「how to use」の検索結果

[omh] Resume or finish the work we agreed on: continue or finish the accepted work from conversation context, preserve rejected ideas, and report evidence-bounded completion. Also declare and advance the metadata-only plan checklist without starting a delivery engine. Use when the user says: todo-checklist, plan checklist, todo checklist, phase checklist, declare a plan checklist, declare the plan todo, show the plan todo, clear the plan todo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "create an influencer brief" or "write a campaign brief"; produces a structured creator brief with deliverables, key messages, creative direction, timeline, disclosure rules, and compensation terms. Not for choosing how to split spend across creators — use budget-optimizer. 达人合作简报/创作者BF

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures Amazon CloudFront content delivery across six workflows: when to use CloudFront and how it fits with AWS WAF, Shield, CloudFront Functions, Lambda@Edge, Route 53, and origins (creating a distribution, caching, and Flat Rate Pricing (FRP) versus pay-as-you-go pricing); managing custom-domain TLS certificates (ACM in us-east-1); configuring multi-tenant distributions; protecting origins with origin access control (OAC), VPC origins, and origin mutual TLS (mTLS); securing content with signed URLs and cookies, geographic restrictions, viewer mutual TLS, and edge token validation; and observing traffic with standard and real-time logs. Applicable when the customer wants to put CloudFront in front of content, choose pricing, lock an origin, restrict who can view content, or analyze logs. Not applicable for the Route 53 DNS side of a CloudFront custom domain or failover between distributions (see the route53-cloudfront skill), or for pure-Route 53 DNS work (see the route53 skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Update website docs to match recent code changes, cross-validating every flag against source. Use this skill whenever the user asks to: update documentation, sync docs with code, document a new flag or command, fix stale docs, or update the README. This skill covers all website/docs/ categories (commands, reference, understand, how-to, troubleshooting, getting-started) plus the built-in skill description and README. If you just implemented a feature and need to update docs, this is the skill to use. Never manually edit website docs without cross-validating flags against Go source first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided journey from an app idea to a deliberate architecture: boundaries, domain model, data decisions, and resilience, making only the expensive-to-reverse decisions and deferring the rest. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - clean-architecture, domain-driven-design, system-design, ddia-systems, software-design-philosophy, release-it, pragmatic-programmer, 37signals-way - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (ARCHITECTURE.md, DESIGN-CODE-ARCHITECTURE-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to design a new app's architecture, choose boundaries and a domain model, decide monolith versus microservices, or says 'how should I structure this app'. If a codebase already exists, use remove-technical-debt (aged), improve-code-quality (fresh prototype), or architecture-optimization (slow but working); if unvalidated, run create-business or create-app first. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define product positioning by mapping competitive alternatives, unique attributes, and best-fit customers to the right market category. Use when the user mentions "positioning", "competitive alternatives", "how to position", "market category", "positioning canvas", "repositioning", "category creation", "what category are we in", or "why prospects dont get what we do". Also trigger when launching a new product, entering a crowded market, or diagnosing why prospects dont grasp the product's value. Covers the positioning canvas and team workshops. For customer jobs analysis, see jobs-to-be-done. For go-to-market, see crossing-the-chasm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to monitor, triage, or reduce their app's crash rate — including setting up Crashlytics, prioritizing which crashes to fix first, interpreting crash data, and understanding how crashes affect App Store ranking. Use when the user mentions "crash", "crashlytics", "crash rate", "ANR", "app not responding", "crash-free sessions", "crash-free users", "symbolication", "stability", "firebase crashes", "app crashing", or "crash report". For overall analytics setup, see app-analytics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to analyze their own app's actual performance data from App Store Connect — real downloads, revenue, IAP, subscriptions, trials, or country breakdowns synced via Appeeky Connect. Use when the user asks about "my downloads", "my revenue", "how is my app performing", "ASC data", "sales and trends", "my subscription numbers", "App Store Connect metrics", or wants to compare periods or top markets. For third-party app estimates, see app-analytics. For subscription analytics depth, see monetization-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to implement, optimize, or use App Clips for app discovery and conversion. Use when the user mentions "App Clip", "app clip code", "mini app", "instant app", "App Clip card", "App Clip link", "no download required", "instant experience", or wants to understand how App Clips appear in App Store search. For general App Store discoverability, see aso-audit. For marketing campaigns, see ua-campaign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a complete, beginner-friendly explanation of an entire code repository as a set of markdown files. Maps the repo structure with `treecap` (installing it if missing), studies the actual source, then writes a `CODE_EXPLANATION/` folder containing an `OVERVIEW.md` plus numbered deep-dive files (01_architecture.md, 02_models.md, ...) that explain how the code is built, what it does, and how the pieces fit together — illustrated with real code excerpts. Use this skill whenever the user wants to understand, document, onboard onto, or get a walkthrough of a codebase: phrases like "explain this repo", "explain the code", "code explanation", "walk me through this codebase", "help me understand how this is built", "document the architecture", or "what does this project do" — even if they don't say the word "skill". Prefer this over ad-hoc summaries whenever the goal is a durable, written explanation of a whole repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two stages: first a single-page sheet of numbered panels from an image model, then that sheet fed to Seedance as the reference. The sheet owns order, framing and timing, and the video prompt only has to connect the panels. Use when the user wants a Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 video prompt for this kind of clip (Storyboard grid to video; 中文触发词: 分镜网格转视频, 分镜图, 九宫格, 故事板), or asks how published cases of this type were prompted. Read references/cases.md before drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Owns execution: how work actually