358 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guide founders through operational fundamentals — entity setup, co-founder agreements, IP assignment, banking, bookkeeping, taxes, insurance, and contractor agreements. Phase-based interactive guided process.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scope arbitration — resolve disagreements between product and engineering on what is in or out of scope, with a decision log and escalation path. Use when asked to "resolve this scope disagreement", "arbitrate between product and eng", "scope is creeping", "we can't agree on what's in scope", or "help us decide what to cut".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft or review legal ops documents — NDA, MSA, SaaS agreement review checklist, vendor contract terms. Use when asked to "review this contract", "draft an NDA", "what should I look for in this agreement", or "build our contract review process".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Qualify a vendor or supplier of GxP-relevant software or services. Covers vendor risk classification, assessment questionnaire design, desk and on-site audit approaches, quality agreement evaluation, SLA review, and ongoing monitoring cadence definition. Use when selecting a new vendor for a GxP-critical system, onboarding a cloud provider for regulated data, performing a periodic re-qualification, when a vendor audit finding requires re-assessment, or when EU Annex 11 or ICH Q10 requires supplier qualification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up systematic data labeling workflows using Label Studio or similar tools. Implement quality controls, measure inter-annotator agreement, manage labeler teams, and integrate labeled data into ML training pipelines. Use when starting a supervised ML project that requires labeled training data, when model performance is limited by insufficient labeled examples, when labeling text, images, audio, or video, or when implementing active learning to prioritize the most valuable examples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Achieve distributed agreement without central authority using bee democracy, threshold voting, and quorum sensing. Covers proposal generation, advocacy dynamics, commitment thresholds, deadlock resolution, and consensus quality assessment. Use when a group must decide between options without a designated leader, when centralized decision-making is a bottleneck, when stakeholders have different perspectives to integrate, or when designing automated systems that must reach consensus such as distributed databases or multi-agent AI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates a complete, professional client onboarding package for AI consultants, AI auditors, and solopreneurs working in the AI space (AI strategy, automation, AI readiness audits, implementation, training, etc.). Use this skill whenever a user asks to onboard a new client, set up a client folder, write a welcome email, generate a discovery questionnaire, draft a service agreement, or create a project brief — especially in an AI consulting context. Also trigger when the user says things like "I have a new client", "prepare onboarding docs", "create a client package", or "set up a new project". Produces four ready-to-use deliverables: intake questionnaire, welcome email, service agreement, and project brief.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Design and implement smart contracts as self-executing programmatic agreements on blockchain. Use this skill when the user needs to build automated on-chain logic, evaluate smart contract security, or design tokenized business rules — even if they say 'smart contract development', 'automated agreement', or 'on-chain logic'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts IRC 664–compliant Charitable Remainder Trust agreements (CRAT/CRUT), covering payout math, remainder qualification, trustee powers, and tax compliance. Use when drafting a CRT, CRAT, CRUT, unitrust, annuity trust, or charitable remainder planning document, or when ensuring IRC 664 compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts structured data from large sets of legal documents into tabular format for review, analysis, and reporting. Processes contracts, agreements, correspondence, filings, and other legal documents in bulk — extracting key terms, dates, parties, obligations, risks, and custom fields into organized tables. Use when conducting due diligence document review, bulk contract extraction, compliance audits across document sets, lease portfolio analysis, employment agreement review, regulatory filing review, or any task requiring structured extraction from multiple documents. Trigger keywords: tabular review, bulk extraction, document review table, data room review, batch document analysis, contract extraction, portfolio review, structured extraction, document comparison table.