「model comparison」の検索結果

Estimate a public company's intrinsic value with DCF, relative (peer multiple), and sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) methods, then blend them into an implied share price with upside/downside vs the market price, a WACC and terminal-growth sensitivity grid, and bull/base/bear scenarios. Use this skill whenever the user asks what a company or ticker is worth: fair value, intrinsic value, implied share price, a price target from fundamentals, whether it is overvalued or undervalued, building a DCF (WACC, terminal value, discounted cash flow), EV/EBITDA or P/E based targets, peer comparison valuation, or SOTP and conglomerate discounts. Run the model rather than answering valuation questions from memory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns an answer into a one-page visual HTML explainer: the model writes a short Markdown draft and the bundled CLI builds one page. Use it proactively and liberally, without being asked, whenever a page would help the reader more than plain text, even if plain text would also work: any explanation of how something works or how parts relate (flow, request path, architecture, code or folder structure, state machine, lifecycle, history); any comparison, trade-off or decision with pros and cons; any diagnosis, review or investigation, especially with several causes or findings to rank; any answer with a table, a numbered or ranked list, steps, branches or several sections; or when the user says "I don't get it / draw it / explain visually / 讲讲原理 / 没看懂 / 画个图". When in doubt, use it: a page is quick and cheap to make. Also for explainer videos ("make a video", "做个视频") and for changing its settings. Skip only for small talk, a trivial one-line answer, or when the user asks for plain text.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete conventional non-oncology diagnostic machine-learning research designs from a user-provided disease context, optional mechanism theme, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on disease-vs-control transcriptome comparison, optional mechanism-gene restriction, feature shrinkage, diagnostic model construction, ROC / calibration / DCA evaluation, interpretation layers, and orthogonal validation. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when screening differentially expressed genes from a bulk expression matrix between two user-specified groups, producing DEG tables, a volcano plot, and a clustered heatmap. Triggers include DEG analysis, volcano plot, clustered heatmap, limma-based two-group comparison, and case-vs-control screening. NOT for single-cell RNA-seq, multi-group contrasts, count-model workflows such as DESeq2/edgeR, or non-expression omics data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate one or more standalone Meta image-ad creatives via ChatGPT Image 2 (gpt-image-2) through the Arcads external API. Locks the model, auto-strips platform chrome, enforces edge-safe layouts and glyph-safety inside body text. Use when the user asks for a "gpt-image-2 ad", "ChatGPT Image ad", "Image 2 ad creative", "make a static image ad with GPT", or anchors on a need for typography-heavy / dense-text / UI-mimicry ad creatives (chat threads, comparison tables, fake search results, iOS dialogs, Slack snapshots, ChatGPT-conversation ads, Apple Notes lists). Does NOT trigger on Nano Banana cues — use nano-banana-image-ad for those.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures and runs LLM evaluation using Promptfoo framework. Use when setting up prompt testing, creating evaluation configs (promptfooconfig.yaml), writing Python custom assertions, implementing llm-rubric for LLM-as-judge, or managing few-shot examples in prompts. Triggers on keywords like "promptfoo", "eval", "LLM evaluation", "prompt testing", or "model comparison".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**WORKFLOW SKILL** - Evaluate AI agent skills using structured benchmarks with YAML specs, fixture isolation, and pluggable validators. USE FOR: run waza, waza help, run eval, run benchmark, evaluate skill, test agent, generate eval suite, init eval, compare results, score agent, agent evaluation, skill testing, cross-model comparison. DO NOT USE FOR: improving skill frontmatter (use waza dev), creating new skills from scratch (use skill-creator), token counting or budget checks (use waza tokens). INVOKES: Copilot SDK executor, mock engine, code/regex validators. FOR SINGLE OPERATIONS: use waza run directly for a single benchmark.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monitor competitor pricing pages via live web scrape and Web Archive snapshots. Track plan changes, tier restructuring, new pricing models, and feature gating shifts. Produces a pricing comparison matrix and flags when a competitor changes packaging. Use when a product marketing team needs to stay current on competitive pricing or when preparing for a pricing change of their own.