「firm」の検索結果

Run verification commands and confirm output before claiming success

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep cross-domain synthesis engine for the vault. Triggers on "synthesize X", "what do I know about X", "connect ideas about X", "cross-domain analysis of X", "map everything in the vault about X". Searches comprehensively, surfaces non-obvious patterns and tensions, then challenges the user to generate original thought. The vault should surprise you — if synthesis only confirms what you already think, it failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-implementation self-review. Use AFTER finishing ANY code implementation or change — before declaring it done, committing, or opening a PR — to critique your own work: re-read the diff adversarially, confirm unit tests cover every branch/edge, kill duplication, follow clean-code/SOLID and the repo's own docs & invariants, decide if something should become documentation, update/prune memory, and strip outdated comments. Trigger it whenever you've just written or modified code and are about to wrap up, even if the user didn't explicitly ask for a review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read a CONTINUE_HERE.md continuation file at session start and resume from where the prior session left off. Covers detecting the file, assessing freshness, parsing the structured handoff, confirming the resumption plan with the user, and cleaning up after consumption. Optionally configures a SessionStart hook and CLAUDE.md instruction for automatic pickup. Use at the start of a session when a continuation file exists, when bootstrapping after an interrupted session, or when setting up automatic continuation detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Close out a finished memex milestone slice by writing the handoff trail: update `docs/CONTINUE_HERE.md` §1 current-state and §3 next-slice, tick the `docs/ROADMAP.md` scoreboard (milestone header ✅ + version, `- [x]` items), confirm any new observation is logged (deferring to memex-observe), and propose the git tag plus a `MN Slice X:` commit subject. Use after you finish a milestone slice in the memex repo and before you commit/tag it, when handing the next slice to a fresh session, or whenever CONTINUE_HERE and ROADMAP have drifted behind what actually shipped.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Log a bias-log / vipassana observation to the memex store the moment a reasoning pattern surfaces, mid-session or at close. Use when you catch a bias in your own reasoning (anchoring, confirmation, trust-the-summary), when a pace tell or verification gap appears, or when meditate/observe produces a reflection worth persisting across sessions. Primary path pipes the body to `memex add` over stdin (`--title` required) then runs the `meditate-vipassana` extractor to make it queryable; secondary path appends a numbered bullet to `docs/OBSERVATIONS.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply GitHub repository security protections tier by tier — rulesets, read-only Actions token, secret scanning + push protection, Dependabot, and (gated) required status checks / required PR with a GitHub App bypass for a CI auto-commit bot. Mutating and confirmation-gated: always assess first, apply the no-regret baseline, then decide required checks separately. Use when hardening a public user-owned repo after an audit, when a repo has no branch protection, when adding required checks without breaking a bot that pushes to the default branch, or when provisioning a GitHub App bypass actor for trusted automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Field identification of fungi using morphological features, spore prints, habitat analysis, and seasonal context with a safety-first approach. Covers cap, gill, stem, and spore characteristics, look-alike differentiation, toxicity risk assessment, and the critical rule of absolute certainty before consumption. Use when encountering an unknown fungus, foraging for edible mushrooms and needing to confirm species before consumption, assessing whether fungi in a garden or property are harmful, or differentiating an edible species from a dangerous look-alike.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trademark filing procedures covering EUIPO (EU), USPTO (US), and WIPO Madrid Protocol (international). Walks through pre-filing conflict checks, Nice classification, descriptiveness assessment, mark type decisions, filing basis strategy, office-specific e-filing procedures, Madrid Protocol extension, post- filing monitoring, and open-source trademark policy drafting. Use after running screen-trademark to confirm the mark is clear, when ready to secure trademark rights in one or more jurisdictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture outbound HTTP and telemetry from a CLI harness at runtime. Covers capture-channel selection (transcript file vs verbose-fetch stderr vs outbound proxy vs on-disk state), hook-driven per-event capture vs long-running session capture, JSONL output format for diff-friendly artifacts, and the observability table that maps each target to the cheapest channel that captures it. Use when a static finding needs runtime confirmation, when a payload shape is needed for a client re-implementation, or when dark-vs-live disambiguation requires watching what the binary actually sends.