1,174 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Reports how local Git branches are progressing toward canonical upstream inclusion as a compact terminal table plus a browser-rendered HTML report, with branch purpose, stack dependencies, Git Machete topology, ahead/behind counts, change-request status, and next action. Use when asked for upstreaming status, local branch submission progress, which branches have change requests, or what remains before they can land.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan every open pull request in a GitHub repository, filter to the ones that are genuinely mergeable now, and report a compact verdict with a suggested merge order. Use when the user asks which PRs can be merged, wants an open-PR backlog triaged or reviewed in bulk, asks why a PR is blocked, or wants to clear a queue of stale or bot-reviewed PRs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
案件预算和持续的 WIP/偏差监控。在案件设立时构建分阶段费用估算，按法域或工作流运行自下而上预算，计算应急准备金，并构建 AFA 安排（固定费用、上限费用、分阶段固定费用）。持续监控：对照预算的 WIP 跟踪、比例性评估（支出与进度）、带根本原因分析的偏差评述、完成预测、变现率监控、核销分析。触发词：'build a budget'、'fee estimate'、'what will this cost'、'WIP review'、'budget vs actual'、'how are we tracking against budget'、'we're over budget'、'realisation is poor'、'what's our ETC'、'budget for the German workstream'、'model the financial impact of this scope change'、'draft a fee adjustment'、'write-off analysis'、'how much contingency'、'AFA structure'、'fixed fee estimate'、'budget update'、'forecast to complete'。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces neutral, section-pinned U.S. legislative bill summaries translating statutory language into plain terms with identifying data, provisions, fiscal impacts, and controversy. Use when summarizing bills, analyzing proposed legislation, preparing bill briefs, digesting committee reports or fiscal notes, or writing legislative updates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarizes cybersecurity breach incidents into structured legal and compliance records. Trigger when synthesizing incident reports, forensics, logs, or notifications into a defensible chronology, scope-impact analysis, response ledger, or regulatory-risk assessment. Keywords: data breach, incident response, unauthorized access, ransomware, exfiltration, GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produces structured U.S. legal audit summaries that distill compliance findings into executive-ready risk prioritization and remediation plans, covering likelihood/impact scoring, consequence analysis, and corrective actions with timelines and owners. Use for legal audits, compliance audits, regulatory audits, compliance gap analyses, risk assessments, audit report summaries, or remediation roadmaps. Trigger keywords: audit summary, compliance findings, audit report, risk prioritization, remediation plan, regulatory exposure, corrective action plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts the "Interest of Amicus Curiae" section of an amicus brief. Establishes institutional credibility, tethers the amicus's interest to the specific legal question, articulates non-party impacts, and embeds disclosure guardrails under FRAP 29 and Supreme Court Rule 37. Trigger when drafting amicus briefs, friend-of-the-court filings, interest statements, amicus disclosures, or when the user asks why an organization belongs in a case.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
欧盟 AI 法案知识引擎——以 70 份官方欧盟来源文件为基础的权威监管问答（包括 2026 年委员会关于 Art. 6 高风险分类的指南草稿——一般原则、附件 I、附件 III）。基于完整条例文本、委员会指南、EDPB/EDPS 意见、《实践守则》、协调标准、FRIA 指南、事件模板和行业特定指引，以条款级引用回答关于 AI 法案的任何问题。当用户询问"EU AI Act"、"AI Act regulation"、"Regulation 2024/1689"、"KI-Verordnung"、要求"explain an AI Act article"、"what does Article X say"、"AI Act requirements"、"AI Act penalties"、"AI Act timeline"、"GPAI obligations"、"high-risk AI"、"prohibited AI practices"、"AI Act and GDPR"、"fundamental rights impact assessment"、"AI Act standards"、"AI Act national implementation"、"AI literacy"、"serious incident reporting"、"Digital Omnibus"、"AI regulatory sandbox"，或任何关于欧盟人工智能监管的问题时，应使用本技能。德语术语同样触发："KI-Gesetz"、"KI-Verordnung"、"Hochrisiko-KI"、"KI-Kompetenz"、"Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung"、"GPAI-Verhaltenskodex"。对于产出分类决定而非知识答案的评估工作流，提议在会话内运行结构化风险等级分类。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime router for context decisions: read-more/stop/ask/assume/delegate, minimal read-set, compaction timing. Model: Write/Select/Compress/Isolate. NOT for agent-tree overhead audit (context-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only audit of the project's agent-tree structural overhead vs the context window. NOT for cost tracking (budget skill); NOT for read/compact decisions (mk:context-engineering).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persists and restores mid-session workflow progress across context resets. Use when resuming workflows, saving state, or handling context compaction. Triggers on: handoff, save state, resume workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only audit of .codex/ structural overhead: 'remove X save Y tokens' vs the context window. NOT for cost tracking (budget skill); NOT for runtime read/compact decisions (mk:context-engineering).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runtime router for context decisions: read-more/stop/ask/assume/delegate, minimal read-set, compaction timing. Model: Write/Select/Compress/Isolate. NOT for .codex/ overhead audit (mk:context-audit).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Persists and restores mid-session workflow progress across context resets. Use when resuming workflows, saving state, or handling context compaction. Triggers on: handoff, save state, resume workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design randomized controlled trials for causal inference. Use when user mentions: randomized evaluation, RCT, field experiment, randomized experiment, treatment assignment, causal impact, experimental design, control group, intervention evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply or adapt a dual-theme neo-glow control board for UI kits, design-system previews, settings surfaces, admin panels, control rooms, and dense operational interfaces. Use when Codex should build or restyle interface work with bright white or dark control surfaces, compact neumorphic cards, vertical icon rails, blue/cyan halo accents, glowing active states, luminous toggles, and a board focused on control states, inputs, and specification details.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search cloud memory backup when local results are insufficient. Use when memory_search returns few/no results for a topic you know was discussed before. Cloud preserves everything - even memories that were deleted or compacted locally.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track complex, multi-session work with dependency graphs using bd (beads) issue tracker. Use when work spans multiple sessions, has complex dependencies, or requires persistent context across compaction cycles. For simple single-session linear tasks, TodoWrite remains appropriate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommends ACTH stimulation during AVS to improve success rate of bilateral selective catheterization, acknowledging unclear impact on diagnostic accuracy for laterality. Triggers include when setting up AVS and asking 'Should I administer ACTH?' or considering procedural optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read-only release + backlog recap. Reports the last release, commits-since-tag classified by conventional-commit type with the semver bump they trigger and pushed-vs-origin state, the backlog bucketed (open/picked-up/dropped with epic parent→child nesting), the roadmap epics with their per-task tallies, and condensed open questions — then recommends the next pickup. One `cli.mjs recap` call returns all six recap keys. Invoke any time (on demand) to plan a release or choose the next thing to build; a compact form is also surfaced at session start. Not a workflow phase; never writes CHANGELOG; never starts or commits work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Preflight a spec draft without saving. Runs the same checks as the write-boundary hooks — PlantUML syntax, required diagram presence, AC-to-sequence traceability, Design calls quality floor, and System delta row resolution — and prints a compact pass/fail table. Use while iterating so the hooks don't bite on save.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First-principles assumption auditor. Classifies each hidden assumption (fact / convention / belief / interest-driven), ranks by fragility × impact, and rebuilds conclusions from verified premises. Bilingual: auto-detects Chinese or English.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for prioritization, or when there are more tasks than capacity: "what should we do first?", "rank this backlog", "cut scope for the MVP", "RICE score these". Picks a method (RICE, ICE, MoSCoW, impact-effort), scores items and sets a cut line. Skip for choosing between two designs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。