gets done across the organization, including process, program management, capacity, vendors, supply chain, and service delivery. Use this when execution is the problem rather than strategy, to design or fix a process, to resolve cross-functional handoff failures, to plan capacity, to assess delivery risk, or when the same failure keeps recurring. Also use to decide whether to build, hire, or outsource a capability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies decision science and cognitive bias research to marketing and product decisions — how people actually choose under uncertainty, and how framing, defaults, sequencing, and social context change behavior. Use this to diagnose why a well-argued offer is not converting, to structure choices and pricing presentation, to design an experience around how attention and memory work, or to pressure-test whether a persuasion tactic is legitimate or manipulative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Smallest personal narrated-explainer-video pipeline (spoken narration over visuals, not an audio podcast), fully tool-agnostic and autonomous by default — topic → research ∥ asset collection → script → TTS → video → 4K render ∥ publish info + cover. The skill defines the pipeline logic and self-verified checkpoints; any TTS backend and any video tool (Remotion, HyperFrames, CapCut, ...) work, and how much human oversight to apply is set by the working project's AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md, not here. Use when the user wants a quick personal narrated video with minimal steps, whether or not they name the tool stack. Do NOT trigger for audio-only podcasts, written episodic content, or heavy multi-format production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Case studies of television series writing (剧集案例库) from primary texts; Sorkin's six West Wing teleplays (act-page tables, eight act-out types); Chase's five Sopranos scripts (the 35-beat A/B/C/D recipe, what a pilot refuses to explain); Fellowes's annotated Downton Abbey season two (19 storylines, 419 footnotes); Waller-Bridge's Fleabag Scriptures (the six-episode half-hour template); Calvisi's eight minute-by-minute pilot beat sheets (Breaking Bad, Mad Men, Game of Thrones and more); Landau's 47-series structure appendix; Miller's Hannibal and HTGAWM breakdowns; Goldberg & Rabkin's beat sheets; Sakamoto Yuji's We Made a Beautiful Bouquet (a feature) and Noh Hee-kyung's The Most Beautiful Goodbye. Use when you want a worked example of how an episode or pilot is built, need real act lengths, scene counts or storyline grids to imitate, are breaking a multi-thread ensemble episode, designing a bottle episode or a finale, writing a relationship or family drama, or ask 某一集是怎么写的 / 这部剧的结构表.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writing plays and screenplays in the Chekhovian mode (契诃夫戏剧法) — distilled from the complete plays (没有父亲的人/普拉东诺夫, 伊凡诺夫, 林妖→万尼亚舅舅, 海鸥, 三姊妹, 樱桃园, nine one-acts) plus Chekhov's own letters, Stanislavsky's and Nemirovich-Danchenko's rehearsal notes and 焦菊隐/童道明 criticism. Covers the four-act mood-based structure without central climax, off-stage events, "correct answer stated in Act 1 and refused", the announced event that never happens, three-layer endings (hope monologue + nihilist line + household action), no-villain conflict with environment, every character's object and catchphrase, one-way love chains, half-step-off dialogue, philosophy cut by thirst, the shortest words for the deepest pain, stage-direction and sound discipline, and how Chekhov revised The Wood Demon into Uncle Vanya. Use when the user wants an ensemble drama, a "nothing happens" play, subtext-heavy dialogue, a family estate / provincial story, an anti-climactic structure, or asks how to "Chekhov-ize" a script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tech debt assessment that identifies, classifies, and prioritizes maintainability problems — helping teams build a refactoring roadmap — drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks about tech debt, refactoring priorities, what to clean up first, or asks "why is this so hard to change?", "what should we fix first?", or "how do I justify refactoring to management?". Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime — "health" in those contexts is infrastructure, not code quality. Also not for single-function refactoring questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Installs, configures, customizes, or troubleshoots the Claude Code statusline (cwd, model, token counts). Use when the user wants to set up or change the statusline, switch minimal vs full layouts, show absolute token counts instead of a percentage, add cost via ccusage, or fix a statusline that is blank, silent, stuck, or stopped updating. Trigger phrases: 状态栏, 状态栏不显示, 状态栏空白, "statusline blank", "statusline broken".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze Claude Code and Claude Desktop Code token usage, cost, quota burn, model mix, cache read/write, and 5-hour block consumption using ccusage evidence. Use when the user asks why Claude quota was exhausted, whether a model such as fable/opus/sonnet is unusually expensive, how many tokens were spent today or historically, or needs a human-friendly explanation of local Claude Code CLI/Desktop usage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spot a bad client before you sign — the warning signs of the projects that turn into unpaid, scope-creeping nightmares, and how to screen, price, or decline them. Use when asked is this client a red flag, should I take this client, screening a difficult client, or how to avoid bad clients. Produces a read on the warning signs present (haggling, vagueness, disrespect, urgency, unrealistic expectations), what each predicts, screening questions to ask before committing, protective terms if you proceed anyway, and how to decline gracefully — so you avoid the clients who cost more than they pay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a realistic plan to change careers — mapping your transferable skills, the real gaps, and a bridge that doesn't require torching your income overnight. Use when asked to help me change careers, career pivot plan, how do I switch to [field], or I want a new career but don't know how. Produces a transferable-skills map, an honest gap analysis to the target role, a staged bridge (skill-building, positioning, side-door entry), a financial-runway reality check, and a narrative that reframes your background as an asset — not a starting-from-zero story.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set a boundary with someone — a friend, family member, coworker, or partner — clearly and kindly, with the actual words and a plan for the pushback. Use when asked how do I set a boundary with, I need to say no to, someone keeps overstepping, or help me set limits with. Produces a read on the boundary you actually need, a warm-but-firm script to state it (without over-explaining or apologizing it away), how to hold it when they push back or guilt-trip, and what to do if they don't respect it — because a boundary you can't state and hold isn't a boundary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。