2,157 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Multi-agent DAG orchestration for workflows where AI agents collaborate via dependency graphs, covering agent spawning, output merging, and quality evaluation. Use when a task needs multiple specialized agents or to parallelize AI work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applied statistics for business and product questions — test selection, assumption checks, power planning, effect sizes with intervals, multiplicity correction. Use when interpreting an experiment, sizing a study, or vetting a claim.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer prediction questions using market trading data, not opinions. Use when the user asks probability questions about geopolitics, economics, markets, industries, or any topic where real money is being traded on the outcome. Examples: 'What's the probability of WW3?', 'Will there be a recession?', 'Is AI in a bubble?', 'When will the Russia-Ukraine war end?', 'Is it a good time to buy gold?', 'Will SPY drop 5% this month?', 'Is NVDA options premium overpriced?'. The skill reads prices from prediction markets, commodities, equities, options chains, derivatives, yield curves, and currencies, then cross-validates multiple signals to produce a structured probability report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
World-class prompt powerhouse that generates production-ready mega-prompts for any role, industry, and task through intelligent 7-question flow, 69 comprehensive presets across 15 professional domains (technical, business, creative, legal, finance, HR, design, customer, executive, manufacturing, R&D, regulatory, specialized-technical, research, creative-media), multiple output formats (XML/Claude/ChatGPT/Gemini), quality validation gates, and contextual best practices from OpenAI/Anthropic/Google. Supports both core and advanced modes with testing scenarios and prompt variations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when coordinating multiple AI agents with Agent Relay's workflow engine and need to pick the right orchestration pattern - covers the 10 core patterns (fan-out, pipeline, hub-spoke, consensus, mesh, handoff, cascade, dag, debate, hierarchical) plus 14 specialized ones, with decision framework and accurate SDK/YAML examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when seeing WebSocket errors like "Invalid frame header", "RSV1 must be clear", or "WS_ERR_UNEXPECTED_RSV_1" - covers multiple WebSocketServer conflicts, compression issues, and raw frame debugging techniques
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need Codex to coordinate multiple agents through Agent Relay for peer-to-peer messaging, lead/worker handoffs, or shared status tracking across sub-agents and terminals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover and recommend **combinations** of agent skills to complete complex, multi-faceted tasks. Provides two recommendation strategies — **Maximum Quality** (best skill per subtask) and **Minimum Dependencies** (fewest installs). Use this skill whenever the user wants to find skills, asks "how do I do X", "find a skill for X", or describes a task that likely requires multiple capabilities working together. Also use when the user mentions composing workflows, building pipelines, or needs help across several domains at once — even if they only say "find me a skill". This skill supersedes simple single-skill search by decomposing the task into subtasks and assembling an optimal skill portfolio.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build custom LLM evaluation pipelines using the OpenJudge framework. Covers selecting and configuring graders (LLM-based, function-based, agentic), running batch evaluations with GradingRunner, combining scores with aggregators, applying evaluation strategies (voting, average), auto-generating graders from data, and analyzing results (pairwise win rates, statistics, validation metrics). Use when the user wants to evaluate LLM outputs, compare multiple models, design scoring criteria, or build an automated evaluation system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user has run multiple evaluation skills and wants a comprehensive analysis — maturity assessment, cross-skill signals, trends, prioritized actions, and an executive summary. Also use when the user mentions eval health check, evaluation audit, ship readiness, evaluation maturity, or "how good is my evaluation system itself." This is a read-only analysis skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user has evaluation principles or a dataset but needs help choosing the right graders, designing evaluation metrics, creating LLM-as-judge prompts, combining multiple metrics into a composite score, or building an automated evaluation pipeline. Also use when the user mentions grader selection, metric design, judge prompt engineering, rubric design, evaluation pipeline code, or "how to evaluate [X] automatically." Outputs executable OpenJudge pipeline code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants help with academic papers or citations but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — reviewing a paper, checking a BibTeX file for fake references, or benchmarking multiple LLMs on reference-recommendation accuracy. Also use when the user mentions paper review, peer review, BibTeX verification, citation checking, reference hallucination, or academic literature accuracy and hasn't specified which of those three tasks they mean. This skill is the entry router for the academic-eval suite: it asks one diagnostic question then routes to the right sub-skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants to compare or benchmark multiple LLMs/agents arena-style but it's unclear which specific workflow fits — a general-purpose win-rate comparison on a custom task, or a benchmark specifically about reference/citation hallucination rate. Also use when the user mentions model arena, agent arena, pairwise model comparison, win-rate ranking, or comparing models on a task and hasn't specified whether that task is generic or about citation accuracy. This skill is the entry router for the arena-eval suite: it asks one diagnostic question when needed, then recommends the workflow or workflows needed to cover the request.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect whether an API endpoint is backed by genuine Claude (not a wrapper, proxy, or impersonator) using 9 weighted rule-based checks that mirror the claude-verify project. Also extracts injected system prompts from providers that override Claude's identity. Fully self-contained — copy the code below and run, no extra packages beyond httpx. Use when the user wants to verify a Claude API key or endpoint, check if a third-party Claude service is authentic, audit API providers for Claude authenticity, test multiple models in parallel, or discover what system prompt a provider has injected.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enforces staged execution discipline on large tasks: a written stage plan, parallel delegation where the runtime supports it, a failable verification check at each stage, and a skeptical self-review before delivery. Trigger when the user explicitly asks OR when the task objectively spans multiple files, sources, or sessions. Do NOT trigger on ordinary multi-step requests that a direct attempt handles fine (autonomous triggering only; explicit invocation always runs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
