「nda」の検索結果

Analyze conversion funnel drop-offs and identify biggest leak points with impact-ranked recommendations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data quality audit on CRM with completeness scoring and specific fix recommendations

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running analytical SQL over Parquet/CSV/JSON without a warehouse, replacing pandas for data wrangling, joining S3 data in-place, building local data marts, or embedding OLAP into an app. Triggers: read_parquet/read_csv setup, partitioned dataset queries, hive partitioning, glob patterns for S3, COPY TO export, attach Postgres/MySQL, UDFs in Python/R, MotherDuck cloud sync, columnar performance vs row stores. NOT for OLTP workloads (concurrent writes), distributed analytics at petabyte scale (use Spark/Trino), or vector search (use pgvector/Lance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data structures and algorithms for AI agent episodic memory. Covers vector stores (HNSW, IVF, PQ), temporal indexing, knowledge graphs with triple stores, hierarchical summarization, forgetting curves, working/long-term/ procedural memory, and memory consolidation. Deep analysis of MemGPT/Letta, Zep/Graphiti, Mem0, and the Stanford generative agents memory architecture. Teaches the CS fundamentals behind how agents remember, retrieve, and forget. Activate on: "agent memory", "episodic memory", "vector search algorithm", "HNSW", "memory retrieval", "forgetting curve", "knowledge graph memory", "MemGPT", "Letta", "Zep", "Mem0", "memory consolidation", "temporal retrieval", "agent long-term memory", "memory layer". NOT for: conversation protocol design (use agent-conversation-protocols), agent infrastructure selection (use agentic-infrastructure-2026), building RAG pipelines (use ai-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational impossibility result proving consensus cannot be guaranteed in asynchronous systems with even one faulty process

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundational distributed computing algorithms for consensus, coordination, and fault tolerance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Managing third-party dependencies — version pinning, security auditing, license compliance, update workflows, lockfile management, supply chain security. Activate on "npm audit", "dependabot", "renovate", "pin versions", "dependency update", "supply chain", "license compliance", "lockfile", "security advisory", "typosquatting", "SBOM". NOT for internal monorepo package management (use monorepo-management) or publishing your own packages to npm/PyPI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

