「advice」の検索結果

Draft a firm, professional cease-and-desist letter to stop harassment, defamation, IP misuse, or unwanted contact — clear about what must stop and what happens if it doesn't. Use when asked to write a cease and desist, make someone stop [harassing/using my work/defaming me], or send a formal letter to stop. Produces a structured letter stating the conduct, why it's wrongful, the specific demand and deadline, and the consequence, plus guidance on delivery and records — flagging when the matter needs a real lawyer. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain a cap table, dilution, SAFEs, option pools, and round mechanics in plain English with the actual math. Use when asked to explain dilution, model a SAFE or priced round, size an option pool, understand a term sheet's economics, or figure out who owns what after a raise. Produces a worked ownership breakdown before/after the round, the dilution math step by step, and the traps founders miss. Not legal or financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode a care-home contract before a parent moves in — the fee-escalation clause with no cap, the needs-can-no-longer-be-met eviction trigger, the guarantor line that quietly makes you personally liable, and the after-death charges nobody mentions on the tour. Use when asked to review a care-home or nursing-home contract, what does this admission agreement mean, can they raise the fees, or can they make my parent leave. Produces a clause-by-clause decode ranked by financial and eviction risk, the questions to put in writing before signing, and the negotiate-or-verify list. Pairs with long-term-care-options for choosing the home; this is for the contract. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a short-term (13-week) cash flow forecast to see if you can cover what's due. Use when asked to build a cash flow forecast, a 13-week cash flow, a cash projection, or to plan around a cash crunch. Produces a week-by-week forecast structure — opening cash, expected inflows, scheduled outflows, net movement, and closing/low-point — with the formulas and a worked example, plus the levers if cash goes tight. Not financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a realistic personal monthly budget from someone's income and expenses. Use when asked to make a budget, plan monthly spending, allocate income, or get finances under control. Produces a categorized budget (a 50/30/20-style allocation tuned to their reality), a surplus/shortfall number, and concrete next moves. Educational, not regulated financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check whether a raise, more hours, or a new job could cost you more in lost benefits than you gain — the 'benefits cliff' — before you accept it. Use when asked will a raise hurt my benefits, benefits cliff, if I make more will I lose my food stamps or medicaid, or should I take more hours. Produces a plain map of which benefits phase out at what income (and which cut off suddenly vs. taper), a rough read on whether a specific income change helps or hurts net, the ones with hard cliffs to watch (childcare, Medicaid, housing), the moves that soften a cliff, and where to get a real benefits screening. Not financial/benefits advice; points to a benefits counselor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the band agreement before the money or the breakup arrives — who owns the songs, how money splits (writing vs performing distinguished), who owns the name, what happens when someone quits, and the decision rules for offers — decided while everyone still shares a van. Use when a band asks 'how should we split money', 'who owns our songs', 'our drummer quit, what happens', or is about to record/release/sign anything. Produces a plain-language band agreement and the meeting script to agree it. Not legal advice — it's the conversation that makes the lawyer cheap later.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think clearly about whether bankruptcy is the right move, or whether another path fits better — without shame and without a sales pitch. Use when asked should I file for bankruptcy, is bankruptcy my best option, alternatives to bankruptcy, or what happens if I file. Produces an honest read on whether your situation is the kind bankruptcy actually helps, the main types and what each does (and doesn't) discharge, the real trade-offs (what you keep, the credit impact and its recovery, what's not dischargeable), the alternatives to weigh first (negotiation, debt management, doing nothing on time-barred debt), and a strong push to consult a bankruptcy attorney. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to check whether a figure is audited, which headline numbers sit outside the audited accounts, what 'adjusted' or 'underlying' means in this report, or who is vouching for the numbers in the highlights. For every headline figure in the highlights, chairman's statement and CEO review of an uploaded annual report, states whether it sits inside or outside the audited statements and what was added or removed versus the nearest audited number. Produces a boundary table, the list of figures outside the boundary, and a plain-English summary of who is vouching for what. Educational, not financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide when and how your product and communications must (or should) label AI-generated content, and write the disclosure policy — surface-by-surface rules, exact label wording, and the review trigger for regulations like the EU AI Act's transparency obligations. Use when asked 'do we have to label AI content', 'write our AI disclosure policy', 'are we covered for the AI Act', or when marketing/support/product start shipping AI-generated output. Produces a disclosure policy with a per-surface matrix and ready-to-use label copy. Not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Request a reasonable accommodation at work or in education — frame it around the barrier and the adjustment (not your diagnosis), cite the right process, and navigate the back-and-forth constructively. Use when someone says 'I need a workplace accommodation', 'request reasonable adjustments', 'ADA/Equality Act accommodation', or 'how do I ask for accommodations for my disability/condition'. Produces the request letter, a barriers-and-adjustments map, disclosure guidance, and a plan for the interactive process. Not legal advice — routes to the formal process and to advocacy where needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether and how someone can safely stay in their own home as they age — the home hazards, the support gaps, and the modifications and services that make it work. Use when asked can my parent stay in their home safely, aging in place assessment, is it safe for them to live alone, or what do we need for them to stay home. Produces a room-by-room safety read (fall hazards, accessibility), an honest look at the daily-living and support gaps, the modifications and services that could close them, warning signs that home may no longer be safe, and how to raise it respectfully — helping a family make a clear-eyed, dignity-preserving decision. Not medical advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work through the first hours and days after a disaster — a fire, flood, storm, or