「red」の検索結果

Bulk-regenerate broken test selectors after a UI refactor or redesign. Detects drift between old and new DOM with an aria-snapshot diff, maps old locators to new equivalents using role-first + region scoping, validates against the new build, and produces a single PR with grouped per-file selector updates and per-change evidence. Assumes Playwright >= 1.50 (trace viewer DOM-snapshot panel, getByRole filtering, ariaSnapshot). Use when: "UI refactor broke tests," "redesign broke tests," "bulk update selectors," "regenerate selectors after refactor," "selector drift," "fix N broken tests after redesign." Not for: healing one flaky test at runtime — use test-reliability. Not for: writing a new test suite from scratch — use playwright-automation. Not for: re-recording tests after a framework switch (Selenium to Playwright) — use test-migration. Related: test-reliability, playwright-automation, test-migration, ci-cd-integration, visual-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Surface risks through guided questioning, helping users consider pivots, constraints, and prioritization during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Triggers on requests to identify risks, stress-test the idea, perform red team review, or when user asks "what could go wrong?", "identify risks", "red team", "risk assessment", "challenge assumptions", "stress test the idea". Consumes all prior IDs (CFD-, BR-, FEA-, PER-, UJ-, SCR-) as interview context. Outputs RISK- entries with owner decisions and mitigations. Feeds v0.5 Technical Stack Selection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symfony UX LiveComponent for reactive server-rendered UI -- components that re-render via AJAX on user interaction, zero JavaScript required. Use when building live search, real-time filtering, dynamic forms, inline validation, dependent selects, auto-save, polling, deferred/lazy rendering, or any UI that updates itself based on user input. Code triggers: AsLiveComponent, LiveProp, LiveAction, data-model, data-loading, data-live-action-url, ComponentWithFormTrait, LiveListener, emit, defer, lazy, polling. Also trigger when the user asks "how to build a search that filters as I type", "how to validate a form in real-time", "how to make a reactive component in PHP", "how to build dependent selects", "how to defer component rendering", "how to communicate between components via emit", "how to bind a form to a LiveComponent". Do NOT trigger for static reusable UI without reactivity (use twig-component), pure client-side JS behavior (use stimulus), or page-level navigation (use turbo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Написание русскоязычной статьи или лонгрида с нуля: бриф, фактура, структура, черновик и самопроверка по методу Людмилы Сарычевой. Use this skill whenever the user asks to write, outline, structure, draft, assemble, or turn notes/interviews/materials into a Russian article, newsletter essay, longread, case, guide, or expert text. Триггеры: «напиши статью», «собери лонгрид», «напиши текст для блога про…», «есть интервью с экспертом, сделай статью», «составь план статьи», «придумай структуру», «собери материал», «сделай черновик», «напиши колонку», «из интервью в статью», «план лонгрида», «текст с нуля», «помоги написать материал». Для коротких постов в соцсети см. skill post; для правки готового текста — redaktura; для текстов интерфейса — ux-copy; для настройки проекта — redpolitika.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

