「are」の検索結果

Route open-ended NVFLARE advice and only conversion requests whose preliminary source inspection reports unresolved or conflicting ownership; never load this skill merely to inspect a concrete conversion request before selecting its detected framework converter.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a reproducible final report, literature-outcome synthesis, JSON summary, and refreshed progress plot for a stopped or interrupted NVFLARE Auto-FL campaign.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks why a reported NVFLARE job failure signal occurred: the job failed, stalled, timed out, lost clients, ended with EXECUTION_EXCEPTION, or produced suspicious errors. Diagnose in simulation, POC, or production by collecting bounded evidence and mapping failure patterns to recovery actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compute federated statistics over tabular data (count, sum, mean, stddev, var, histogram, quantile, noise-protected min/max) and image data (count, failure_count, pixel-intensity histogram) across NVFLARE sites via FedStatsRecipe — automatic and non-interactive from the dataset, feature names (header or supplied), and optionally a README or notes declaring which statistics to compute; do not use for model training conversion, hierarchical statistics, deployment, POC/production lifecycle, or failed-job diagnosis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convert existing plain or manual PyTorch training code into an NVFLARE federated job using Client API model exchange, local validation, and job export; use when the user names plain PyTorch or preliminary source inspection identifies one plain-PyTorch owner, and not for Lightning, other frameworks, deployment, POC/production lifecycle, or experiment workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for agent-assisted Auto-FL optimization of an existing NVFLARE job in simulation, POC, or production. Do not use for code conversion, diagnosis-only work, or deployment setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Changing DOCA versions safely: upgrading or downgrading the host DOCA packages, refreshing the BlueField BFB, bumping the NGC DOCA container tag, or rolling back, with the discipline detect -> report -> ASK -> only then a guided upgrade. Trigger on "is there a newer DOCA", "I want the newest DOCA features, can I just apt upgrade in place", "should I move to the next release", "the upgrade stopped midway and dpkg is in a broken state", "my component is being deprecated, what now", or "roll me back", even without the word upgrade. Detect what is installed, find the newer release, report the gap, then STOP and ask for explicit confirmation; never upgrade automatically. Not for a runtime error on an unchanged install (doca-debug). Version detection alone belongs to doca-version, first-time install to doca-setup, any hardware / firmware / reboot step to doca-hardware-safety, and public-docs or sunset routing to doca-public-knowledge-map.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for BlueField-3 (BF3) day-1 platform bring-up via the classic RShim/BFB path: pushing a BlueField bundle (BFB) to the DPU over RShim with bfb-install from the host, the host-to-DPU TMFIFO management channel (tmfifo_net0, the 192.168.100.x convention), RShim daemon state and console-over-rshim, DPU mode selection (DPU/embedded-function vs separated-host/NIC mode) via mlxconfig, post-BFB recovery, a six-state BlueField-state classifier, and verifying the install (cat /etc/mlnx-release plus version checks). Trigger even when the user does not say "BF3" — typical phrasings include {push a BFB to my BlueField-3}, {bfb-install exited 0 but the DPU never came back}, {ping 192.168.100.2 works but ssh fails}, or {is DOCA on the host or the Arm side?}. BFB reflash, mlxconfig set, mode changes, and firmware burns are destructive: require explicit target-bound confirmation and load doca-hardware-safety. App launch, container deploy, env install, and the BF4 BMC-Redfish path route elsewhere.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is invoking the DOCA PCC Counters tool — the `pcc_counters.sh` bash script under the DOCA tools directory — to arm and read the fixed firmware/hardware PCC (Programmable Congestion Control) diagnostic counters (CNP, RTT, WRED-drop, etc.) on a ConnectX / BlueField device via mst + the mlx5 debugfs `diag_cnt` interface. The script takes two positional args — `set | query` and an mst device path — with no `--help` or subcommands. Trigger even without "pcc_counters.sh" or "PCC counters": "how do I read the CNP / RTT / WRED-drop counters", "PCC counter stuck at zero", "the script says Bad Device", or "is congestion control dropping packets on this port?". Route elsewhere for writing a custom PCC algorithm (doca-pcc), factory firmware PCC config, DOCA install, or fleet-wide CC tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DOCA-shipped Zero-Touch RoCE RTT congestion control (ZTR RTTCC) reference algorithm on a BlueField-3 DPA: deploy, tune and evaluate doca_pcc_dev_ztr_rttcc_algo through the shipped DOCA PCC sample. Trigger on "my RoCE-v2 flows aren't being throttled", "PCC sample isn't dispatching to my algo", "set-params returns fail", "algorithm loaded but counters are flat", "how do I pick the multipath PCC variant", or "do I need a custom CC algorithm on BF3", even without naming ZTR RTTCC. Your own algorithm through the host library belongs to doca-pcc; the doca_spcx_cc command line to doca-spcx-cc. Covers picking a variant (vanilla / PM / RX-rate / multipath / window-probeless) at DPACC build time, tuning host-set parameters, and DOCA_PCC_DEV_STATUS_FAIL from the algorithm. Refuse and route elsewhere for writing a custom PCC algorithm from scratch, read-only PCC counter inspection, or firmware-only pre-Programmable PCC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Before data leaves the team -- a dataset, log, ticket export or transcript excerpt bound for a vendor, a public issue, a model provider or a training corpus: classify every field, minimize first, pseudonymize with the mapping kept local, and call it redacted only after an observed residual scan. Use when the user says: data-share-review, data share review, pii redaction, redact pii, pseudonymize, de-identify, anonymize the dataset, residual pii.