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a filing-ready U.S. complaint for breach of a purchase agreement. Trigger when the user requests a breach-of-contract complaint, forum-selection analysis, or remedy package for a real-estate or asset purchase dispute.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts a state-court complaint for breach of a real property purchase agreement. Triggers when the user needs to initiate a lawsuit for breach of a real estate purchase contract, purchase agreement breach, or buyer/seller contract dispute. Covers caption, jurisdiction/venue, party allegations, chronological facts, contract elements, damages, and prayer for relief.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triages an incoming non-disclosure agreement against the organisation's written standard NDA positions and returns a DRAFT triage pack: a clause-by-clause deviations table with a severity band, a suggested response per clause quoted from the positions document, open questions and a governing-law flag, all for counsel to decide. Never gives legal advice or an acceptability call. Use when the user asks to "triage this NDA against our standard positions", "screen this confidentiality agreement before it goes to legal", "red-flag this mutual NDA", "first-pass the counterparty's NDA" or "is this NDA standard or does it need counsel". Do not use for a full review of an MSA, SOW, licence or any whole contract, use contract-review-pack instead; for one clause lined up across several documents, use clause-comparison-table. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "draft an influencer contract", "review these agreement terms", or "build a partnership template"; produces a full influencer agreement framework (scope, compensation, usage rights, exclusivity, FTC disclosure), a clause-by-clause review with red flags, and a negotiation cheat sheet. Not for outreach negotiation before a deal exists — use outreach-manager. 达人合同/合作协议条款审查
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when working with Adobe Sign — adobe Acrobat Sign (formerly Adobe Sign) eSignature platform management covering agreements, templates, workflows, users, and audit trails. Use when monitoring agreement status, analyzing signing completion rates, reviewing workflow performance, managing Adobe Sign users, or auditing document signing activity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use after changing prompts, skills, the compiler, or editorial policies — or when the user asks to measure edit quality, run regression evals, check agreement with approved edits, or says '評価して', '一致率を測って', 'eval を回して'. Compares agent output against human-approved golden projects.
Use this skill when the user asks about International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA) compliance — quarterly returns, jurisdiction reporting, fuel + miles reconciliation, IFTA-100/101 forms, base jurisdiction selection, IFTA license + decals, recordkeeping requirements, common IFTA audit findings, or how to handle non-IFTA jurisdictions. Cite IFTA Articles of Agreement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user wants to "synthesize two competing solutions without averaging", "resolve a design/value disagreement by lifting to a higher frame", "止揚 / アウフヘーベン", "矛盾を止揚", "独立案を統合", "平均化せず統合", "contradiction lift", "sublate competing designs", or has two good-but-divergent answers to the same question and wants a higher-order resolution (a selection mechanism) or an honest aporia — not a compromise. NOTE: Use this when two independent solutions diverge and you want to PRESERVE both truth-moments while lifting to a higher frame. Use devils-advocate to stress-test ONE proposal with an assigned opponent, strong-inference to find an unknown cause, and dialectic-loop to validate a claim against a real corpus.
コードレビューの指摘を実際のコードや対応環境と照らし合わせ、妥当性を確認します。不明点の整理、根拠を示した返答、修正ごとのテストまで進めるスキルです。
計画やアイデアを質問で掘り下げ、決定同士の依存関係を整理します。推奨案を添えた質問を段階的に重ね、曖昧な前提や未決事項を確認して共通理解を築くスキルです。
利用できる専門エージェントを分野別に一覧にし、最大5つを選んで同じ課題に並行で取り組ませ、意見の一致点や相違点、次の対応を一つの報告にまとめるスキル。
複数の視点でまとめた重要な意思決定の草案に、Codexによる外部批評を一度追加します。結論の弱点や見落とし、反対意見の扱いを確認するスキルです。
Look up the current US import duty on one HTS product from one country — the HTS column rate (MFN, trade-agreement or column 2) plus the Section 301 and 232 duties in chapter 99 — from the live USITC Harmonized Tariff Schedule. Use when the user asks what the US charges today on a product from a specific country, including China tariffs and other additional duties.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ADR-152 — weighted similarity between two harness fingerprints (genome + score JSON). Returns overall score in [0,1] plus per-component breakdown (cosine over 9 numerics, categorical agreement over 4 enums, jaccard over agent_topology). Unblocks ADR-151 §3.2 Recommender, §3.3 Drift Detection, §3.5 Plugin Compat. Pure-TS, no `@metaharness/*` dep — preserves ADR-150's four architectural constraints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。