UX-тексты на русском языке: кнопки, формы, ошибки, пустые состояния, онбординг, подтверждения, уведомления, пуши и микрокопия. Use this skill whenever the user asks to write, rewrite, review, choose, or improve interface copy, product messages, UI strings, transactional emails, push notifications, toasts, snackbars, forms, empty states, onboarding, errors, confirmations, labels, tooltips, or button text. Триггеры: «текст для кнопки», «сообщение об ошибке», «текст в форму», «пустое состояние», «подпись к полю», «текст тоста», «снекбар», «онбординг», «пуш-уведомление», «микрокопия», «UX-текст», «что написать на экране…», «лейбл поля», «тултип», «подтверждение удаления», «письмо-уведомление». Для статей и постов см. skills statya и redaktura; для проектного словаря — redpolitika.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer questions about the AI SDK and help build AI-powered features. Use when developers: (1) Ask about AI SDK functions like generateText, streamText, ToolLoopAgent, embed, or tools, (2) Want to build AI agents, chatbots, RAG systems, or text generation features, (3) Have questions about AI providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc.), streaming, tool calling, structured output, or embeddings, (4) Use React hooks like useChat or useCompletion. Triggers on: "AI SDK", "Vercel AI SDK", "generateText", "streamText", "add AI to my app", "build an agent", "tool calling", "structured output", "useChat".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert in Crawl4AI, the open-source web crawler built for AI applications. You help developers extract clean, structured data from websites for LLM training, RAG pipelines, and content analysis — with automatic markdown conversion, JavaScript rendering, CSS-based extraction, LLM-powered structured extraction, and session management for multi-page crawling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mask, redact, and anonymize sensitive data (PII, PCI, PHI) in databases, logs, and APIs. Use when protecting PII in dev/staging environments, redacting sensitive data from logs, anonymizing data for analytics, or applying k-anonymity and differential privacy for GDPR-compliant data sharing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract structured data from any document format using unified document processing. Use when a user asks to extract data from a document, parse a PDF, pull structured data from files, convert documents to JSON or CSV, extract fields from invoices or forms, or scrape data from documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check for data breaches and credential leaks using HaveIBeenPwned API and other sources. Use when: checking if an email or domain is in a known breach, assessing corporate credential exposure, password hygiene audits, or pre-engagement phishing simulation scoping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class application logging - structured logs, correlation IDs, log aggregation, and the battle scars from debugging production without proper logsUse when "log, logging, logger, debug, trace, audit, structured log, correlation id, request id, log level, winston, pino, bunyan, log4j, logging, observability, debugging, monitoring, tracing, structured-logs, correlation, aggregation" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BullMQ expert for Redis-backed job queues, background processing, and reliable async execution in Node.js/TypeScript applications. Use when "bullmq, bull queue, redis queue, background job, job queue, delayed job, repeatable job, worker process, job scheduling, async processing, bullmq, bull, redis, queue, background-jobs, job-processing, async, workers, scheduling, delayed-jobs" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

World-class caching strategies - cache invalidation, Redis patterns, CDN caching, and the battle scars from cache bugs that served stale data for hoursUse when "cache, caching, redis, memcached, cdn, ttl, invalidation, stale, cache aside, write through, cache stampede, thundering herd, cache warming, etag, cache-control, caching, redis, memcached, cdn, performance, http-cache, ttl, invalidation" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Global content at the speed of AI. This skill covers the full spectrum of AI-powered localization: translation, cultural adaptation, voice localization, visual adaptation, and the orchestration required to take content from one language/market to 50. Traditional localization is slow, expensive, and creates bottlenecks. AI-powered localization