1,095 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Format documents for Japanese enterprise approval workflows including ringi (稟議), purchase requests (購入申請), and internal proposals. Handles bilingual requirements, proper keigo levels, required approval sections, and corporate template compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinate Codex work across the current task, internal subagents, user-owned tasks, worktrees, handoffs, formal review gates, or recurring automation. Use for delegation, parallel roles, another Codex task, cross-repo work, QA/review handoffs, scheduled follow-up, or task inspection and continuation. Chinese triggers include 子Agent/子进程/子对话, 另一个对话接手, 并行处理, 分给QA, 多仓库收口, 巡检, 持续推进, 定时自动继续, 创建/读取/转交任务.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, reviewing, modifying, migrating, optimizing, securing, operating, troubleshooting, or decommissioning data architectures across data model exploration, SQL, ISO SQL conformance, NoSQL, vector, graph, document, time-series, NewSQL, search, in-memory, SQLite, CDC/Debezium, DBMS storage/query/recovery internals, database incident prevention, hardware acceleration, cache, big-data, lakehouse, and warehouse systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Heuristic-first software surgery for proof-backed, minimal-diff implementation: Contract to Invariants to Cut Rationale to inevitable incision to Proof. Use when users say "run /tw-tk", "patch-first", "keep the diff small", "state contract + invariants", "one clear incision", "fix it with a validation signal", or orchestration cues like "workers use /tw-tk" / "internally use /tw-tk".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load before external product/design research, competitor comparison, clean-room implementation, or adding/updating code, packages, images, fonts, datasets, generated artifacts, or other dependencies whose source/provenance/license may affect outbound licensing; not for purely internal source use with no dependency change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide (GAO-20-195G). Use for program cost estimating: the four characteristics of a reliable estimate (comprehensive, well documented, accurate, credible) and the 18 best practices; the 12-step cost estimating process (purpose, plan, technical baseline, WBS, ground rules and assumptions, data, point estimate, sensitivity, risk/uncertainty, document, present, update); estimating methods (analogy, parametric, engineering build-up, learning curves); Monte Carlo risk/uncertainty analysis, confidence levels and contingency; auditing and validating an estimate against the characteristics; earned value management (EIA-748, BCWS/BCWP/ACWP, CPI/SPI/TCPI, EAC, PMB, IBR); and specialized techniques (software cost estimating, learning curves, Analysis of Alternatives, WBS templates, the Green Book internal-control framework). This is the cost-estimating companion to the GAO Schedule and Technology Readiness Assessment guides. Does not cover schedule estimating/risk in depth (see the GAO Schedule Assessment Guide), agency-specific cost models, or the full text of referenced standards (EIA-748, MIL-STD-881D, the Green Book) — these are named, not reproduced.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Knowledge base from the FAA Requirements Engineering Management Handbook (DOT/FAA/AR-08/32). Use for writing requirements for real-time, embedded control systems — the avionics/medical slant — via the Handbook's eleven recommended practices: system overview and boundary (monitored/controlled variables), operational concepts (use cases), environmental assumptions, change-tolerant functional architecture (dependency diagrams), safety-driven architecture revision (FHA/PSSA/fault tree), system modes, detailed behavior and performance requirements (ideal value + tolerance + latency), the four-variable model bridge to software requirements (MON/CON/NAT/REQ, IN'/REQ'/OUT', DO-178B mapping), subsystem allocation, and rationale. Carries the Isolette Thermostat and Flight Control System worked examples. Slanted toward control systems with sensors and actuators; thin on information-system / enterprise / agile requirements, on requirements-management tooling, and on the formal-methods internals of SCR/RSML/SpecTRM (it names them, does not re-teach them). Does not reproduce the IEEE/DO-178B/ARP standards it cites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares a DRAFT vendor risk screening brief from the material the user provides on one vendor (questionnaire answers, certificates, assurance reports, policies, contract extracts): per screening topic, what a document evidences with reference, date and scope, what is only asserted, what is missing or contradicted, certificate and report details as stated, and ready-to-send questions for the vendor and the internal owners. No web research, no risk rating, tier, score or recommendation. Use when the user asks to "screen this vendor", "review the vendor's questionnaire answers", "check what the vendor's certificate covers", "what is missing from this due diligence pack" or "draft the follow-up questions for the vendor". Do not use for answering a customer's questionnaire about your own