「common」の検索結果

Apply a set of Rosetta Stone attribute mappings to a Narrative dataset by wrapping them in a one-shot workflow that calls the `CreateRosettaStoneMappingsIfNotExist` task. Consumes the structured output of `/generate-rosetta-stone-mappings`, normalizes the generator's snake_case to the workflow task's camelCase, re-validates every expression against the dataset's current schema, gates on user approval, submits via `narrative_workflows_create`, polls the triggered run, and reports per-mapping created / conflict / failed. Use when: "apply these mappings to dataset N", "create the Rosetta Stone mappings I just generated", "push the mappings I saved earlier to <dataset>", "productionize this mapping list", "submit the suggested_mappings array". (narrative-common)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, evaluate, and improve Rosetta Stone attribute mappings for a Narrative dataset. Use when: "map this dataset to Rosetta Stone", "suggest normalized attributes for dataset N", "evaluate the mappings on dataset N", "why is this mapping low confidence", "fix this expression", "improve this NQL mapping expression". (narrative-common)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate onboarding documentation for a codebase — architecture overview, key files, local setup, and common gotchas. Use this skill whenever someone asks to onboard onto a codebase, create onboarding docs, generate a codebase overview, explain a project's architecture to newcomers, or asks "how does this codebase work". Also trigger when users say things like "document this repo for new devs", "write a getting started guide", or "help me understand this project".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Systems Modeling Handbook for Systems Engineering (NASA-HDBK-1009A Rev A, 2025). Use for model-based systems engineering (MBSE) wired into NASA's NPR 7123.1 SE processes: the three aspects of MBSE (language / methodology / framework), the NASA SE Engine and its two OOSEM-derived steps (Model Planning, Setting Up the Model), the Modeling Plan as a SEMP subset, the tool-agnostic NASA SE metamodel of elements and relationships across the four SysML pillars (structure / behavior / requirements / parametrics), worked SysML diagrams and tables for stakeholders, requirements, structure and V&V, generating SE work products (ConOps, MOE, MOP, TPM, V&V), the MBSE Grid framework, alternative modeling approaches (PBR, Scenario, System Specification, Verification), and the ConOps model-content template. Scope is bounded to four common technical processes (Stakeholder Expectation Definition, Technical Requirements Definition, Product Verification, Product Validation). Does NOT teach SysML itself, mandate a tool, define NPR 7123.1 processes, cover technical-management processes 10-17, or reproduce the OMG SysML specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from FAA-STD-025f (Preparation of Interface Documentation). Use for IRD/ICD family definitions, common format and content, IRD shall-requirements, ICD design characteristics, verification/VRTM, and CM/revision/approval of FAA Enterprise Subsystem interfaces. Covers rev F preparation rules only; does not replace FAA-STD-005 drawing/spec prep, Order 1800.66 full CM procedures, or non-FAA interface standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from MIL-STD-881F (13 May 2022), DoD Standard Practice for Work Breakdown Structures for Defense Materiel Items. Use for Program/Contract/Subcontract WBS construction, 100% rule and dictionary discipline, commodity appendices A–J, Common Elements (K), sustainment CES reporting (L), Government ST&E (M), and RFP/post-award implementation. Technical planning & WBS and PM/measurement focus—not a cost manual substitute for CAPE policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide (NASA/SP-2011-3421, 2nd ed.). Use for quantitative PRA of aerospace and safety-critical systems: the risk triplet and scenario logic stack (MLD, ESD, event trees, fault trees, minimal cut sets), Bayesian data collection and parameter estimation, aleatory/epistemic uncertainty modeling and common-cause failure (Alpha Factor, beta-factor, CCBE), human reliability analysis (THERP, CREAM, NARA, SPAR-H), context-based software risk (CSRM), physics-based and structural/phenomenological models (stress-strength, limit