「eth」の検索結果

Draft or review an employer's Otameshi Tenshoku listing so a candidate can decide whether to apply: check item by item that the work, deliverable, out-of-scope tasks, required experience, support, hours, schedule, location, compensation, contract form and payment timing are stated, find open-ended, unpaid-company-work, guarantee, personal-attribute and unverifiable wording, and confirm that the hours, weekly availability, period, rate and budget hold together. Use when a hiring manager, recruiter or small-business owner wants a listing written from a plan, wants an existing draft or published listing reviewed before or after posting, or wants to know why applications are not coming; do not use to design the work itself (trial-work-design), to reply to applicants (applicant-reply), to state market rates, legal, tax or service conditions from memory, or to post or update the listing on the user's behalf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lay out how a job search will actually run alongside a current job: the hours available each week and what they go to, how weekday daytime slots for interviews will be found, which routes to use (direct applications, job boards, scout sites, agents, referrals, public employment services) and what each one discloses to whom, how to keep the search from reaching the current employer through public profiles or workplace equipment, a single tracker of every application's stage, next action, and deadline, and a date and conditions for reviewing, reducing, or pausing the search. Use when someone has decided to start looking, or to gather information while employed, and asks how to fit it in, which routes to use, whether the applications they are running fit the time they have, or how to keep track of them; do not use to decide whether to change jobs, to pick or rate employers or job postings, to predict outcomes, or to send applications, publish profiles, or contact agents on the user's behalf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Go through an interview that has just finished and sort out what happened: the questions asked and how fully they were answered, which of them were prepared for and which came from the submitted documents, the reverse questions still unanswered, what the employer said about conditions and whether any of it was in writing, and when a result was promised. Use when a user has just come out of an interview and wants to record it while it is fresh or to work out what to fix before the next round; do not use to judge how it went, to estimate whether they will pass, or to read anything into the interviewer's manner.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan the first months at a new Japanese employer after an offer is accepted, listing every expectation and promise made in interviews, the offer, or negotiation with its source, separating what is in writing from what was only said and what has no agreed measure, working out when the probation period ends and whether its criteria and conditions are known, and scheduling who to confirm what with before and after the start date. Use when a user has accepted an offer and wants to prepare for joining, make sure verbal promises such as remote days or a future role are confirmed, or understand what the probation period means for them; do not use to predict whether they will fit in or pass probation, to judge their manager or colleagues, to rule on the legality of probation terms, or to contact the new employer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check the working conditions of a Japanese job offer item by item against the conditions an employer states in writing, compare the offer letter or 労働条件通知書 with the job posting and what was said in interviews, and separate what is confirmed in writing from what is still only verbal. Use when a user has received an offer, a working-conditions notice, or an employment contract and wants to know what is missing, what conflicts with earlier statements, and what to confirm before the acceptance deadline; do not use to rule on whether the terms are lawful, to decide whether to accept or decline, or to contact the employer on the user's behalf.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes memory and retrieval tasks between MemPalace and QMD. Use this skill whenever the user asks WHERE something is in the codebase (route to QMD), WHY something was built a certain way or what was decided (route to MemPalace), or needs BOTH code and historical context (combined). Trigger on phrases like: 'where is X', 'find X in the code', 'search the codebase for X', 'what did we decide about X', 'why does X work this way', 'show me X and why we built it', 'look up X', 'what's in the handoffs about X', 'pull the relevant files for X'. Use proactively whenever a question could benefit from codebase search OR project memory — don't wait for the user to explicitly ask for a search.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Check whether a Playwright, Puppeteer, Selenium or CDP-driven browser presents a coherent fingerprint, using liarjs as a library against a Page you already have - navigator.webdriver, HeadlessChrome tokens, worker versus main-thread identity, patched-API integrity, WebGL versus WebGPU GPU identity. Use when asked whether an automated browser looks like a normal one, when a headless setup or a stealth plugin's effect needs measuring rather than assuming, or when an assertion on fingerprint quality belongs in a test suite.