「iter」の検索結果

Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates end-to-end autonomous AI research projects using a two-loop architecture. The inner loop runs rapid experiment iterations with clear optimization targets. The outer loop synthesizes results, identifies patterns, and steers research direction. Routes to domain-specific skills for execution, supports continuous agent operation via Claude Code /loop and OpenClaw heartbeat, and produces research presentations and papers. Use when starting a research project, running autonomous experiments, or managing a multi-hypothesis research effort.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

帮助用户撰写高质量的文献综述类论文。提供从选题、文献检索、评估筛选、结构规划到最终写作的全流程指导。适用于需要撰写独立文献综述论文或学术论文中文献综述部分的用户。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, and DARPA. Agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, broader impacts, significance statements, innovation narratives, and compliance with submission requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from academic medical papers. Use when editing or reviewing manuscripts to make them sound more natural and professionally written. Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" guide, adapted for medical literature.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to compare, cross-review, merge, judge, choose, or arbitrate competing plans from multiple agents such as Codex and Claude Code; when given two or more proposed plans, session IDs, transcripts, plan documents, PR descriptions, or pasted strategies; or when the user wants one recommended execution plan after agents review each other's proposals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever a pull request is opened, reopened, or synchronized in microsoft/apm to assess whether and how the documentation corpus must change to stay truthful with the proposed code change. Activate even when the PR title or body says nothing about docs -- the skill must run on every PR to detect silent drift between code and docs. Classifies impact as no-change, in-place edit (one to a few paragraphs), or structural change (new page or TOC reshape), then orchestrates a CDO + doc-writer + python-architect + editorial-owner + growth-hacker loop to produce a patch-ready advisory. Does NOT review code quality, security, or test coverage. Does NOT auto-merge or auto-push doc edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to run a four-panel adversarial advisory review on any pull request that touches the OpenAPM specification artifact (docs/src/content/docs/specs/openapm-*.md), its inline / sidecar JSON Schemas (docs/src/content/docs/specs/schemas/*.schema.json), or the conformance fixture seed (tests/fixtures/spec-conformance/**). The panel fans out to four spec-ecosystem reviewers (swagger-openapi-editor, oci-distribution-editor, pkgmgr-registry-contract-editor, w3c-tag-architect), each running in its own agent thread, and a spec-editor synthesizer that produces a fold-now / defer-v0.1.1 / defer-v0.2 / reject list plus a ship decision keyed off a 1..10 shocked_meter scale. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE consolidated comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes folds, and renders a ship recommendation that the maintainer weighs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to run a multi-persona expert advisory review on a labelled pull request in microsoft/apm. panel-mode (full | lean | delta) selects a surface-gated roster plus a CEO synthesizer; omitted or unknown mode is lean. Do not spawn inactive stubs. The orchestrator is the sole writer to the PR: ONE recommendation comment, no verdict labels, no merge gating. The panel is advisory -- it surfaces findings, prioritizes follow-ups, and renders a ship-recommendation that the maintainer and author weigh.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive ONE already selected open pull request in microsoft/apm to mergeable. Classifies copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] inline review, runs autopilot-pr-review-worker, folds (by default) every recommendation inside the PR's stated scope, pushes to the head branch or a superseding PR that preserves authorship via commit trailers, watches CI to green (`agent-merge` when that skill or `<agent_merge_state>` is present; otherwise `gh pr checks --watch`), and iterates under fixed caps until ready-to-merge, advisory-with-deferred, superseded, or blocked. Plan before any fold, push, or reviewer request. Never spawned by autopilot-pr-review-scheduler. That scheduler is advisory only. Invoke this skill by name when the caller asked to drive a PR to merge.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain and patch existing Lark/Feishu documents while preserving comments, highlights, citations, and newer remote edits. Use for iterative document updates, local-mirror sync, or durable project ownership; LoopX integration is optional.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize code performance through iterative improvements (max 2 rounds). Benchmark execution time and memory usage, compare against baseline implementations, and generate detailed optimization reports. Supports C++, Python, Java, Rust, and other languages.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create publication-quality scientific diagrams using Nano Banana 2 AI with smart iterative refinement. Uses Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview for quality review. Only regenerates if quality is below threshold for your document type. Specialized in neural network architectures, system diagrams, flowcharts, biological pathways, and complex scientific visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write SEO-optimized blog posts, landing pages, and content improvements following Google's E-E-A-T and Helpful Content guidelines. Handles new content creation from a keyword or topic, and improving existing pages. Use when asked to "write a blog post", "create a landing page", "improve this page", "write content about X", "content for keyword X", "draft an article", "blog post about", "landing page for", "service page", "product page copy", "rewrite this page", "make this page rank better", "content brief", "how-to guide", "listicle", or any content creation or improvement task for a website.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GSC-driven content calendar. Pulls real Search Console data, finds the highest click-potential opportunities (striking-distance queries at positions 5-20, unanswered query intent, related-keyword expansions), and produces a dated, prioritized content calendar — ready to hand to /content-writer. Use when the user asks "plan my content", "what should I write next", "content calendar", "content plan", "content roadmap", "editorial calendar", "what topics will rank", "find quick-win SEO topics", "click-potential analysis", or "schedule my SEO content".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Programmatic SEO planning and audit: building or evaluating large sets of template-generated pages that target long-tail query patterns (e.g. "[service] in [city]", "[product] vs [product]", "[tool] for [use-case]"). Covers data-source and template design, thin/duplicate-content and doorway-page risks, per-page uniqueness and value thresholds, internal linking and hubs, indexation management (publish vs. noindex), and scaling without a manual action. Use whenever the user wants to generate many pages from a template/dataset, build location/comparison/use-case pages at scale, or asks why generated pages aren't indexing. Trigger on: "programmatic SEO", "pSEO", "generate pages at scale", "templated pages", "location pages at scale", "comparison pages", "[city] pages", "my generated pages aren't indexed", "doorway pages", "scale content". For one-off content use /content-writer; for keyword discovery use /keyword-research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep research with hyperresearch, for Claude Code and OpenAI Codex. Use when the user asks for deep research, a research report, a literature review, or a multi-source analysis with verified citations. Checks that the hyperresearch CLI is installed, sets it up in the current project for the agent you are running in, then hands off to the hyperresearch pipeline (a tier-adaptive 16-step pipeline with a persistent source vault). Not for quick lookups one or two searches can answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

