本文へ移動
cccskills

「exe」の検索結果

4,365 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

progress

無料日本語概要

実行中・実行済みのプログラムやジョブの状況を知りたいとき,自分が起動したものか無関係のものかを問わず調べて答える.「どうなってる?」「学習状況は?」「進捗見せて」など,実行そのものを頼んでいるわけではなく既存の何かの様子を尋ねられたときに使う.新しく実行を頼まれたときは /ops:exec を使う.

tomoking2004/claude-plugins32026年7月23日 更新

pre-pr-check

無料日本語概要

This skill should be used when the user asks to "PR を出す前に確認して", "check if this branch is ready to merge", "run pre-PR checks", "PRを作る前にチェックして", or wants to verify a branch before opening a pull request. Executes verification commands, validates Conventional Commits format, and confirms documentation is updated, then reports whether gh pr create is safe to run.

t6adev/claude-code-tools32026年4月9日 更新

dev:epic

無料日本語概要

フィーチャー全体の設計・ストーリー分割を行い、PLAN.md と plan.json を生成。 ストーリー駆動開発フローと統合し、dev:story の上位レイヤーとして機能する。 各ストーリーに executionType とフェーズを付与し、実行計画を構造化する。 Trigger: フィーチャー計画, エピック作成, 全体設計, /dev:epic

ryryo/dot-claude-dev32026年10月14日 更新

[51] EXECUTE. Commitment to maximum quality work with 150% coverage. Use when you need the highest quality output for critical tasks, complex problems, important decisions, or when standard work isn't enough. Triggers on "maximum quality", "150% mode", "full quality", "critical task", or when you explicitly want AI to work at its best.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree22026年7月22日 更新

[52] EXECUTE. Three-stage refactoring workflow: (1) iterative research of refactor/modularization options, (2) plan + risk/edge-case analysis + Scope150 validation, then implement with tests after user confirmation, and (3) apply Scout105 cleanup protocol. Use when asked to refactor, modularize, or restructure code safely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree22026年7月22日 更新

Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants the task executed directly, or says "just do it" / "直接做". DO NOT TRIGGER when user says "优化代码", "优化性能", "optimize performance", "optimize this code" — those are refactoring/performance tasks, not prompt optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sayasaya8039/ZWG_Terminal22026年6月8日 更新

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

David-Li0406/meta-skill-evloving22026年7月14日 更新

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

David-Li0406/meta-skill-evloving22026年7月14日 更新

Expert sales execution covering pipeline management, discovery, demos, negotiation, and deal closing. Use when qualifying opportunities, running MEDDIC discovery, building account plans, handling objections, structuring proposals, or forecasting pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Design KPI dashboards for executive monitoring. Use for performance tracking, strategic initiatives, and management reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Guide a startup to set a single quantified traction goal and define the critical path of milestones to reach it. Use whenever a founder needs to prioritize activities, set growth goals, define milestones, decide what NOT to work on, plan quarterly/yearly execution, cascade goals to teams, escape the 'too many things to do' trap, or apply a binary on-path/off-path filter to proposed work. Activates on phrases like 'traction goal', 'critical path', 'what should we focus on', 'too many priorities', 'prioritization', 'milestones', 'quarterly planning', 'yearly goals', 'OKRs', 'where should I spend my time', 'what NOT to do', 'company planning', 'goal setting', 'DuckDuckGo', 'roadmap'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aAAaqwq/openclaw-team22026年6月18日 更新

Founder and CEO automation — morning standup, overnight cycle, burn rate, runway, pipeline review, investor and fundraising prep, executive summary, daily digest. Operates on the .mxm-executive-summary context.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DrNabeelKhan/maxim22026年9月17日 更新

Technology-agnostic prompt generator that creates customizable AI prompts for scanning codebases and identifying high-quality code exemplars. Supports multiple programming languages (.NET, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, React, Angular, Python) with configurable analysis depth, categorization methods, and documentation formats to establish coding standards and maintain consistency across development teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jcasnellie69/homelab-config22026年10月14日 更新