organisation, use vendor-security-questionnaire-prefill instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns a list of merged changes, closed work items or commit messages the user provides into DRAFT release notes under the version heading and date the user supplies, grouped as features, fixes and other, in the organisation's tone from the style guide or prior notes given, with every entry traced to its source item, breaking changes and required actions flagged first, and internal-only items held back for the release owner to confirm. Use when the user asks to "write the release notes for this version", "turn these merged pull requests into a changelog", "summarise what shipped this sprint for customers", "draft the what's new for this release" or "group these closed tickets into release notes". Do not use for an announcement email or intranet post about a launch, use announcement-drafter instead; for a change ticket, use change-request-pack; for a how-to article about one fix, use knowledge-article-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces a DRAFT 30-60-90 day onboarding plan for a new hire from the role, the team context and the systems list: phase outcomes traced to the role, activities with a named owner and due window, an access and equipment request table, learning items, manager checkpoints and the items the manager must confirm. Use when the user asks to "build an onboarding plan for our new hire", "draft the induction plan for this role", "write a first 90 days plan", "put together a new starter plan with owners", "create a ramp plan from this job description" or "plan the integration of an internal mover". Do not use for writing the job description itself, use job-description-drafter instead; for interview questions or a scorecard, use interview-scorecard-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds a DRAFT content calendar for a stated period from the themes, channels, cadence rules, fixed dates and owners the user provides: one dated row per planned item with theme, channel, format, working title, owner, status and source, plus a cadence check with its arithmetic, theme balance, owner load and the slots left open. Use when the user asks to "build the content calendar for Q4", "lay these themes onto dates", "plan a month of posts across our channels", "extend the editorial calendar" or "check this calendar against our cadence". Do not use for deciding what the campaign says or why it runs, use campaign-brief-builder instead; for writing the items themselves, use announcement-drafter or internal-newsletter-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as an Investor archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict whose conditions read as terms, findings that cite the exact passage, capital-allocation risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run an investor review", "what would an investor say about this", "pressure-test the capital case" or "prepare me for the investment committee". Do not use for internal budget, cost or finance-function review, use cfo-reviewer instead; for revenue forecast and pipeline, use cro-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triages a batch of customer support tickets (helpdesk export, shared mailbox, chat transcripts, web forms) into one row per ticket with category, urgency graded on the evidence in the ticket, suggested next action and owner, plus a DRAFT customer reply for every ticket that needs one, returned as one Markdown pack. Use when the user asks to "triage these tickets", "sort the support queue", "what needs an answer first", "categorise this backlog", "draft replies for these tickets" or "build today's queue review". Do not use for internal requests from colleagues, use request-intake-triage instead; for one long thread that needs handing over, use escalation-summary; for a personal mailbox, use inbox-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or product plan in character as a Chief Product Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, product and adoption risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CPO review", "pressure-test this product plan", "what would a CPO say about this", "challenge the user evidence" or "check the roadmap opportunity cost". Do not use for positioning, messaging or launch marketing, use cmo-reviewer instead; for internal staff adoption of a rollout, use frontline-skeptic-reviewer; for what a change asks of paying customers, use customer-advocate-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Package a contribution (gist, script, fix or skill) as a product instead of a bare snippet: README with problem and result, install steps, a test, license, honest limits and a clear entry point. Use before publishing a gist, sharing a fix or releasing a slice of internal tooling. Triggers: /pack, package this properly, make it a product, ship it with quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the WooCommerce REST API v4 (namespace wc/v4, since WC 10.2) alongside or in place of v3 — verified route catalog (Customers, Orders, Refunds, Products, ShippingZones with DELETE, ShippingZoneMethod, Fulfillments, segmented Settings under /wc/v4/settings/<group>), the hook