1,686 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guides privacy program maturity assessment using the AICPA/CIPT Privacy Maturity Model with five levels: Ad Hoc, Repeating, Defined, Managed, and Optimized. Covers assessment methodology across ten privacy domains, scoring criteria, gap analysis, maturity roadmap generation, and benchmarking against industry peers. Keywords: privacy maturity, AICPA, maturity model, assessment, roadmap, benchmarking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build privacy KPI dashboards tracking DSAR volume and response time, breach count and severity, DPIA completion rate, training coverage, and consent rates. Includes metric definitions, data collection patterns, visualization designs, and executive reporting templates for privacy program measurement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Addresses HIPAA privacy and security requirements for health data interoperability under the 21st Century Cures Act, ONC Health IT Certification Program, and CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule. Covers information blocking prohibitions, FHIR API patient access, TEFCA exchange purposes, and privacy safeguards for health information exchange. Keywords: interoperability, information blocking, FHIR, TEFCA, Cures Act, patient access API, health information exchange.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides internal privacy audit program design and execution including risk-based audit planning, scope definition, fieldwork procedures, finding classification, evidence gathering, remediation tracking, and management reporting. Covers audit universe definition, annual audit plan, working papers, and closure verification. Keywords: internal audit, privacy audit, fieldwork, remediation, findings, audit plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides systematic assessment of current state versus GDPR requirements across all chapters with prioritised remediation matrix. Activate when starting compliance programmes or conducting periodic reassessment. Keywords: gap analysis, compliance assessment, remediation matrix, GDPR readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Governs employee health data processing for fitness-for-work assessments, occupational health surveillance, COVID testing legacy programmes, and absence management. Applies Art. 9(2)(b) employment obligations and Art. 9(2)(h) health professional exceptions. Covers data minimisation, occupational health provider relationships, and return-to-work procedures. Keywords: health data, Art. 9, occupational health, fitness-for-work, special category, employment, sickness absence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) compliance under 16 CFR Part 312. Covers verifiable parental consent methods including signed forms, credit card verification, government ID, knowledge-based authentication, and video call. Includes FTC safe harbor programs and enforcement actions. Keywords: COPPA, FTC, children, parental consent, safe harbor, verifiable consent.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interact with Reddit — browse subreddits, read posts and comments, search content, view user profiles, post comments, vote, save posts, subscribe to subreddits. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Reddit, r/, subreddit, wants to browse Reddit posts, read Reddit discussions, search Reddit, look up Reddit users, or interact with Reddit content. Also trigger when the user pastes a Reddit URL (e.g. reddit.com/r/programming/...) or mentions a subreddit name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Modern Zig project architecture guide. Use when creating Zig projects (systems programming, CLI tools, game dev, high-performance services). Covers explicit allocators, comptime, error handling, and build system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, or implement application structured logging architecture from repository evidence. Use when a user asks whether or where to add logs, how to choose or migrate a logger, how to standardize events/fields/levels/redaction, how to add HTTP access or panic logs, or why production logs cannot answer an incident question. Do not use merely to tail platform logs or to design a full metrics, tracing, SLO, and incident-management program.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use claudraband CLI to control Claude Code sessions programmatically. Use when running, scripting, or automating Claude Code via the claudraband CLI — sending prompts, listing/resuming sessions, or working in interactive REPL mode. Triggers on any mention of claudraband, claudraband-cli, npx claudraband, bunx claudraband, or automating Claude Code sessions. Used when you need to ask yourself (Claude) a question
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use claudraband CLI and daemon workflows programmatically to send prompts, resume sessions, inspect status, and manage live session state. Use when running, scripting, or automating Claude Code via claudraband/`cband`, including startup prompt handling, `--connect` daemon mode, and ACP sessions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-channel demand generation, paid media optimization, SEO strategy, and partnership programs for Series A+ startups. Includes CAC calculator, channel playbooks, HubSpot integration, and international expansion tactics. Use when planning demand generation campaigns, optimizing paid media, building SEO strategies, establishing partnerships, or when user mentions demand gen, paid ads, LinkedIn ads, Google ads, CAC, acquisition, lead generation, or pipeline generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive PDF manipulation toolkit for extracting text and tables, creating new PDFs, merging/splitting documents, and handling forms. When Claude needs to fill in a PDF form or programmatically process, generate, or analyze PDF documents at scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing or running PowerShell on Windows, especially native programs, quoted paths, escaping, pwsh, Start-Process, file operations, or shell troubleshooting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Native Rust browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, navigate pages, fill forms, click buttons, take screenshots, share a live browser view, narrate browser actions, extract structured data, run assertions, test web apps, mock network requests, or automate any browser task. Triggers include "open a website", "fill out a form", "take a screenshot", "show me the browser", "share the screen", "pause the browser", "step through this", "scrape data", "test this web app", "login to a site", "visual regression test", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Native Rust browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites — navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, sharing a live browser view, narrating browser actions, extracting structured data, running assertions, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "show me the browser", "share the screen", "pause the browser", "step through this", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", "visual regression test", "check for prompt injection", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect, normalize, and structure execution traces from instrumented programs (strace, ltrace) into JSON format for downstream analysis. Use when working with system call traces, library call traces, or execution logs that need to be analyzed for debugging, test case reproduction, or verification. Supports parsing strace/ltrace output, filtering noise, extracting debug information, and preparing traces for bug analysis or reproduction workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically generate TLA+ specifications from source code (C/C++, Python) for formal verification of distributed systems. Use when users need to: (1) Generate TLA+ specs from program implementations, (2) Model distributed systems, consensus protocols, or concurrent algorithms, (3) Extract state variables, actions, and invariants from code, (4) Create formal specifications for model checking with TLC, (5) Verify safety and liveness properties of distributed systems. Particularly effective for message-passing systems, replication protocols, consensus algorithms, and distributed transactions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically reduces bug-triggering test cases to minimal form while preserving the failure. Use when debugging with large, complex test cases that need simplification, reproducing bugs with minimal examples, or creating regression tests from verbose failure scenarios. Takes a failing test and systematically removes unnecessary inputs, steps, assertions, and code using delta debugging and other reduction algorithms. Supports unit tests, integration tests, input files, and multiple programming languages (Python, JavaScript, Java, C/C++).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs symbolic execution to detect potential errors by exploring execution paths, solving path constraints, and generating test inputs. Use when you need to analyze code for bugs like null dereferences, division by zero, buffer overflows, or assertion violations. Also use to generate test inputs that exercise different code paths, find edge cases, or explore all reachable program states. Supports Python, Java, and C/C++ through manual symbolic execution techniques and integration with tools like KLEE, angr, Z3, and Symbolic PathFinder.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract language-agnostic pseudocode from formally verified programs (Isabelle/HOL, Coq) while preserving verified control flow, data dependencies, and algorithmic logic. Use when: (1) Users have verified code and need readable pseudocode, (2) Documenting verified algorithms for broader audiences, (3) Translating verified implementations to other languages, (4) Creating algorithm specifications from verified code, (5) Preserving verification guarantees in pseudocode form, or (6) Abstracting proof-heavy code to essential logic. Maintains semantic faithfulness to verified implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate systematic refinement steps from high-level specifications to concrete implementations in Isabelle/HOL or Coq, preserving correctness obligations at each step. Use when working with formal verification, program refinement, proof development, or when translating abstract specifications into executable code while maintaining formal guarantees. Supports data refinement (abstract types → concrete structures), algorithmic refinement (specifications → algorithms), and stepwise refinement with proof obligations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect semantic-level bugs by analyzing whether code behavior matches its intended purpose inferred from function/variable names, comments, docstrings, and documentation. Use when users need to: (1) Find logic errors where implementation contradicts stated intent, (2) Identify off-by-one errors and boundary mismatches, (3) Detect inverted logic or wrong operators, (4) Catch missing edge case handling, (5) Verify code matches its documentation. Highlights mismatches between intent and implementation across multiple programming languages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。