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add Rcpp or RcppArmadillo integration to an R package for high-performance C++ code. Covers setup, writing C++ functions, RcppExports generation, testing compiled code, and debugging. Use when an R function is too slow and profiling confirms a bottleneck, when you need to interface with existing C/C++ libraries, or when implementing algorithms (loops, recursion, linear algebra) that benefit from compiled code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn words with two readings into one confirmed ask. Use when the user's words admit two readings that would build different things.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide the technical path once the ask is clear. Use when the WHAT is confirmed but more than one way to build it remains — architecture, technology, design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Meta-agent supervisor that manages a fleet of Claude Code agents running in tmux windows. Auto-discovers spare worktrees, spawns agents, monitors state, kicks idle agents, approves safe confirmations, and recycles worktrees when done. TRIGGER when user asks to supervise agents, run parallel tasks, manage worktrees, check agent status, or orchestrate parallel work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing no_std Cortex-M or RISC-V firmware in Rust with cortex-m-rt, probe-rs, defmt, RTIC, or a panic handler. Not for no_std library constraints: use rust-no-std.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing a custom bootloader, jumping to application code, relocating VTOR, or implementing DFU/USB firmware update on Cortex-M. Not for reset-to-main: use baremetal-startup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cut a versioned LoreWeave release — draft the CHANGELOG.md entry from what shipped since the last tag, confirm the SemVer bump and pre-release/release decision with the user, then tag and push to trigger the automated build + GitHub Release. Use when the user says "cut a release", "publish v...", "ship v0.1.0", "make a release", or asks what's changed since the last version.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec-driven development workflow. Interactive phase-by-phase confirmation from proposal to implementation. Trigger: 'spec-flow', 'spec mode', 'need a plan', 'structured development', 'write a spec', 'feature spec', 'technical spec', '需求文档', '技术方案', '任务拆解', '规格驱动', '写个方案', '做个规划', '结构化开发', 'plan this feature', 'break this down', 'design doc'. Creates .spec-flow/ directory with proposal, requirements, design, and tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map a confirmed platform-neutral website Design System to a local Elementor Site Settings and Widget inheritance contract. Use for a new or rebuilt Elementor site that needs Global Style setup guidance, or an existing site that must preserve its current visual system. Do not redesign the site, implement Widgets, or modify WordPress, Elementor, themes, or remote data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research 3–5 confirmed same-industry or cross-industry websites and translate their brand narrative, page architecture, art direction, and visual-system evidence into one reusable Visual Reference Brief. Use when strong references are scarce, a site needs brand-led or premium positioning, a page lacks a narrative spine, or a key module lacks a credible design precedent. Do not create page content, a Design System, UI directions, HTML, or a permanent brand gallery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and visually validate implementation-agnostic website pages or modules from an approved Design System and confirmed content. Use for Module Design Solutions, Page UI Architecture Maps, media, evidence, page motion budgets, section motion intent, visual-direction images, and direction review before HTML. Do not use to write or review HTML/CSS/JS, run browser implementation QA, plan platform fields, or implement CMS components.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactively gather parameters for `python -m cli.inference.throughput_optimizer`, generate a deployment simulation command, explain assumptions, ask for execution confirmation, then run the simulation and summarize the best parallel strategy. Use when the user wants to evaluate a model on one or more hardware profiles, compare hardware targets, compare aggregation versus disaggregation versus PD ratio optimization, choose TP/EP/MOE-DP search ranges, or obtain recommended concurrency, throughput, TTFT, and TPOT results from throughput modeling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interactively gather parameters for `python -m cli.inference.text_generate`, generate a concrete text generation simulation command, explain assumptions, ask for execution confirmation, then run the command and summarize performance metrics. Use when the user wants to validate a specific model, hardware profile, batch/query size, prefill or decode scenario, TP/DP/EP/MOE parallel strategy, profiling database, chrome trace, empirical metrics export, or a best row produced by throughput_optimizer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。