1,058 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Compare two sessions side-by-side using Agent Monitor data — per-model token usage (input/output/cache_read/cache_write + compaction baselines), pricing engine cost breakdowns, workflow intelligence (complexity scores, tool flow transitions, subagent effectiveness), session metadata (thinking_blocks, turn_count, turn_duration_ms, usage_extras), and full event timelines with all 10+ event types.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically evaluate and compare multiple AI models or agents without pre-existing test data. Generates test queries from a task description, collects responses from all target endpoints, auto-generates evaluation rubrics, runs pairwise comparisons via a judge model, and produces win-rate rankings with reports and charts. Supports checkpoint resume, incremental endpoint addition, and judge model hot-swap. Use when the user asks to compare, benchmark, or rank multiple models or agents on a custom task, or run an arena-style evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide to analyze multiple documents (PDF, DOCX) against user-defined columns and produce a structured Excel output with citations. Use when the user wants to: (1) Extract specific information from multiple documents into a table, (2) Compare clauses or provisions across contracts, (3) Create a document review matrix with source citations. Triggers on: 'tabular review', 'document matrix', 'extract from documents', 'compare across documents', 'review multiple contracts'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design game concepts from a novel. From SOURCE_BIBLE and PRODUCT_BRIEF, compare meaningful alternatives on the dimensions still unlocked, then select a playable direction using hard vetoes and explicit trade-offs. Use for what game should this novel become, compare game concepts, choose a game direction for this book, decide whether this novel should become an interactive story. 小说游戏概念设计。根据 SOURCE_BIBLE 与 PRODUCT_BRIEF 比较未锁定维度上的有效替代方案，用硬否决和关键取舍选择可玩方向。用于判断小说适合做成什么游戏、该不该做成互动叙事、比较游戏方案等需求。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage and compare multiple affiliate programs as a portfolio. Triggers on: "manage my affiliate programs", "compare my programs", "portfolio overview", "which program should I focus on", "diversify my affiliate income", "program switching", "affiliate portfolio", "program comparison", "revenue allocation", "which programs to drop", "add new programs", "affiliate program strategy".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write "X vs Y" comparison blog posts that help readers choose between two competing products. Triggers on: "write a comparison post", "X vs Y blog post", "compare [product A] and [product B]", "which is better [A] or [B]", "head to head comparison", "[product] vs [product] article", "comparison review", "write a versus article", "side by side comparison blog", "which should I choose [A] or [B]", "compare these two products for my blog".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the HyperFrames CLI development loop: init, add, catalog, capture, lint, check, snapshot, compare, grade-compare, preview, play, present, beats, keyframes, single or batch render, publish, cloud, cloudrun, feedback, lambda, doctor, browser, info, upgrade, skills, compositions, docs, benchmark, telemetry, transcribe, auth, tts, and remove-background. Also use when diagnosing build or render failures. validate, inspect, and layout are deprecated aliases; use check. Covers local, HeyGen-hosted cloud, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Run rendering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
求职工具包。把「找岗位 → 签 offer」拆成六个独立子 skill：⓪ Job Hunt 批量发现岗位，① Job Description 解码具体 JD，② Resume 定向简历，③ BQ 准备行为面试，④ Offer Compare 对比多份 offer，⑤ Salary Negotiation 谈 package。任何求职相关请求（找工作、该不该投、改简历、准备面试、选 offer、谈薪）都从这里进，再路由到对应子 skill。关键词：求职, offer, career, job hunt, LinkedIn jobs, JD, resume, CV, behavioral interview, BQ, STAR, offer compare, salary negotiation, 薪资谈判, 选 offer。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user explicitly asks for an adversarial / multi-round dialectic between masters — 祖师辩论, 各执一词, 谁更对, debate, 应成 vs 顿悟, 顿渐之争. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel single-round) by being adversarial multi-round via fresh-subagent orchestration. Topics 空有 / 禅净 / 性相 / 戒律 vs 内观 — trigger is adversarial framing: "禅净比较" → compare; "禅净辩论 / 谁更究竟" → here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when user asks for a sequenced learning path within a Buddhist tradition — 学修次第, 先学什么, 从哪入门, 下一步读什么, curriculum, 学习计划, 路径推荐. Differs from /compare-masters (parallel opinion) and /master-debate (adversarial dialectic) by being 纵向 / 时序: stage-by-stage plan keyed on tradition × level (L0-L3) → foundation → intermediate → advanced + blind spots. Trigger is planning intent — "禅宗对比" goes to /compare-masters; "禅宗从哪开始学" goes here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Same-epoch comparison of training runs across wandb, neptune, tensorboard, or mlflow. Aligns runs at the student's current step (never current-vs-final-of-baseline) and separates proxy metrics from downstream targets. Use when the user asks to compare runs, check if a run is improving, track lag against a baseline, rank experiments, or evaluate run-vs-run performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare EPD products on normalized GWP and other impacts while checking declared units, system boundaries, and LEED eligibility. Use for side-by-side EPD comparison.