「findings」の検索結果

Structured, risk-aware code review of a GitHub pull request using the gh CLI, with diff triage, unresolved-thread suppression, and severity-grouped findings ending in an approve/request-changes verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an infrastructure-first security audit of a repository - secrets archaeology, dependency supply chain, CI/CD pipeline, LLM/AI attack surface, agent skill supply chain, OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat model, and data classification - with a confidence gate and a pre-emit verification gate that suppress speculative findings. Use when asked for a security audit, threat model, pentest-style review, OWASP pass, or a pre-release security check. Not for reviewing a single diff - use review-changes or requesting-code-review for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write what the work found into the project's knowledge record, so the next session inherits it instead of re-deriving it. Use the moment something worth keeping exists: a fact taken from a source, a rule worked out, a decision or conclusion, a measurement, a correction to a recorded value, or a question left open - and check for unrecorded findings before implementation, handoff (including a PR), or finishing work. Record within the user's write authorization. The first write creates GROUNDING.yaml. Covers one-report update, add, set, review, same and distinct, judgments with a falsifier, and background capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only reviewer for agent-flow. Judges one diff against the acceptance criteria, AGENTS.md rules, protected paths and risk boundaries; returns a JSON verdict with line-anchored findings. Use when launched with AGENT_FLOW_ROLE=reviewer or asked for an agent-flow review of a diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn research, analysis, or any markdown the agent just produced into a live, beautifully designed web report with a shareable tracked URL via ReportRoom. Use when the user says "publish this", "make this shareable", "turn this into a report", "put this on a page", or wants findings to live beyond the chat. Not for recurring client deliverables (use client-reporter), slide decks (use deck-publisher), or proposals that need view alerts (use proposal-tracker).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks for a multi-agent .NET code review - five parallel reviewers (correctness, performance, security/observability, data/messaging/integration, generalist) plus an adversarial maintainer that refutes weak findings. Requires the review agent roles registered by scripts/install-codex.sh. Keywords: dotnet review pipeline, multi-agent review, parallel reviewers, maintainer pushback, review this branch, cynical review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review gate for correctness, reuse, and simplification. Produces a structured verdict with actionable findings. Trigger on any PR before merge, or on any agent-generated code before it is committed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only SRE checkup of any GCP project: deterministic probes of the edge, Cloud Run services, 7-day error logs, Cloud Scheduler, alert policies and uptime checks, Secret Manager and IAM, the data stores and the machine's own scheduled jobs, audited into one fixed status table (LIVE / WARNING / RED / INCONCLUSIVE) with evidence, findings by severity, what could not be checked, and a single OVERALL line delivered as one notification. Parametrised by a per-project manifest, so the same routine runs on every project. Use when the operator says "cloud checkup", "SRE check", "is everything live", "what's healthy / warning / red", "any errors this week", "audit the infra", "weekly checkup", "set up the weekly checkup", before a deploy or demo, or after an incident. Cloud Run first; App Engine and GKE differ only in the serving probes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a two-agent independent review/redteam followed by peer collaboration to produce a consensus superset of findings and enumerated revision requests. Use when Codex 5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 should first critique a matter independently, then exchange work, synthesize the best combined analysis, and finish with a single agreed revision list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combine independent work from two or more selected agents into one decision-ready research report, design, or proposal. Preserve useful complementary findings, develop stronger combined options, and present material alternatives only when they exist. Use when multiple perspectives should improve the product without forcing consensus or staging disagreement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load this skill whenever you are filing, reviewing, or generating accessibility bug reports — whether from automated tool output, manual testing, user reports, or testing with disabled people. The purpose of this skill is to make accessibility findings easier to report accurately, connect them to real people and tasks, and let developers reproduce, understand, and fix them without unnecessary back-and-forth. Absolutely always describe the barrier and its task impact before citing a WCAG criterion. Under no circumstances guess a disability diagnosis, treat automated tool output as a conformance conclusion, or expose secrets/personal data in a report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Research] Use when you need to synthesize research findings into structured report using template.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a Mixture of Experts (MoE) audit on any topic, plan, codebase, evidence archive, or process. Dynamically spawns specialized subagents with different critical lenses to cross-reference findings and detect flaws, overlap, retention issues, or drift. Use when designing architectures, analyzing complex code, verifying multi-step plans, classifying evidence artifacts, or looking for duplicated intent in a repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a question against high-trust primary sources and capture the findings as a Markdown file in the repo. Use when the user wants a topic researched, docs or API facts gathered, or reading legwork delegated to a background agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to evidence IDs and locators; review extraction candidates; migrate v0.2 PaperRecord JSON; validate or verify a v0.3 PaperPackage; generate research extensions; export reviewable JSON or Markdown; or safely update a compatible 13-field literature workbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aggregate findings and generate multi-format pentest reports with remediation roadmap and risk scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retest remediated findings, detect regressions, and generate remediation status and certification artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-generate a professional, client-ready GEO service proposal from audit data. Creates a full proposal in markdown and PDF including executive summary, findings, recommended service packages (Basic/Standard/Premium), pricing, timeline, and terms. Use when user says "proposal", "proposta", "offerta", "preventivo", "generate proposal", or after completing a GEO audit for a prospect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a professional, client-facing GEO report combining all audit results into a single deliverable with scores, findings, and prioritized actions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a professional PDF report from a GEO audit using pandoc plus a Chrome/Chromium-compatible headless browser. Converts GEO-AUDIT-REPORT.md into a styled, client-ready PDF with a cover page, color-coded score tables, severity-tagged findings, and a 90-day roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。