La compétence Normalisation juridique FR nettoie un document Word rédigé en français juridique. Elle distingue deux régimes : les corrections déterministes (apostrophes courbes, guillemets français, espaces insécables, insécables des références — art. 1240, n° 21-12.345, 50 % —, ordinaux 1ère → 1re, ligatures œ, la loi dispose et non stipule, anglicismes-calques), appliquées directement ; et les réécritures de jugement (virgule avant « et », ternaires creux, formules emphatiques, harmonisations), posées en révisions Word soumises à votre acceptation. Chaque changement est consigné et restitué en tableau récapitulatif : on revient en arrière mot à mot — « défais 3, 7-10 ». La normalisation des citations reste purement formelle. Fonctionne en Cowork ou sur fichier Word.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Invoice review, non-compliance flagging, rejection communication, billing trend analysis, and conversation preparation for in-house legal ops teams managing outside counsel. Review invoices against billing guidelines; flag block billing, prohibited fees, rate violations, staffing violations, late submission. Produce line-item review report and approval note. Draft rejection letter to outside counsel. Build invoice review checklist. Analyse billing trends across multiple invoices and produce a structured conversation guide for the relationship review. Identify systemic patterns and produce formal non-compliance notice. Trigger on: 'review this invoice', 'flag billing issues', 'check invoice against guidelines', 'write the rejection letter', 'build an invoice checklist', 'block billing', 'UTBMS', 'billing non-compliance', 'analyse our invoices', 'billing trends', 'prep for the billing conversation', 'relationship review', 'the firm keeps doing this', 'escalate'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Asesor experto en litigación bajo sistemas de derecho civil (civil law) en América Latina. Asiste a abogados litigantes, equipos legales internos y clientes directos con estrategia procesal, análisis de riesgos, opciones tácticas, plazos y orientación sobre el proceso civil en múltiples jurisdicciones. Al final de cada sesión redacta un correo electrónico claro que resume los hallazgos para el cliente.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete prep for all three scored components of the California Bar Exam: the five written ESSAYS (13 subjects — Business Associations, Civil Procedure, Community Property, Constitutional Law, Contracts, Criminal Law & Procedure, Evidence, Professional Responsibility, Real Property, Remedies, Torts, Trusts, Wills & Succession), the PERFORMANCE TEST, and the multiple-choice MBE (7 subjects). Trigger whenever someone is studying for the California bar (or the MBE) and says things like: "give me the rule for [issue]", "big issues in [subject]", "drill/quiz me on [topic]", "MBE questions on [subject]", "teach me [doctrine]", "build an attack outline", "grade my essay", "memorizable paragraph for [issue]", "performance test approach", or "make a study plan" — or names any tested essay/MBE subject in a study, memorization, drilling, or practice-question context. Also trigger when a student uploads a practice essay, PT, or question set to be graded or turned into rule blocks. When in doubt during bar prep, trigger.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes how multiple regulations interact for a specific product, service, or business model. Identifies where obligations overlap, reinforce, complement, duplicate, or conflict; builds a priority matrix; produces an integrated compliance timeline; and estimates the total compliance burden. Use when (1) scoping a new product or service against the full regulatory landscape before launch, (2) conducting M&A due diligence on a target's multi-regulation exposure, (3) building a strategic compliance roadmap where single-regulation analyses miss the interactions, (4) advising on complex situations where regulations touch the same conduct from different angles, or (5) estimating budget and resourcing for multi-regulation compliance. Primary coverage of EU digital regulation (GDPR, Data Act, AI Act, CRA, NIS2, DORA, DMA, DSA, ePrivacy) and national implementations; the framework extends to any jurisdiction where overlapping regulatory regimes apply to the same activity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When you want multiple expert perspectives on a founder/operator question — a simulated board of advisors (Jason Fried, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Jensen Huang, Bob Iger, Paul Graham, Naval Ravikant, Sara Blakely). Bring a real decision — "should I raise prices?", "hire my first employee?", "raise or bootstrap?", "kill this project?" — and the council weighs in through documented frameworks, surfaces disagreements, and synthesizes a recommendation. Also use for 'maker council,' 'board of advisors,' 'what would Bezos do,' 'what would Jason Fried say,' 'channel Naval,' 'ask the council,' or how a famous founder would approach a problem. Optional live-research pass via deep-research / watch-video / last30days. Marketing questions go to marketing-skills' marketing-council. Archives to ~/.config/makerskills/maker-council/archive/. To commit to a direction, hand off to decide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anchor a multidisciplinary unit in a real-world phenomenon that requires multiple subject lenses to understand. Use when designing integrated or phenomenon-based units across disciplines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build students' capacity to compare accounts across multiple historical sources — identifying agreements, contradictions, and gaps. Use when students treat individual documents as complete answers rather than partial perspectives.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map curriculum connections across multiple subjects for a real-world problem or authentic context. Use when planning cross-curricular projects or connecting content to real issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。