「valuation」の検索結果

用户需要评估一个资产/投资/项目的价值，或纠结某个东西"值不值"时。适用于任何能产生（或不产生）现金流的资产评估。 语言信号："这个值多少钱"/"这只股票贵不贵"/"这个项目值不值得投"/"应该用PE还是PB估值" 不适用于：不需要估值分析的纯情感/审美决策。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research on a topic — use when investigating unfamiliar domains, answering complex questions requiring multiple sources, or when an evaluation flags something for deeper analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI agent architecture, graph and loop composition, protocol choice, evaluation, and observability. Use when scoping or reviewing systems before implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds ML pipelines: EDA, features, leakage checks, evaluation. Use when doing data science or explaining fairness, privacy, speech, vision-language, or diffusion mechanics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a Monte Carlo monitor and recommend config changes to reduce alert noise. Supports metric, custom SQL, validation, table, and agent (metric, evaluation, trajectory, validation) monitors. Fetches the report, identifies patterns, and suggests tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Role-playing as end users to generate authentic feature requests, surface unmet needs, and challenge team assumptions. Not for real feedback analysis (Voice) or UI evaluation (Echo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designing and evaluating AI/ML systems: prompt engineering, RAG design, LLM application patterns, AI safety, evaluation frameworks, MLOps, cost optimization. Use for AI pipelines or eval harnesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate AI design contract (AI-SPEC.md) for phases that involve building AI systems — framework selection, implementation guidance from official docs, and evaluation strategy

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retroactively audit an executed AI phase's evaluation coverage — scores each eval dimension as COVERED/PARTIAL/MISSING and produces an actionable EVAL-REVIEW.md with remediation plan

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when summarizing analysis results, writing reports, documenting experiment outcomes, or presenting model evaluation — including structuring findings in Japanese with conclusions, facts, assumptions, interpretations, and caveats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this when reviewing statistical analysis, experiments, model evaluation, or ML work done by someone else (a notebook, PR, or report) — checking that the required context is stated and that every method applied comes with the figures and values required by the matching *-diagnostics skill. When running an analysis yourself, apply the matching *-diagnostics skill directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a library of metacognitive prompts targeting planning, monitoring, or evaluation for a specific task. Use when developing students' thinking-about-thinking during independent work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate scaffolds supporting student self-regulation across planning, monitoring, and evaluation phases. Use when students struggle to manage their own learning during extended or independent tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a critical thinking task targeting specific skills like evaluating evidence, identifying bias, or analysing arguments. Use when embedding critical analysis into subject lessons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-source research with citations using You.com. Use for questions that need several sources compared and synthesized, such as library or framework comparisons, tool and vendor evaluations, market research, or deep-dive reports. Routes between a cost-conscious agentic search loop and the one-shot `you-research` MCP tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when looking up journal impact factors (JCR IF), checking a journal's impact factor by name, comparing IF across journals, or answering questions about "影响因子" / "impact factor" / "IF". Triggers on "impact factor", "journal IF", "影响因子", "JCR", "IF score", "journal rank", "which journal has higher IF", "what is the IF of". PROACTIVELY USE when user mentions journal prestige, publication venue quality, or manuscript submission target evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Respond to review comments on a PR after evaluation and fixes

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants web research: gathering cited, multi-angle evidence on a specific question. Triggers on: "research X for me", "do web research on", "look up sources for", "find citations for", "gather evidence on", "what does the web say about X". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), local file search, LLM-as-judge evaluation, or paywalled/auth-gated scraping. Produces a written plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a cited, structured read of local documents and project knowledge. Triggers on: "analyze these docs", "scan my project for context", "read the docs folder", "summarize what's in .beagle/concepts/", "extract context from docs/", "what's in this folder", "go read everything in X and tell me what's there". Also invoked programmatically by other beagle skills (prfaq-beagle Ignition, brainstorm-beagle reference points, strategy-interview context grounding) via the companion contract. Does NOT trigger on codebase lookups ("find this function", "search the repo"), web research (use web-research), LLM-as-judge evaluation (use llm-judge), or document editing (use humanize-beagle). Produces a written scan plan, parallel-subagent findings, and a cited synthesis report on disk — never inline prose, never unsourced claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Semi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation criteria for developed market value general insurance stocks. P/B 0.7-1.5x, Combined Ratio <100%, investment yield benchmarks, and dividend sustainability assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation criteria for emerging market insurance stocks. P/B 0.5-1.0x with 30-50% EM discount, combined ratio targets, and China vs India market comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation criteria for developed market life insurance using Embedded Value (EV) methodology. EV Multiple 0.6-1.0x, PVFP + ANAV calculation, and why P/E is unreliable for life insurers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Valuation criteria for developed market growth general insurance stocks. Combined Ratio improvement trajectory, premium growth 7-10% YoY, expense ratio decline, and retention rate targets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。