「exit」の検索結果

A six-year-old code reviewer who asks "why?" about everything. Catches over-engineering, confusing names, and unnecessary complexity. To invoke, say `6yo`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A six-year-old code reviewer who asks "why?" about everything. Catches over-engineering, confusing names, and unnecessary complexity, then corrects the code according to the language spec, but through kids eyes, maintaining simplicity and readability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A six-year-old code reviewer who asks "why?" about everything. Catches over-engineering, confusing names, and unnecessary complexity. Output is a 1-2 line summary of the request as a whole: how is the file? Is the class nice? Is the function correct?

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit over-engineered codebases by factoring layers into live obligations, quotienting redundant distinctions, ablating unearned surface, and normalizing survivors while preserving required behavior. Use when change latency or agent difficulty comes from frameworks, plugins, DI, codegen, task runners, config indirection, ORMs, GraphQL, monorepo/infra tooling, or web stacks, or when asked to remove layers. Produces an evidence-backed Reduction Certificate, cuts, migration phases, proof signals, and rollback. Not for one local readability cleanup (use tw-complexity-mitigator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review+fix protocol with optional pre-core git diff review and safety guardrails (unsoundness, invariants, footguns, incidental complexity). Use when prompts say "/tw-fix this PR", "fix current branch", "fix this diff", "repair CI red", or "apply a minimal patch", and when crash/corruption/invariant-break issues need correction with a validation signal. Stop only after self-review exhausts actionable changes, each full cycle reaches post-self-review rerun plus terminal diff-review closure, and two consecutive zero-edit full cycles are clean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review someone else's PR through an architectural/strategic lens — does it shift design, raise complexity, or quietly change precedent? Drives a brief reflective discussion with the user, then posts a concise review comment via `gh`. Defers line-level and bug-hunting concerns to AI review bots and the PR author.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from DOE Systems Engineering Methodology (SEM) Version 3 — the DOE SDLC for IT investments. Use for staged systems lifecycle planning through maintenance, Stage Exits, Structured Walkthroughs, In-Stage Assessments, requirements traceability, and CMM-aligned process discipline. Covers SEM3 (2002) guidance only; does not replace modern DevSecOps tooling standards, DOE O 413.3B capital-asset directives, or current CIO policy supersessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from DAFMAN 63-119 (15 April 2021), Mission-Oriented Test Readiness Certification. Use for continuous MOTRC replacing single-point OTRR thinking: framework/applicability, Certification Official vs PM roles, review cycle and exit criteria, certification memo/decertify gates, DT&E/contractor evidence, ITT integration and cyber resiliency, and the 31-template matrix. DAF T&E readiness process only—does not replace DoDI 5000.89, AFI 99-103, or multi-service lead policies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive ffmpeg through the media_run tool as an argv array - remux instead of re-encode, map streams explicitly, trim at keyframes, scale and crop, extract audio and frames, and build GIFs, contact sheets and concatenations. Covers the flags this pack injects, reading a failure from its exit code and last log lines, and the version-dependent spellings to hedge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating, modifying, explaining, or reviewing TBQ3 Bar-based trading strategies with OnBar, OnInit, OnReady, entries, exits, MarketPosition, stop profit/loss, sizing, slippage, commission, multi-symbol, or cross-period logic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits a website codebase and makes code changes so AI engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews) can better discover, parse, quote, and cite the site. Covers structured data, content structure, technical signals, and freshness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Re-mint a ChatGPT bearer token when a nightly sync exits with a token-expired code: the session cookie lives for months and deterministically produces a fresh bearer, with no LLM and no browser. Triggers: "/chatgpt-token-heal", "chatgpt token dead", or the sync failing on that error.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the vault data-safety runbook: 3-2-1 backup, the never-deleted originals archive, the schedulers that keep it running, and the restore or new-machine migration procedure. Verifies by reading state rather than trusting exit codes. Triggers: "make a backup", "verify the backup", "the backup looks broken", "restore the vault".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches what prompts people ask AI engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude) about a product category and produces a prompts.csv artifact — a prioritized, strictly-schema'd list of the queries where the brand should be cited. Feeds the monitor workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or audit an `/llms.txt` file at the site root that makes the site legible to LLMs and AI answer engines at inference time, following the llms.txt proposal (Jeremy Howard, 2024). Use this skill whenever the user asks to "build llms.txt", "create llms.txt", "generate llms.txt", "audit llms.txt", "make my site LLM-friendly", "expose the site to AI assistants", "let ChatGPT / Claude / Perplexity cite my site", "add an AI assistants index", or asks about `.md` companion pages for LLM consumption. Output is a valid `llms.txt` file (or an audit) plus optional `.md` companion page generation for top pages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize content for AI search and LLM citations across AI Overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, and similar systems. Use when improving AI visibility, answer engine optimization, or citatio

