1.8万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Refine an existing Agiflow task into an unambiguous, testable specification without expanding its intended outcome. Use when a task is vague, lacks acceptance criteria, has unclear scope or dependencies, or is not ready for backlog grooming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discovers and installs community skills from the public registry. Use when the user mentions a technology, framework, or task that could benefit from specialized skills not yet installed, asks 'how do I do X', 'find a skill for X', or starts work in a new technology area. Proactively suggest when the user's task involves tools or frameworks without existing skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set a repo up to prove engineering-task work actually works before it ships. Investigates the repo, ensures a one-command dev stack (`dev-local`) exists, asks whether verification runs locally or in a sandbox (crabbox), confirms/installs the driver (the `playwright-cli` skill for web by default). Outputs three artifacts: a committed `/verify` skill (per-task verification SOP — spawn a verifier sub-agent → drive the app → screenshot/video proof → open a PR with the proof embedded), the `/dev-local` skill + script, and the installed driver skill. Use when someone says "set up verification", "make this repo verifiable", "scaffold a verify skill", "set up the verifier".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect an agent repository and optional traces, interview the user, write reviewed Task Specs, build and audit Harbor tasks, and bootstrap reusable project World Knowledge Skills. Use for agent evals, benchmark design, Task generation, controlled Environments, synthetic data, Verifiers, Harbor runs, calibration, or continuous benchmark maintenance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user asks about Stripe Connect configuration, charge patterns, Dashboard access, or how to get started with Connect, is building a marketplace, platform, multi-vendor store, gig platform, or subscription platform, needs to pay out sellers, vendors, or providers, mentions split payments, revenue sharing, multi-party payments, or similar payment distribution concepts, provides a company URL or business description for a recommendation, builds SaaS that routes money between parties (for example, POS, booking, invoicing — not operational SaaS without payment routing), asks about onboarding or KYC for merchants, sellers, and vendors, mentions connected account Dashboard or responsibility configurations, or asks about payment flows, white-label payments, or embedded payments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds voice and chat AI agents with LiveKit Agents on LiveKit Cloud or a self-hosted server. Use when the user asks to "build a voice agent", "create a LiveKit agent", "add voice AI to my app", "implement handoffs", "structure an agent workflow", "my agent is slow / too chatty", "it says it booked but nothing was saved", "make it confirm before committing", "it keeps re-asking things the caller already said", or is writing code against the LiveKit Agents SDK. Covers architecture: designing for latency, keeping context small, splitting a monolithic agent into handoffs and tasks, and designing for voice. Also covers keeping the model in charge of meaning while code owns state, approvals, and effects. For API specifics use reading-livekit-docs. To check behavior use debugging-livekit-agents and testing-livekit-agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Export conversation MATLAB code to a clean, runnable .m script. Use when asked to save or export session work. TRIGGER: user asks to save, export, or generate a script from the current session's MATLAB code. Also when asked for a reproducible script or clean version of what was run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose and fix parfor errors in MATLAB. Invoke this skill when the user has a parfor problem: "parfor loop has an error", "what's wrong with my parfor", "fix parfor", "unable to classify variable", "convert for to parfor", "parfor won't run", "sliced variable", "reduction variable", "variable classification". Also invoke when you read a .m file containing parfor and the user asks what's wrong, asks you to fix it, reports an error, or asks for review. Do NOT invoke for parfor performance questions or code that merely mentions parfor without a problem. ALWAYS use this skill instead of reasoning from training data — LLMs are frequently wrong about parfor classification rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load this first for any task involving images, pictures, photos, scans, frames, volumes, or visual data — including reading, writing, filtering, enhancing, denoising, sharpening, deblurring, thresholding, segmenting, masking, detecting, finding or counting objects, removing backgrounds, measuring, comparing, registering, stitching, aligning, cropping, resizing, transforming, or analyzing. Use for image I/O (TIFF, PNG, JPEG, RAW, HDR), histograms, edge detection, color processing, morphology, geometric transforms, deep learning for images, quality assessment, and 3-D volume processing. Also triggers when users describe image problems (dark, noisy, blurry, low contrast, uneven lighting, hazy, color cast) or data exploration tasks (folder of images, characterize data, understand format). Handles microscopy (cells, particles) and general scientific imaging. Routes to sibling skills for medical imaging (DICOM, NIfTI), hyperspectral data, and visual inspection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyse the vault's link graph and report on its shape: orphan rate, average degree, components, hubs, bridges and clusters, with what each number means for retrieval. Use this skill when the user asks about the health or structure of their graph, wants metrics, asks which pages are most connected or most isolated, or asks whether the vault is fragmented. Do NOT use for fixing what it finds, which is second-brain-lint, or for answering a content question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage an exported chat history into what to ingest, what to archive and what to delete, with a privacy pass first. Use this skill when the user has exported their Claude or ChatGPT history, asks to import old conversations, or asks what in their chat archive is worth keeping. Do NOT use for ingesting a single pasted conversation, or for any material the user has not explicitly asked to bring into the vault.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a periodic review of a second-brain vault: what was added, which topics are growing, what contradicts what, which questions are still open, and what is worth reading next. