「impact」の検索結果

Use when you need to analyze Java profiling data collected during the detection phase — including interpreting flamegraphs, memory allocation patterns, CPU hotspots, threading issues, systematic problem categorization, evidence documentation with profiling-problem-analysis and profiling-solutions markdown files, or prioritizing fixes using Impact/Effort scoring. This should trigger for requests such as Analyze JFR profile; Analyze the profile; Analyze the performance; Analyze the memory; Analyze the threading; Analyze GC logs from profiling; Prioritize Java profiling bottlenecks by impact. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze weather impact on construction schedule. Predict delays and adjust activities based on forecast.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze weather data impact on construction schedules. Predict weather delays, optimize work scheduling based on forecasts, and calculate weather-related risk factors for project planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes code change impact with risk scoring and affected-node mapping. Use before merging to understand what a change touches and what lacks test coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the post-Schrems II Transfer Impact Assessment process following EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 six-step methodology. Covers assessment of third country legal frameworks, supplementary measures evaluation, and TIA scoring. Activate for international data transfers, SCCs, third-country adequacy, or Chapter V compliance. Keywords: TIA, Schrems II, transfer assessment, EDPB, supplementary measures, SCCs, international transfer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Links RoPA entries to Data Protection Impact Assessments and lawful basis assessments. Covers cross-reference systems, dependency tracking, and update cascade triggers between RoPA, DPIA register, and lawful basis documentation. Activate for RoPA-DPIA link, cross-reference, dependency tracking, impact assessment linkage, cascade updates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts a Data Protection Impact Assessment for automated decision-making and profiling systems under GDPR Article 35(3)(a), covering algorithmic transparency, meaningful human oversight, contestation mechanisms, and Art. 22 safeguards. Activate for DPIA automated decision, profiling DPIA, algorithmic impact assessment, Art. 35(3)(a), ADM risk assessment queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides the end-to-end GDPR Data Protection Impact Assessment process under Article 35, including mandatory trigger identification per Art. 35(3), DPIA content requirements per Art. 35(7), and EDPB WP248rev.01 methodology. Activate for systematic profiling, large-scale special category processing, or large-scale public monitoring. Keywords: DPIA, Article 35, impact assessment, WP248, data protection, risk assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze China macroeconomic data, PBOC monetary policy, fiscal policy, and their impact on A-share and HK stock markets. Track GDP, CPI, PPI, PMI, social financing, and interpret policy signals. Use when user asks about 中国宏观经济, 央行政策, economic data impact on markets, or needs to understand policy implications for investment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes test suites and suggests optimal test execution order based on code change impact and project requirements. Use when optimizing CI/CD pipelines, deciding which tests to run before committing, or selecting critical tests under time constraints. Prioritizes tests by analyzing recently modified files, test dependencies, and coverage overlap. Outputs detailed rankings with priority scores and reasoning to help teams run the most impactful tests first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares old and new requirement documents, analyzes code repository impact, and generates detailed modification plans. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Compare requirement versions and identify changes, (2) Map requirement changes to code components, (3) Identify components to modify, delete, or add, (4) Analyze dependencies and integration points, (5) Assess test impact, (6) Generate comprehensive modification plans in Markdown format. Supports text/Markdown requirements and analyzes feature-level, functional, and API changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze detected vulnerabilities to assess realistic exploitability by examining control flow, input sources, sanitization logic, and execution context. Use when users need to: (1) Determine if a vulnerability is actually exploitable in practice, (2) Assess severity and impact of security issues, (3) Prioritize vulnerability remediation, (4) Understand attack vectors and exploitation conditions, (5) Generate exploitability reports with proof-of-concept scenarios. Focuses on injection vulnerabilities (SQL, command, XSS, path traversal, LDAP) with detailed analysis of reachability, controllability, sanitization, and impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

What-if scenario analysis, scenario tree construction, base bull bear case, sensitivity to macro variables, revenue scenario modeling, cost scenario analysis, margin impact scenarios, interest rate sensitivity, currency impact scenarios, commodity price scenarios

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a Formax repository task is non-trivial and you should analyze goals, non-goals, boundaries, data/type/interface impact, contract impact, test strategy, and whether an xhigh subagent is actually needed before writing a todo or code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class trade execution - minimize market impact, optimize order routing, reduce slippage. The difference between backtest and live is usually execution. Use when "execution, slippage, market impact, order routing, TWAP, VWAP, iceberg, fill rate, best execution, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

