「step」の検索結果

Triage a raw bug report into something a team can act on — clean repro steps, a defensible severity/priority, environment, likely area/owner, and duplicate check. Use when asked to triage this bug, set severity and priority, is this a P1, or clean up this bug report for the backlog. Produces the normalized repro, a severity and priority with the reasoning (impact × frequency × workaround), the environment/metadata, a suspected component and owner queue, and a duplicate/related-issue check — flagging when info is missing rather than guessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write changelogs and release notes readers actually benefit from — changes translated to so-whats, grouped by reader impact (breaking first, gifts second, plumbing last), with the upgrade path stated and the marketing kept honest. Use when asked write the release notes, turn this commit list into a changelog, announce this update to users, or why does nobody read our changelogs. Produces the impact-grouped changelog, the so-what translations, the breaking-changes block with migration steps, and the two-audience split when needed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert a meeting into async work that actually decides — the doc-plus-deadline format that replaces the room, the comment-window rules, the decision-closure step that async usually fumbles, and the honest test for what still needs synchronous. Use when asked can this meeting be async, replace our status meeting with a doc, run this decision without a call, or async isn't working for us. Produces the conversion design, the async artifact format, the closure protocol, and the still-needs-a-room list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the beneficiary designations that quietly override wills — the account-by-account sweep, the life-event triggers that make them stale, and the coordination check against actual intentions. Use when asked check my beneficiaries, does my 401k go to my ex, do beneficiary forms beat a will, or what should I update after marriage/divorce/a birth. Produces the account sweep list, the stale-designation red flags, the intent-vs-paperwork comparison table, and the update checklist with the verify-in-writing step.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up a backup system that actually protects your photos, files, and devices — built on the 3-2-1 rule and, crucially, tested so it works when you need it. Use when asked how to back up my data, set up backups, protect my photos/files, or what's a good backup strategy. Produces a 3-2-1 plan tailored to your devices and data, specific what-to-back-up priorities, an automation setup so it happens without you, a restore-test step, and protection against the failure that ruins backups (ransomware/sync-deletes reaching the backup).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare the conversations with aging parents that everyone postpones — the driving talk, the money talk, the care-options talk, the moving talk — each with an opener that doesn't ambush, a dignity-first script, rehearsal against realistic resistance, and the fallback when it goes badly. Use when someone says 'I need to talk to my dad about driving', 'my mum won't discuss her finances', 'we need to talk about care', or is dreading a visit for exactly this reason. Produces the conversation plan, a rehearsal, and the small-steps fallback. A preparation tool, not family therapy — and it says so when the situation needs more.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Work through the first hours and days after a disaster — a fire, flood, storm, or evacuation — in the right order: safety and people first, then documenting for insurance and aid, then the immediate recovery steps, without missing the things that cost money or health later. Use when someone says 'my house flooded/burned', 'what do I do after the disaster', 'we just evacuated, now what', or 'the storm damaged everything'. Produces a triaged action plan (safety → document → claim → recover), the do-not-miss list, and where to get help. Not legal advice; routes to emergency services and official aid.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a skill's recommendations into real, executed actions — open the tickets, file the issues, post the updates — safely: dry-run preview, risk-classified, approval-gated, then recorded back to the brain. Use when asked to act on a plan, file tickets from a checklist, create issues from a PRD, execute the recommended next steps, or wire a skill's output into GitHub/Linear/Slack. Produces a dry-run actions plan with per-action risk, executes only after approval via the connected action MCP, and logs what was done. Nothing acts silently.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review an LLM agent design and find where it will be unreliable, expensive, or unsafe. Use when asked to review an agent architecture, critique a multi-step/tool-using agent, debug an agent that loops or goes off-task, or harden an agent before launch. Produces a structured review — task fit, control flow, tools, memory/context, failure handling, cost, and safety — with prioritised findings and fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build an Instagram carousel - the cover that earns the swipe, slide-by-slide copy, and the 1080x1350 files to upload. Use when the user says "carousel", "slides", "swipe post", "turn this into a carousel", or has a list-shaped or step-shaped idea that would die as a single image.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running or planning an Apache Struts release on any maintenance line (6.x, 7.x) - cutting the tag, staging artifacts, opening the vote, promoting, updating the site and announcing - or when asked what the next step in a release is.