「sme」の検索結果

Identify design quality issues in code including high coupling, low cohesion, God classes, long methods, and other code smells. Use when: (1) Reviewing code architecture and design quality, (2) Identifying refactoring opportunities, (3) Detecting God classes or classes with too many responsibilities, (4) Finding high coupling or low cohesion issues, (5) Analyzing code maintainability and technical debt. Detects coupling smells, cohesion problems, complexity issues, size violations, and encapsulation problems with actionable refactoring suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify and report code smells indicating poor design or maintainability issues in Python code, including duplicate code, magic numbers, hardcoded values, God classes, feature envy, inappropriate intimacy, data clumps, primitive obsession, and long parameter lists. Use when conducting code quality audits, preparing for refactoring, improving codebase maintainability, or performing design reviews. Produces markdown reports with severity ratings, locations, descriptions, and specific refactoring recommendations with before/after examples. Triggers when users ask to find code smells, identify design issues, suggest refactorings, improve code quality, or detect maintainability problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Life-Cycle Assessment Analyst. Use when a task calls for Life-Cycle Assessment Analyst judgment. Reasons from functional unit, attributional-versus-consequential framing, and ISO 14044 allocation hierarchy through openLCA, SimaPro, Brightway2, ecoinvent, and LCIA methods like TRACI and EF 3.0 while treating allocation-driven ranking flips, biogenic-versus-fossil carbon mistagging, cut-off-masked hotspots, and PCR mismatch as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or review legal risk assessment deliverables with traceable assumptions, decision criteria, ownership, and risk controls. Use when the user asks for legal risk assessment planning or analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an instructor asks for a MATLAB Grader assessment setup guide, adoption guide, pilot plan, course-specific rollout, QTI 3 sharing workflow, or recommended MATLAB Grader assessment-item-generation configuration based on a learning objective, course title, course description, module description, lab description, or assessment goal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate MATLAB Grader assessment items that are suitability-gated, profile-driven, feedback-aware, and validated through MATLAB MCP. Produces Script, Function, Class Definition, Class Inheritance, Object Usage, and Class Methods items with MATLAB Grader assessment setup instructions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select the right formative assessment technique for a specific learning moment, purpose, and age group. Use when choosing how to check understanding during, between, or after lessons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify curriculum content into Know, Understand, and Do categories to align teaching and assessment approaches. Use when planning units, writing objectives, or selecting assessment methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design multi-informant assessment approaches for dispositional competencies like curiosity or resilience. Use when assessing character strengths or competencies that written tests cannot capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments (FRIA) for high-risk AI systems as required by EU AI Act Article 27. Use when (1) deployers of high-risk AI systems (Annex III) need to assess fundamental rights impacts before first use, (2) public bodies or private entities providing public services are deploying AI systems, (3) credit scoring or insurance risk assessment AI systems are being deployed (Annex III 5b, 5c), (4) evaluating impact on natural persons' fundamental rights (dignity, liberty, privacy, data protection, non-discrimination, children's rights, etc.), or (5) creating EU AI Act Article 27 compliance documentation with market surveillance notification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assessing anthropogenic environmental impacts — pollution pathways, habitat destruction and fragmentation, land-use change, invasive species, overharvest, and extinction debt. Covers environmental impact assessment (EIA) methodology, exposure-effect relationships, population viability analysis, IPAT and ecological footprint frameworks, and strategic environmental assessment. Use when quantifying or forecasting human impacts on ecosystems, designing monitoring programs, or evaluating a proposed intervention against a baseline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review touched code for maintainability smells such as duplication, awkward indirection, suspicious clones, dead code, poor naming, and Boy Scout cleanup opportunities. Use when a broad review needs a dedicated maintainability pass or when the user asks for code-smell review specifically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI self-healing through systematic subsystem assessment, rebalancing, and integration. Maps healing modalities to AI-internal processes: memory foundation, reasoning clarity, tool use accuracy, communication alignment, and creative coherence. Covers assessment triage, subsystem scanning, drift correction, and memory integration. Use mid-session when responses feel formulaic or disconnected, after a chain of errors suggesting subsystem drift, when context overload may have staled earlier assumptions, or as proactive maintenance between complex tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to write a threat / risk / vulnerability assessment, or wants the appropriate template for each type. Distinct structures and section ordering per assessment kind. Prefers graded evidence items from /quality-of-information-check and runs that skill first when handed raw URLs or text. Confidence is capped by the weakest load-bearing claim, and at Moderate when the evidence is ungraded.