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Resume or finish the work we agreed on: continue or finish the accepted work from conversation context, preserve rejected ideas, and report evidence-bounded completion. Also declare and advance the metadata-only plan checklist without starting a delivery engine. Use when the user says: todo-checklist, plan checklist, todo checklist, phase checklist, declare a plan checklist, declare the plan todo, show the plan todo, clear the plan todo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Live view of running coding units: showing which coding units are running right now, on which runtime and model, with observed tokens and elapsed time. Use when the user says: running-work-board, running work board, which units are running, what models are running, 지금 뭐 돌고 있어, 뭐가 돌고 있어, 어떤 모델로 돌고 있어, 실행 중인 작업 보여줘.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Coding owner already chosen, handoff pending: prepares the handoff for the coding agent you already chose, composing its prompt from that agent's own installed skills; never selects the owner and never executes the work itself. Use when the user says: ulw-maestro, coding handoff, prepare the handoff, prepare a coding handoff, hand off the coding work, external executor handoff, handoff prompt, delegation prompt.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[omh] Choosing between coding agents on evidence: compare executor or agent choices on reproducible tasks using quality, cost, time, tool, and evidence metrics. Use when the user says: agent-evaluation, agent evaluation, agent eval, agent benchmark, executor evaluation, executor benchmark, compare agents, compare codex claude.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare azd-based Azure projects for deployment: generates azure.yaml, infrastructure (Bicep/Terraform), and Dockerfiles for the Azure Developer CLI (azd) workflow. USE ONLY when the user explicitly wants to use azd as the deployment tool, or the project already has an azure.yaml file. DO NOT USE FOR: non-azd deployments, Python App Service code-only deploys (use python-appservice-deploy), or cross-cloud migration (use azure-cloud-migrate). WHEN: prepare app for azd, create azure.yaml, set up azd infrastructure, modernize app for Azure with azd, deploy with azd, function app, timer trigger, service bus trigger, event-driven function, managed identity, generate Bicep, generate Terraform, create and deploy to Azure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess whether source code is ready to deploy to Azure — the check BEFORE infrastructure work. Evaluates build health, app completeness, dependencies and local services, stack compatibility, and deployment feasibility. Answers questions about what your app needs before it can be deployed — frameworks, dependencies, and configuration. Checks whether dependencies are compatible and identifies deployment blockers and unsupported frameworks. WHEN: "evaluate my repo", "is my app ready to deploy", "what does my app need to deploy", "what do I need before deploying", "does my app need", "can I ship this to Azure", "scan my repo for issues", "is this app deployable", "check if my app is ready for Azure", "do I need a Dockerfile", "what's blocking my deployment", "are there any blockers", "are my dependencies compatible", "does Azure support my framework", "what needs to change before deploying", "check my app configuration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forecast Azure spend and price planned resources or workloads. WHEN: "forecast Azure spending", "project next month cost", "compare forecast to my planning target", "how much will Azure cost", "estimate VM cost", "compare storage tiers", "compare Azure regions", "retail price", "EA rate card", "negotiated pricesheet". DO NOT USE FOR: configured budget health or alerts, bill analysis, cost spikes, rightsizing, or commitments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, debug, or review Cloudflare Workers invoked by the Forward action in Gateway HTTP policies, including the GatewayMiddleware entrypoint, Gateway types, context, and continuation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or maintain Cloudflare Sandbox apps on the stable @cloudflare/sandbox package. Use sandbox-next for preview apps and sandbox-migrate-to-next for stable-to-preview migrations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement or troubleshoot Cloudflare Email Sending and Email Routing integrations and their delivery configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or maintain Cloudflare Sandbox apps on @cloudflare/sandbox@next (SDK 1.0 preview). Use sandbox-migrate-to-next when porting a stable app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and plan migrations from existing VPN, SWG, or SASE platforms to Cloudflare One, including policy mapping, parity gaps, and rollout.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test whether two traits share a causal variant at a genomic locus using Bayesian colocalization with coloc. Computes posterior probabilities for shared vs distinct causal variants between GWAS and eQTL signals. Use when determining if a GWAS signal and an eQTL share the same causal variant.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。