「vendor」の検索結果

Use when a marketing BUDGET has to be planned or managed in USD — allocation by bucket, channel, and month, test versus scale split, scale-up and stop-loss thresholds, reserve, a plan-versus-actual tracker, and a review cadence. Trigger on 'budget planning', 'marketing budget', 'split the budget across channels', 'stop loss threshold', 'quarterly budget', 'we keep overspending and nobody notices'. Also use when a number has been approved and nobody has divided it up. Not for — the revenue-backward math that produces the number, see `10-reverse-kpi-global`; paid media allocation only, see `54-media-plan-global`; paying an external vendor, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agency or freelancer takes on a NEW client and needs everything up front — an 11-section intake covering business overview, audience, current marketing, goals, budget, timeline, brand assets, approval process, and success criteria, written for the client to fill in and return. Trigger on 'client intake', 'agency brief', 'onboard a new client', 'discovery call template', 'what should I ask a new client', 'kickoff questionnaire'. Also use when the user just signed someone and does not know where to begin. Not for — the internal context file the skills read, see `product-marketing-context-global`; the plan built from the answers, see `00-marketing-plan-global`; briefing an outside vendor, see `67-agency-vendor-brief-global`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementing the IAB Transparency and Consent Framework v2.2 for programmatic advertising consent management. Covers CMP registration, Global Vendor List integration, TC String encoding, publisher restrictions, and compliance validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Framework for evaluating and selecting Consent Management Platforms (CMPs). Covers TCF v2.2 certification requirements, Global Privacy Control support, multi-regulation compliance (GDPR, CCPA, LGPD), A/B testing capabilities, API integration options, reporting features, and a structured vendor comparison methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a comprehensive breach response team playbook defining CSIRT and privacy team structure with named roles (incident commander, legal counsel, communications, IT forensics, DPO), escalation matrices, communication templates, pre-negotiated vendor contacts, and regulatory authority contacts organized by jurisdiction. Keywords: breach response playbook, CSIRT, incident response team, escalation matrix, communication templates, vendor contacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quota-triggered failover from Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Hermes or OpenClaw. When armed, it reads the sender quota and tries other-vendor models in place, then receiving agents in the configured order. Use when a long run must finish even if one vendor's quota runs out. Not a monitor for anything else.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authoritative guidance for building Claude Code skills, agents, and plugins, plus init and update steps that install and refresh the plugin-building skills in the current repository. Use when you need the rules or best practices for a skill, agent, hook, or plugin — designing, reviewing, hardening, or checking one against the guidance. Run with `init` to vendor the guidance, skill-builder, and agent-builder skills into the current repository (so they run with no dependency on this plugin) plus a path-scoped rule index, or `update` to refresh an already-vendored copy. Does not run an interview to build a new skill or agent from scratch — use skill-builder or agent-builder. Does not write feature code, review application code, or build non-plugin features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate vendors with comparison matrices, TCO analysis, risk assessment, reference check templates, and negotiation strategies

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Make technology decisions for every product capability by discovering existing assets, evaluating vendor-aligned options, and categorizing as Reuse/Extend/Build/Buy/Integrate/Research during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Handles both greenfield and brownfield contexts. Triggers on "tech stack", "build or buy?", "what technologies?", "technical decisions", "what do we reuse?", "existing stack", "vendor constraint", "IBM-first", "what tools do we need?", "evaluate solutions", "select tech stack". Consumes FEA- (features), SCR- (screens), RISK- (constraints). Outputs TECH- entries with decisions, rationale, and cross-references. Feeds v0.6 Architecture Design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue real repository work between Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Grok Build with a privacy-bounded, drift-aware handoff packet. Use for cross-vendor takeover, context-limit checkpoints, multi-hop Claude→Codex→Grok relays, or receiving an existing Director packet. Use native resume commands for same-CLI history; never treat another vendor's session ID as portable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft or review legal ops documents — NDA, MSA, SaaS agreement review checklist, vendor contract terms. Use when asked to "review this contract", "draft an NDA", "what should I look for in this agreement", or "build our contract review process".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operations reconnaissance — audit process documentation, vendor contracts, compliance posture, OKR health, and cross-functional friction points to understand where operations is the bottleneck. Use when asked to "audit our operations", "where are we slow", "what processes are broken", or "before designing a compliance program".