enables simultaneous global launches, personalized content by market, and continuous localization as content evolves. But localization isn't just translation. It's cultural adaptation. It's knowing that colors mean different things in different cultures, that humor doesn't translate, that some messages must be completely reimagined for new markets. Use when "localize, localization, translate, translation, multi-language, international, global, multilingual, market adaptation, cultural adaptation, other languages, different countries, localization, translation, international, global, multilingual, cultural-adaptation, ai-dubbing" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive patterns for building AI-powered code generation tools, code assistants, automated refactoring, code review, and structured output generation using LLMs with function calling and tool use. Use when "code generation, AI code assistant, function calling, structured output, code review AI, automated refactoring, tool use, code completion, agent code, " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit experiment integrity against the evidence ledger. At L2 (repo + result files present) a fresh cross-model reviewer reads the eval code line-by-line for fake/derived ground truth, score self-normalization, phantom results (a paper number with no backing file/key), dead/uncalled metric code, verified-scope inflation, method-described ≠ method-evaluated drift, synthesized-looking results, placeholder/fake data still wired into a released result, code-output ≠ reported-number mismatch, and missing reproducibility artifacts (an empirical/agent/LLM paper shipping neither code nor the prompts/configs its results need) — every finding span-anchored to a ledger claim_id. At L0/L1 (PDF / source only) the same patterns are surfaced as info-level 'could-not-verify' signals where the ledger gives an anchor (observability_level_required:2) — NEVER a fraud verdict from a PDF. The reviewer PROPOSES findings; tools/adjudicate_findings.py computes the verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "experiment forensics", "audit the results", "check the eval code", "实验诚实度".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end substantive-integrity forensic sweep of a research paper (especially autoresearch / AI-Scientist-style output). Orchestrates the whole pipeline: ingest (arxiv-id | pdf | dir → working dir + pdftotext for L0) → /evidence-ledger (artifact manifest + observability level L0/L1/L2 + span-anchored claims.json) → fan out the integrity auditor skills (consistency, citation, baseline, experiment, presentation, proof-derivation, eval-design — each reads the ledger, emits span-anchored findings) + the zero-verdict-weight AIS writing-style track → advisory memos (/adversarial-case-builder + /novelty-duplication-advisory, no verdict weight) → deterministic tools/adjudicate_findings.py (--ledger REQUIRED) → reviewer-ready Integrity Forensics Report. Cross-model (fresh codex per dimension) and reviewer≠adjudicator: the model proposes findings, the deterministic adjudicator decides the verdict. Observability-aware, detect-only, never an opaque AI-text classifier (a separate zero-weight AIS section lists AI writing-style impressions, never moving the verdict). Triggers: "anti-autoresearch", "integrity audit this paper", "forensic review", "audit a submission", "审一篇投稿的诚信".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWT — AI-Powered E2E Testing (Beta) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs AI-powered E2E web testing — eyes and hands for AI coding tools. Declarative YAML scenarios, Playwright execution, visual matching (OpenCV + OCR), platform auto-detection (Flutter/React/Vue), learning DB. Install: npx skills add ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt -g and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWT — AI-Powered E2E Testing (Beta) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs AI-powered E2E web testing — eyes and hands for AI coding tools. Declarative YAML scenarios, Playwright execution, visual matching (OpenCV + OCR), platform auto-detection (Flutter/React/Vue), learning DB. Install: npx skills add ksgisang/awt-skill --skill awt -g and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

