「check」の検索結果

Compatibility alias for the Elixir/Phoenix plugin's N+1 query checker. Invoke explicitly with /ecto:n1-check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs plugin health checks (venv packages, skill registration, and album slug collisions). Use when the user asks to check plugin health, verify setup, or troubleshoot missing skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates all pre-generation gates before sending tracks to Suno. Checks sources verified, lyrics reviewed, pronunciation resolved, explicit flag set, style prompt complete, and artist names cleared. Use before generating tracks on Suno or when the user says "pre-gen check" or "ready to generate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "verify a fix", "reproduce failure", "diagnose issue", "check BEFORE/AFTER state", "VF task", "reality check", "check test quality", "mock-only tests", or needs guidance on verifying fixes by reproducing failures before and after implementation, or detecting mock-heavy test anti-patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a release checklist and GitHub issue for an R package. Use when the user asks to "create a release checklist" or "start a release" for an R package.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare R packages for CRAN submission by checking for common ad-hoc requirements not caught by devtools::check(). Use when: (1) Preparing a package for first CRAN release, (2) Preparing a package update for CRAN resubmission, (3) Reviewing a package to ensure CRAN compliance, (4) Responding to CRAN reviewer feedback. Covers documentation requirements, DESCRIPTION field standards, URL validation, examples, and administrative requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when someone asks "does this sound AI?", "check if this is AI-written", "what gives this away as AI", "run ai-check on this", or "score this text". Also use when reviewing a draft for AI tells before publishing, or when a piece of text reads as suspiciously polished, generic, or pattern-y and the user wants a forensic breakdown of why.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a complete mathematical-modeling competition paper with an atomic checklist covering abstract readability, page structure, typography, headings, pagination, figures, tables, equations, anonymity, metadata, visual balance, and page allocation. Return the review in chat or Markdown by default, and provide the bundled single-sheet checklist when the user requests a reusable form. Use when the user provides a PDF or Word paper and asks for a full-paper format and writing-compliance audit; do not replace technical model correctness review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to verify paper claims against code or data, audit numerical accuracy, check formula-code alignment, or validate citation accuracy. Triggers on phrases like "verify claims", "check numbers", "do the numbers match", "formula vs code", "audit the paper", or "cross-check results".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured fact-checking workflow. Use when verifying claims for publication, rating claims, or setting pre-publication checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect package managers and CI action pins, then discover outdated or vulnerable dependencies. Returns structured findings without upgrading. Use when the user asks to "review dependencies", "check for outdated packages", "check dependencies", "scan dependencies", "dependency review", "check for outdated GitHub Actions", or "are my workflow actions up to date".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run targeted linting, formatting, and code quality checks on modified files. Use this to validate code style, type safety, security, and other quality metrics before committing. Supports running all checks or targeting specific checks on specific files for efficient validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor PR checks and fix failures until green. Uses gh pr checks as the source of truth for PR-attached checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a month-end (or period) close checklist against a Well workspace — verify everything is reconciled and posted before the books are closed. Use when the user asks to close the month/period, run a close checklist, check if the books are ready to close, or what's left before closing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Health check for the bb/pt/ctf workflow driver subsystem - verifies everything is in place so every machine runs the same. Checks vault-content consistency (scripts present, JSON valid, routing wired, all 69 tool pages carry phase:, the tool index resolves, the hook edits are in place) AND per-machine wiring (the three workflow skills symlinked, hooks registered, imports work), then runs a live init->board->next smoke test. Use when setting up the workflow on a new machine, after a vault sync, when the driver misbehaves, or on "bb-health", "campaign health", "is the workflow set up", "check hooks and scripts", "why is the board not working".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles GDPR Art. 10 criminal conviction and offence data classification including official authority requirements, national law derogations, and comprehensive register restrictions. Covers controller obligations for criminal background checks and offence records. Keywords: criminal data, Art 10, conviction data, offence records, criminal background, DBS check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Educator morning course health check for Canvas LMS. Shows submission rates, struggling students, grade distribution, and upcoming deadlines. Trigger phrases include "morning check", "course status", "how are my students", or any start-of-day teaching review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a skill is brittle, drifting, repeatedly failing, or needs a Reliable Skill Contract. Trigger for phrases like skill lifeguard, reliable skill, self-maintaining skill, negative examples, verification checkpoints, drift signals, replay hooks, or failure log to skill patch. Audits or patches skills so high-value workflows include explicit forbidden behaviors, checkpoints, machine-checkable done conditions, replay or smoke hooks, and drift detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verifies factual claims in documents using web search and official sources, then proposes corrections with user confirmation. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify information, validate claims, check accuracy, or update outdated information in documents. Supports AI model specs, technical documentation, statistics, and general factual statements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit web pages for accessibility issues, WCAG compliance, and screen reader compatibility. Trigger when the user asks to: check accessibility, run an a11y audit, test WCAG compliance, check screen reader support, audit ARIA attributes, verify keyboard navigation, find accessibility issues, or check for missing alt text or labels.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

2Checkout integration. Manage data, records, and automate workflows. Use when the user wants to interact with 2Checkout data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run before pushing a PR that touched UI to find untranslated keys in any of the 21 non-English locales and to catch user-visible English strings that bypass context.l10n. Reports findings as a checklist; refuses to declare clean until all are addressed or explicitly waived. Invoke with /check-l10n.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Checks whether a new version of a repository preserves the behavior observed by tests on the old version. Use this skill when comparing two versions of code to detect regressions, verify refactoring safety, validate bug fixes don't break existing functionality, or ensure backward compatibility. Detects differences in function outputs, exceptions, observable states, and performance between versions. Generates reports highlighting potential regressions (critical, high, medium, low severity), improvements, and areas requiring verification. Triggers when users ask to check for regressions between versions, compare test behavior across versions, verify behavior preservation, or validate that changes don't break existing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically repair code violations of temporal properties using model-checking counterexamples as guidance. Use when working with formal verification results, temporal logic property violations (LTL, CTL), model checking counterexamples, or when asked to repair property violations, fix counterexamples, repair temporal properties, fix model checking violations, or repair code based on counterexamples. Applicable to concurrent systems, state machines, synchronization issues, safety/liveness properties, and resource management violations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。