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An AI analyst for buying B2B software. Investigates what vendors claim, checks the evidence, surfaces contradictions and unanswered questions, and produces a shareable Decision Brief with the questions to ask before you buy. Quick Eval by default; Deep Eval on request. Use when asked to evaluate, compare, vet, or research B2B software vendors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operates or audits a live Qualtrics survey through the v3 APIs without disrupting fielding. Covers publish gating, quotas, flow routing, embedded data, panel-vendor redirects, read-back verification, and a read-only pre-fielding audit. Use when publishing or patching a fielding instrument, when a quota counts without blocking, when configuring panel-vendor redirects or flow gates, or when auditing a survey before launch for consent gates, force-response completeness, quotas and redirects, anti-bot instrumentation, and language-arm symmetry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evidence needs grading before anyone reasons from it — the user asks "how reliable is this?", "grade this source", "check this report", "can I trust this article?", "is this corroborated?", or hands over a URL, a pasted report or a Liberty91 event ahead of an ACH or assessment. The Quality of Information Check from the CIA Tradecraft Primer, adapted for vendor and press CTI reporting. Resolves each document to its originating source, splits it into claims, and grades every claim on two written elements, access level (how the source knows) and claim support (what backs the statement), with a stated rationale, using a fixed rubric with hard caps. The grade is not an Admiralty rating. Five outlets citing one vendor report count as one source; anything that cannot be traced to a primary is capped, not guessed. Returns a graded claim table, gaps, a deception screen and JSON. /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments run it first by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dark web intelligence collection methodology — vendor-first access posture, sourced reference lists for 35+ underground forums and 30+ Telegram channels, OPSEC primer, passive-monitoring strategy, and bundled Python CLIs for onion-indexer search, Telegram channel monitoring, and local keyword matching. Use when the user wants to design or run dark-web collection, build a selector list, pick a vendor, or set up monitoring infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Solve the newsvendor problem for single-period ordering decisions under uncertain demand. Use this skill when the user needs to determine optimal order quantity for perishable goods, seasonal products, or one-time purchase decisions — even if they say 'how much to order for this season', 'perishable inventory', or 'single-period ordering'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full legal plugin suite for commercial contract review, privacy/DPA analysis, and AI governance vendor reviews. Use when the user invokes /commercial-legal:review, /privacy-legal:dpa-review, /ai-governance-legal:vendor-ai-review, renewal tracking, DSAR responses, or EU AI Act triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

In-house legal workflows for contract review against playbooks, NDA triage with GREEN/YELLOW/RED ratings, compliance briefings, and vendor checks. Use when the user invokes /review-contract, /triage-nda, /legal-risk-assessment, or /vendor-check for organisation-standard legal analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Marketing analytics and data-driven optimization for B2B SaaS campaigns. Use this skill when analyzing marketing performance, optimizing conversion rates, running A/B tests, conducting customer research, creating marketing dashboards, building attribution models, analyzing funnel metrics, or storytelling with data. Also triggers on: marketing ops, performance analytics, CRO, A/B testing, data storytelling, customer insights, tracking plan, event taxonomy, UTM taxonomy, GA4 audit, consent mode, instrumentation contract, sample size calculation, minimum detectable effect, test duration, not enough traffic to A/B test, statistical significance, Bayesian vs frequentist, sample ratio mismatch, experiment feasibility, martech stack, marketing tech stack audit, tool consolidation, build vs buy, vendor evaluation, shadow IT tools, ESP/CRM/platform migration, switching cost, cutover plan, suppression list migration, data portability, customer interviews, survey design, sampling frame, non-response bias, how many people should I interview, thematic saturation, voice of customer, jobs-to-be-done, buyer persona research, is this finding real, data enrichment, which enrichment provider should we buy, waterfall enrichment, contact data quality, match rate, our list data is bad, email verification, catch-all domain, accept-all, bounce rate from bad data, B2B data decay, how often should we re-verify contacts, ZoomInfo vs Apollo vs Clearbit evaluation, cost per usable record, where did this list come from, GDPR Article 14 notice, purchased list compliance, suppression screening, TAM list building, demand planning, marketing plan, how many leads do we need, what pipeline target should marketing carry, funnel model, top-down vs bottom-up plan, plan of record, annual marketing planning, quarterly planning, pipeline coverage we have to create, sales cycle lag, our leads cannot close this quarter, carry-in pipeline, scenario planning, conservative moderate aggressive forecast, stretch target, reforecast, re-forecast triggers, assumption register, capacity ceiling, addressable audience ceiling, marginal cost per lead, blended CPL is wrong, we missed plan and nobody knows why, AI policy for the marketing team, AI governance, AI acceptable use policy, which AI tools are we allowed to use, can I paste customer data into ChatGPT, shadow AI, AI use register, human review of AI output, when can we stop reviewing every AI draft, can the agent send on its own, the AI made a mistake now what, pull back AI autonomy, AI evals, our AI vendor changed