2,476 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Transforms workflow to use Manus-style persistent markdown files for planning, progress tracking, and knowledge storage. Use when starting complex tasks, multi-step projects, research tasks, or when the user mentions planning, organizing work, tracking progress, or wants structured output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to maintain an Obsidian knowledge base for a research project, import an existing research repository into Obsidian, keep project memory or daily notes synchronized, summarize project context into durable notes, or update experiments, results, papers, writing, and plans in an Obsidian vault without requiring MCP.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user wants to detach, archive, purge, or otherwise change the lifecycle state of an Obsidian project knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to start a new research project, import an existing code-plus-Markdown repository into Obsidian, or bind the current repository to a compact research knowledge base for future syncing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when generating higher-level synthesis notes such as literature reviews, comparison matrices, project summaries, or other cross-note summaries inside the project knowledge base.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic Review Pipeline Orchestrator - Coordinates systematic literature review automation Manages the complete 7-stage PRISMA 2020 pipeline from research question to RAG system Delegates to specialized agents (I1, I2, I3) while enforcing human checkpoints Use when: conducting systematic reviews, building knowledge repositories, PRISMA automation Triggers: systematic review, PRISMA, literature review automation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "learn from Kaggle", "study Kaggle solutions", "analyze Kaggle competitions", or mentions Kaggle competition URLs. Provides access to extracted knowledge from winning Kaggle solutions across NLP, CV, time series, tabular, and multimodal domains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Document a recently solved research problem to compound methodological knowledge
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews whether a design is SOUND — solving the right problem, derived from its stated goals and constraints — and emits ranked, evidence-backed findings, not edits. Read when asked to 'review this design', 'is this design sound', 'pressure-test this proposal', 'do a design review', 'does this solve the right problem', 'poke holes in this spec', 'should we build this', or to critique a proposal / spec / ADR / architecture or product decision. Do NOT read when the user wants to AUTHOR one of these — routing a new proposal is frame-a-proposal, a spec is write-a-spec, a decision record is record-a-decision, a postmortem is write-a-postmortem. Do NOT read for code review of a diff, or to fact-check individual claims (that is a correctness pass, a different job).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Frame a new design proposal (RFC-shape) under proposals/ — problem before solution, named beneficiary and observable change, real alternatives, honest drawbacks, and a live open-questions backlog. Read when asked to frame a proposal, write an RFC, propose a design, pitch a change, draft a PRD-style design doc, or open a design proposal for review. Do NOT read to record a decision after it is accepted (use record-a-decision), to write an implementation spec (use write-a-spec), to write a postmortem (use write-a-postmortem), or to review or critique an existing design (use review-a-design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Records an architecture decision as a Nygard/MADR-shaped ADR under decisions/ — capturing the context that forced the choice, the options weighed, the decision itself, and its consequences in both directions, plus the supersedes chain that keeps a decision log honest. Read when asked to record an architecture decision, write an ADR, log the decision we made, document why we chose X over Y, capture this decision for the record, or supersede an old decision with a new one. Do NOT read to frame a proposal or explore an idea not yet decided (frame-a-proposal), to write a spec or implementation plan (write-a-spec), to write an incident postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or to judge whether a design is sound (review-a-design). This skill records a decision already made; it does not make one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a blameless incident postmortem under postmortems/ following the Google SRE shape — evidence-based timeline, trigger vs root cause vs symptom, contributing factors, what went well, and owned+dated+verifiable action items. Read when asked to write a postmortem, do an incident review, run a root cause analysis, write up the outage, retro on the outage, or when the user says we had an incident and wants it documented. Do NOT read to frame a proposal (use frame-a-proposal), write a spec (use write-a-spec), record a decision (use record-a-decision), or review a design (use review-a-design) — a postmortem documents an incident that already happened, it does not propose, specify, decide, or critique future work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement semantic vector search with AgentDB for intelligent document retrieval, similarity matching, and context-aware querying. Use when building RAG systems, semantic search engines, or intelligent knowledge bases.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve relevant durable BB memories or save verified knowledge useful to future threads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Approve a GitHub contributor to open PRs in get-bb/bb, then land the allowlist change with SlopCop and CI skipped. Use for requests such as "add @username to be able to open PRs" or an explicit add-contributor invocation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-detect work context (Dev vs Knowledge) — use to tailor workflows based on current task type
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Retrieve authoritative OpenAI API and platform documentation when an integration or claim needs current external evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Initializes a hierarchical AGENTS.md knowledge base for a project. Use when a repo needs its structure, commands, and conventions documented for agents.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build local constrained-browser agents with a safe_browser tool that owns CDP, enforces a domain allowlist with Fetch interception, and lets a runtime Claude Agent SDK agent complete browsing tasks without raw browser, shell, or CDP access. Use when the user wants an agent to browse or scrape while staying on approved domains, demo blocked off-domain navigation, or generate a safe browser client.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage {{KIRO_DIR}}/steering/ as persistent project knowledge
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Web+AI 安全测试知识库。融合 WooYun 88,636 案例 + 先知 L1-L4 方法论 + GAARM 150 风险 + OWASP Top 10 (LLM/ASI/WSTG)。 TRIGGER when 任务是实战安全测试：渗透测试、漏洞挖掘/利用、红队攻防、安全审计 (SAST/DAST)、 CTF、AI/LLM 安全测试 (Prompt 注入/越狱/MCP/Agent/沙箱逃逸)。用户明确给出测试目标 (URL/代码/模型/Agent 架构) 且意图是"测试/审计/挖漏洞/利用"。 DO NOT trigger: - 安全概念讨论（"什么是 XSS"、"SQL 注入原理是什么"）→ 普通问答 - 非安全性质的 code review / debug / 性能优化 → code-audit-skill 或其他 - 修复语法错误 / 业务逻辑 bug → 普通编程协助 - 纯 Web 白盒代码审计（完整项目目录 / Source-Sink 污点分析）→ code-audit-skill - 仅引用 CVE 编号查文档 → WebSearch 边界细则: CTF 短代码片段 + 利用思路 → 本 Skill；完整项目目录 + 系统白盒审计 → code-audit-skill
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for creating effective skills. This skill should be used when users want to create a new skill (or update an existing skill) that extends Codex's capabilities with specialized knowledge, workflows, or tool integrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Graph-based drug discovery toolkit. Molecular property prediction (ADMET), protein modeling, knowledge graph reasoning, molecular generation, retrosynthesis, GNNs (GIN, GAT, SchNet), 40+ datasets, for PyTorch-based ML on molecules, proteins, and biomedical graphs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。