evacuation — in the right order: safety and people first, then documenting for insurance and aid, then the immediate recovery steps, without missing the things that cost money or health later. Use when someone says 'my house flooded/burned', 'what do I do after the disaster', 'we just evacuated, now what', or 'the storm damaged everything'. Produces a triaged action plan (safety → document → claim → recover), the do-not-miss list, and where to get help. Not legal advice; routes to emergency services and official aid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to walk me through an annual report, teach me to read this 10-K, explain a company's accounts to a beginner, or tutor me on the financial statements in an uploaded report. Walks a beginner up a fixed six-rung ladder — statement map, balance sheet line by line, operating profit to free cash flow, five sector-appropriate ratios with healthy ranges, the sceptical read, then a reusable checklist and a five-question quiz. Produces a page-referenced tutorial in which every figure cites the page it came from and anything missing is marked 'not disclosed in this report'. Educational, not financial advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write an AI usage policy people can actually follow — approved tools, data rules, disclosure duties, and review obligations, in one page instead of legal fog. Use when asked for a company AI policy, acceptable-use rules for ChatGPT/Claude/Copilot at work, guidance on what data may go into AI tools, or to fix a policy nobody reads. Produces a one-page usable policy plus the decision log behind it. Not a substitute for legal advice; pairs with compliance-checklist for regulatory mapping and ai-ethics-review for system-level assessments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discovers user intent and generates a structured, step-by-step plan for model customization workflows. This skill must always be activated alongside any other skill when the user's request relates to model customization — including fine-tuning, training, building, customizing, reviewing data, or getting advice on approach, regardless of domain. Do not skip this skill even if the immediate ask is narrow (e.g., reviewing data format or a single workflow step), because planning discovers the full scope of work needed. Also activate when the user wants to resume, continue, or modify an existing plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification-first methodology for the UNMIK Regulation 64 Panels of the Kosovo district courts (2000–2008). Citations are verified against UNMIK/EULEX archives and legal-tools.org. Keeps the Reg. 64 Panels distinct from the Kosovo Specialist Chambers, and clarifies that Reg. 2000/64 permitted (did not impose) internationally-majority panels. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run an attorney-facing knockout/availability trademark search across the United States and Canada. Use whenever a user (founder, client, or attorney) asks whether a brand, mark, name, logo, slogan, or product name is "available," "free to use," "clearable," or "already taken" — or asks Claude to "search the trademark register," "check USPTO," "check CIPO," "do a knockout search," "clearance search," "availability search," or "see if [mark] is trademarked." Trigger even when the user phrases it casually ("can I call my company X?", "is this name taken?"). Covers federal USPTO (TESS/TSDR), federal Canada (CIPO), common-law/web/state, and WIPO Madrid international. Output is a knockout availability memo with green/yellow/red verdict for attorney review. Includes professional-responsibility gating (AI-use disclosure, conflict check, scope confirmation) before substantive analysis. Not legal advice — produces work product for attorney sign-off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews or drafts the agreement that pays an employee to settle their claims — and flags the statutory conditions that decide whether it actually binds them. Works under s.203 ERA 1996 for England & Wales. Flags apparent s.203 condition gaps for a solicitor to confirm (writing, specific complaints, independent adviser, identification, insurance, statement of conditions), drafts the substantive terms (sum, tax characterisation, confidentiality, references, restrictive covenants, indemnities), and surfaces enforceability risks. Does not rule on validity and is not legal advice. Use when the user says 'review this settlement agreement', 'draft a settlement agreement', 'compromise agreement' (old term), or asks whether an agreement is binding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sanctions and export control analysis tool for Claude Desktop. Real-time individual screening across 30+ official lists (UN, EU, OFAC, OFSI, French DGT...), sectoral analysis, dual-use goods (EU Reg. 2021/821), US/China extraterritorial regimes (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), USD/SWIFT risk and jurisdictional mapping across 30+ countries. All results sourced and verified in real time — no memory-based answers. Responds in French, English, German, Spanish, Russian and Chinese. Updated 19 May 2026 (EU 20th package, UK SEUC, Cuba EO). Indicative guidance only — not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification-first methodology for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon. Citations are verified against the STL legacy archive and legal-tools.org. Covers the Ayyash et al. case, the two contempt cases (STL-14-05 New TV/Al-Khayat and STL-14-06 Akhbar Beirut/Al-Amin), and the 2011 terrorism decision. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification-first methodology for the Special Court for Sierra Leone and its Residual Special Court. Citations are verified against rscsl.org and legal-tools.org. Covers Taylor, the AFRC/CDF/RUF cases, the child-soldier and forced-marriage holdings, the head-of-State immunity decision, and the fixed-term (no life) penalty regime. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification-first methodology for the Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz (JEP), Colombia's transitional justice court under the 2016 Acuerdo Final with FARC-EP. Citations are verified against jep.gov.co before use. Covers the 11 macrocasos (from Caso 01 secuestro through Caso 11 violencia sexual, including Caso 03 falsos positivos), the three sanction tiers (propias, alternativas, ordinarias), TOAR, and the SIVJRNR sister bodies (CEV, UBPD). Guards the key structural distinctions (Sala de Reconocimiento vs Tribunal para la Paz; comparecientes FARC-EP vs Fuerza Pública vs terceros civiles; Acto Legislativo 01/2017 vs Ley Estatutaria 1957/2019). Research aid, not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verification-first methodology for the Special Panels for Serious Crimes of the Dili District Court (UNTAET, 2000–2006). Citations are verified against JSMP, the UN archives and legal-tools.org. Covers the Los Palos case, the Serious Crimes Unit caseload (391 indicted; about 88 tried) and the SPSC-vs-Jakarta distinction. Research aid, not legal advice. Part of the open-source "Skills for International Justice" library — methodology: github.com/jeannesulzer/international-criminal-tribunals-skills

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。