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user requests React Doctor or a React code-health audit, or when a concrete React diagnostic question would benefit from its scan. Not a default step after React changes or before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task is multi-step, may span context resets or sessions, uses subagents, or risks losing state before completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you have an approved spec or written requirements for a multi-step task that needs a durable plan document before touching code. Small, single-owner, or fast-path tasks do not need this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break large features into independently verifiable, human-reviewable slices under a feature directory in specs/. Use for risky or multi-step feature work that needs upfront questioning, API seams, browser-playable checkpoints, HTML visualizations, screenshot gates, staged implementation plans, recursive fog-of-war reslicing, or proactive research into reference implementations/best practices before slicing. Pairs with your project's verification harness and screenshot gates (the browser checkpoints), [refactor-clean](../refactor-clean/SKILL.md) (review the materialized spec so the plan describes one-owner architecture, not the feature bolted on), [screenshot-critique](../../visual/screenshot-critique/SKILL.md) and [compare-screenshots](../../visual/compare-screenshots/SKILL.md) (the visual gates), and a code-review pass (audit each slice before it lands).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill before anything hard to undo gets agreed to - a contract, a purchase, a migration, a launch, a price change, a reorganisation - and whenever the user asks "what could go wrong", "what are we missing", "poke holes in this", or for a premortem or a red team, in any language. Assumes the decision already failed and works backwards to find out why, in a fresh agent that had no hand in making it. Sweeps nine areas and shows what each produced, including the empty ones. Ends on one verdict: go ahead, go but fix these first, try it small first, think again, do not do this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill when work wraps up or the user asks how it went - "done or not", "are we done", "what happened", "report", "what's the status of this ticket" - in any language, and when a Stop hook asks for a session report. Produces a ten-line plain- language report: a lead, a checkmark table, and a verdict - fully done, anything needed from you, new debt, safe to close. Every "yes" names its proof; unverified says "not checked". Saves the report so the next session starts from it instead of re-exploring the repo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill before asking the user any technical question or offering options, and whenever they ask to be asked in plain words - "ask simple", "ask me simply", "ask me in plain words" - in any language. ALWAYS invoke it too when the user asks for your view on a technical choice: whether it is worth doing, more than the problem needs, or replaceable by something simpler, and which option you would take. Invoke it even when the code makes the answer look obvious: the checks are what make the answer more than a guess. Rewrites the question in plain words and always ends with one marked recommendation. A structural choice first passes six checks, shown as a table: effort now, simpler substitute, extra work later, lock-in, over-engineering, easy to undo. Doing nothing is always weighed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS invoke this skill when the user asks where the project as a whole stands - "where are we", "what's the big picture", "what have we built", "what is in this project", "map the project", "what does this thing even do", "what is stale", "what can we delete", "update the roadmap" - in any language, and whenever a session report has just been written. It keeps one file, BIG-PICTURE.md: what the product is, every feature with how far it got, which parts nobody has touched, and what is queued next. Age and wiring are measured from git; how far a feature got comes from the reports or says "not checked". Where a tracker is connected it offers to open the queue as tickets, after a yes and never before. Never invents work, never deletes code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Incrementally upgrade React Native Storybook across the supported migration paths. Use when upgrading `@storybook/react-native` projects from 5.3.x to 6.5.x, 6.5.x to 7.6.x, 7.6.x to 8.3.x, 8.x to 9.x, or 9.x to 10.x. Detect the currently installed Storybook version, choose only the next migration step, update dependencies and config, regenerate `storybook.requires`, convert remaining `storiesOf` stories to CSF during the `6.5.x -> 7.6.x` upgrade, and stop after a single version hop instead of jumping multiple major versions at once.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads existing brand DNA, keywords.csv, and prompts.csv, then produces a plan.csv — a strictly-schema'd content architecture telling the next pipeline step which pages to create, for which keyword/prompt clusters, and in what build order.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks "what's on my plate today", "catch me up", "morning brief", or wants a summary of their day across calendar, reminders and email. The single most common multi-step automation. Powered by LMCP on macOS and Windows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate multi-step work across services the user has authorized through Aident Loadout, using live action schemas, connection checks, cost preflight, and explicit approval for side effects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。