, interactions, golden regression), and integration/E2E tests (full app flows, native OS interactions). Use this skill when writing any Flutter test, setting up mocking with mocktail or mockito, implementing golden file tests, debugging async failures (pumpAndSettle timeouts, Timer leaks, FakeAsync deadlocks), fixing cross-platform golden pixel diffs in CI/CD, testing state management (Riverpod/BLoC/Provider), handling permission dialogs or native system UI with Patrol, or troubleshooting MediaQuery/Theme missing errors in widget tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profile and optimize Python code using cProfile, memory profilers, and performance best practices. Use when debugging slow Python code, optimizing bottlenecks, or improving application performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement distributed tracing with Jaeger and Tempo to track requests across microservices and identify performance bottlenecks. Use when debugging microservices, analyzing request flows, or implementing observability for distributed systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies battle-tested clean code principles to writing, reviewing, and refactoring code. Covers naming, functions, comments, error handling, class design, and the critical difference between clever code and clear code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reduce OpenClaw token usage and API costs through smart model routing, heartbeat optimization, budget tracking, and native 2026.2.15 features (session pruning, bootstrap size limits, cache TTL alignment). Use when token costs are high, API rate limits are being hit, or hosting multiple agents at scale. The 4 executable scripts (context_optimizer, model_router, heartbeat_optimizer, token_tracker) are local-only — no network requests, no subprocess calls, no system modifications. Reference files (PROVIDERS.md, config-patches.json) document optional multi-provider strategies that require external API keys and network access if you choose to use them. See SECURITY.md for full breakdown.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Adyen — adyen payment platform management including merchant accounts, payment methods, terminal configuration, risk management, settlement reports, and webhook notifications. Covers authorization rates, payment method performance, fraud scoring, and payout reconciliation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with AWS API Gateway — analyzing REST or HTTP APIs, debugging latency or 5xx errors, auditing throttling and stage configuration, reviewing usage plans, or checking authorization setup. Covers API inventory, CloudWatch metrics, stage audits, and integration health for both REST (v1) and HTTP (v2) APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use after generating code, after accepting AI suggestions, or when reviewing AI-written modules. Also use when code works but feels brittle, when error handling seems thin, when orphaned resources or missing cleanup are suspected, or when the agent claims done but hidden debt may exist. Catches the specific failure patterns AI agents produce that humans would not.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NVIDIA RAG Blueprint performance-tuning guidance for profiling retrieval stacks, comparing bottlenecks, and validating latency or throughput improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cache dynamic and static responses on Netlify's CDN from Functions, Edge Functions, and proxies. Use when you add caching or cache-control headers to a function response, tune cache TTL or stale-while-revalidate, set up the durable cache, vary a cache key by query/header/cookie/country/language, purge or invalidate the cache by site or cache tag, use the programmatic Cache API (caches.open/match/put) or @netlify/cache helpers (fetchWithCache/cacheHeaders/getCacheStatus), speed up an expensive API call, add ISR or on-demand revalidation, or debug why a response is or isn't cached via the Cache-Status header.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MongoDB schema design patterns and anti-patterns. Use when designing data models, reviewing schemas, migrating from SQL, or troubleshooting performance issues caused by schema problems. Triggers on "design schema", "embed vs reference", "MongoDB data model", "schema review", "unbounded arrays", "one-to-many", "tree structure", "16MB limit", "schema validation", "JSON Schema", "time series", "schema migration", "polymorphic", "TTL", "data lifecycle", "archive", "index explosion", "unnecessary indexes", "approximation pattern", "document versioning".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish build performance baselines and apply systematic optimization techniques. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: diagnosing slow builds, establishing before/after measurements (cold, warm, no-op scenarios), applying optimization strategies like MSBuild Server, static graph builds, artifacts output, and dependency graph trimming. Start here before diving into build-perf-diagnostics, incremental-build, or build-parallelism. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems, detailed bottleneck analysis (use build-perf-diagnostics after baselining).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codified expertise for production scheduling, job sequencing, line balancing, changeover optimisation, and bottleneck resolution in discrete and batch manufacturing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profile and optimize Python code using cProfile, memory profilers, and performance best practices. Use when debugging slow Python code, optimizing bottlenecks, or improving application performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Experimental workflow for auditing recurring feedback, telemetry, errors, and brittle delivery paths to find systemic fixes. Use for periodic or requested cross-source lookbacks, not routine single-item intake.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow automation is the infrastructure that makes AI agents reliable. Without durable execution, a network hiccup during a 10-step payment flow means lost money and angry customers. With it, workflows resume exactly where they left off. This skill covers the platforms (n8n, Temporal, Inngest) and patterns (sequential, parallel, orchestrator-worker) that turn brittle scripts into production-grade automation. Key insight: The platforms make different tradeoffs. n8n optimizes for accessibility

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert human-written CLAUDE.md into AI-native structured-label format. Battle-tested across 4 models. Same rules, fewer tokens, higher compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements security controls at the API gateway layer including authentication enforcement, rate limiting, request validation, IP allowlisting, TLS termination, and threat protection. The engineer configures API gateways (Kong, AWS API Gateway, Azure APIM, Apigee) to act as a centralized security enforcement point that validates, throttles, and monitors all API traffic before it reaches backend services. Activates for requests involving API gateway security, API management security, gateway a...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces and audits externally published marketing copy where factual claims must survive scrutiny — landing pages, product pages, launch emails, one-pagers, search/social metadata. Every statistic, competitor comparison, capability description, and proof point is traced to a fetched source or the project's own documents, labeled, and adversarially verified before it ships. Use when writing or rewriting high-stakes marketing copy; when copy must pass legal, compliance, brand, or claims review; when the audience is skeptical technical or executive buyers; when the company has little or no customer proof yet (pre-launch, zero customers); or when auditing existing copy for unsupported claims, invented capabilities, unverified statistics, or AI-slop language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。