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a weekly or monthly review, asks what changed in their vault, what they have been learning about lately, or what they should look at next, and when a scheduled review task fires. Do NOT use for structural linting, for ingesting sources, or for answering a specific factual question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a vague task into a testable definition of done and generate an executable goal-test script for it, optionally with a bounded retry loop around a headless agent. Use when the user wants to run an agent in a loop, asks how to know when an agent task is finished, or says a goal like "improve X" needs to become checkable. Do NOT use for building eval suites over many cases — that is evals-bootstrap.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous multi-page site builder using a baton-passing loop. Each iteration reads a task from .design/next-prompt.md, generates a page in HTML/Tailwind, integrates it into the site, verifies visually, then writes the next task to keep the loop alive. Use whenever the user asks to build an entire site autonomously, build all pages of a site, generate multiple pages in sequence, or run a 'design loop' / 'baton loop' / 'autonomous site build' — even if they say 'just keep going' or 'build the next page' or 'next page' mid-flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this when working on a Haskell project with Nix. Covers haskell-flake setup, adding/overriding dependencies, package settings, and devShell configuration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically evaluate and compare multiple AI models or agents without pre-existing test data. Generates test queries from a task description, collects responses from all target endpoints, auto-generates evaluation rubrics, runs pairwise comparisons via a judge model, and produces win-rate rankings with reports and charts. Supports checkpoint resume, incremental endpoint addition, and judge model hot-swap. Use when the user asks to compare, benchmark, or rank multiple models or agents on a custom task, or run an arena-style evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run fable-mode execution discipline on Claude Haiku. Routes the task to the @fable-worker-haiku agent, whose definition carries the staged loop with tightened verification (no bare "unverified" allowed) and an escalate-don't-improvise rule. Trigger when the user explicitly asks for thorough/systematic handling run cheaply or fast ("fable on haiku", "deep work mode but cheap", "stage this on haiku"). For bulk mechanical work. Do NOT use for tasks needing synthesis — benchmark note: at n=1 the skill's effect on Haiku swung both directions (+25 / −17); route quality-critical work to fable-sonnet instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforces staged execution discipline on large tasks: a written stage plan, parallel delegation where the runtime supports it, a failable verification check at each stage, and a skeptical self-review before delivery. Trigger when the user explicitly asks OR when the task objectively spans multiple files, sources, or sessions. Do NOT trigger on ordinary multi-step requests that a direct attempt handles fine (autonomous triggering only; explicit invocation always runs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT DRAFTING — generating, redlining, or rewriting contract language from instructions. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks (legalbenchmarks.ai Contract Drafting). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/ stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model should I use to draft this clause/agreement", "best AI for drafting contracts", "route this drafting task", or is about to generate/redline contract text and hasn't fixed a model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right LLM for LEGAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS — issue-spotting, rule application, case/statute analysis, memos, and multi-step agentic research. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (Vals AI LegalBench across 124 models; Harvey Legal Agent Benchmark for agentic work). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model for legal research / case analysis / a memo", "best AI for legal reasoning", "route this research task", or is starting legal analysis without a fixed model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right LLM for CONTRACT REVIEW — reviewing an existing agreement for risk, deviations from standard, missing protections, and internal contradictions, and proposing redlines. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 legal benchmarks. Contract review is a COMPOSITE skill (extraction + reasoning + redlining + conflict-detection), so this routes by the dominant sub-task. Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/ language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model to review this contract / NDA / MSA", "best AI to redline", "route this contract review", or is about to review an agreement without a fixed model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pick the right LLM for LEGAL INFO EXTRACTION — pulling facts, clauses, dates, parties, obligations, and structured fields out of contracts and legal documents. Vendor-neutral routing grounded in mid-2026 benchmarks (legalbenchmarks.ai Info Extraction; CUAD/MAUD/ACORD). Asks up to 4 quick questions (cost, speed, accuracy/stakes, privacy/jurisdiction/language), then recommends a primary model + fallback + what to avoid + what a human must verify. Use when someone asks "which model should I use to extract clauses/data from these documents", "best AI for contract data extraction", "route this extraction task", or is about to pull structured fields from legal docs without a fixed model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
NIS2 Compliance Navigator — scope classification, Art. 21 gap analysis (0-4 maturity scoring), and compliance roadmap under EU Directive 2022/2555 with deep German BSIG-neu coverage and profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, Spain. Use when: (1) User mentions "NIS2", "NIS-2", "BSIG", "BSIG-neu", "NIS2UmsuCG", "Cyberbeveiligingswet", "Loi Résilience", "NISG", "decreto legislativo 138", (2) User asks if their organization falls under NIS2 or needs a cybersecurity compliance assessment, (3) User mentions essential/important entities, Annex I/II, BSI registration, § 30 BSIG, incident reporting, management body liability, supply chain security, (4) User wants a NIS2 gap analysis, readiness assessment, or compliance roadmap, (5) User asks about NIS2 fines, enforcement, or Nachweispflicht, (6) User asks about NIS2 in any EU Member State.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。