「framing」の検索結果

Create a clean modern design system with a luminous blue sky atmosphere, soft drifting cloud light, minimal white framing, and serene premium typography.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create polished 60 fps 4:3 4K browser screen-recording style videos from Codex in-app browser captures, with browser-only crop, natural macOS cursor styling, deliberate click choreography, zoom-follow framing, ffprobe/thumbnail verification, and optional native recording compatibility checks. Use when the user asks to record or re-record browser actions, show cursor clicks and zooms, make Dribbble/UI inspiration or product demo recordings, or asks whether Codex, Playwright, or an MCP can produce a natural browser demo video.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement or tune Three.js game cameras. Use for isometric framing, follow behavior, orbit/zoom limits, occlusion, lock-on, camera shake, touch camera controls, and camera regression tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bugcrowd-specific reporting tactics complementing report-writing: VRT category search-and-fallback strategy when no exact match exists, manual severity override when VRT defaults underrate impact, severity-request paragraph as first body section, OOS-clause rebuttal templates (rate limiting on auth-flow endpoints, debug-info framing, user-enumeration with sensitive PII, theoretical-issue counter), chained-finding cross-reference patterns, target selection for QA-vs-prod programs, researcher-side hygiene (Bugcrowdninja email alias, account state restoration, friendly-tester posture). Use when filing a Bugcrowd submission, when VRT default seems wrong, when triager closes as OOS or downgrades severity, when chaining linked submissions, or when scope distinguishes production from QA. Pairs with report-writing and triage-validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses a research paper outline (.qmd file) against structured criteria from Kosuke Imai's empirical research guide. Evaluates the abstract and section outline for: research question clarity, stated contributions, hypotheses and testable implications, data description, planned results and inferential approach, and robustness checks. Detects causal papers from the abstract and conditionally assesses identification strategy only when causal framing is present. Produces a structured markdown report with PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL assessments and actionable suggestions. Use when asked to assess, evaluate, review, or check a paper outline, abstract-and-outline, or research plan in a .qmd file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

URL validation and content sanitization for untrusted sources — use when handling external input safely

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "map the category narrative", "tear down how competitors tell their story", or "find the language conventions in our market"; produces a category narrative map — the dominant stories and points of view in the category, its language conventions and framing clichés, and a per-competitor narrative teardown (arc, claimed onlyness, proof pattern) plus how each rival's messaging has shifted over time (scraped copy vs archived copy). Not for the positioning canvas itself — use positioning-mapper; not for the beachhead's beliefs and objections — use audience-belief-mapper; not for SERP keyword targeting — use keyword-research; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 品类叙事/竞争叙事拆解/语言惯例/叙事演变

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify, score, and prioritise design opportunities against impact and effort. Use when there are more ideas than capacity. For framing the one you choose, use `design-brief`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define actionable principles that resolve trade-offs when the team disagrees. Use when the same decisions keep getting relitigated. For a single project's framing, use `design-brief`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and facilitate a design sprint from challenge framing through prototype testing. Use when compressing discovery into days. For ongoing team cadence, use `team-workflow`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitate a structured team critique — framing, feedback rules, and actionable outcomes. Use when running a session with people in the room. For a solo expert review, use `heuristic-evaluation` (prototyping-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map functional, emotional, and social jobs with outcome expectations. Use when reframing decisions around motivation rather than features. For who the user is, use `user-persona`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build research-grounded personas with goals, frustrations, and behavioural patterns. Use when decisions need a consistent user reference. For one session's emotional snapshot use `empathy-map`; for motivation framing use `jobs-to-be-done`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze and operate an AssemblyAI Streaming v3 session with safe tokens, audio framing, turn handling, and explicit termination. Use when building live captions or voice agents. Trigger with "AssemblyAI streaming", "AssemblyAI v3 WebSocket", or "live transcript".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP request smuggling and desynchronization testing. Use when front proxies, CDNs, or load balancers disagree with the origin on message framing (Content-Length vs Transfer-Encoding), on HTTP/2→HTTP/1 translation, or when exploring client-side desync via browser fetch pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP/2 protocol-specific attack playbook. Use when the target supports HTTP/2 and you need to exploit binary framing, HPACK compression, h2c upgrade smuggling, pseudo-header injection, stream multiplexing abuse, or H2→H1 downgrade translation flaws.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discover what customers truly need by analyzing the "job" they hire your product to do. Use when the user mentions "customer discovery", "why customers churn", "what job does this solve", "competing against luck", "product-market fit", "switching behavior", "milkshake moment", or "functional vs emotional jobs". Also trigger when investigating why users choose competitors, designing features around real customer needs, or reframing a value proposition. Covers JTBD interviews, competition analysis, and jobs-oriented roadmaps. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For rapid validation, see design-sprint. For non-leading interview technique, see mom-test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies decision science and cognitive bias research to marketing and product decisions — how people actually choose under uncertainty, and how framing, defaults, sequencing, and social context change behavior. Use this to diagnose why a well-argued offer is not converting, to structure choices and pricing presentation, to design an experience around how attention and memory work, or to pressure-test whether a persuasion tactic is legitimate or manipulative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs corporate development — deal thesis, target screening, valuation framing, diligence, and integration planning. Use this when considering an acquisition or being approached about one, when evaluating build-versus-buy at company scale, when running or reviewing diligence, or when planning how an acquired business will actually be integrated.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answers a business question with data without fooling yourself — framing the question so an answer would change something, choosing the right comparison, checking the data before trusting it, recognizing the traps that produce confident wrong answers (aggregation reversals, survivorship, regression to the mean, multiple comparisons), and reporting uncertainty honestly. Use this to run an analysis, review one before acting on it, or work out why two people looking at the same data reached opposite conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Owns where the business plays and how it wins over a multi-year horizon — portfolio choices, corporate development, strategic partnerships, and planning under uncertainty. Use this for a decision about which markets or businesses to be in, whether to build, buy, or partner, how to allocate capital across business lines, or when a long-horizon bet needs framing. Distinct from `chief-executive`, which arbitrates present-quarter conflicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Two stages: first a single-page sheet of numbered panels from an image model, then that sheet fed to Seedance as the reference. The sheet owns order, framing and timing, and the video prompt only has to connect the panels. Use when the user wants a Seedance 2.5 / 2.0 video prompt for this kind of clip (Storyboard grid to video; 中文触发词: 分镜网格转视频, 分镜图, 九宫格, 故事板), or asks how published cases of this type were prompted. Read references/cases.md before drafting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a translational blueprint for moving a biomedical finding toward diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response prediction, patient stratification, or therapeutic development, with explicit translational milestones, validation thresholds, and feasibility-sensitive route framing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs a realistic, execution-aware biomedical study version under explicit constraints of samples, time, budget, data access, lab capacity, team skill, and validation resources. Always use this skill when the user has a real study idea, a candidate route, or a partially framed project but cannot assume ideal conditions. If critical feasibility inputs are missing, first clarify what resources are currently available, what resources may be obtainable, and what resources are realistically unavailable. Do not invent access, capabilities, collaborations, or validation resources. Focus first on feasibility-constrained study framing, route narrowing, dependency control, and minimum viable study design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。