1,234 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use for every coding task. Enforce strict TDD workflow: activate Serena, investigate first, clarify+confirm requirements, write per-task REQUIREMENTS.md in .requirements/<datetime>_<feature_name>/, verify APIs via web search, then implement in tiny test-verified steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever the user mentions Betaflight, FPV drone firmware, flight-controller config, PID/filter/rates tuning, or blackbox log analysis — or shares a Betaflight artifact: a CLI diff/dump (lines like 'diff all', 'set ', 'feature ', 'resource ') or a .bbl/.bfl blackbox log, even when not named as such — or runs a chirp tuning session via Sweep Studio / FPVLogForge (a chirp log ID to analyse, 'analyse log', 'résultat chirp', iterative Bode/step/Ms tuning). Covers flight symptoms (oscillations, wobble, propwash, jello, hot motors, drift), motor/ESC and RX/ELRS/CRSF setup, builds from 3" to 10" (cinewhoop, tinywhoop, longrange, X-class), version migrations (4.4 → 4.5 → 4.6), and configuring a new drone from scratch (setup wizard). Trigger even when phrased casually ("mon drone wobble", "PID help", "config FC") — under-triggering is worse than over-triggering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when generating changesets in the pythinker-code repository — deciding whether to write one, which package to list, the bump level, the wording, and the confirmation workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide technology stack for accounting firms. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with accounting-tech-stack related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan advisory services for accounting firms. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with advisory-services-plan related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Three-phase code review. Investigates internally, verifies findings, then reports only confirmed issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a local skill with the terum-skills CLI — hygiene, trigger evals and execution cases against a baseline, billed to the user's own Claude Code — after confirming the cost, and show the result as a Markdown board. Use when the user asks to eval, test, score or benchmark a skill, or to see whether an edit made it better.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Intake for an autonomous research run (Arbor). Use when the user wants to optimize a metric in a repo over many isolated experiments — 'optimize this benchmark', 'improve the model F1 overnight', 'beat the leaderboard'. Discovers the repo/eval/splits, measures the baseline, confirms a Research Contract, then emits a ready-to-send /auto-research command. Does NOT start the run itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a viable business model for a one-person company using Lean Canvas and a simplified Business Model Canvas. Use when Codex needs to explain the business-model concepts when needed, verify niche and value-proposition prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple model choices, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and position a viable niche market for a one-person company by combining market mapping and customer segmentation. Use when Codex needs to explain niche concepts when needed, check founder-resource prerequisites, ask one question at a time, generate multiple niche options, and write user-confirmed positioning outputs into `opc-doc/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design value propositions for candidate customer segments and help the user choose the strongest one. Use when Codex needs to explain jobs, pains, and gains when needed, check niche-positioning prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple value-proposition options, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review the operating health of a one-person company using lightweight metrics, bottleneck analysis, and stop-loss logic. Use when Codex needs to explain review concepts when needed, verify available outputs, ask one question at a time, present multiple bottleneck hypotheses, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a conversion loop for a one-person company from reach to lead capture to purchase. Use when Codex needs to explain conversion concepts when needed, verify MVP prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple conversion-path options, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn repeatable outputs of a one-person company into compounding assets. Use when Codex needs to explain asset-compounding concepts when needed, verify prerequisite outputs, ask one question at a time, present multiple assetization priorities, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define the smallest viable experiment and MVP for a selected one-person company opportunity. Use when Codex needs to explain what MVP means when needed, verify prerequisites, ask one question at a time, present multiple MVP options, and write user-confirmed outputs into `opc-doc/`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a feature or code change made by Claude is complete and the developer wants to confirm they actually understood it before shipping. Triggers on "handoff", "quiz me", "comprehension check", "did I understand this", "verify I read the code", "test my understanding", or after finishing a feature when the developer wants to take ownership of AI-written code. Also triggers on requests for an interactive or clickable quiz ("interactive mode", "let me answer with the mouse", "mode interactif", "je réponds à la souris"). Quizzes the developer on WHERE the logic lives (file/function) and WHY decisions were made (trade-offs, behavior, debugging), with the number of questions scaled to the size of the change. Multiple-choice questions are clickable by default (asked through `AskUserQuestion`) and fall back to typed answers. Points to file:line on wrong answers, allows one retry, then reveals the answer, and ends with a score plus the weak areas to re-read. Conducts the quiz in the developer's language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive fix verification methodology to ensure bugs are truly fixed. Use after implementing any bug fix to verify it works and hasn't caused regressions. Keywords: verify, confirm, test, validate, check, ensure, regression, fixed
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing human approval gates for high-stakes agent actions. Keywords: human-in-the-loop, HITL, approval gate, checkpoint, confirmation, risk-tiered, action review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design agent system prompts with explicit behavior rules and cognitive control. This skill should be used when users need to define agent instructions, create intent-to-tool mappings, establish confirmation policies, or prevent hallucinated actions in AI agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create/update .agent/constitution.md. Use when commands/boundaries/constraints must be confirmed before baseline or code changes. Draft v0 from repo evidence, then interview user.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write rigorous, conversion-focused marketing copy for landing pages and emails. Enforces brief confirmation and strict no-fabrication rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
X/Twitter browser operations. Use for X browsing, analysis, bookmark management, content and profile operations, or browser-driven troubleshooting. Require explicit confirmation for outbound posts, DMs, engagement, follows, blocks, mutes, and list edits. Out of scope: keyword/hashtag research of public posts traced to primary sources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。