持久战略：面对长期、复杂、短期不可能速胜的任务，客观评估态势，划分战略防御 / 相持 / 反攻三阶段，判定当前所处阶段，设置阶段转换条件，并在困难阶段仍给出局部进攻点。当任务跨多个会话或多轮迭代、资源暂时不足、或出现"想放弃"与"一把梭"两种情绪时触发；任务能在当前会话完成时不触发。 English: Protracted strategy. For long-horizon work that cannot be won quickly, assess the situation objectively, divide the effort into defense / stalemate / counter-offensive stages, name the current stage and its exit condition, and always identify a local offensive even while accumulating. Trigger when work spans many sessions or iterations, resources are temporarily short, or you notice either defeatism or a rush to finish; skip when the task fits in the current session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

工作流组合：当一个任务明显需要多件思想武器接力时，提供四种标准组合模式（新项目启动、复杂问题攻坚、方案迭代优化、阶段复盘），定义调用顺序、每步交接物和终止条件。触发信号包括从零启动、疑难攻坚、迭代优化、阶段复盘；单一 skill 就够用时不触发。 English: Workflow patterns. When a task clearly needs several skills in sequence, pick one of four standard patterns (project kickoff, hard-problem assault, iterative improvement, stage retrospective) that fix the order, the handoff artifact between steps, and the stop condition. Skip when a single skill suffices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

实践认识论：把方案、假说或判断放回实践中检验，按「实践 → 认识 → 再实践」螺旋迭代，并在开始前写明循环终止条件。当你提出了假说要验证、一次尝试失败要复盘再来、发现自己只想不做或只做不想时触发；一次性输出、答案可直接查阅、还没形成假说（先调查）时不触发。 English: Practice-cognition loop. Test a hypothesis or plan in practice, learn from the result, and iterate in a rising spiral with an explicit stop condition. Trigger when a plan needs validation, an attempt failed and must be retried, or you notice thinking without doing (or doing without thinking); skip for one-shot outputs, lookup questions, or before any hypothesis exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

群众路线：从持有真实情况的多方（用户、使用者、代码库、日志、运行结果）收集分散意见，系统化为方案，再带回去对齐与检验，循环改进。当多方意见分歧、需要汇总零散反馈、方案要拿回给真实使用者确认、或你发觉自己在闭门造车时触发；信息源单一且完整、处于执行阶段时不触发。 English: Mass line. Collect scattered input from everyone who holds ground truth (users, operators, codebase, logs, runtime results), synthesize it into a coherent plan, take it back for alignment and validation, and iterate. Trigger when inputs conflict, feedback must be consolidated, a plan needs sign-off from real users, or you sense you are designing in isolation; skip when there is a single complete source and the work is pure execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches and rewrites code by AST shape across 25 languages. Use when the target is a syntax pattern (every call/class/import shaped like X, a codemod, a YAML rule) rather than literal text; for plain strings, comments, or filenames, use rg.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a full DevTools-protocol trace of any browser automation — CDP firehose, screenshots, and DOM dumps — then bisect the stream into per-page searchable buckets. Use when the user wants to debug a failed run, audit network/console/DOM activity, attach a trace to an in-progress session, or feed structured per-page summaries back into an agent loop so its next iteration learns from the last one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。