states, FORM/SORM, NASGRO, range safety), uncertainty propagation and importance measures (F-V, RAW, Birnbaum, DIM), and launch-abort modeling with worked PRA examples. This is the QUANTITATIVE engine beneath NASA's risk doctrine — for the qualitative RIDM/CRM decision framework use the nasa-risk pack. Thin on programme management, organisational risk governance, and non-aerospace regulatory contexts; aerospace-focused and anchored to the 2011 second edition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the FAA System Safety Handbook (Dec 30, 2000). Use for system safety as a specialty within systems engineering: the five-step safety risk management process (mandated by FAA Order 8040.4 and the AMS), the severity-by-likelihood risk matrix and acceptance bands, the Safety Order of Precedence, system-description models (5M, SHEL(L)), the hazard-analysis activities (PHL/PHA/RHA/SSHA/SHA/O&SHA/HHA), integrated system hazard analysis, the analysis techniques (FTA, FMEA/FMECA, Fault Hazard, Common Cause, Sneak Circuit, Energy Trace), closed-loop hazard tracking (Safety Action Record), and the specialty domains the handbook covers — acquisition-lifecycle safety and contracting (OSA/CSA/SSPP/ISSPP), software safety (control-capability ranking, SHCM, DO-178B), test & evaluation safety, facilities safety, commercial launch safety (AST licensing, expected casualty, MPL/DAMP), system safety training, and Operational Risk Management (ORM) with human/organizational factors. Scope limits: this is a year-2000 FAA how-to; it predates the modern FAA/ICAO Safety Management System (SMS) and Just Culture regulatory frameworks, and many cited orders, advisory circulars, and launch-licensing rules have since been restructured. It is FAA/NAS-centric, leans on MIL-STD-882C, and does not define the SE life-cycle processes themselves (use nasa-npr-7123 / dau-se-guidebook) or reproduce third-party standard text (MIL-STD-882, DO-178B, ISO/IEC/IEEE).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NASA NPR 7123.1D — Systems Engineering Processes and Requirements. Use for the 17 common SE processes (SE Engine), life-cycle reviews and entrance/success criteria, SEMP structure and content, ETA roles and tailoring/customizing rules, Technology Readiness Levels (TRL 1–9), SE work product maturity terminology, contracted project oversight, and MOE/MOP/TPM measurement frameworks. Does not cover NASA programme financial management, human spaceflight medical standards, or software engineering requirements in depth (see NPR 7150.2 for the latter).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Systems Engineering Handbook (NASA/SP-2016-6105 Rev 2). Use for NASA's systems-engineering process model — the SE Engine and 17 common technical processes, the program/project life cycle (Pre-Phase A through F), Key Decision Points and technical reviews (MCR/SRR/PDR/CDR/…), stakeholder expectations, technical requirements, design solution, product verification and validation, and crosscutting technical management (planning, risk, configuration, interfaces, data, assessment, decision analysis). Strong for aerospace/spaceflight project SE and lifecycle gating; NASA-specific terminology (KDPs, NPR 7123.1).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a control list and an audit scope into draft evidence requests grouped by control owner, each with the control as stated, the audit period, evidence examples (commonly requested) and a proposed due date derived from the fieldwork dates. Never judges whether evidence is sufficient, never selects the sample and never sends a request; the auditor decides. Use when the user asks to "prepare the evidence requests", "draft the PBC list", "build the evidence request pack for the audit" or "what do we need to ask each control owner for". Do not use for document requests and interview questions built from an audit plan, use audit-prep-pack instead; to check claims in a report against sources, use claims-evidence-map. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ドメイン共通要求仕様書の新規作成・更新・レビューを支援する。AI駆動開発成果物フローのビジネス要求(D1)に位置する成果物で、プロダクト要求仕様書(PRD)が方針・概念を扱うのに対し、本書は **3 ドメイン以上で横断的に効く具体的な要求(水準・方針・原則)** を集約する文書。**ドメイン要求仕様書群(個別)とは並列の関係にあり、横断的な水準・方針・原則は本書が単独で責務を持つ(=厳密な MECE。個別ドメインで言い換えない)。** 機能要求・非機能要求・UI/UX 方針・セキュリティ要求・データアクセス要求・法務/コンプライアンス要求 の各節を持つ。PRD・アクター一覧・ドメイン定義書 を上流とし、PRD策定後、ドメイン要求仕様書群(個別)の作成前に呼び出す。