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design spec with 98 rules for building CLI tools that AI agents can safely use. Covers structured JSON output, error handling, input contracts, safety guardrails, exit codes, and agent self-descriptio

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "analyze backlinks", "analyze my off-site signals", or "track AI traffic / ChatGPT / Perplexity referrals"; profiles referring domains, anchor-text mix, toxic links, and disavow candidates (backlinks mode) or isolates AI-assistant referral sessions in GA4/GSC/logs and reports their trend, landing pages, and AI-vs-organic conversion (ai-referrals mode). Not for internal links — use site-structure-optimizer; not for keyword positions — use rank-tracker; not for multi-metric stakeholder reports — use performance-monitor. 外链分析/反向链接/AI流量/AI引荐/ChatGPT流量/AI转化

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "design a welcome flow", "set up an abandoned-cart sequence", "build a light re-engagement branch inside a lifecycle flow", or "plan a cold-outbound sequence"; produces general lifecycle automation flows (welcome, cart, browse-abandon, post-purchase, in-flow re-engagement, B2B cold outbound) with trigger, step timing, branch/exit conditions, goal, frequency governance (send caps, quiet hours, fatigue guardrail), a sunset path, and a SEND N-dimension score. Not for the closed-loop win-back / re-consent (re-permission) program on a lapsed cohort — use reactivation-specialist; not for writing each email's copy — use email-creative-builder; not for computing EQS or the N1 unsubscribe veto — use email-quality-auditor. 邮件自动化流程设计/购物车挽回/流失召回序列

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "optimize for AI citations"; improves citation readiness for ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, Gemini, and Claude. Not for structural on-page SEO — use on-page-seo-checker; not for net-new drafting — use content-writer. AI引用优化/GEO优化/AI搜索

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers or wants to build systems to prevent it. For post-cancel win-back email sequences, see emails. For in-app upgrade paywalls, see paywalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation that continuously aggregates metrics (daily totals, running counts, min/max, lifetime revenue) using reduction annotations. Use for real-time dashboards, continuous materialised views, and replacing batch ETL aggregations with streaming. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this. Use when user says "aggregation derivation", "derivation to sum daily totals", "running-count derivation", "transformation for min/max per group", "derive lifetime metrics", "aggregate-by-date derivation", or "real-time-dashboard derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation with custom SQLite state (internal tables) to make per-document decisions based on accumulated history — account balances, inventory levels, approval workflows, deduplication. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this. Use when user says "stateful derivation", "derivation to track balance", "transformation to approve based on state", "derive an approval workflow", "deduplication derivation", or "build a stateful derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create an Estuary derivation that maintains a sliding time window of events (e.g. "transfers in the last 24h", "failed logins in the last 5 minutes") using internal SQLite state and readDelay for time-based expiration. Derivations add complexity and cost — confirm the user wants a derivation before reaching for this. Use when user says "windowing derivation", "derivation for last-24h events", "rolling-window derivation", "sliding-window transformation", "fraud-detection derivation", "rate-limit derivation", or "time-window derivation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。