the model, AI output went out wrong, prompt injection, can our AI read prospect replies safely, lethal trifecta, the AI leaked internal notes, turn off auto-generated ad assets, auto-applied recommendations, AI literacy training, EU AI Act Article 4, duplicate records in the CRM, dedupe before import, which value wins in a merge, CRM cleanup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-funnel paid advertising operations for B2B SaaS. Use this skill for PPC strategy, Google Ads optimization, LinkedIn Ads, social media advertising, programmatic buying, creative strategy, attribution modeling, budget allocation, budget pacing and planned-vs-delivered reconciliation, audience overlap and campaign self-competition audits, suppression lists, ROAS improvement, media spend optimization, and the media no auction sells — newsletter and podcast sponsorships, community and industry-publication placements, paid review-site listings on G2 and Capterra, and pay-per-lead content syndication. It also covers buying on the AI answer surface — ads inside Google AI Overviews and AI Mode that existing Search, Shopping and Performance Max campaigns already serve into with no opt-out, no placement targeting and no segmented reporting, and ChatGPT Ads and Microsoft Copilot as separate opt-in platforms with their own plan-tier reach limits, no negative keywords, and a landing-page crawler gate. It also owns the conversion signal the bidding algorithms learn from — CRM pipeline stages (SQL, opportunity, closed-won) sent back to Google Ads, LinkedIn, Meta and Microsoft Ads through offline conversion import, enhanced conversions for leads, the Google Data Manager API and the LinkedIn Conversions API, with click-ID capture, stage values, dedupe, EEA consent signals and retractions. It also gates connected TV (CTV) and streaming video for B2B — whether a reach medium belongs in the plan, how a vendor ties a TV household to a target account (member data, IP-to-account graph or contextual), the server-side ad insertion (SSAI) fraud questions, Programmatic Guaranteed deals, and a holdout lift test because CTV has no click. It also runs person-led paid social — LinkedIn Thought Leader Ads and Meta partnership ads that put spend behind an employee's or creator's post — on a paid-usage term, an in-post disclosure check and an end-date register, because the platform approval carries no term. Also triggers on: CTV, connected TV, OTT, streaming TV ads, should we run CTV, LinkedIn CTV, B2B CTV, account-based CTV, SSAI fraud, thought leader ads, boost an employee's post, sponsor a creator's post, partnership ads, whitelisting, creator usage rights, PPC, Google Ads, LinkedIn Ads, social ads, programmatic, ad creative, attribution, media budget, paid campaigns, ROAS, CPA, ad spend, newsletter sponsorship, podcast sponsorship, community sponsorship, sponsor a newsletter, content syndication, pay-per-lead, cost per lead vendor, media kit, rate card, insertion order, direct buy, publisher partnership, make-good, G2 paid listing, Capterra ads, review site advertising, sponsorship ROI, budget pacing, we underspent our budget, are our campaigns competing with each other, audience overlap, self-competition, campaign cannibalization, suppression list, exclusion list, ad frequency across channels, how many ad accounts do we have, ads in AI Overviews, AI Mode ads, ChatGPT Ads, OpenAI Ads Manager, Copilot ads, conversational ads, should we advertise on ChatGPT, can we buy our way into the AI answer, our ads are showing in AI Overviews and we cannot report on it, context hints, OAI-AdsBot, our ad landing page fails review, robots.txt is blocking our ads, our paid leads are junk, Google Ads is optimizing for the wrong leads, offline conversion import, OCI, enhanced conversions for leads, send CRM stages back to Google Ads, upload SQLs to LinkedIn, LinkedIn Conversions API, LinkedIn CAPI, Meta conversion leads, CRM to ad platform, gclid, li_fat_id, msclkid, value-based bidding, optimize for pipeline not form fills, low match rate, conversion lag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Advertising and Promotions Manager — building a media plan backward from an objective and budget, briefing or evaluating creative against a brief, negotiating with agencies/media vendors, sanity-checking vendor-reported attribution, or reading a post-campaign debrief to separate delivery performance from response performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI compliance analysis for EU AI Act, ISO 42001, NIST AI RMF, GDPR, OECD, financial services regulations (SEC, FCA, FINRA, DORA, MiFID II), and other frameworks. Use when asked to generate a compliance checklist for an AI tool or use case, determine if a risk assessment is required, score an AI tool's risk level, identify where an AI tool or use case could run afoul of regulatory requirements, perform a gap analysis, recommend remediation steps, assess a vendor, draft an acceptable use policy, map training requirements, or review jurisdiction-specific AI rules. Triggers on phrases like "compliance checklist", "risk assessment", "risk score", "does this comply", "EU AI Act", "ISO 42001", "NIST AI RMF", "AI governance", "gap analysis", "vendor assessment", "acceptable use policy", "MNPI", "AI training requirements", or any request to evaluate an AI tool or use case for regulatory compliance or risk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Swap the external provider/library that backs a crouton package (e.g. the map renderer, geocoder, editor engine, storage SDK) while keeping the package's public API stable so consuming apps need no changes. Use when asked to "change the X provider", "replace library Y in package Z", "switch from <vendor A> to <vendor B>" inside packages/. Encodes the keep-the-API-stable playbook + the gotchas (dist .d.ts over docs, generator templates, fixtures, dup-dep type clashes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。