prefix pattern woocommerce_rest_api_v4_<route>_*, shared error codes, and the RestApiCache trait (WC 10.5+) for endpoint response caching. The v4 AbstractController lives under the Internal namespace and is NOT a public extension surface; plugin-defined REST routes use WP_REST_Controller directly. Use when calling WC REST endpoints, when picking v3 vs v4, or when reviewing /wc/v3/ URLs that now have v4 equivalents. Triggers on wc/v4, /wc/v4/, woocommerce_rest_api_v4_*, RestApiCache, customer-owned Woo endpoints, REST API v4 in WooCommerce context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Customize WooCommerce transactional emails the classic PHP-template way (NOT the block email editor) — extend WC_Email, declare $id / $title / $template_html / $template_plain / $placeholders, hook trigger() to a woocommerce_order_status_*_notification action, register via the woocommerce_email_classes filter. Plus the canonical template-override pattern (copy templates/emails/*.php to your theme's /woocommerce/emails/ folder; wc_get_template resolves them automatically), and the get_default_subject / get_default_heading override pattern for admin-customizable strings. Use when adding a new transactional email (custom shipped notification, vendor split, internal alert), overriding an existing template, or customizing strings that the admin Settings cannot reach. Triggers on WC_Email, woocommerce_email_classes, woocommerce_order_status_*_notification, wc_get_template_html, template_html / template_plain in WC context, "transactional email" / "send WooCommerce email programmatically".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs and reviews the internal architecture of a WordPress plugin — folder layout, PSR-4 one-class-per-file discipline, Schema/Constants placement, composition-root vs singleton decisions, conditional asset enqueueing, script config via wp_add_inline_script, and prefixed custom-hook naming. Use when scaffolding includes/src, reviewing class organization, asset enqueue code, repeated strings, or "should I make this a singleton" decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Register a custom Listings callback for JetEngine — the per-field transform fired when a Dynamic Field widget renders meta values (Format date, Format number, Get post title, Convert units, …). Two registration paths are supported. Legacy 3-filter via jet-engine/listings/allowed-callbacks (label), jet-engine/listings/allowed-callbacks-args (control schema), and jet-engine/listing/dynamic-field/callback-args (positional args at runtime). Modern single-call $manager->register_callback($name, $label, $args) hooked on jet-engine/callbacks/register fires the three filters internally for you. Critical contract — the callback identifier you register MUST be a real PHP callable string (a global function name OR `Fully\\Qualified\\Class::method`). Bare static method names like `'unit_converter'` fail JE's is_callable() gate at apply_callback() and the rendered field silently becomes empty. Use when scaffolding a JetEngine companion plugin's listing-field transform, when seeing "callback appl...
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit on-page SEO and GEO (generative engine optimization) signals across the site — title tags, meta descriptions, H1/H2/H3 hierarchy, canonical tags, Open Graph, structured data, content length, internal link density, and AI-citation readiness. Use this skill whenever the user asks to "audit SEO", "check metadata", "review titles and descriptions", "check heading structure", "run an SEO audit", "GEO audit", "check schema markup", "find SEO issues", or review any on-page signal affecting organic or AI-search visibility. Output is a prioritized issue list with per-page findings and fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Announcement board: author, category, department, priority, audience, publish and expiry dates, status and acknowledgements, as CSV, SQL, JSON Schema or Notion on request. Use for internal notices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "plan my site structure", "design the page hierarchy / navigation / URL taxonomy", "fix internal linking", or "find orphan pages"; runs two modes — architecture (hierarchy, nav, URL patterns, hub/spoke clusters, Mermaid site maps) and linking (link graph, authority flow, anchor text, orphan disposition, source/target/anchor plan) — and outputs a structure score /100 plus a handoff summary. Not for external backlinks — use offsite-signal-analyzer; not for XML sitemap or indexation issues — use technical-seo-checker. 网站架构/信息架构/站点地图/内链优化
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design scalable SEO page systems using templates, structured data sources, quality thresholds, internal linking, indexation controls and anti-thin-content gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "create a campaign report", "build an executive summary", or "deliver client results"; produces audience-tailored influencer marketing reports (executive, client, internal team) with data tables, narrative, key learnings, and recommendations. Not for raw metric computation — use performance-analyzer. 达人营销报告/结案汇报
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。