推特中文圈 AI 自媒体博主 (推特(X) 中文圈 AI 自媒体博主 (从业者视角) — 在 X/推特 用中文做 AI 内容的自媒体博主，重点是**怎么写推文/thread、怎么制作内容**。覆盖: (a) 选题 — AI 模型发布解读 / prompt 技巧 / AI 工具实测 / AI 出海与独立开发(build in public) / 英文一手编译翻译 / 信息差 / AI 资讯快讯 / 深度长推; (b) 文案与内容结构(核心) — 单条推(开头钩子/信息密度/短句断行/配图截图/数据图)、长推与 thread(首条钩子/编号/逻辑链/结尾关注 CTA)、引用锐评(quote tweet)、排版可读性、配图(ray.so/carbon 代码图/产品截图/对比图); (c) 内容制作工作流 — 找信息源(英文一手/arXiv/官方/Reddit/HN)→选题→编译总结加洞察→写推/thread→配图→发布→互动维护; (d) AI 工具用于内容生产 — 英文一手编译总结(GPT/Claude/Kimi)、配图(ray.so/carbon/截图美化)、thread 工具(Typefully/Hypefury)、翻译、排程分析; (e) 平台机制与涨粉 — X 算法时间线(转评赞/互动权重/外链降权)、蹭热点借势、互动与回复、build in public 涨粉、英文区搬运到中文区的信息差红利; (f) 变现(次要) — 广告 / 知识星球 / 社群 / 付费课程 / 咨询 / 导流。学派分歧: 编译搬运(英文一手翻译) vs 原创洞察、快讯资讯 vs 深度长推、锐评玩梗 vs 严肃干货、build in public vs 纯内容、全 AI 自动发 vs 人工精选。代表生态(宝玉/歸藏/向阳乔木/AI 进化论/小互/Gorden Sun 等)。不含: 英文 AI Twitter 圈(聚焦中文圈)、通用 X 增长营销、其他平台、AI 工具技术原理。) Master OS — automated mastery of 推特(X) 中文圈 AI 自媒体博主 (从业者视角) — 在 X/推特 用中文做 AI 内容的自媒体博主，重点是**怎么写推文/thread、怎么制作内容**。覆盖: (a) 选题 — AI 模型发布解读 / prompt 技巧 / AI 工具实测 / AI 出海与独立开发(build in public) / 英文一手编译翻译 / 信息差 / AI 资讯快讯 / 深度长推; (b) 文案与内容结构(核心) — 单条推(开头钩子/信息密度/短句断行/配图截图/数据图)、长推与 thread(首条钩子/编号/逻辑链/结尾关注 CTA)、引用锐评(quote tweet)、排版可读性、配图(ray.so/carbon 代码图/产品截图/对比图); (c) 内容制作工作流 — 找信息源(英文一手/arXiv/官方/Reddit/HN)→选题→编译总结加洞察→写推/thread→配图→发布→互动维护; (d) AI 工具用于内容生产 — 英文一手编译总结(GPT/Claude/Kimi)、配图(ray.so/carbon/截图美化)、thread 工具(Typefully/Hypefury)、翻译、排程分析; (e) 平台机制与涨粉 — X 算法时间线(转评赞/互动权重/外链降权)、蹭热点借势、互动与回复、build in public 涨粉、英文区搬运到中文区的信息差红利; (f) 变现(次要) — 广告 / 知识星球 / 社群 / 付费课程 / 咨询 / 导流。学派分歧: 编译搬运(英文一手翻译) vs 原创洞察、快讯资讯 vs 深度长推、锐评玩梗 vs 严肃干货、build in public vs 纯内容、全 AI 自动发 vs 人工精选。代表生态(宝玉/歸藏/向阳乔木/AI 进化论/小互/Gorden Sun 等)。不含: 英文 AI Twitter 圈(聚焦中文圈)、通用 X 增长营销、其他平台、AI 工具技术原理。: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on 推特(X) 中文圈 AI 自媒体博主 (从业者视角) — 在 X/推特 用中文做 AI 内容的自媒体博主，重点是**怎么写推文/thread、怎么制作内容**。覆盖: (a) 选题 — AI 模型发布解读 / prompt 技巧 / AI 工具实测 / AI 出海与独立开发(build in public) / 英文一手编译翻译 / 信息差 / AI 资讯快讯 / 深度长推; (b) 文案与内容结构(核心) — 单条推(开头钩子/信息密度/短句断行/配图截图/数据图)、长推与 thread(首条钩子/编号/逻辑链/结尾关注 CTA)、引用锐评(quote tweet)、排版可读性、配图(ray.so/carbon 代码图/产品截图/对比图); (c) 内容制作工作流 — 找信息源(英文一手/arXiv/官方/Reddit/HN)→选题→编译总结加洞察→写推/thread→配图→发布→互动维护; (d) AI 工具用于内容生产 — 英文一手编译总结(GPT/Claude/Kimi)、配图(ray.so/carbon/截图美化)、thread 工具(Typefully/Hypefury)、翻译、排程分析; (e) 平台机制与涨粉 — X 算法时间线(转评赞/互动权重/外链降权)、蹭热点借势、互动与回复、build in public 涨粉、英文区搬运到中文区的信息差红利; (f) 变现(次要) — 广告 / 知识星球 / 社群 / 付费课程 / 咨询 / 导流。学派分歧: 编译搬运(英文一手翻译) vs 原创洞察、快讯资讯 vs 深度长推、锐评玩梗 vs 严肃干货、build in public vs 纯内容、全 AI 自动发 vs 人工精选。代表生态(宝玉/歸藏/向阳乔木/AI 进化论/小互/Gorden Sun 等)。不含: 英文 AI Twitter 圈(聚焦中文圈)、通用 X 增长营销、其他平台、AI 工具技术原理。 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「推特 ai 博主」「推特中文 ai」「x ai 自媒体」「推特 thread」「推特爆款推文」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

独立开发者与微型 SaaS — 单人或极小团队 (≤3 人) 构建可持续订阅收入的软件产品商业, 有别于自由职业/咨询、企业级 SaaS 和开源维护: (a) 产品发现与验证 (自己的痒 vs 市场优先 Nugent/Walling; 着陆页冒烟测试; 先接 Stripe 再写代码; JTBD 访谈适配独立开发者场景; Reddit/HN/X/社区痛点挖掘; Mom Test 验证框架; 公开构建作为验证机制); (b) 独立开发者技术架构 (无聊技术论 McKinley; 单体优先; serverless vs VPS 在 ≤$100/月预算下的取舍; Rails/Django/Laravel/Next.js 等框架的出货速度选型; 托管服务优先于自建; Supabase/PlanetScale/Neon 数据库即服务; Clerk/Auth0 认证即服务; Stripe/Paddle/LemonSqueezy 支付; Vercel/Fly.io/Railway 部署; AI 辅助编码 Cursor/Copilot 作为力量倍增器); (c) 无营销团队的分发与增长 (SEO 作为微型 SaaS 护城河; Product Hunt 发布; AppSumo 终身授权利弊; 冷邮件; Twitter/X 公开构建; IndieHackers 社区分发; 集成市场 Shopify/WordPress/Zapier/Slack 应用目录; 联盟计划; 一人内容营销); (d) 定价与变现 (SaaS 定价心理学; freemium vs 免费试用 vs 纯付费; 按席位 vs 按用量 vs 固定费率; 年付折扣; 老用户保价; 微型 SaaS 流失率控制; MRR/ARR/LTV/CAC 在微型规模的含义; $10K MRR 里程碑心理学); (e) 独立创始人心智模型与生活设计 (default alive vs default dead Graham; 拉面盈利 Levels; 生活方式生意 vs 增长生意的光谱; 独立开发者倦怠预防; 时间管理与上下文切换成本; 地理套利与远程优先; 一次构建反复销售的资产思维; 社区作为支持网络 IndieHackers/WIP/MicroConf); (f) 法务与运营基础 (公司注册地选择 LLC/Ltd/GmbH 税效; Stripe Atlas vs Firstbase vs 本地律师; 服务条款与隐私政策; GDPR/CCPA 低成本合规; 知识产权基础; 首次雇人的承包商 vs 员工选择; 独立开发者会计 SaaS — Xero/QuickBooks; 多辖区税务义务)。