1,005 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Build competitive intelligence briefs following the CI cycle — Plan, Collect, Analyze, Disseminate. Profile competitors, create feature comparison matrices, analyze pricing, build positioning maps, and identify win/loss patterns. Use when preparing for product launches, sales enablement, or strategic reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DeFi attack pattern playbook. Use when analyzing flash loan attacks, price oracle manipulation, MEV sandwich attacks, governance exploits, bridge vulnerabilities, and token standard edge cases in decentralized finance protocols.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Business logic vulnerability playbook. Use when reasoning about workflows, race conditions, price manipulation, coupon abuse, state machines, and multi-step authorization gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Business logic flaws are application vulnerabilities where valid functions are abused in unintended ways: price manipulation via hidden field tampering, workflow step-skipping, function call limit bypass (coupon reuse), process timing exploitation (race conditions on balance updates), and request forging via guessable/predictable parameters. Detect using Burp Suite proxy interception, HTTP POST/GET parameter analysis, and misuse-case testing against multi-step workflows. Tools: Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate a logged-in Miaoshou ERP workflow for TikTok Shop Malaysia product discovery, product screening, profit estimation, listing preparation, and reviewed publishing. Use when the user asks to search or select products in 妙手 ERP, evaluate low-price traffic products, prepare Malaysian TikTok Shop listings, move products into the TikTok collection box, or publish approved listings. Prefer browser operation through the user's existing login; never store credentials or call undocumented private endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Re-read pinned on-chain facts and watch documentary source fingerprints behind failure scenarios monthly, reporting drift without approving or changing scenario records automatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate a Pharos stablecoin addition or pre-launch promotion by enforcing pre-edit runtime admission, routing specialist research and authorized edits, and owning the integrated generation/check handoff.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research stablecoin reserve composition, review provenance, custody evidence, dependency edges, and backing-pillar slices; populate the owning reserves sidecar only when explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for a whole-corpus, read-only audit of tracked stablecoin static metadata and domain sidecars, especially after catalog changes or when factual or internal-consistency drift needs review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and repair Pharos documentation against the codebase. Use for documentation update passes, verified-doc drift, source-path/doc-sync failures, methodology/doc routing updates, or requests to verify docs without trusting existing prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refresh tracked pre-launch stablecoin milestones, dates, launch phases, featured content, and promotion evidence. Use for the recurring upcoming-assets review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when adding, reviewing, or repairing Pharos Worker cron schedules, slot dispatch, leases, or runtime experiments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drain the Pharos Yield Intelligence coverage-audit queue into reviewed source coverage, documented intentional gaps, or watchlisted deferrals. Use monthly after `yield-coverage-audit` runs, after yield coverage drops, or when promoting queue candidates such as `native-exact-pool`, `lending-allowlist`, `source-family-adapter`, or `stale-auto-lending-override`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write or refresh evidence-grounded editorial summaries for stablecoin detail pages, including draining the AI-summary candidate queue after scoring changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify CoinGecko identity, discover missing stablecoin chain coverage, or populate independently verified deployments only when requested. Use for `geckoId` audits and `contracts[]` work in the Pharos stablecoin registry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when curating, refreshing, expiring, calibrating, or equivalence-testing evidence and publication inputs for the active Safety Score model. Not for unrelated scoring models or copy-only changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare logical commits, publish through Pharos’s protected-main pull-request gate, monitor deployment, and hand off operational acceptance. Use only when commit, push, publish, release, or deployment watching is requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix failed Pharos GitHub Actions, adaptive PR checks, Cloudflare deploys, Pages releases, or scheduled automation. Use when a gate/run failed or the user asks to retrigger and iterate until clear.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft a short, prioritized questionnaire for a collaborating stablecoin team when public evidence cannot resolve important Pharos data or confidence gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Update Pharos funding donations by reconciling inbound transfers, rejecting wallet self-activity and spam, pricing receipt-time value, and appending user-approved rows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the retained annotation candidate queue and curate per-coin editorial history. Use weekly during active event periods, monthly otherwise, or on queue-health warnings; this does not restore the retired live chart overlay.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a weekly changelog entry from git history, filtering operational noise and producing editorial summary, field notes, statistics, and a bounded commit manifest. Stops for review unless commit was explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Curate evidence-backed collateralQuality and whole-book custodyModel labels. Use when adding a stablecoin or auditing Selector custody eligibility and DDR depeg-duration verdicts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drain the Pharos Dependency Map coverage-audit queues into evidence-refreshed edges, reviewed target dispositions, or documented deferrals. Use monthly after weekly production dependency audits, after dependency coverage drops, or when reviewing adapter gaps, material unlinked slices, symbol leads, duplicate/split groups, or unverifiable published edges.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。