3,394 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Comprehensive toolkit for writing high-quality computer science research papers (conference, journal, thesis). Provides narrative construction guidance, sentence-level clarity principles (Gopen & Swan), academic phrasebank, CS-specific conventions, and section-by-section quality checklists. Use when assisting with academic paper writing, revision, or structure planning across all stages from drafting to submission.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[61] VALIDATE. Comprehensive code quality check combining ESLint, TypeScript compilation, and unused code detection. Runs full lint suite with detailed error reporting and fix suggestions. Use before commits, after major changes, or when ensuring code quality standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write-time code quality enforcement using Plankton — auto-formatting, linting, and Claude-powered fixes on every file edit via hooks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run technical quality checks across accessibility, performance, theming, responsive design, and anti-patterns. Generates a scored report with P0-P3 severity ratings and actionable plan. Use when the user wants an accessibility check, performance audit, or technical quality review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Download YouTube videos with customizable quality and format options. Use this skill when the user asks to download, save, or grab YouTube videos. Supports various quality settings (best, 1080p, 720p, 480p, 360p), multiple formats (mp4, webm, mkv), and audio-only downloads as MP3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google-grade software engineering culture encompassing Code Readability, Design Doc Review, Blameless Postmortem, Testing Philosophy, Code Review standards, and engineering excellence practices distilled from Google's internal engineering culture documented in "Software Engineering at Google" and real Google/Brain/DeepMind experience. USE WHEN: establishing engineering standards, reviewing code quality, designing development workflows, onboarding engineers, setting code review guidelines, adopting Google-level engineering excellence, or building an engineering culture that promotes maintainability, readability, and quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and run multi-agent content production teams on OpenClaw with single-repo architecture, symlink-based file sharing, role-specialized AGENTS.md, and automated review-fix-score loops. Use when: (1) Setting up a team of 3+ agents with writer/reviewer/scorer/fixer roles for content creation, (2) Creating a quality-controlled publishing pipeline, (3) Bootstrapping agent workspaces with symlinks and tool configs from scratch, (4) Running multi-round review→fix→score cycles until a quality threshold is met, (5) Debugging agent spawn permissions, tool-call loops, or symlink issues. Based on real production experience building a 6-agent content team (2026-03-30).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-dimensional Quality Acceptance and Problem Convergence Engine - Deeply deconstruct requirements, eliminate extreme defects, define absolutely objective acceptance and failure criteria.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test and assure quality — test plan, QA, coverage, unit test, integration test, end-to-end, performance, benchmark, regression. Applies TDD and FIRST principles for the CTO office's tester.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up eval-based QA for Python LLM applications: instrument the app, build golden datasets, write and run eval tests, and iterate on failures. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user asks to set up QA, add tests, add evals, evaluate, benchmark, fix wrong behaviors, improve quality, or do quality assurance for any Python project that calls an LLM model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Test Planning and Quality Assurance prompt that generates comprehensive test strategies, task breakdowns, and quality validation plans for GitHub projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Patterns and techniques for evaluating and improving AI agent outputs. Use this skill when: - Implementing self-critique and reflection loops - Building evaluator-optimizer pipelines for quality-critical generation - Creating test-driven code refinement workflows - Designing rubric-based or LLM-as-judge evaluation systems - Adding iterative improvement to agent outputs (code, reports, analysis) - Measuring and improving agent response quality
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master AI-powered test automation with modern frameworks, self-healing tests, and comprehensive quality engineering. Build scalable testing strategies with advanced CI/CD integration. Use PROACTIVELY for testing automation or quality assurance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit an AEM Edge Delivery Services page for content quality, SEO, accessibility, performance, and EDS best practices. Produces a prioritized fix list with specific remediation steps. Use when reviewing page quality, preparing for launch, or optimizing existing content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[BETA] Detect, review, and fix code-quality and correctness issues in an AEM as a Cloud Service project — locally, with no external services or network calls. Use whenever a user wants to check, review, assess, audit, scan, modernize, upgrade, or fix AEM Java, Sling Models, OSGi, or Maven code — for example: "check my Sling Models are implemented correctly", "review my @Inject usage", "are my Maven dependencies up to date", "scan this AEM project for issues", "modernize my Sling Models", or "fix code-quality problems". Name the files to assess, or ask it to scan the repo; it detects issues, plans, and — only when you ask — applies surgical edits on a branch or in place, then verifies with mvn compile. It recognises the intent and handles each issue type itself, reporting anything it cannot yet fix. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive dimension analysis and reporting for CJA. Use this skill whenever the user wants to analyze one or more dimensions — including cardinality, distribution/skew, trends, anomalies, data quality errors, comparisons, and forecasting. Also trigger when someone asks "what are the top values for...", "dimension health", "explore this dimension", "dimension dashboard", "dimension statistics", "data quality check on a dimension", "dimension cardinality", "dimension trends", "dimension skew", "dimension anomalies", "compare dimensions", or any similar request to understand what's inside a CJA dimension. Produces an interactive HTML dashboard or a markdown report. Works with the CJA MCP server.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct one bounded evidence-grounded code review when the user explicitly requests review or ROSE names a concrete unresolved correctness/quality risk; do not trigger automatically after implementation, before every merge, for every bug fix/refactor, or as a completion gate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code-review quality gate and test-enhancement rubric. Use when ROSE needs sharper review output contracts, severity and risk prioritization, evidence anchors, negative review cases, fixture or golden-output drift guidance, or a Chinese review report profile; do not use as a duplicate code-review agent or final PASS authority.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive quality verification: spec compliance, lint, type-check, tests, cross-layer data flow, code reuse, and consistency checks. Use when code is written and needs quality verification, before committing changes, or to catch context drift during long sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Data quality audit on CRM with completeness scoring and specific fix recommendations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
技術文書やエージェント向け指示ファイルを作成・レビューするスキル。READMEや貢献手順も調べ、説明の分かりやすさ、運用上の整合性、多言語版の差分を確認します。
OpenClawのリリース候補を人が試すために、隔離コピーなどの検証環境を準備し、テストの進行とフィードバック整理を支援します。公開前の報告確認も扱います。
編集前後の文章やパッチから、変更箇所を比較できる画面とPNG・PDFを作るスキル。共有用URLや添付ファイルで、修正内容を具体的に伝えられます。