「decision」の検索結果

Agent-native memory for OpenClaw that structures memory from agent trace, execution history, decisions, tool calls, and conversations into durable long-term memory primitives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn meeting transcripts or rough notes into crisp summaries with decisions, risks, and owner-tagged action items; use for Zoom/Meet/Teams transcripts, call notes, or long meeting chats to generate share-ready outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a GitHub pull request by summarizing its diff and key design decisions. Use when the user wants to review a PR, understand changes in a branch, or get a code review summary. Trigger keywords - review PR, review pull request, summarize PR, summarize diff, code review, review branch, PR summary, diff summary.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an animation from scratch, making the decisions in the order that determines whether it feels right — should it animate at all, what purpose, which tool, which properties, which curve and duration, how it interrupts, how it exits. Writes the implementation. Use when asked to animate something, add motion, make a component feel alive, or build a transition. For critiquing existing motion use review-animations; for auditing a whole codebase use improve-animations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Save a user-selected answer, decision, insight, or session summary into an Obsidian vault as one reviewed transaction. Use only when the user explicitly asks to preserve specific conversation content, not when they supply a file or URL to ingest. Triggers: /save, save this, save that answer, file this conversation, save this analysis, keep this insight, preserve this chat result.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Fable-derived 10-stage OBSERVE, OBSERVE, LISTEN, THINK, CONNECT, CONNECT, FEEL, ACCEPT, CREATE, GROW loop to consequential or ambiguous reasoning and decisions. Use for think this through, deep think, architecture review, postmortem, tradeoff analysis, or challenges to assumptions. This is a reasoning review, not a deterministic vault health check or repair workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a Linear project status update from what actually moved — progress, risks, and the one decision that needs making. Use when someone asks for a project update, a status post, where a project stands, whether it will land on time, or what to tell stakeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Records research provenance as a post-task epilogue, scanning conversation history at the end of a coding or research session to extract decisions, experiments, dead ends, claims, heuristics, and pivots, and writing them into the ara/ directory with user-vs-AI provenance tags. Use as a session epilogue — never during execution — to maintain a faithful, auditable trace of how a research project actually evolved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when challenging ideas, plans, decisions, or proposals using structured critical reasoning. Invoke to play devil's advocate, run a pre-mortem, red team, or audit evidence and assumptions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds security-focused full-stack web applications by implementing integrated frontend and backend components with layered security at every level. Covers the complete stack from database to UI, enforcing auth, input validation, output encoding, and parameterized queries across all layers. Use when implementing features across frontend and backend, building REST APIs with corresponding UI, connecting frontend components to backend endpoints, creating end-to-end data flows from database to UI, or implementing CRUD operations with UI forms. Distinct from frontend-only, backend-only, or API-only skills in that it simultaneously addresses all three perspectives—Frontend, Backend, and Security—within a single implementation workflow. Invoke for full-stack feature work, web app development, authenticated API routes with views, microservices, real-time features, monorepo architecture, or technology selection decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn raw notes or a transcript into a clean summary with decisions and action items.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户困在无法改变的处境（坏关系/讨厌的同事/不如意的事）里反复内耗、问「该忍还是该走」时调用。 核心理念: 面对任何情境只有三选项——改变它/接受它/离开它; 三者都不做是痛苦之源; 接受=快速适应, 用「积极方面是什么」重释训练。 不适用于: 可以改变的处境(应先改变), 以及涉及违法/人身安全的场景。 Triggers: 接受/忍/内耗/放不下/该走该留/acceptance/let go/change-accept-leave

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户询问《纳瓦尔宝典》这本书本身(书名/作者/章节/整书概览/术语)，或涉及本书未独立成 Skill 的主题时调用: 幸福训练/欲望管理、接受与内耗、冥想与心猴、地位游戏与攀比、选朋友与圈子、打工vs创业(委托代理)、 诚实沟通、身份与自我形象、期望与愤怒、生命意义、该不该信玄学(理性验证)、长期复利与声誉、判断力训练。 以下意图优先使用同包独立 Skill: wealth-structure(致富/股权期权)、productize-yourself(职业定位/副业方向)、 decision-heuristics(重大选择纠结)、hourly-rate-time(时薪/外包/时间分配)、reading-metaskill(怎么读书学习)、screen-detox(刷手机上瘾)。 Triggers: 纳瓦尔/Naval/纳瓦尔宝典/幸福/冥想/内耗/攀比/圈子/复利/人生意义

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Required reading whenever any chart_* tool is available. Teaches the one-tool embedding contract (call chart_render → live chart appears in chat AND a downloadable PNG lands in the queen session dir), the ECharts (data viz) vs Mermaid (structural diagrams) decision, the BI/financial-grade aesthetic baseline (no chartjunk, restrained palette, proper typography, single message per chart), and the canonical spec patterns for the 12 most-common chart types. Skipping this leads to 1990s-Excel charts, missing downloads, and the agent writing markdown image links by hand instead of letting chart_render drive the UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain a free-form scratchpad of decisions, extracted values, and open questions so context pruning doesn't lose anything you still need.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Follow a structured recovery decision tree when tool calls fail instead of blindly retrying or giving up.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brand mention and authority scanner for AI visibility. Analyzes brand presence across platforms that AI models rely on for entity recognition and citation decisions. Produces a Brand Authority Score (0-100) with platform-specific recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

File a phase artifact into MemPalace; mirror decision facts into its temporal KG

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recall decisions, patterns, and surprises from MemPalace before planning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract decisions, lessons, patterns, and surprises from completed phase artifacts

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ingest external plans with conflict detection against project decisions before writing anything.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Refresh Claude Ads platform, API, policy, regulation, benchmark, issue, pull-request, fork, and repository evidence. Use for ads research refresh, expired refresh_due dates, stale API or platform claims, reverify-or-demote decisions, release-current claim validation, ecosystem review, current platform changes, or updating paid-media knowledge. When tools or sources are unavailable, still demote the stale claim for the current run and block dependent release-current assertions before requesting access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and evaluate paid-ad experiments with hypotheses, randomization units, sample-size and duration assumptions, guardrails, platform experiment tools, analysis, and decision rules. Use for A/B test, split test, experiment design, hypothesis, statistical significance, sample size, test duration, or experiment readout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。