7,778 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Whole-repo audit for over-engineering. Like ponytail-review, but scans the entire codebase instead of a diff: a ranked list of what to delete, simplify, or replace with stdlib/native equivalents. Use when the user says "audit this codebase", "audit for over-engineering", "what can I delete from this repo", "find bloat", "ponytail-audit", or "/ponytail-audit". One-shot report, does not apply fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a fast, read-only health check across all skills in the library and produce a structured quality report — without modifying anything. Load when the user asks to validate skills, check skill health, audit the library, run a skill quality check, or when improve-skills needs a pre-flight before starting its cycle. Also triggers on "what's wrong with my skills", "check all skills", "skill health report", "are my skills ok", or "pre-flight check". Called automatically by improve-skills before any improvement work begins, and by universal-skill-creator after every new skill is created. Never modifies any file — only reads and reports.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstrap full agent infrastructure for an existing, already-coded project without modifying a single line of source code. Surveys the repo, infers conventions from manifests, README, git history, and source samples, then generates the missing AGENTS.md, docs/architecture.md, docs/product-soul.md, ADR backfill, and seeded docs/memory/ files. Asks the user only about gaps the repo cannot reveal. Load when the user asks to "retroactive project setup", "backfill agent infrastructure", "bootstrap agents for this existing repo", "onboard agents to a legacy codebase", "set up agents without touching code", or "fill in missing agent context for this project".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Install Codex skills into $CODEX_HOME/skills from a curated list or a GitHub repo path. Use when a user asks to list installable skills, install a curated skill, or install a skill from another repo (including private repos).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user requests to generate, create, or write professional research reports including but not limited to market analysis, consumer insights, brand analysis, financial analysis, industry research, competitive intelligence, investment due diligence, or any consulting-grade analytical report. This skill operates in two phases — (1) generating a structured analysis framework with chapter skeleton, data query requirements, and analysis logic, and (2) after data collection by other skills, producing the final consulting-grade report with structured narratives, embedded charts, and strategic insights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct multi-round deep research on any GitHub Repo. Use when users request comprehensive analysis, timeline reconstruction, competitive analysis, or in-depth investigation of GitHub. Produces structured markdown reports with executive summaries, chronological timelines, metrics analysis, and Mermaid diagrams. Triggers on Github repository URL or open source projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ユーザーからのリクエストをタスク分割して Issue 登録・プロジェクト管理・進捗報告。 トリガー例: 「差分からタスク登録して」「計画をIssueにして」「タスク管理」「実行して」「repo-manager」
Researches a question to something usable — a verdict with a flip condition, a versioned playbook or a graded report — every claim tagged by evidence. Trigger on which X should I pick (even from pasted pages), is Y worth it, compare A vs B, go/no-go, research this, deep research, fact-check a doc, write or merge a reference guide or playbook, grade a research report, read a bot-blocking source (Reddit, YouTube, X), or map an unfamiliar repo before contributing (entry points, flows, where to change X); or say researchscribe (verdict, playbook, research, verify, sources, map, refresh). Code review is engineering tooling's; fiction canon is lorescribe's; messages commscribe's; prompt model picks promptwright's; skill niches skillwright's; config rigwright's; brands brandscribe's.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a session's fan-out — splits a large request into tiered, recoverable units, dispatches and reconciles them against the repo. Trigger when work needs many agents or spans many repos or files (rebuild, re-architect, sweep, migrate, 'do all of this'); when subagents would launch with no model or effort set; for the plan table (units, models, tokens, meters) before launch; to resume a unit that died or hit a usage limit; when units would share a repo; or say dispatchwright (plan, dispatch, resume, audit, refresh). Tiers come from its own table (scoutwright flags it stale); pacing, pacewright's; hooks, rigwright's; schedules, agentwright's.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates InMemory repository implementations for PHP 8.5 testing. Creates fake repositories with array storage, supporting CRUD operations and queries without database.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adds comprehensive accessibility testing to CI/CD pipelines using axe-core Playwright integration or pa11y-ci. Automatically generates markdown reports for pull requests showing WCAG violations with severity levels, affected elements, and remediation guidance. This skill should be used when implementing accessibility CI checks, adding a11y tests to pipelines, generating accessibility reports, enforcing WCAG compliance, automating accessibility scans, or setting up PR accessibility gates. Trigger terms include a11y ci, accessibility pipeline, wcag ci, axe-core ci, pa11y ci, accessibility reports, a11y automation, accessibility gate, compliance check.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Power BI report visualization design prompt for creating effective, user-friendly, and accessible reports with optimal chart selection and layout design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates structured bug reports for defects found during Oracle-to-PostgreSQL migration. Use when documenting behavioral differences between Oracle and PostgreSQL as actionable bug reports with severity, root cause, and remediation steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clone/create/fork repos; manage remotes, releases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract and catalog attack patterns from cyber threat intelligence reports into a structured STIX-based library mapped to MITRE ATT&CK for detection engineering and threat-informed defense.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Uses the Linux Audit framework (auditd) with ausearch and aureport utilities to detect intrusion attempts, unauthorized access, privilege escalation, and suspicious system activity. Covers audit rule configuration, log querying, timeline reconstruction, and integration with SIEM platforms. Activates for requests involving auditd analysis, Linux audit log investigation, ausearch queries, aureport summaries, or host-based intrusion detection on Linux.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically categorizes test failures, suggests responsible owners, and provides common fix checklists. Generates actionable test reports with failure analysis. Use for "test reporting", "failure triage", "test analysis", or "test automation".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Finding validation before writing any report — 7-Question Gate (all 7 questions), 4 pre-submission gates, always-rejected list, conditionally valid with chain table, CVSS 3.1 quick reference, severity decision guide, report title formula, 60-second pre-submit checklist. Use BEFORE writing any report. One wrong answer = kill the finding and move on. Saves N/A ratio.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage ASM/recon output for ownership before testing — separate the target's real assets from namespace-collision noise. Automated recon keyword-matches on the brand name, so for any target whose name is a common/dictionary word, the output is dominated by assets belonging to UNRELATED same-named companies (repos, cloud buckets, mobile apps, breach corpora, typosquats). Built from an authorized engagement where an ASM report's 'Criticals' were overwhelmingly false positives and the combo/repos/mobile/bucket lists were polluted with unrelated same-named orgs. Use at the START of any engagement, immediately on receiving any ASM/recon/OSINT dataset, BEFORE testing anything.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error ...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OpenClaw全体の品質検証を継続し、不具合の再現から根本原因の修正、レビュー、反映確認まで進めます。実環境や負荷の検証結果を、再開可能な報告書に記録します。
GitHubのローカル保存データからIssueやPR、重複候補を調べ、同期状況や情報の不足を確認しながら、判断前に最新の状態を照合するスキル。
共有のレビュー手順と補助スクリプトを使い、対象リポジトリ固有の要件も踏まえてコードを確認するスキル。OpenClawの共通インストールを参照します。
Notionのローカル保存データを検索し、ページやデータベースの一覧・件数・同期状況を確認して、必要に応じてMarkdownを書き出すスキル。