State-of-the-art data visualization for React/Next.js/TypeScript with Tailwind CSS. Creates compelling, tested, and accessible visualizations following Tufte principles and NYT Graphics standards. Activate on "data viz", "chart", "graph", "visualization", "dashboard", "plot", "Recharts", "Nivo", "D3". NOT for static images, print graphics, or basic HTML tables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify every destructive/gated action an agent body can attempt (git, filesystem, network, shell, github) into block/approve/allow tiers, and audit whether the pre-tool and post-tool governance backing that classification is real: blocked actions proven zero-side-effect by a negative fixture, every denial backed by a receipt and a transcript event, every block-tier denial paired with a safe alternative, and no unmanaged or same-UID body ever marked "contained." Use when building or reviewing Agent Harbor's C5 governance gate (destructive git blocker, approval request/result, denial receipts), gating a new tool surface before it can run destructive commands, or auditing whether an existing "destructive-action blocked" claim actually has evidence behind it. NOT for proving an existing sandbox boundary actually contains an adversary once an action is isolated (use sandboxed-adversarial-test-harness), deciding where in a DAG to place a human review node or designing the approval UX itself (use human-gate-designer), or designing the general work-receipt schema across an entire agent task (use agent-work-receipt-designer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the practical path from 'we have no design system' or 'we have a mess' to a real, functional design system. Component inventory, design token extraction, headless UI adoption (Radix, React Aria, Headless UI), migration order of operations, and the assessment-to-rollout pipeline. Activate on 'design system from scratch', 'bootstrap design system', 'no design system', 'design system migration', 'headless UI adoption', 'component audit', 'design token extraction', 'design system strategy'. NOT for building specific components once a system exists (use design-system-creator), not for generating token files/configs (use design-system-generator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Learns from DAG execution history to improve future performance. Identifies successful patterns, detects anti-patterns, and provides recommendations. Activate on 'learn patterns', 'execution patterns', 'what worked', 'optimize based on history', 'pattern analysis'. NOT for failure analysis (use dag-failure-analyzer) or performance profiling (use dag-performance-profiler).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate finite-DAG order objectives and construct reachability-chain or direct-edge path partitions with explicit proof boundaries. NOT for equating reachability chains with direct-edge paths without checking the chosen objective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in color theory, palette harmony, and perceptual color science for computational photo composition. Specializes in earth-mover distance optimization, warm/cool alternation, diversity-aware palette selection, and hue-based photo sequencing. Activate on "color palette", "color harmony", "warm cool", "earth mover distance", "Wasserstein", "LAB space", "hue sorted", "palette matching". NOT for basic RGB manipulation (use standard image processing), single-photo color grading (use native-app-designer), UI color schemes (use vaporwave-glassomorphic-ui-designer), or color blindness simulation (accessibility specialists).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether an enforced-coordination MCP has actually shrunk its ~19 legacy etiquette verbs into the 5 enforced tools — work/act/ask/recall/status — each carrying one denial shape and one transcript event, migrated through a real retirement path (intake-metadata, alias, or doc-history — never a parallel runtime), with zero legacy-verb calls once a body reaches compliance mode C4+. Use when reviewing a broker-collapse migration plan, gating a body's move from advisory (C0-C3) to enforced (C4+) coordination, or verifying IT-018 Broker Collapse compliance. NOT for the inbound trigger→spawn boundary that decides whether an event may spawn an agent at all (use fleet-event-spawn-trust), the capability-token cryptographic mechanism behind a denial (use agentic-zero-trust-security), designing how a swarm of agents invokes and shards work (use swarm-invocation-designer), or auditing an individual PR's mergeability (use agent-pr-authoring).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic analyst that maps competitive landscapes, identifies white space opportunities, and provides positioning recommendations. Use when users need competitive analysis, market positioning strategy, differentiation tactics, or "how do I stand out?" guidance across any domain (portfolios, products, services). NOT for market size estimation or financial forecasting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Render mathematically-faithful Turkish marbling (Ebru) and paper-marbling with closed-form coordinate-deformation maps — a drop is a radial outward push, a comb/tine is a decaying shear, all composed as homeomorphisms over colored region boundaries. No fluid solver, runs 60fps on a 2D canvas. Use when building a marbling/Ebru toy or generative-art renderer, implementing drop/comb/wave/swirl deformations, scripting traditional patterns (Battal, Gel-Git, Şal, Bülbül Yuvası), keeping combed edges crisp via adaptive resampling, modeling ox-gall shouldering for crisp ring-in-ring drops, or exporting high-DPI marbled prints. NOT for real fluid / Navier-Stokes simulation, metaball / alpha-blended "smoke" blob effects, raster image-processing filters, or non-marbling generative art.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose when intuitive judgment, agent confidence, or expert routing can be trusted by classifying environment validity, feedback quality, and task-boundary fit. Use for confidence calibration, agent routing, expertise audits, and escalation design. NOT for deterministic implementation tasks, pure syntax debugging, or domains with explicit verifiable answers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates comprehensive, context-aware code review checklists tailored to the specific codebase, programming language, and team standards. Analyzes PR diffs and suggests what reviewers should focus on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design AgentSpeak-style BDI plan libraries with explicit event, context, failure, and authority boundaries. NOT for treating BDI plans as safety approval or guaranteed execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cryptographic security for agentic systems — zero-trust agent networking, signed message envelopes (JWS/JWE), capability-based security (ocaps), Merkle tree audit trails, WASM sandboxing, and formal verification. Covers CLI dev tool security, mTLS between agents, permission boundaries (least privilege for AI agents), and supply chain security for skills/plugins. Activate on: "agent security", "zero trust agents", "secure agent communication", "capability-based security", "ocap", "signed messages between agents", "agent audit trail", "sandbox agent execution", "agent permissions", "mTLS agents", "cryptographic verification", "agent supply chain", "OWASP agentic", "prove agent did X", "tamper-proof agent logs". NOT for: application-level SAST scanning (use security-auditor), network firewall rules (use infrastructure), SOC2/HIPAA compliance (organizational), or prompt injection defense (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Declare an agentic application's interaction disclosure, state, context, capabilities, and effect-control boundaries. Use for a reviewable design specification and static consistency audit before implementation. NOT for proving that controls are deployed or enforced, exposing private chain-of-thought, selecting a model/router, or designing a multi-agent protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to design contextual inputs for an always-on AI agent with episodic memory. Covers what data to feed the agent, how to structure observations and triggers, ambient context capture (screen, audio, calendar), context window budgeting, and retrieval strategies that keep the agent grounded in what's actually happening. Activate on: "what should the agent observe", "context inputs for agent", "ambient context capture", "agent triggers", "agent input design", "screenpipe integration", "context window budget", "what data to feed my agent", "/always-on-agent-inputs". NOT for: memory architecture and storage (use always-on-agent-architecture), application ideas (use always-on-agent-applications), safety concerns (use always-on-agent-safety).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。