2,693 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, craft, run, debrief, save, and prepare repeatable AI-agent loops for publication. Use when a user asks to analyze code or coding threads for recurring work, find a published loop, interview them to turn a goal into a bounded loop, review a loop for weak checks or unsafe authority, execute a loop with an evidence receipt, learn from completed runs, save or reuse a project loop, or validate and submit a loop to Loop Library.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a proposed change against requirements, regressions, verification evidence, and relevant security risks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exercise a running product against acceptance criteria and report evidence. Build success alone does not verify behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate research rigor. Assess methodology, experimental design, statistical validity, biases, confounding, evidence quality (GRADE, Cochrane ROB), for critical analysis of scientific claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug live Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) incidents with a read-only, evidence-first investigation. WHEN: pod crashes or Pending, CrashLoopBackOff, OOMKilled, ImagePullBackOff, node NotReady, DNS or ingress failure, connectivity timeout, network policy, SNAT exhaustion, node-pool scaling blocked by QuotaExceeded or InsufficientVCPUQuota, upgrade stuck, spot or zone disruption, a bare VMExtensionProvisioningError or AllocationFailed wrapper, an uncataloged capacity symptom, or 'investigate my AKS cluster'. DO NOT USE FOR: packet capture (use aks-network-capture); GPU or model-serving issues (use aks-gpu-inference); cluster creation or provisioning (use azure-kubernetes); cost (use cost-analysis from the optional azure-cost plugin); pod rightsizing (use azure-kubernetes); a fully qualified documented AKS signature with every required nested qualifier (use aks-known-issues); standalone failures on non-AKS Azure resources (use azure-diagnostics). Unqualified errors and open-ended incidents stay here only for AKS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose Day-2 AKS GPU and KAITO incidents using profile-aware, read-only evidence. WHEN: 'Insufficient nvidia.com/gpu', GPU pod Pending, model-load OOM, DCGM/VRAM, KAITO Workspace not ready, or GPU autoscaling. DO NOT USE FOR: setup (airunway-aks-setup), non-GPU incidents (aks-troubleshooting), standalone VM quota (azure-quotas), or generic cost (cost-analysis or cost-optimization from the optional azure-cost plugin).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collects bounded packet captures from AKS nodes and Azure network configuration for wire-level evidence. WHEN: "capture packets on an AKS node", "take a pcap", "run tcpdump on AKS", "prove where packets drop". Use for explicit packet-capture intent after read-only diagnostics, not general AKS connectivity or ingress troubleshooting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert raw notes, error logs, voice dictation, or screenshots into crisp GitHub-flavored markdown issue reports. Use when the user pastes bug info, error messages, or informal descriptions and wants a structured GitHub issue. Supports images/GIFs for visual evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Filter and prioritize variants by pathogenicity, population frequency, and clinical evidence for rare disease analysis. Use when identifying candidate disease-causing variants from exome or genome sequencing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server. Returns 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details not available in abstracts alone.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review closed trades, partial exits, and monthly trade aggregates for process adherence, risk discipline, execution quality, and evidence-based trading behavior patterns. Use after trader-memory-core and signal-postmortem have produced records, or when the user asks for a post-trade coach, risk-manager style review, rule-adherence review, next-session operating rules, or psychology-aware trading behavior feedback. This skill does not provide buy/sell advice, therapy, or broker execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Judge whether a market FAILED to react to news favorable to a crowded speculative position — step 2 of Jason Shapiro's COT contrarian process. Consumes a cot-contrarian-detector report (or an explicit direction) plus a Claude-curated events JSON, fetches the underlying price series with a documented fallback chain, and produces a fail-closed CONFIRMED / NOT_CONFIRMED / INSUFFICIENT_EVIDENCE verdict using a statistically validated drift-significance test (not a naive failure-ratio, which false-confirms on pure noise). Generic beyond COT — reusable for PEAD and macro-crowding news-failure checks. Use when the user asks to check news-failure confirmation, whether a crowded market "shrugged off" good/bad news, or wants to run Shapiro step 2 on a CROWDED_LONG/CROWDED_SHORT market.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate a selective workspace for complex reasoning, long tasks, repository engineering, coordinated agents, and authorized security analysis. Use when work requires durable state, evidence, cross-file consistency, or recovery; keep direct answers lightweight.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "plan the participation ramp before we promote", "how much account history or karma do we need in this community", or "design entry incentives and member lifecycle for our own Discord"; produces the per-community pre-promotion warming plan — account-history/tenure expectations (Estimated, named sources), a give-before-ask ledger spec, a per-community etiquette + rule digest with last-verified dates, and the warming → active graduation criteria that channel-registry requires as state-transition evidence — plus the owned-community variant (entry paths + member lifecycle for your own Discord/Slack/forum/企业微信私域). Not for launch-day submissions or T-0 threads — use community-launch-runner. 社区预热/先给后取/账号养成/毕业标准
