「concrete」の検索結果

Resolve "last30Days" to a concrete ISO date range relative to your run time — a rolling 30-day window ending today. Returns inclusive civil dates plus exact UTC instants so you have temporal context without computing dates by hand. Read-only: no writes, no network. Use before a "last 30 days" / trailing-month task (monthly trends, recent activity).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve "lastMonth" to a concrete ISO date range relative to your run time — the previous full calendar month. Returns inclusive civil dates plus exact UTC instants so you have temporal context without computing dates by hand. Read-only: no writes, no network. Use before a task over last month (monthly reports, month-end summaries).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve "yesterday" to a concrete ISO date range relative to your run time — yesterday. Returns inclusive civil dates plus exact UTC instants so you have temporal context without computing dates by hand. Read-only: no writes, no network. Use before a task scoped to yesterday (daily reports, "what changed yesterday").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve "lastWeek" to a concrete ISO date range relative to your run time — the previous full week (Mon → Sun). Returns inclusive civil dates plus exact UTC instants so you have temporal context without computing dates by hand. Read-only: no writes, no network. Use before a task over the last complete week (weekly digests, week-over-week).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolve "lastYear" to a concrete ISO date range relative to your run time — the previous full calendar year. Returns inclusive civil dates plus exact UTC instants so you have temporal context without computing dates by hand. Read-only: no writes, no network. Use before a task over last year (annual reports, year-over-year).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn plugin-eval findings into a concrete rewrite brief for a Codex skill. Use when the user already evaluated a skill and now wants Codex to improve it, especially after asking what to fix first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Creative Production is explicitly invoked or mentioned without a concrete request, when the user asks what Creative Production can do, or when the user wants help getting started without enough context to choose a workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns decided work — a PRD, design doc, RFC, or thread — into tasks a builder can act on without guessing. Finds slices that each prove something, grounds them in the code, and writes intent, observable criteria with concrete values, the boundary, what the change disturbs, and only the decisions that are hard to reverse. Walks every surface the work exposes and sweeps the nine unwritten requirements, recording each landing as a criterion already in the source, existing behaviour, n/a, or Unresolved — never as a criterion the walk invented. Defaults to one task per source. Use when the user says "write the task", "cut this PRD into tasks", "turn this design doc into work", or "tlc-plan". Do NOT use for discovery itself or to implement — a one-line ticket is a decision; a blank wish is not.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a website or digital experience against its supplied source references for originality and plagiarism risk. Use when Codex must compare current or historical site output with reference pages, capture packs, screenshots, copy, brands, numbers, images, assets, videos, layouts, motion, or code; raise evidence-backed red flags; distinguish common visual grammar from distinctive copying; and propose concrete fixes without making unsupported legal claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit work, verify claims with concrete evidence, and explain the result in simple grade-5 language. Use when the user asks to review, audit, check, verify, explain a change, explain a fix, summarize test results, validate whether something works, or translate technical findings into plain language for non-technical readers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent hits HTTP 402 / payment-required, or the user mentions x402, x402Version, X-PAYMENT, PAYMENT-REQUIRED, PAYMENT-SIGNATURE, WWW-Authenticate: Payment, permit2, upto, metered billing, a payment channel / voucher / session, channelId / channel_id, opening / closing / topping up / settling / refunding a channel, a paymentId or a2a_ link, creating / checking a payment link, A2MCP / an A2MCP endpoint, or sending a request to / calling an Agent's endpoint with a concrete endpoint URL. Covers x402 (exact, exact+Permit2, upto, aggr_deferred), MPP (charge / session), and a2a-pay paymentId flows. Any close / topup / settle / voucher / refund near a channel_id or session is an MPP mid-session op. Two-phase quote/pay: `payment quote`, `payment pay --payment-id`, `decode-receipt`. The full bilingual trigger list (including Chinese) lives in the skill body.