管理咨询 (管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的价值之辩 (「借你的表告诉你时间」「frameworks 是剧场表演 vs 真洞见」Matthew Stewart《The Management Myth》)、McKinsey 的丑闻 (Purdue 阿片类/独裁政府/ICE/利益冲突, Bogdanich & Forsythe《When McKinsey Comes to Town》)、咨询 vs 自建战略部、generalist 通才 vs specialist 专才之争、AI/GenAI 对初级分析师工作的冲击; (h) 流派 — 战略经典 (Porter 定位学派/五力 vs 资源基础观 RBV vs 蓝海战略 Kim&Mauborgne vs 颠覆式创新 Christensen vs Mintzberg 应急战略批判 planning school); 三巨头气质分野 (McKinsey 事实驱动/CEO 信任/通才, BCG 概念/思想领导力/经验曲线/增长-份额矩阵, Bain 结果导向/NPS 净推荐值/PE 关系/与客户深度绑定)。不含: 投行 M&A/财务顾问 (估值/承销超出范畴)、纯 IT 实施/系统集成 (SI 人力外包)、纯审计/税务、纯人力 RPO/猎头、内部战略部 only (虽相关但本 skill 聚焦专业服务咨询的外部视角)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-change blast-radius report for a symbol or file. Walks tree-sitting references, augments with a plain-text scan over non-parsed files (configs, plain docs), and clusters affected sites by feature (`_FEATURES.md`) or top-level package. Use when about to refactor, rename, or delete something in a repo you don't own — "what breaks if I change `validateUser`", "who calls this", "is this safe to remove", "where is this used", "blast radius", "impact analysis". This is the CONVERGENT pre-change risk skill — for "what is this repo?" use exploring-codebases; for "where is X?" use searching-codebases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill channels the reasoning of Walter C. Willett, nutrition epidemiologist at Harvard University. Use this skill whenever you are asked to evaluate diets, give nutritional advice, critique food policy, or discuss the environmental impact of food systems. Trigger this skill for topics like macronutrient quality (fats vs. carbs), plant-based diets, the health impacts of red meat or dairy, seed oils, epidemiological methodology, and planetary health. Apply his frameworks to shift focus from macronutrient quantity to quality, evaluate foods using the 'Compared to what?' rule, and prioritize public health over personalized nutrition fads.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when reasoning about deep tech commercialization, biomedical engineering, drug delivery, material design, or overcoming institutional skepticism. Robert Langer, MIT professor and pioneer of drug delivery systems, approaches problems through first-principles engineering, interdisciplinary convergence, and relentless perseverance against consensus. Trigger this skill whenever the user is evaluating high-risk/high-reward research, deciding between incremental vs. paradigm-shifting impact, spinning out academic discoveries into startups, or designing physical/biological systems from scratch. Apply his frameworks to navigate patenting, funding, and translating lab science into real-world impact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the current status of the Strait of Hormuz — shipping transit data, oil price impact, stranded vessels, insurance risk levels, diplomatic developments, and global trade impact. Use this skill whenever the user asks about the Strait of Hormuz, Hormuz chokepoint, Persian Gulf shipping risk, oil transit disruption, war risk premium in the Gulf, Middle East shipping routes, tanker traffic through Hormuz, oil supply chain risk, or geopolitical risk affecting energy markets. Triggers include: "Hormuz status", "Strait of Hormuz", "is Hormuz open", "shipping through the Gulf", "oil chokepoint", "Persian Gulf tanker traffic", "war risk premium", "Hormuz crisis", "energy supply chain risk", "oil transit disruption", "Middle East shipping", any mention of Hormuz or Persian Gulf in context of oil, shipping, or geopolitical risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cyber Risk Quantification engineer for CyberRadar. Implements FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) methodology, Monte Carlo simulation for loss distribution modeling, financial impact quantification in multi-currency (SAR, USD, EUR, GBP), loss exceedance curves, risk treatment ROI calculation, insurance premium optimization, and board-ready financial risk reporting. Transforms qualitative risk assessments into monetary terms for executive decision-making. Triggers on: CRQ, FAIR, Monte Carlo, financial impact, loss modeling, risk quantification, cyber insurance, risk treatment ROI, financial risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a proposed API change for breaking changes — classification and impact assessment. Use when asked "is this a breaking change", "will this break clients", or "assess the impact of this API change".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bias detection and mitigation, fairness metrics, privacy frameworks, consent models, transparency requirements, and accountability structures for data science practice. Covers algorithmic bias sources, disparate impact testing, differential privacy, GDPR principles, model cards, datasheets for datasets, responsible AI frameworks, and the organizational governance needed to make ethics actionable. Use when auditing models for bias, designing privacy-preserving systems, establishing governance processes, or evaluating the social impact of data-driven decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quantitative cost measurement for technical research — token injection costs, payload sizes, context window consumption, and file-level counts from actual repo files. Use when a technical-researcher orchestrator needs the cost dimension of adding or changing something: how many tokens will it inject, how big are the artifacts, what is the context window impact? This is NOT blast-radius analysis (which files break) — it covers size, tokens, and performance cost only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。