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing content quality, E-E-A-T, or publish readiness; runs a typed 80-item CORE-EEAT profile with evidence coverage, veto checks, and a fix plan. Not for structural tags/headers alone — use on-page-seo-checker; not for domain/citation trust — use domain-authority-auditor. 内容质量/EEAT评分
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "write SEO content", "draft a blog post / landing page", "update outdated content", or "fix traffic/ranking decay"; two modes — new drafts pages with keywords, headers, snippets, and evidence boundaries; refresh scores decay, prioritizes update work, and produces a republish plan with GEO guidance. Not for AI-citation/GEO readiness scoring — use geo-content-optimizer; not for publish-gate scoring — use content-quality-auditor. SEO文章写作/内容更新/排名恢复
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "check if our surfaces have drifted from the canon", "watch for competitor repositioning", or "define when we should reposition"; produces a drift report — self-drift per flagship surface vs the narrative-registry canon over time (via wayback.py, change history Measured with as-of dates), competitor-repositioning alerts, an explicit repositioning-trigger condition set, and a D1/W1/M1 message-shift retro (intended vs actual pull-through, evidence-labeled) — feeding the TALE L drift-audit sub-items and the narrative-whiplash guardrail fact base. Not for the first-time consistency check before a surface ships — use narrative-cascade-planner; not for computing the TALE profile result or running the vetoes — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for echo-rate / AI-answer resonance measurement — use narrative-resonance-monitor. 自漂移监测/竞品重定位告警/重定位触发/叙事漂移复盘
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "plan an influencer campaign", "build a campaign blueprint", "track or close a creator campaign", or "record a late campaign correction"; produces the plan and, when requested, a non-canonical evidence tracker with scoped identity, publication, reconciliation, close, and reopen receipts. Not for individual creator briefs — use brief-generator; not for overall product launches without creators — use launch-tier-planner; not for sending, publishing, amplifying, or paying — use the owning execution workflow. 达人营销策划/种草方案/活动追踪与关账
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "find influencers", "build an influencer list", or "discover creators in [niche]"; produces a multi-platform candidate pool, per-influencer evidence profiles, authenticity red-flag screening, and a Fit-readiness queue without action ranking. Not for STAR scoring or ranking a known shortlist — use fit-scorer. 达人挖掘/找达人/创作者名单
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "measure how our narrative is landing", "track echo rate against our canon lexicon", or "check how AI answer engines describe our brand"; produces a resonance report — echo rate (overlap of market language with the narrative-registry canon lexicon, method declared), AI-answer perception via tavily.py --answer (proxy-labeled), share-of-voice on a locked competitor panel (reusing share-of-voice-tracker), and resonance signals from bluesky.py / gdelt.py / pageviews.py — every number labeled Measured / proxy / User-provided, feeding the TALE E dimension and the upstream of the E1 evidence-integrity veto. Not for rebuilding share-of-voice machinery — use share-of-voice-tracker; not for own-site GA4/GSC analytics — use performance-monitor; not for scoring TALE profile result — use narrative-quality-auditor; not for adjudicating claims — use offer-claims-registry. 回声率/AI回答感知/份额之声/共鸣信号
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing domain authority, trust, or citation credibility; runs a peer-relative 40-item CITE profile with evidence coverage and verified manipulation/penalty veto checks. Not for page-level content quality — use content-quality-auditor; not for backlink profiling alone — use offsite-signal-analyzer. 域名权威/网站可信度
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "audit our brand narrative" or "is this message on-canon"; runs separate typed TALE truth, system, or effectiveness profiles and never averages them into one composite. Checks differentiation, canon, landing consistency, and evidence integrity. Not for launch readiness — use launch-readiness-auditor; not for social operations — use social-quality-auditor. 品牌叙事分层审计/发布前一致性放行
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "build battle cards", "prep the sales team for launch", or "write the internal launch FAQ"; produces the internal enablement kit for a sales-led launch — battle cards vs each named alternative (where we win / where they win / trap questions, every fact traceable), a sales talk track derived from the PR-FAQ spine, an objection-handling table (objection → response → evidence), internal FAQ + CS macros, and an internal launch announcement with embargo discipline. Not for the external message house — use message-house-builder; not for competitor tracking itself — use competitor-tracker or competitor-analysis; not for outbound sequences — use cold-outbound-sequencer. 销售赋能/battle card/销售叙事/异议处理/内部FAQ
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。