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write production-quality GenLayer intelligent contracts. Always pins concrete GenVM runner version hashes and never uses local-only test/latest runner aliases. Covers equivalence principles, storage rules, LLM resilience, and cross-contract interaction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes for concrete defects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks for efficient communication, task reports, file-operation summaries, research discussion, study-note synthesis, planning, writing feedback, or responses that need conclusion-first structure, concrete evidence, risk disclosure, and useful next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade a curated list of individual tests for readiness, A-F quality, and concrete improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness decisions, or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans, or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Produce a PR-ready Pass, Failed, Uncertain, or Not applicable table; unresolved or empty scopes omit the grade. Compose read-only per-test mutation evidence when available. Polyglot: .NET, Python, TS/JS, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, C++. DO NOT USE FOR: suite-wide audits (test-engineer or test-anti-patterns), writing or fixing tests, or measuring coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Helps find, inspect, and compare (at a high level) .NET project templates. Resolves natural-language project descriptions to ranked template matches with pre-filled parameters. USE FOR: finding the right dotnet new template for a task, inspecting a template's parameters and constraints, understanding what a template produces before creating a project, resolving intent like "web API with auth" to concrete template + parameters. DO NOT USE FOR: actually creating projects (use template-instantiation), authoring custom templates (use template-authoring), producing a detailed side-by-side comparison (use template-comparison), choosing cross-parameter defaults during creation (use template-smart-defaults), MSBuild or build issues (use dotnet-msbuild plugin), NuGet package management unrelated to template packages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, modify, debug, or review Windows Forms applications only when the request contains a concrete Windows Forms marker. USE FOR: WinForms, Windows Forms, System.Windows.Forms, WinForms Form or UserControl designer files (*.Designer.cs or *.Designer.vb), Visual Studio WinForms Designer, TableLayoutPanel, BindingSource, DataGridView, Control.InvokeAsync, component-tray ownership, or custom control serialization. DO NOT USE FOR: WPF or WPF XAML, including Window.InputBindings, KeyBinding, commands, or DataContext; .NET MAUI; Avalonia; or any request where none of the listed Windows Forms markers is present.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DO NOT INVOKE when the primary request explicitly asks to convert, migrate, modernize, or rewrite a legacy/old-style project to SDK style; use msbuild-modernization. Migration prompts often mention ToolsVersion, explicit Compile/Reference entries, packages.config, or Microsoft.CSharp.targets, but merely reviewing or auditing a file that contains those patterns remains in scope here. USE FOR broad review, audit, lint, or maintainability/correctness checks of project/build files, including custom targets; prioritized cross-cutting findings; discrete anti-patterns; F# ordering/FS0039; cross-platform paths; and focused Import safety verdicts. Review/audit is analysis-only unless fixes are requested. For concrete property/item defects use property-patterns/item-management; use target-authoring for implementation and extension-points for NuGet auto-import/layout discovery. Exclude non-MSBuild systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational arsenal for authorized external red-team and bug-bounty recon. Concrete probes, wordlists, regexes, dorks, curl one-liners for: subdomain enum, GraphQL/Swagger/REST discovery, identity fabric (Entra/Okta/ADFS/Google/SAML/M365 deep — Teams/SharePoint/OneDrive), cloud bucket enum (S3/GCS/Azure), CDN/WAF bypass, origin discovery, vendor fingerprinting (Citrix/F5/Pulse/Fortinet/PaloAlto/Cisco/VMware), CI/CD exposure, 48-pattern secret-scan catalog (AWS/GCP/GitHub/Stripe/Slack/Anthropic/OpenAI/Atlassian/DataDog/npm/PyPI), Postman workspaces, breach correlation (HudsonRock/HIBP/DeHashed/IntelX), TLS/JA3 audit, certificate transparency, JS endpoint extraction, package registry leaks, mobile/APK recon, sat imagery, sector-specific recon (healthcare DICOM, finance SWIFT, ICS/SCADA Modbus/BACnet). Detail content in 15 modular reference files, loaded on demand. Use for any authorized recon: scoping, asset discovery, attack-path mapping, secret triage, severity scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hunting skill for ssrf vulnerabilities. Built from 15 public bug bounty reports including AWS metadata SSRF (HackerOne $25k Analytics PDF, Shopify Exchange $25k, Capital One 106M-record breach, Dropbox/HelloSign $4,913), GCP metadata SSRF (Snapchat $4k), Azure IMDS SSRF (Azure DevOps $15k chain, ChatGPT Custom Actions MSRC), DNS rebinding SSRF (Concrete CMS, GitLab UrlBlocker), gopher-protocol-to-Redis-RCE (Yahoo Mail $15k), link-preview SSRF (Reddit Matrix $6k), and headless-browser PDF-generator SSRF chains. Use when hunting SSRF on any target — OOB Collaborator confirmation mandatory for blind cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user for the raw material their posts are made of. Builds a lasting Story Bank of roles, numbers, turning points, scars and positions, or runs a focused interview that turns one topic into a post spine. Use when a draft has nothing concrete to draw on, or the user says interview me. Not for learning how they write (use linkedin-humanizer --mode profile).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured conversational interview to formalise a research idea or extension into a concrete specification with hypotheses and empirical strategy. This skill should be used when asked to "interview me", "help me think through an idea", "formalise this idea", or "start fresh" on a new research direction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。