- Recover deleted, edited or historical web content using the Wayback Machine and its CDX API, archive.today, Common Crawl… Use when a page is deleted, changed or 404s, checking what a site used to say, finding old team or staff pages, prior pricing, removed posts, pre-redaction wording or old contact details, enumerating every archived URL for a domain, or preserving evidence before it disappears

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**MANDATORY for ALL MCP server work** - mcp-use framework best practices and patterns. **READ THIS FIRST** before any MCP server work, including: - Creating new MCP servers - Modifying existing MCP servers (adding/updating tools, resources, prompts, widgets) - Debugging MCP server issues or errors - Reviewing MCP server code for quality, security, or performance - Answering questions about MCP development or mcp-use patterns - Making ANY changes to server.tool(), server.resource(), server.prompt(), or widgets This skill contains critical architecture decisions, security patterns, and common pitfalls. Always consult the relevant reference files BEFORE implementing MCP features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a WooCommerce-style AJAX product search select (the selectWoo / wooselect dropdown) — class="wc-product-search" + the data-action attribute pointing to woocommerce_json_search_products (products only) or woocommerce_json_search_products_and_variations (products AND variations, often the right choice). Pre-selected items rendered server-side as <option selected> via wc_get_product() + get_formatted_name(); WC's wc-enhanced-select script auto-enqueued on WC admin screens, explicit enqueue required on non-WC pages. Solves the "load 20k products into a select" antipattern AI assistants commonly emit. Use when adding a product picker meta box, a custom WC admin page selector, or any UI where the user must search and pick from many products. Triggers on wc-product-search, woocommerce_json_search_products, woocommerce_json_search_products_and_variations, selectWoo, wc-enhanced-select, "select2 products in WooCommerce", or product-picker meta box scaffolding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds and reviews custom WordPress REST API endpoints registered via register_rest_route on rest_api_init — namespace and version slug, permission_callback authorization (NEVER __return_true on state-changing routes, which is the most common plugin-side vulnerability on wp.org), args schema with validate_callback / sanitize_callback / type / enum, object-level capability checks via current_user_can with object ID, responses with WP_REST_Response and WP_Error carrying an HTTP status, no raw DB rows / sensitive columns in responses, cookie auth via X-WP-Nonce, REST vs admin-ajax decision. Recommends the better-route library when the plugin grows past a few endpoints. Use when scaffolding or reviewing a REST endpoint, or migrating from admin-ajax. Triggers on register_rest_route, rest_api_init, permission_callback, WP_REST_Request, WP_REST_Response, WP_Error, X-WP-Nonce, rest_ensure_response, register_rest_field, or any file path containing /rest/ or /api/ in a WP plugin or theme.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits WordPress plugin or theme PHP code for the most common security mistakes — missing nonce checks, capability checks, input sanitization, output escaping, unslashing, SQL preparation, AJAX nopriv exposure, file/path traversal, and unsafe redirects. Use when reviewing pull requests, before releasing a plugin, when the user asks "is this secure", or when handling code that touches $_GET / $_POST / $_REQUEST / $_COOKIE / $_FILES / $_SERVER, admin-ajax / admin-post, REST endpoints, options, user meta, custom DB queries, or file uploads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete operational guide for the NV oOS (Open Operator System) WordPress plugin in Docker/WSL2 — setup, assistant creation, credential tokens, MCP tool calling, API key auto-detection, env var bridging, common fixes, and IGCSE study configuration. Use when setting up the plugin for the first time, creating assistants programmatically, generating MCP bridge tokens, troubleshooting Docker path issues, bridging API keys, or calling tools via JSON-RPC over HTTP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement secure API design patterns including authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, and protection against common API vulnerabilities

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Behavioral guidelines to reduce common LLM coding mistakes. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring code to avoid overcomplication, make surgical changes, surface assumptions, and define verifiabl

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core firmware context for the Megahub ESP32 project. Use when working on PlatformIO configuration, build scripts, library structure, main.cpp, or general ESP32 firmware development. Covers build system, project structure, common pitfalls, and debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks common code quality and maintainability risks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check common security risks in application code (SQLi, XSS, secrets, open redirect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects per-caller special-cases (bandaids) bolted onto shared infrastructure/common functions, and when two or more same-kind special-cases exist proposes generalizing the lower-level mechanism instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。