2,821 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Statistical visualization with pandas integration. Use for quick exploration of distributions, relationships, and categorical comparisons with attractive defaults. Best for box plots, violin plots, pair plots, heatmaps. Built on matplotlib. For interactive plots use plotly; for publication styling use scientific-visualization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build and verify the Windows desktop build (NSIS installer + latest.yml) for the canonical OpenMausBot release and its legacy updater mirror. Use when cutting a release, shipping a new version to Windows users, or when a Windows user reports they are stuck on an old version. Windows only — does not cover the macOS dmg/notarization flow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots. Use for a figure that will ship in a report, paper, export, or kept artifact. Covers data fidelity, label economy, color threading, chart choice, layout, and render-then-verify QA without imposing a visual house style. For multi-panel composition use `figure-composer`; for whole-paper ordering use `paper-narrative`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building a feature on reusable database storage or UI, such as CRM, or deciding whether it needs a Macro database entity. Covers shared storage, a host-independent database UI and API contract, ownership, authorization, and the _entities naming convention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep analysis of Git history: identify frequently changed hotspot files, analyze code ownership by contributor, and scan for leaked secrets. Triggered when users ask about Git analysis, code hotspots, who owns what code, secret scanning, security audits of commit history, or optimizing code review assignments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文（用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」）。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
中英双语学术降 AIGC / bilingual academic de-AIGC skill. Removes AI-generated writing signatures from empirical papers in economics, management, and the social sciences — in both English and Chinese. Covers Turnitin AI, GPTZero, Originality.ai on the English side and 知网 AMLC, 万方, 维普 on the Chinese side. Uses a six-step loop (intake → audit → claim-evidence check → differentiated rewrite → five-dimension self-score → cold-reader recheck) with two pattern libraries (22 English + 17 Chinese patterns), section-by-section strategies for empirical papers, and hard protections that keep every number, coefficient, and citation intact. Since 2026-08 it also carries a provenance layer (去水印): deterministic, CJK-safe cleaning of invisible-character carriers and file metadata (docx / png / jpg / svg / pdf, incl. C2PA), an honest account of Claude's statistical text watermark, and an author "ownership pass" — it never claims a text is watermark-free.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates publication-quality figures for ML papers from research context. Given a paper section or description, extracts system components and relationships to generate architecture diagrams via Gemini. Given experiment results or data, auto-selects chart type and generates data-driven figures via matplotlib/seaborn. Use when creating any figure for a conference paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Experimental workflow for monitoring explicitly authorized delivery tasks and reporting stalled work. Use for scheduled ship follow-through.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to work in a Writing Pipeline project (the `writing-pipeline` starter pack): a three-stage drafting flow, ideas → drafts → published. Read when the project has these folders, OR when asked to capture an idea, start or revise a draft, review a piece before it ships, or publish it. Carries the stage flow and review behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read when the user asks what OpenKnowledge is, wants to install it on a repository, wants to open or preview a single markdown file that is not part of an OpenKnowledge project, wants to share an OpenKnowledge project with collaborators, asks whether OpenKnowledge supports a particular capability, or asks how `ok init` / `ok cowork` / OK Desktop set up a project. Do NOT load to perform OpenKnowledge reads/writes — the runtime guidance for editing markdown inside an initialized OK project ships as a separate project-local skill installed into each detected agent's skills dir (for example `.claude/skills/open-knowledge/`) whenever `ok init` runs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to work in a Software Lifecycle project (the `software-lifecycle` starter pack): proposals → decisions → specs → postmortems, plus guides. Read when the project has these folders, or when asked how this project is organized. Carries the doc lifecycle, status flows, and per-folder agent behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. The five workflows — frame a proposal, write a spec, record a decision, write a postmortem, review a design — each ship as their own sibling skill in this pack. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates, forks, authors, validates, publishes, updates, versions, pulls, archives, restores, transfers, and manages co-authors for Observal Agents. Use when the user wants to build or install an Agent, change an Agent definition, publish a draft, release a version, or manage Agent ownership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a nontrivial change needs end-to-end verification before committing or shipping
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-ship doc sync across project markdown. Use when: sync docs, update docs, document changes, release notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a full build-and-ship pipeline from a spec — use for hands-off project generation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Trace codepaths in diffs, map against tests, auto-generate missing coverage — use before shipping PRs
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify assumptions before implementing large or risky changes to APIs, provider data, billing, pricing, quotas, or defaults. Use when a mistake could affect customers or the user asks if a change is safe to ship. Checks real-world impact beyond passing tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Examine what a file claims about itself and what it actually contains — powered by Apache Tika. True content-based type detection (extensions lie), provenance claims (authors, dates, creating application), revision and tamper signals (PDF incremental updates, tracked changes, hidden slides, zip integrity), hidden and embedded content (attachments, macros), risk indicators (PDF JavaScript actions, encryption), and content digests. Evidence gathering, not verdicts: Tika reports what the file asserts and what parsing observed; it does not attribute authorship or validate signatures. Use for triaging suspicious files, provenance questions, e-discovery-style review, or "is this file what it claims to be."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to run a multi-persona expert advisory review on a labelled pull request in microsoft/apm. panel-mode (full | lean | delta) selects a surface-gated roster plus a CEO synthesizer; omitted or unknown mode is lean. Do not spawn inactive stubs. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE recommendation comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes follow-ups, and renders a ship-recommendation that the maintainer and author weigh.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive ONE already selected open pull request in microsoft/apm to mergeable. Classifies copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] inline review, runs autopilot-pr-review-worker, folds (by default) every recommendation inside the PR's stated scope, pushes to the head branch or a superseding PR that preserves authorship via commit trailers, watches CI to green (`agent-merge` when that skill or `<agent_merge_state>` is present; otherwise `gh pr checks --watch`), and iterates under fixed caps until ready-to-merge, advisory-with-deferred, superseded, or blocked. Plan before any fold, push, or reviewer request. Never spawned by autopilot-pr-review-scheduler. That scheduler is advisory only. Invoke this skill by name when the caller asked to drive a PR to merge.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to cut an APM release from the current worktree: assess whether the cycle since the last tag warrants a patch or minor bump (semver discipline against the merged-since-last-tag diff), sanitize the [Unreleased] CHANGELOG block into a dated version block with one concise "so what" entry per merged PR (drop internal-only churn, consolidate duplicates), bump pyproject.toml + uv.lock, run the CI-mirror lint chain, and open the release PR. Activate on "ship a release", "cut v0.x", "release prep", "bump and PR", "open release PR", "what kind of release do we need", or any phrasing that ends in opening a release PR -- even when the user does not say "skill". Stops BEFORE tagging; tagging stays a human gate that triggers the release workflow. Refuses to bump to a major (>= 1.0.0) version without explicit operator confirmation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain and patch existing Lark/Feishu documents while preserving comments, highlights, citations, and newer remote edits. Use for iterative document updates, local-mirror sync, or durable project ownership; LoopX integration is optional.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and execute large refactor or rewrite efforts efficiently with parallel multi-agent analysis and implementation. Use when a user asks to refactor many files, split workstreams, analyze a target code area, and coordinate sub-agents with clear ownership and dependency-aware execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。