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze spatial cell-cell interactions, neighborhoods, and niches in IMC/MIBI data with squidpy and imcRtools, covering neighborhood-enrichment permutation nulls, the abundance-vs-density confound, inhomogeneous Ripley's K, cellular-neighborhood discovery, graph-construction (contact vs proximity), and edge effects. Use when testing whether cell types co-locate, choosing a spatial null, building a neighbor graph, discovering tissue niches, or deciding whether a spatial pattern is real or a density/segmentation artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare cell-type composition and spatial features across conditions in IMC/MIBI cohorts with the patient as the experimental unit, covering pseudoreplication, per-patient aggregation, mixed models, compositional (Dirichlet/scCODA) differential abundance, diffcyt, per-image-to-patient spatial differential testing (SpaceANOVA), batch covariates, and FDR. Use when testing whether a cell type or spatial niche differs between groups, avoiding cell-level pseudoreplication, choosing a differential-abundance method, or correctly powering an IMC cohort comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tests whether two genomic interval sets overlap (colocalize) more than expected by chance using a permutation test against a structured-genome null model. Covers bedtools fisher (analytic 2x2 screen), bedtools shuffle + jaccard permutation, GAT (isochore/GC-conditioned simulation with FDR), regioneR (flexible permutation, randomizeRegions vs circularRandomizeRegions, localZScore), LOLA (universe-relative Fisher against a region database), and GREAT/rGREAT (regulatory-domain binomial + hypergeometric for ontology-from-regions). Stresses the universe/background choice, matched background, blacklist exclusion, and multiple-testing control. Use when asking whether peaks/regions are enriched at enhancers/TFBS/features, scoring region-set colocalization or region-set enrichment, comparing CNV/SV concordance, or turning an overlap count into a defensible p-value.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates statistical power for high-dimensional genomics experiments (bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, ATAC-seq, ChIP-seq, methylation, proteomics) under negative-binomial count models using RNASeqPower, PROPER, and simulation via powsimR, distinguishing per-gene from marginal (transcriptome-wide) power, the role of mean expression and dispersion, and the sequencing-depth-versus-replicate tradeoff. Covers simulation as the honest default for overdispersed counts, FDR-aware average power versus single-test power, observed/post-hoc power as an anti-pattern, and the winner's-curse / Type-S / Type-M consequences of underpowering. Use when planning replicate number for a sequencing experiment, deciding whether to add depth or samples, choosing closed-form versus simulation power, estimating power from pilot dispersions, or justifying replication in a grant. For clinical-trial power see clinical-biostatistics/power-and-sample-size; for the inverse sample-size question see experimental-design/sample-size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Infer gene regulatory networks from bulk or general expression data with mutual-information (ARACNe) and tree-ensemble (GENIE3, GRNBoost2) methods, and infer transcription-factor protein activity from regulons with VIPER and msVIPER. Covers the activity-not-edges paradigm, the undirected-association caveat, the DREAM5 wisdom-of-crowds and method-complementarity result, AUPRC-over-AUROC evaluation, and gold-standard incompleteness. Use when inferring a regulatory network from a bulk expression matrix, finding master regulators, or scoring TF activity from a signature. For single-cell motif-pruned regulons see scenic-regulons; for co-expression modules see coexpression-networks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls m6A peaks from MeRIP-seq / m6A-seq paired IP-vs-input data using exomePeak2 (transcript-aware, GC-bias-corrected Poisson GLM; Liu 2022 *NAR Genom Bioinform* 4:lqac046), MeTPeak (HMM over sliding windows; Cui 2016 *Bioinformatics* 32:i378), MACS3 / MACS2 with --nomodel --broad --keep-dup all (genome-wide broad alternative), and DRACH motif enrichment confirmation via HOMER or ggseqlogo as a sanity check (NOT a filter). Covers BED12 vs narrowPeak output formats, exonic vs intronic peak handling, multi-tool reconciliation (intersection vs union; cross-caller IDR-equivalent), the m6A-vs-m6Am ambiguity at 5'UTR peaks that antibody-based methods cannot resolve, and orthogonal-validation routes (miCLIP / GLORI / m6A-SAC-seq / m6Anet). Use when calling peaks from paired IP/input genome BAMs, choosing exomePeak2 (transcript-aware default) vs MACS3 (broad genomic) vs MeTPeak (HMM-smoothed low-coverage), confirming DRACH enrichment as a sanity check on the peak set as a whole, reconciling differing peak sets across tools, validating MeRIP peaks against orthogonal single-base methods, interpreting peaks at the 5' end where m6Am contamination is possible, or recommending a multi-tool consensus strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects m6A modifications from Oxford Nanopore direct-RNA-sequencing (ONT DRS) signal data using m6Anet (Hendra 2022 *Nat Methods* 19:1590; multiple-instance-learning neural network over DRACH 5-mer signal). Covers the required upstream pipeline (Dorado / Guppy basecalling -> minimap2 transcriptome alignment with `-ax map-ont -uf -k14 --secondary=no` -> nanopolish eventalign with `--scale-events --signal-index` (m6Anet-required) plus `--summary` / `--threads` housekeeping -> m6anet dataprep -> m6anet inference), per-site vs per-read probability interpretation including the `mod_ratio` per-site stoichiometry column, the DRACH-only modeling constraint, minimum-coverage thresholds (20-50 reads per site for stable probability estimates), multi-condition comparison via xPore (Pratanwanich 2021 *Nat Biotechnol* 39:1394), Nanocompore (Leger 2021 *Nat Commun* 12:7198), ELIGOS (Jenjaroenpun 2021 *NAR* 49:e7), and Dorado native modification calling (RNA004 chemistry, 2024+), reference-transcriptome