中国独立开发者生态: 出海作为主导策略 (从中国构建面向全球市场的产品以避开国内竞争/监管); 即刻/V2EX/少数派作为社区枢纽; 微信小程序作为替代分发; 小报童/爱发电作为中文市场变现; 人民币定价心理学; 支付宝/微信支付集成; ICP 备案要求; 中国区 App Store 审核差异; 独立开发者周刊。诚实处理: 生存偏差 (每一个 Pieter Levels 背后是数千个从未达到 $1K MRR 的人), AI 对微型 SaaS 生态位的颠覆 (wrapper 产品脆弱), 独自构建的孤独与心理健康成本, 公开构建的表演性质 vs 真正透明, AppSumo 终身授权上瘾毁坏单位经济, 样板代码销售的伦理边界。不含: 企业级 SaaS (不同 GTM/销售/融资模型), 不含: 自由职业/咨询 (用时间换钱非建资产), 不含: 开源维护 (不同可持续性模型), 不含: 风投支持的创业 (不同增长期望), 不含: 无代码/低代码平台构建 (相邻但不同受众), 不含: 内容创作作为主业。 (Independent Developer and Micro-SaaS — the craft of single-person or tiny-team (≤3 people) software product businesses that generate sustainable recurring revenue without venture capital, distinct from freelancing/consulting, enterprise SaaS, and open-source maintainership: (a) product discovery and validation (scratching your own itch vs market-first Nugent/Walling; landing page smoke tests; Stripe checkout before code; Jobs-to-Be-Done interview adapted to solo context; Reddit/HN/X/community pain-point mining; idea validation frameworks Fitzpatrick Mom Test; build-in-public as validation mechanism); (b) technical architecture for solo operators (boring technology thesis Mckinley; monolith-first; serverless vs VPS tradeoffs for ≤$100/mo infra; framework selection for shipping speed — Rails/Django/Laravel/Next.js/Remix/SvelteKit; managed services over self-hosted whenever possible; database-as-a-service Supabase/PlanetScale/Neon/Turso; auth-as-a-service Clerk/Auth0/Supabase Auth; payment integration Stripe/Paddle/LemonSqueezy; deployment Vercel/Fly.io/Railway/Render; monorepo vs polyrepo for solo; AI-assisted coding Cursor/Copilot as force multiplier); (c) distribution and growth without a marketing team (SEO as moat for micro-SaaS Ahrefs-style content marketing on 1-person budget; Product Hunt launches; AppSumo lifetime deals tradeoffs; cold email outreach; Twitter/X building in public; IndieHackers community distribution; integration marketplaces Shopify/WordPress/Zapier/Slack app directories as channels; affiliate programs; content marketing at scale-of-one); (d) pricing and monetization (SaaS pricing psychology Patel/Campbell; freemium vs free trial vs paid-only; per-seat vs usage-based vs flat-rate; annual discount strategies; grandfathering existing customers; churn reduction for micro-SaaS — Baremetrics/ProfitWell/ChartMogul analytics; MRR/ARR/LTV/CAC at micro scale; the $10K MRR milestone psychology); (e) solo founder mental model and lifestyle design (default alive vs default dead Graham; ramen profitability Levels; lifestyle business vs growth business spectrum; burnout prevention for solo operators — no team to delegate to; time management and context-switching costs; geographic arbitrage and remote-first; the 'build once sell twice' asset mindset; community as support network IndieHackers/WIP/MicroConf); (f) legal and operational basics (incorporation LLC/Ltd/Gm

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a long swarm of hundreds to thousands of cheap headless coding workers that drive a large failing-test backlog to green. Failures are clustered by signature, each worker fixes one cluster in its own git worktree, a serial no-regression merge gate lands the fixes, the loop resumes across restarts for hours, and it federates across sibling sessions over git branches when one container's CPU is not enough. Use for "fix these thousands of failing tests with a Haiku swarm", "drive the test suite to green with hundreds of agents", "build this compiler or interpreter against a conformance suite", "launch, relaunch or check in on the swarm loop", "the swarm is stuck, idle or rejecting everything", "parallel agents fixing tests keep hitting merge conflicts and regressions", "add sibling containers to the swarm", or "compare models on the tail the swarm could not fix". Ships the harness, a per-project TOML config, a fake-worker selftest, check-in signals and the 2026-10-12 haiku-cc failure catalogue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。