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when comparing two videos to analyze compression results or quality differences. Generates interactive HTML reports with quality metrics (PSNR, SSIM) and frame-by-frame visual comparisons. Triggers when users mention "compare videos", "video quality", "compression analysis", "before/after compression", or request quality assessment of compressed videos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another. Does not investigate runtime bugs — use investigate. Does not assess module-level architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not research open-ended options with no second artifact to compare against — use research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Head-to-Head Stock Comparison — takes two tickers and compares them across valuation, growth, profitability, technical setup, sentiment, risk profile, and analyst consensus with a scored comparison table and overall recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate API consistency between two versions of Python libraries. Use when you need to compare API behavior, signatures, and exceptions between library versions to identify breaking changes, incompatible modifications, and behavior differences. The skill performs static analysis of Python code, compares function signatures, class definitions, parameter types, return types, and generates a detailed JSON report with breaking changes, warnings, and migration guidance. Supports Python libraries and packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares old and new requirement documents, analyzes code repository impact, and generates detailed modification plans. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Compare requirement versions and identify changes, (2) Map requirement changes to code components, (3) Identify components to modify, delete, or add, (4) Analyze dependencies and integration points, (5) Assess test impact, (6) Generate comprehensive modification plans in Markdown format. Supports text/Markdown requirements and analyzes feature-level, functional, and API changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate API consistency between two versions of Java libraries. Use when you need to compare API behavior, signatures, and exceptions between Java library versions to identify breaking changes, incompatible modifications, and behavior differences. The skill performs static analysis of Java code, compares method signatures, class definitions, interface changes, parameter types, return types, exception declarations, and generates a detailed JSON report with breaking changes, warnings, and migration guidance. Supports Java libraries and packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare runtime behavior between original and migrated repositories to detect behavioral differences, regressions, and semantic changes. Use when validating code migrations, refactorings, language ports, framework upgrades, or any transformation that should preserve behavior. Automatically compares test results, execution traces, API responses, and observable outputs between two repository versions. Provides actionable guidance for fixing deviations and ensuring behavioral equivalence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate, compare, and manage vendor relationships. Trigger with "evaluate this vendor", "compare vendors", "vendor review", "should we renew", "RFP", or when the user is making procurement or vendor decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate, refine, compare, and when needed validate distinctive names for startups, AI products, developer tools, protocols, open-source projects, apps, product families, local businesses, services, companies, nonprofits, and other organizations. Use when asked to name or rename a business, brand, product, venture, shop, studio, or organization; derive a name from an existing project or concept; create a company and product naming system; compare candidates; or check company, domain, package, repository, marketplace, or trademark conflicts. Default to a fast no-browse creative pass; use current validation when the user requests availability or research, or is choosing a final name. Do not claim legal clearance, purchase domains, or present stale or unverified availability as fact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare WOZCODE vs vanilla Claude Code on the user's codebase — real cost, turn, and time savings. TRIGGER on "compare woz", "how much does woz save", "benchmark woz", "woz vs claude", "show me savings", or /woz-benchmark.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare evaluated runs in a retort experiment along factor dimensions. Surfaces effects of each factor, aggregates across replicates, and highlights cells that diverge qualitatively — complementing (not replacing) retort's ANOVA analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Visualizes ChIP-seq data using deepTools (computeMatrix, plotHeatmap, plotProfile, bamCoverage, bamCompare), pyGenomeTracks (modern INI-driven track plots), Gviz (R browser-style), EnrichedHeatmap (ComplexHeatmap-based), ChIPseeker tag heatmaps, and IGV batch screenshots. Handles bigWig normalization choices (CPM, BPM, RPGC, spike-in scaled), bamCompare operations (log2 ratio, subtract, SES), k-means clustering of heatmaps for biological subgrouping, and spike-in-scaled tracks for global-shift experiments. Use when generating publication-quality ChIP-seq signal heatmaps, profile plots, genome-browser tracks, or comparing samples visually.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。