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects aberrant splicing in single rare-disease patients vs a control panel using FRASER 2.0 (Bioconductor; Beta-binomial autoencoder on Intron Jaccard Index, default delta cutoff 0.1, q hyperparameter), OUTRIDER (gene-level outlier expression via autoencoder denoising), LeafcutterMD (Dirichlet-multinomial outlier mode of LeafCutter for annotation-free junctions), and DROP (Snakemake pipeline integrating FRASER2 + OUTRIDER + monoallelic expression for clinical diagnostics). The statistical model is fundamentally different from differential splicing — single-sample-vs-cohort outlier detection rather than two-group comparison. Standard tool in EU rare-disease (Solve-RD) and NIH UDN programs. Use when applying RNA-seq to undiagnosed Mendelian disease, validating predicted splice variants in clinical samples, or detecting cryptic splicing in disease tissue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic competitor analysis covering product teardowns, 12-dimension scoring rubric, feature comparison matrices, SWOT analysis, pricing model deconstruction, UX audits, and strategic action plans with stakeholder presentation templates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a calculator, financial model, investor memo, due diligence report, risk review, dashboard, or client-facing explanation needs clear distinctions between accounting and finance concepts such as cash flow vs profit, EBIT vs EBITDA, CapEx vs OpEx, debt vs equity, market value vs book value, ROI vs ROE, assets vs liabilities, and accounting vs finance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BEER implements a Bayesian model for analyzing phage-immunoprecipitation sequencing (PhIP-seq) data. Given a PhIPData object, BEER returns posterior probabilities of enriched antibody responses, point estimates for the relative fold-change in comparison to negative control samples, and more. Additionally, BEER provides a convenient implementation for using edgeR to identify enriched antibody responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides multi-school trading Q&A, chart/OHLCV analysis, annotation, and fresh-market workflows covering ICT/SMC, ChanLun, Wyckoff, Price Action, Order Flow, VSA, and Elliott Wave. Use for trading concepts; capability-discovery questions about available analysis lenses, Schools, models, modes, or data sources; attached charts; pasted OHLCV; chart annotation; or asset-plus-timeframe requests across crypto, stocks, or forex. Defaults unselected market analysis to strict ICT/SMC, honors explicit School/source selectors, and fails closed when no native analyzer exists. Phase 1 comparison is Q&A-only; fetch fresh Mobius Quant API data only after the capability gate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refine task prompts and propose controlled comparisons without claiming to change model settings or activate plugins. Use for this Bot Generator Bot template; creates drafts or simulations within its declared scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop and consult this skill whenever your response would include specific facts about Anthropic's products. Covers: Claude Code (how to install, Node.js requirements, platform/OS support, MCP server integration, configuration), Claude API (function calling/tool use, batch processing, SDK usage, rate limits, pricing, models, streaming), and Claude.ai (Pro vs Team vs Enterprise plans, feature limits). Trigger this even for coding tasks that use the Anthropic SDK, content creation mentioning Claude capabilities or pricing, or LLM provider comparisons. Any time you would otherwise rely on memory for Anthropic product details, verify here instead — your training data may be outdated or wrong.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve mouse phenotype data from the Jackson Laboratory Mouse Phenome Database (MPD) via its REST API. Browse 520+ projects, look up per-project measure metadata, pull strain-level means (raw or LS-mean adjusted) and per-animal values, find measures by MP/VT ontology terms, and resolve strain nomenclature or gene coordinates. Use for QTL support, cross-strain comparison, mouse model selection, and ontology-driven phenotype discovery. Use monarch-database for disease-gene-phenotype knowledge graphs; ensembl-database for mouse genome annotations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bulk RNA-seq DE with PyDESeq2: load counts, normalize, fit negative binomial models, Wald test (BH-FDR), LFC shrinkage, volcano/MA plots. Use for two-group comparisons, multi-factor designs with batch correction, multiple contrasts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process drone survey data for construction sites. Generate orthomosaics, DEMs, point clouds, calculate volumes, track progress, and integrate with BIM models for comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explain why counterexamples violate specifications by analyzing formal specifications (temporal logic, invariants, pre/postconditions, code contracts), informal requirements (user stories, acceptance criteria), test specifications (assertions, property-based tests), and providing step-by-step traces showing state changes, comparing expected vs actual behavior, identifying root causes, and assessing violation impact. Use when debugging test failures, understanding model checker output, explaining runtime assertion violations, analyzing static analysis warnings, or teaching specification concepts. Produces structured markdown explanations with traces, comparisons, state diagrams, and cause chains. Triggers when users ask why something failed, explain a violation, understand a counterexample, debug a specification, or analyze why a test fails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Carbon Cycle Scientist. Use when a task calls for Carbon Cycle Scientist judgment. Reasons from carbon mass balance across reservoirs and timescales, sign conventions, and budget closure through the Global Carbon Budget protocol, ONEFlux/REddyProc eddy-covariance processing, atmospheric inversions (CarbonTracker, CAMS, GEOS-Chem), Δ¹⁴C/δ¹³C isotopic partitioning, and ILAMB model evaluation while treating NEE sign mismatches, gap-filled GPP read as measured, fixed-depth SOC comparisons, and uncounted lateral aquatic carbon export as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Data Version Control for ML projects. Track large datasets and models alongside Git, build reproducible ML pipelines, and run experiments with metric comparison. Works with any storage backend including S3, GCS, Azure, and local filesystems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。