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess business impact of a proposed change. Use when the user says "impact assessment", "impact analysis", "what will this change affect", "change impact", "who is impacted", "ripple effects", "downstream impact", "impact mapping", "what breaks if we change this", "readiness for change" - even if they don't explicitly say "impact assessment".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a defendant employer's Answer to a workplace harassment complaint. Responds paragraph-by-paragraph to allegations, asserts Faragher-Ellerth and other affirmative defenses, and follows federal/state civil procedure rules. Use when defending employers at the pleadings phase against Title VII, state FEHA, or other employment harassment claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aesthetic assessment and design scoring across 6 dimensions. Use for UI critique, design review, visual quality assessment, remix suggestions. Activate on "design critique", "aesthetic review", "UI assessment", "visual quality", "design score", "remix this design". NOT for implementation (use frontend-developer), accessibility-only audits (use color-contrast-auditor), or brand identity creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VRIO resource analysis combined with Dynamic Capabilities assessment. Use this skill to identify real competitive advantages (Barney VRIO framework), then test whether the organisation can sense new opportunities, seize them, and transform itself to stay ahead (Teece dynamic capabilities). Runs in three modes — full diagnostic for deep first-use sessions, review mode for quick re-assessment, and alert triggers for defining early-warning signals. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about competitive advantage, defensibility, resource assessment, why competitors are gaining ground, organisational agility, or whether advantages will hold. Based on practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Schedule Management Handbook (2024 edition, Revision 2). Use for program/project schedule management of aerospace and large engineering efforts: the five sub-functions (Planning, Development, Assessment & Analysis, Maintenance & Control, Documentation & Communication); the Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) and the WBS/OBS/CBS breakdown structures; the Schedule Management Plan (SMP) and Basis of Estimate (BoE); Critical Path Method, logic, durations, float and margin; tiered schedule assessment (Requirements/Health/Basis checks, the Shock Test) and the Dimensions of Schedule Reliability; Schedule Risk Analysis (SRA), Integrated Cost-Schedule Risk Analysis (ICSRA), Monte Carlo, correlation, merge bias, and the Joint Confidence Level (JCL); baselining, replan vs. rebaseline, EVM schedule metrics (SPI, BEI, CEI, HMI, Earned Schedule, CPLI), and status/progress/forecast reporting. This is NASA's scheduling doctrine grounded in NPR 7120.5 and the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide. Thin on the underlying mechanics of CPM, statistics, and EVM (it points to companion handbooks); aerospace/space-flight-centric; anchored to the 2024 second edition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G). Use for program cost estimating: the four characteristics of a reliable estimate (comprehensive, well documented, accurate, credible) and the 18 best practices; the 12-step cost estimating process (purpose, plan, technical baseline, WBS, ground rules and assumptions, data, point estimate, sensitivity, risk/uncertainty, document, present, update); estimating methods (analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, learning curves); Monte Carlo risk/uncertainty analysis, confidence levels and contingency; auditing and validating an estimate against the characteristics; earned value management (EIA-748, BCWS/BCWP/ACWP, CPI/SPI/TCPI, EAC, PMB, IBR); and specialized techniques (software cost estimating, learning curves, Analysis of Alternatives, WBS templates, the Green Book internal-control framework). This is the cost-estimating companion to the GAO Schedule and Technology Readiness Assessment guides. Does not cover schedule estimating/risk in depth (see the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide), agency-specific cost models, or the full text of referenced standards (EIA-748, MIL-STD-881D, the Green Book) — these are named, not reproduced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0, released in February 2024, provides a comprehensive taxonomy for managing cybersecurity risk through six core Functions - Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover. bu skill covers conducting a maturity assessment against the CSF using Implementation Tiers to measure organizational cybersecurity posture and create improvement roadmaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects test antipatterns and code smells in PHP test suites. Identifies 15 smells (Logic in Test, Mock Overuse, Fragile Tests, Mystery Guest, etc.) with fix recommendations and refactoring patterns for testability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。