version pinning, the cDNA-vs-DRS chemistry distinction (cDNA-Nanopore CANNOT be used for modification detection), and orthogonal validation against MeRIP / GLORI. Use when calling m6A from ONT DRS without immunoprecipitation, choosing m6Anet vs xPore vs Nanocompore vs ELIGOS vs Dorado native, interpreting per-site `probability_modified` vs `mod_ratio` vs per-read modification probabilities, comparing methylation between conditions from ONT data, deciding between m6Anet for known DRACH sites and Dorado/Remora for genome-wide screening, pinning RNA002 vs RNA004 chemistry and basecaller model versions, or troubleshooting eventalign / dataprep failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Aligns and QCs methylated-RNA-immunoprecipitation (MeRIP / m6A-seq) IP and input libraries using STAR or HISAT2 splice-aware mapping, samtools sort/index, IP/input matched-pair tracking, antibody-lot metadata recording, replicate concordance via deepTools multiBamSummary + plotCorrelation, IP enrichment QC via plotFingerprint and per-transcript IP/input ratio distributions, library-complexity saturation curves via PreSeq c_curve / lc_extrap, and the explicit do-NOT-deduplicate convention for standard non-UMI MeRIP. Use when preparing paired IP and input BAM files for exomePeak2 / MeTPeak / MACS3 peak calling, evaluating MeRIP replicate concordance and IP enrichment, deciding whether to deduplicate (standard MeRIP typically NOT — see Tips), choosing genome-vs-transcriptome alignment for downstream peak vs m6Anet workflows, recording antibody clone and lot metadata for downstream cross-batch reconciliation, detecting failed IPs via saturation curves and IP/input distribution shape, or generating IP-over-Input bigWig tracks for downstream visualisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs and analyzes combinatorial CRISPR screens covering paired-Cas9 (Big Papi, Najm 2018), enhanced AsCas12a multiplex (enCas12a, DeWeirdt 2021), in4mer 4-guide-array Cas12a (Esmaeili Anvar N et al 2024 Nat Commun 15:3577) and the Inzolia paralog-pair library, paralog-buffering detection (Dede 2020 Genome Biol; Thompson 2021 Cell Reports 36:109597), genetic-interaction (GI) scoring as observed_double_LFC minus expected_additive_double_LFC, synthetic-lethal and synthetic-rescue interaction interpretation, the half-of-essentiality buffered by paralogs phenomenon, multiplex screen statistical analysis with MAGeCK MLE interaction terms, and the relationship to single-cell combinatorial Perturb-seq. Use when designing a paralog or pathway-pair screen, choosing between paired-Cas9 (Big Papi) and Cas12a multiplex (Inzolia), interpreting genetic interaction scores, identifying synthetic-lethal targets for drug development, or scaling beyond single-gene CRISPR screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Li & Hart 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving 2-3x sensitivity over MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose total effects into direct and indirect paths through mediators using mediation, CMAverse 4-way, HIMA/HIMA2 high-dimensional, BAMA, two-step / MVMR mediation, or double-ML medDML. Use when testing whether a molecular phenotype (expression, methylation, protein) mediates a treatment-outcome relationship, decomposing exposure-mediator interaction via VanderWeele 4-way, screening high-dimensional EWAS mediators, or running MR-based mediation when sequential ignorability is implausible.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and adjust for horizontal pleiotropy in two-sample Mendelian randomization by distinguishing uncorrelated (UHP) from correlated (CHP) pleiotropy and choosing among Egger, MR-PRESSO, MR-RAPS, CAUSE, LHC-MR, LCV, MR-Clust, MR-Mix, and contamination-mixture methods. Use when validating an MR causal claim, running the STROBE-MR sensitivity battery, suspecting a shared heritable confounder, working under weak-instrument or polygenic-exposure regimes, or reconciling discordant estimates across robust methods.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test whether two or more traits share a causal variant at a locus using Bayesian colocalization (coloc.abf, coloc.susie, HyPrColoc, moloc, eCAVIAR, SMR/HEIDI, PWCoCo, SharePro). Use when integrating GWAS with eQTL/sQTL/pQTL/mQTL, distinguishing shared causal variants from LD-driven coincidence, handling allelic heterogeneity, choosing between single-causal vs multi-causal methods, picking PP.H4 thresholds, running sensitivity over p12, or harmonising summary statistics for colocalization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes alternative splicing at single-cell resolution. The first decision is library chemistry — 10X 3' is fundamentally limited (RT primes from poly-A, R2 falls in 3' UTR, <0.1 junction read per cell per AS event). Plate-based full-length methods (Smart-seq3, FLASH-seq, VASA-seq, STORM-seq) and single-cell long-read (MAS-Iso-seq, scISOr-Seq2) are the chemistries that give per-cell isoform structure. Tools include MARVEL (R, Smart-seq integrated), BRIE2 (Bayesian PSI with regulatory features and ELBO_gain test), scQuint (junction-cluster, plate-based; not for 10X), SpliZ (annotation-free Z-score), Psix (graph-smoothness regulated AS), and Sierra (alternative polyadenylation, often confused with AS). Use when analyzing isoform usage in scRNA-seq, identifying cell-type-specific splicing, or determining whether scRNA-seq chemistry supports splicing analysis at all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a thesis's stated conviction matches its evidence, and whether any Conviction Trigger has silently fired without being actioned. Use when user says "conviction audit", "is my conviction right on [TICKER]", "did a trigger fire", or "should I re-rate [TICKER]".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。