Execute all plans in a phase with wave-based parallelization

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

stateforward/emel.cpp22026年9月5日 更新

Executes authorized phishing simulation campaigns to assess an organization's susceptibility to email-based social engineering attacks. The tester designs realistic phishing scenarios, builds credential harvesting infrastructure, sends targeted phishing emails, and tracks open rates, click-through rates, and credential submission rates to measure human security awareness. Activates for requests involving phishing simulation, social engineering assessment, email security testing, or security awareness measurement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aniket2348823/Vul-Agent22026年6月9日 更新

MS17-010 (EternalBlue) is a critical vulnerability in Microsoft's SMBv1 implementation that allows remote code execution. Originally discovered by the NSA and leaked by the Shadow Brokers in 2017, it

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aniket2348823/Vul-Agent22026年6月9日 更新

Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aniket2348823/Vul-Agent22026年6月9日 更新

Detect Mimikatz execution through command-line patterns, LSASS access signatures, binary indicators, and in-memory detection of known modules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aniket2348823/Vul-Agent22026年6月9日 更新

Build structured communication templates for malware incidents including stakeholder notifications, executive briefings, technical advisories, and regulatory disclosures with severity-based escalation procedures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aniket2348823/Vul-Agent22026年6月9日 更新

Executes malware samples in Cuckoo Sandbox to observe runtime behavior including process creation, file system modifications, registry changes, network communications, and API calls. Generates comprehensive behavioral reports for malware classification and IOC extraction. Activates for requests involving dynamic malware analysis, sandbox detonation, behavioral analysis, or automated malware execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aniket2348823/Vul-Agent22026年6月9日 更新

Analyze Windows LNK shortcut files and Jump List artifacts to establish evidence of file access, program execution, and user activity using LECmd, JLECmd, and manual binary parsing of the Shell Link Binary format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aniket2348823/Vul-Agent22026年6月9日 更新

Comprehensive Windows privilege escalation methodology for offensive security engagements. Covers the full attack surface from a standard user shell to NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM: token impersonation via SeImpersonate and SeAssignPrimaryToken privileges using JuicyPotato, PrintSpoofer, GodPotato, SweetPotato, and RoguePotato; service misconfigurations including unquoted service paths, weak service DACLs, writable service binaries, and insecure service creation permissions; AlwaysInstallElevated MSI exploitation; DLL hijacking through search order abuse, phantom DLL loading, and writable PATH directory injection; UAC bypass techniques via fodhelper.exe, eventvwr.exe, CMSTP, and environment variable manipulation; scheduled task abuse for writable task actions and new task creation; registry autorun exploitation for persistence and escalation; PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-34527) for remote and local privilege escalation; and credential harvesting from SAM database extraction, DPAPI blob decryption, LSA secret dumping,...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ajtazer/heckit22026年10月7日 更新

Penetration test and red team report writing methodology. Covers executive summary structuring (risk-led narrative for non-technical readers), technical finding format (title, severity, affected scope, narrative, reproduction steps, impact, remediation, references), CVSS v3.1 / v4.0 scoring with vector justification, OWASP risk rating, evidence hygiene (redacting credentials, hashing client data, time-stamping every action), screenshot and PoC artifact management, finding chain narratives, scope/limitations/assumptions documentation, retest evidence and remediation tracking, deliverable formats (PDF, DOCX, HTML, JSON for SIEM ingestion), client-customer-deliverable separation, and common report mistakes (over-CVSSing, undermining the triager, missing the 'so what'). Use at the end of an engagement when authoring a deliverable, when restructuring a draft for executive readability, or when establishing a reusable report template for a consulting practice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ajtazer/heckit22026年10月7日 更新

Comprehensive CI/CD pipeline exploitation methodology covering GitHub Actions injection vectors (expression injection via PR titles and issue bodies, workflow_run event abuse, GITHUB_TOKEN over-scoping, composite action supply chain compromise), Jenkins attack paths (Groovy sandbox escapes, script console remote code execution, Java remoting deserialization, credential store dumping, shared library injection), GitLab CI exploitation (YAML anchor injection, runner registration token abuse, CI variable extraction, protected branch bypass via merge request pipelines), and Azure DevOps pipeline agent compromise with service connection theft. Includes artifact poisoning techniques across all platforms, tooling guidance for gato and jenkins-attack-framework, and maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1195.002 (Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain). Covers enumeration of pipeline configurations, privilege escalation from contributor to code execution, lateral movement through pipeline trust boundaries, and p...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ajtazer/heckit22026年10月7日 更新