本文へ移動
cccskills

「cis」の検索結果

4,587 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Write a concise feature spec for engineering handoff. Use when the user says "write a spec", "feature spec", "one-pager for eng", "spec this out", "write up this feature", "I need to hand this off to engineering", "shape this up", or wants a concise technical brief - even if they don't say "feature spec".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年10月13日 更新

Structure and run a post-interview candidate debrief. Use when the user says "run the debrief", "how do we decide on this candidate", "let's calibrate", "we need to make a hire/no-hire call", "prep the debrief meeting", or wants to structure the decision-making process after interviews are complete - even if they don't explicitly say "debrief". Also use when a recruiter wants to prevent groupthink or HiPPO effect (highest paid person's opinion) from dominating the decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年10月13日 更新

Manage QA release gates - go/no-go decisions, release sign-off reports, defect triage, and release readiness communication. Use this skill whenever a QA lead or manager needs to formally assess whether a build is ready to ship. Trigger on phrases like "release sign-off", "go or no-go", "is this ready to release", "defect triage", "release gate", "approve the release", "block the release", "release readiness", "quality gate", "sign off on this build", "triage these bugs", or any request to make or document a formal release decision. Also trigger when a release manager or PM asks "what's the QA status?" or "can we ship this?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年10月13日 更新

Generate weekly or monthly status updates from local PM data. Use this skill when: - It's end of week and you need a status update for leadership or stakeholders - You need a monthly executive summary - You want to draft an email update using data from meetings, tracker tickets, and decisions - The user says "weekly update", "status report", "what happened this week?", "weekly summary" - The user says "Friday update", "send status email", "EOW update" Pulls from work logs, meetings, ticket tracker, and decisions — no manual input needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年10月13日 更新

Run structured product thinking exercises before writing a spec. Use this skill when: - You need to think through a feature idea before writing a PRD - You want to run the 11-star experience exercise for a feature - You need a positioning statement using Geoffrey Moore's framework - You want to define product principles and success vision for a new feature - You have a raw feature idea and need to turn it into a structured brief

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年10月13日 更新

Write a structured weekly or bi-weekly program status report for stakeholders. Use when the user says "write a status report", "program update", "stakeholder update", "weekly status", "RAG status", "program health report", "what do I send to leadership", "write the update for [program]", or needs to communicate delivery progress - even if they don't explicitly say "status report". Produces a concise, scannable report with RAG status, blockers, and decisions needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年10月13日 更新

Draft professional emails (MoM, status updates, decisions, stakeholder communication) and save as a draft in your email provider. Use this skill after a meeting, decision, spec update, or any event that needs email communication. Trigger phrases: "send MoM email", "draft meeting minutes email", "MoM email for [meeting]", "create MoM draft", "email the meeting notes", "draft MoM", "draft email", "send update email", "draft email for [topic]". Reads context from meetings, specs, tickets, and conversation. Looks up attendee emails from a local team directory, formats as HTML email, and pushes to the email provider as a draft (never sends).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

qa-aman/claude-skills202026年10月13日 更新

Stress-test a Yuzu plan against the repo's domain language, code, CONTEXT.md, and ADRs while updating docs as decisions crystallize. Use when the user says `/grill-with-docs`, asks to grill a design with docs, wants decision interrogation, or needs ADR-adjacent planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DevNullLtd/Yuzu192026年10月15日 更新

Documenting As-Is and To-Be business processes for a Salesforce project as swim-lane diagrams — one lane per actor, explicit decision points, parallel and exception/sad paths, and per-step automation-tier annotations that drive downstream build decisions. Trigger keywords: As-Is To-Be salesforce process, swim lane salesforce, business process map, automation candidate identification, sad path documentation, process actor mapping, manual residue. NOT for Opportunity stage and exit-criteria design — use admin/sales-process-mapping. NOT for picking Flow vs Apex for one requirement — use admin/process-automation-selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills192026年10月4日 更新

Operational setup guide for Salesforce Energy and Utilities Cloud: license activation, permission sets, industry-specific object configuration (ServicePoint, Meter, MeterReading, Consumption, ServiceAccount, ServiceContract, RatePlan), CIS/billing system integration, and service order management. NOT for generic admin setup, NOT for reading or querying the E&U data model schema (use architect/industries-data-model for that).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills192026年10月4日 更新

