「ida」の検索結果

WPA/WPA2/WPA3-Enterprise (802.1X / EAP) attack methodology — EAP method identification (PEAP-MSCHAPv2, EAP-TTLS, EAP-TLS, EAP-GTC, EAP-PWD, EAP-FAST), evil-twin RADIUS attacks with eaphammer for credential capture, MSCHAPv2 challenge-response cracking, EAP-TLS client certificate theft paths (DPAPI, NDES, AD CS auto-enrollment), supplicant validation bypass (missing server cert validation, missing CN pinning, BYOD misconfigurations), and post-capture pivots into AD via cracked domain credentials. Use for corporate Wi-Fi engagements where the network is 802.1X authenticated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mobile (Android + iOS) application penetration testing methodology. Covers static analysis (apktool/jadx for Android, class-dump/Hopper/IDA for iOS), dynamic instrumentation with Frida and Objection, SSL pinning bypass strategies, root/jailbreak detection bypass, deep-link / URL-scheme abuse, exported component attacks (Android activities, services, providers, receivers; iOS XPC, URL schemes, universal links), insecure data storage (SharedPrefs, KeyStore misuse, NSUserDefaults, Keychain ACL bypass), IPC / Intent redirection, WebView vulnerabilities (JavaScriptInterface, file:// access), Firebase/AWS/Azure misconfiguration leakage, mobile API testing, biometric/Face ID/Touch ID bypass, app-cloning and runtime patching, and mobile malware/RAT analysis primitives. Use for mobile pentest, bug bounty mobile triage, or app-store reconnaissance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when authoring rig specs, agent specs, workflow specs, startup/context fragments, operating-mode declarations, or designing the user spec library. Covers the 4 failure modes (spec instantiates topology but not workflow/mode; spec depends on local paths and fails on another host; agents modify specs as one-off files instead of preserving reusable intent; validation proves YAML shape but not whether topology can run) and the validation-vs-runtime-realization distinction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing multi-agent topologies that run ON OpenRig — authoring RigSpec and AgentSpec files for new rigs, creating agent startup content (guidance / skills / culture), or diagnosing why a launched rig's agents aren't behaving as intended. NOT for changing OpenRig itself (use developing-openrig); NOT for ordinary CLI operation of an existing rig (use openrig-user). Covers the full authoring lifecycle from user intent to validated, launchable rig.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to set up, scale, validate, or harden NVIDIA physical AI infrastructure for synthetic data generation workflows across local MicroK8s or Azure AKS, including Kubernetes clusters, inference endpoint deployment, OSMO deployment, workload submission readiness, and infrastructure failure recovery. Trigger keywords: physical ai infrastructure, resilient scaling, SDG infrastructure, microk8s, azure aks, NVCF deployment, NIM Operator, OSMO deploy, workflow scaling. Don't trigger for: OSMO log summarization or workload-only operations unless infrastructure setup, scaling, validation, or recovery is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate that a Dynamo deployment's NIXL/UCX/NCCL interconnect is ready for disaggregated serving over RDMA/NVLink. Use after recipe-runner brings a deployment up (especially disagg/multi-node) to confirm the KV transport is correct; use troubleshoot for diagnosing already-failed pods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate whether an analysis is accurate, well-supported, and ready to share or use for a decision. Use when reviewing methodology, calculations, comparisons, visuals, caveats, or conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly asks to fix and verify a validated or plausible security vulnerability. Do not use for ordinary bug fixes, correctness or design review findings, general validation, or full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define, review, or update SECURITY.md guidance for a repository or component. Use when the user wants to clarify what Codex Security should review, what is out of scope, which security properties must hold, or whether existing guidance still matches the code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to define their ideal customer profile, position an AI product, build messaging architecture, or validate product-market fit. Also use when the user mentions 'ICP,' 'ideal customer profile,' 'positioning,' 'PMF,' 'product-market fit,' 'messaging,' 'buyer persona,' 'enrichment signals,' 'market positioning,' or 'competitive positioning.' This skill covers market positioning, ICP definition, messaging architecture, and PMF validation for AI-native products. Do NOT use for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert Mermaid diagram creation, validation, and rendering with dual-engine output (SVG/PNG/ASCII). Supports all 20+ diagram types including C4 architecture, AWS architecture-beta with service icons, flowcharts, sequence, ERD, state, class, mindmap, timeline, git graph, sankey, and more. Features code-to-diagram analysis, batch rendering, 15+ themes, and syntax validation. Use when users ask to create diagrams, visualize architecture, render mermaid files, generate ASCII diagrams, document system flows, model databases, draw AWS infrastructure, analyze code structure, or anything involving "mermaid", "diagram", "flowchart", "architecture diagram", "sequence diagram", "ERD", "C4", "ASCII diagram". Do NOT use for non-Mermaid image generation, data plotting with chart libraries, or general documentation writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete browser automation with Playwright. Auto-detects dev servers, writes clean test scripts to /tmp. Test pages, fill forms, take screenshots, check responsive design, validate UX, test login flows, check links, automate any browser task. Use when user wants to test websites, automate browser interactions, validate web functionality, or perform any browser-based testing. Do NOT use for quick page debugging or network inspection (use chrome-devtools instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds duplicate business logic spread across multiple components and suggests consolidation. Use when asking "where is this logic duplicated?", "find common code between services", "what can be consolidated?", "detect shared domain logic", or analyzing component overlap before refactoring. Do NOT use for code-level duplication detection (use linters) or dependency analysis (use coupling-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects anemic domain models, validates and refactors them into rich domain models, and enforces tactical DDD patterns (Entities, Value Objects, Aggregates, Domain Services, Domain Events). Use when the user asks to validate, review, or check domain models or DDD code; detect anemia; refactor domain objects; improve encapsulation; or mentions terms like "anemic model", "rich domain", "aggregate", "value object", "domain event", "ubiquitous language", "is this good DDD", "does this follow DDD", or "check my domain". Do NOT use for module or service boundary design, architectural decomposition, strategic DDD context mapping, or code outside the domain layer (DTOs, controllers, infrastructure adapters).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, repair, validate, or package a reusable iPollo Video template in an active HyperFrames template-authoring session. Use for video template structure, editable variables, reusable scenes, GSAP motion, component reuse, cover metadata, and save-ready validation; do not use for ordinary one-off video edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

