796 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Write and refine high-quality user stories — INVEST criteria, "As a X, I want Y, so that Z" format, Gherkin acceptance criteria when applicable, definition of ready, anti-patterns, and a review checklist. Use when creating or reviewing user stories, PRD section 6, backlog items, or acceptance criteria. Do NOT use for technical specs, architecture decisions, or task decomposition.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review code changes against linked GitHub issue specs to catch implementation drift — building something plausible but wrong. Checks each acceptance criterion against actual code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
UI runtime 驗證 SKILL — 刷新 Cocos asset-db、執行 validate-ui-specs.js、headless-snapshot-test.js、capture-ui-screens.js，並依環境選用 cocos-screenshot 或 cocos-preview-qa 檢查實際畫面殘差，回寫 generated-review / runtime-verdict。USE FOR: 修改 layout / skin / screen / content / Panel / UI 資產後的驗證收尾。DO NOT USE FOR: 純資產生成、無 target 的整專案大範圍探索。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
UI 資產品質驗證 SKILL — 執行 validate-visual-assets.js、validate-ui-specs.js 與必要的 snapshot regression，對 skin family 資產、screen package、proof draft / family-map 進行全面驗證，並回寫 generated-review。USE FOR: 任何 UI 資產生成後、在 ui-preview-judge 前必須先通過的 QA 關卡。DO NOT USE FOR: debug runtime 崩潰（用 cocos-log-reader）、Layout 佈局調整（用 ui-vibe-pipeline）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement complete SS14 features across ownership, ECS, networking, resources, localization, UI, and tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Choose and implement local, directed, broadcast, cancellable, and network events.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement entity behavior, subscriptions, lifecycle handling, and reusable action APIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design SS14 components as serialized state in the correct assembly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a structured discovery interview and produce a complete, developer-ready Product Requirements Document. Load when the user asks to write a PRD, create product requirements, document a feature, define user stories with acceptance criteria, or turn a rough idea into a formal product requirements document. Also triggers on "document this feature", "write requirements for", "create a one-pager", "turn this into a PRD", "I need a PRD for", or any request to produce a structured product document for stakeholder alignment or engineering handoff. Supports Full PRD, Lean PRD, and One-Pager formats. Note: for executable feature specifications (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then consumable by AI coding agents), route to `feature-spec` instead — PRDs frame the product, feature-specs encode the implementable contract.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tactical fast path: turn a small problem, bug report, edit request, or narrow refactor into three deliverables — a brief change-spec (docs/specs/), a detailed implementation-ready plan (docs/plans/), and a TODO.md with agent-pickable tasks and milestones. Load when the user describes a tactical problem and wants quick planning artifacts, says "plan this change", "create a TODO", "write a plan for this", "problem to plan", "break this into tasks for agents", "I want to change X — plan it", or when process-decomposer routes here after determining the user needs lightweight planning deliverables. Also triggers on "create tasks from this problem", "make this actionable", or "turn this into a plan agents can execute". For feature-sized work that needs an executable spec + constitution + cross-check gate, route to `spec-driven-development` (or `feature-spec`) instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set a deliberate visual direction before any UI is built — the single biggest lever against generic AI output. Derives a posture from product-soul/PRD/specs, scores a curated archetype palette, then generates 2-3 GENUINELY DISTINCT directions and compares them side-by-side before committing to one. Load when the user asks to pick an aesthetic, choose a design direction, decide what a UI should feel like, explore visual options, says "what should this look like", "make it feel like [Linear/Apple/ Duolingo]", "give me design directions", "explore some looks", or when frontend-design routes here. Replaces design-archetype. Sub-skill of frontend-design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write the executable feature specification — the WHAT and WHY artifact that agents and reviewers treat as source of truth. Owns both /specify and /clarify modes. Load when the user asks to write a feature spec, write a specification, write an executable spec, define functional requirements, capture acceptance criteria as Given/When/Then, or when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "feature spec", "executable spec", "/specify", "/clarify", "write the spec for this feature", "specification for", "spec-driven", "machine-readable spec". Output: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-feature-spec.md. Hard gate: cannot Approve while [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrator + builder for distinctive, production-grade frontends that don't look AI-generated. Derives stack and design context from product-soul/PRD/specs, then runs the anti-slop chain — explore distinct directions, lock a DESIGN.md system, build from golden examples with mandatory polish + every interactive/empty/loading/error state, then review. Load when the user asks to build a UI, design a frontend, build a landing page or dashboard or web app, beautify or redesign a page, make a UI look premium/playful/editorial, says "build me a frontend", "make this not look AI-generated", "design this interface", "give this real polish", or "frontend design". Routes to design-direction, design-system, design-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a rough idea into a fully approved design before any code is written. Load when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, design a feature, think through approaches, plan a new capability, or figure out what to build. Also triggers on "let's think through", "help me design", "explore options", "what's the best approach for", "I have an idea for", "before we build", or any request to design something before implementation. Enforces a hard gate: no code, no implementation until user approves a design. For executable feature specs (FRs, NFRs, ACs as Given/When/Then), route to `feature-spec` instead — brainstorming owns approach and architecture, not machine-readable requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API documentation workflow for generating OpenAPI specs, creating developer guides, and maintaining comprehensive API documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconcile gene trees against a species tree under probabilistic models of duplication, transfer, and loss (DTL) using ALE (Szöllősi 2013 amalgamated likelihood), GeneRax (Morel 2020 ML reconciliation), AleRax (Morel 2024 co-estimation), Whale.jl (Bayesian DTL+WGD), RANGER-DTL 2 parsimony, NOTUNG, ecceTERA, and Treerecs. Use when inferring ancestral gene-family content, distinguishing duplication from horizontal transfer from differential loss, rooting deep species trees from gene-content signals (STRIDE / Williams 2017 ALE-rooting), counting DTL events per branch, refining noisy gene trees against a species tree, modeling WGD events jointly with DTL, or producing publication-grade gene-family histories for phylogenomic / comparative analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about team driving — two-driver OTR operations, how teams maximize miles, HOS rules with sleeper berth swap, pay structures, equipment requirements (sleeper berth specs), team retention, and common challenges. Reference 49 CFR 395.1(g).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a carrier asks about trailer types — dry van, reefer, flatbed, step-deck, conestoga, tanker, dump, lowboy, intermodal chassis, auto-hauler. Covers length / weight rules, common specs, reefer unit options (Carrier vs Thermo King), liftgate options, kingpin setting, and trailer-to-tractor matching.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Parse and validate project specifications. Use when loading YAML/JSON specs, validating spec structure, extracting requirements, or converting between spec formats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to review, improve, or refactor Java code for generics quality — including avoiding raw types, applying the PECS (Producer Extends Consumer Super) principle for wildcards, using bounded type parameters, designing effective generic methods, leveraging the diamond operator, understanding type erasure implications, handling generic inheritance correctly, preventing heap pollution with @SafeVarargs, and integrating generics with modern Java features like Records, sealed types, and pattern matching. Part of the skills-for-java project
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
API documentation workflow for generating OpenAPI specs, creating developer guides, and maintaining comprehensive API documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when building or debugging URL-backed state with nuxt-ui-tools as a package consumer. Covers codecs, useQueryState, useQueryStates, dynamicQueryState, grouped state, dynamic keys, and practical query-string examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。