Use when a practitioner needs to classify the risk level of an upcoming Salesforce deployment, define rollback trigger conditions, or assign decision authority before the release window opens. Triggers: 'how risky is this release', 'what needs rollback planning', 'classify deployment risk', 'pre-deployment risk checklist', 'rollback decision authority', 'high risk metadata types'. NOT for executing the deployment itself, writing CI/CD pipeline code, or troubleshooting failures after a deployment has already run — use admin/change-management-and-deployment for execution planning and devops/deployment-error-troubleshooting for post-failure diagnosis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills192026年10月4日 更新

Expert in Pre-Socratics, Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Hellenistic schools including Stoicism, Epicureanism, and Skepticism

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sandraschi/advanced-memory-mcp192026年10月13日 更新

Aggregate friction log files across a time period to identify recurring patterns, classify each cluster by intervention type, produce a prioritized action plan with success criteria, and calculate convergence metrics. Complements `skmtc-retro` (which captures per-session signal) by acting as the system's actuator: turning accumulated observations into decisions. The primary output is a review document that makes the "is it getting better?" question answerable. Use this skill when the user asks to "review retros", "review friction", "run a retro review", "what's the pattern across sessions", "what should we fix next", or on a periodic cadence (monthly, pre-release). Also run after a cluster of sessions on the same feature area to surface systemic issues before they compound. Distinct from `skmtc-retro` — that skill captures per-session observations; this skill synthesizes them into decisions. Do not run this skill as a substitute for a per-session retro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

skmtc/skmtc192026年10月12日 更新

Server management principles and decision-making. Process management, monitoring strategy, and scaling decisions. Teaches thinking, not commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

umairinayat/Specter-AI182026年9月29日 更新

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

umairinayat/Specter-AI182026年9月29日 更新

Retrospective learning from a completed experience. Takes a project, incident, decision that played out, or time period; gathers ground truth (observations) separately from recollections; spawns reflectors applying different lenses (what-worked-vs-got-lucky, what-didn't, what-surprised, system-rewards-vs-intent, decisions-that-aged, what-to-tell-past-self, patterns-that-recur) in isolation; synthesizes into updated mental models as first-class output. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

chrisallenlane/claude-swe-workflows182026年5月19日 更新

Prevent silent decimal mismatch bugs across EVM chains. Covers runtime decimal lookup, chain-aware caching, bridged-token precision drift, and safe normalization for bots, dashboards, and DeFi tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月15日 更新

Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) development patterns. Drug interaction checking, dose validation, clinical scoring (NEWS2, qSOFA), alert severity classification, and integration into EMR workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

EMR/EHR development patterns for healthcare applications. Clinical safety, encounter workflows, prescription generation, clinical decision support integration, and accessibility-first UI for medical data entry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月13日 更新

council

無料

Convene a four-voice council for ambiguous decisions, tradeoffs, and go/no-go calls. Use when multiple valid paths exist and you need structured disagreement before choosing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月15日 更新

This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月15日 更新

Generate images, videos, TTS, and music through Pixazo (one API key, 80+ models). Use when Decisions has a Pixazo key or the pixazo MCP is connected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月15日 更新

animate

無料

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月15日 更新

One page, hands-on manual tier — drive a live page through the web accessibility (a11y) checks a rule engine can't decide: keyboard operation and focus order, screen-reader names, roles and states from the accessibility tree, reflow and zoom, reduced motion, form errors, and target size. Grades each finding by evidence basis (verified / confirm-with-a-human / human-required) and severity, and closes every criterion in a ledger: verified, flagged, not exercised, or N/A. Locates and assesses; does not fix (use `accessibility-fix`). Use it for keyboard testing, focus-order checks, screen-reader or a11y-tree review, reflow and zoom at 200%, or 'is this operable, not just lint-clean'. The automated tier is `accessibility-scan`; `accessibility-audit` runs both across a sampled site.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

tensology/decisionsai172026年10月15日 更新