create a fraimz, make fraimz, prove it works, frame proof, PR proof, validate experience, e2e evidence, fraimz.html. The full fraimz loop — frame the claim, drive the real app via CDP, validate/repair, output fraimz.html. Use whenever a task ends with "please create a fraimz" or any change needs end-to-end proof.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

frame proof, HTML frames, screenshots, recording, PR proof, e2e evidence, validate visually. Daytona artifacts workflow for validated screenshots and optional videos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Register AI agents on-chain using the ERC-8004 Trustless Agents standard. Manage agent identity as NFTs, build reputation through feedback, and request third-party validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for using n8n-mcp MCP tools effectively. Use when searching for nodes, validating configurations, accessing templates, managing workflows, organizing workflows into folders, managing credentials, auditing instance security, or using any n8n-mcp tool. Provides tool selection guidance, parameter formats, and common patterns. IMPORTANT — Always consult this skill before calling any n8n-mcp tool — it prevents common mistakes like wrong nodeType formats, incorrect parameter structures, and inefficient tool usage. If the user mentions n8n, workflows, nodes, or automation and you have n8n MCP tools available, use this skill first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Darwin Skill 2.0 (达尔文.skill 2.0): autonomous skill optimizer, v2.0 integrates Microsoft Research SkillLens (arXiv 2605.23899) 9-dim rubric + SkillOpt (arXiv 2605.23904) validation-gated design + human-in-the-loop checkpoints. Evaluates SKILL.md files using a 9-dimension rubric (structure + effectiveness + meta-skill blacklists), runs hill-climbing with git version control, spawns independent judge agents for blind evaluation, validates improvements through test prompts with auto-break on diminishing returns, and generates visual result cards. Use when user mentions "优化skill", "skill评分", "自动优化", "auto optimize", "skill质量检查", "达尔文", "darwin", "帮我改改skill", "skill怎么样", "提升skill质量", "skill review", "skill打分".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only when a developer explicitly asks to clean, prune, tidy, or organize DeepChat SDD documentation after implementation and validation. Scans docs/features, docs/issues, and docs/architecture; prefers multi-agent review when available; removes completed issue docs when a linked GitHub issue is closed or implementation and validation evidence proves the bug no longer exists, drops stale plans and legacy task files from completed feature or architecture goals, and deletes obsolete feature or architecture docs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

2-layer plan validation: instant structural checks + trigger-based specialist agents. Auto-fixes issues using ADRs and first principles. Every issue must be resolved before execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates the complete planning pipeline: product direction (ceo-review) -> architecture (eng-review) -> implementation plan (start) -> validation (validate) -> execution (execute). Run stages individually or let the orchestrator coordinate the full flow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。