Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,200 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, creating API endpoints, or implementing payment/sensitive features. Provides comprehensive security checklist and patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lista de verificação abrangente para conduzir revisões de código minuciosas, cobrindo funcionalidade, segurança, desempenho e manutenibilidade
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Habilidade abrangente de revisão de código para TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Swift, Kotlin, Go. Inclui análise automatizada de código, verificação de boas práticas, scanning de segurança e geração de checklist de revisão. Use ao revisar pull requests, fornecer feedback de código, identificar problemas ou garantir padrões de qualidade de código.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quando o usuário quer otimizar onboarding pós-signup, ativação de usuários, experiência de primeira execução ou time-to-value. Use também quando o usuário menciona "fluxo de onboarding", "taxa de ativação", "ativação de usuários", "experiência de primeira execução", "empty states", "checklist de onboarding", "aha moment" ou "experiência do novo usuário". Para otimização de signup/registro, veja signup-flow-cro. Para sequências de email contínuas, veja email-sequence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Skill Management] Use when shared protocol checklists change and need propagation across skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when you need to run quality gate checklist.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run before building anything new — a pre-build gate that decides whether an idea deserves its own tool, judged from both the agent lens (legible, drivable, automatable) and the human lens (will I touch it, do I want to maintain it). Trigger on "should I build X", "starting a new project / app / tool / repo", "is this worth making", "want to spin up", or any new-build intent — even if the word "checklist" never appears. Outputs a backed GATE.md with checkmarks and a one-line verdict note in the project root docs. Do NOT load for small config tweaks, one-off scripts, bug fixes on existing things, or anything that is clearly a feature of something you already run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants the full package on a repo, says run my project workflow, project check-in, or is overwhelmed opening an old or new folder. Runs the project onboarding checklist—explain-new-project, project-worth-my-time, and project-catch-up—in order or on demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a ready-to-paste social post kit for an app, tool, or project launch or update — "make social posts", "launch posts", "post kit", "prep socials", "promote this". Produces one Markdown file with finished posts for X, Reddit, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, and short-form video, plus a pre-post checklist. Pull real facts from the project (repo, release, what it does, OS, links).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
INTERNAL/HELPER skill — do NOT invoke directly from a user query. This is the shared formatter/poster used by create-issue, create-issue-from-issue-number, and update-issue. It formats an implementation-ready GitHub Issue body, runs the pre-posting checklist, executes `gh issue create` or `gh issue edit`, and optionally posts a 確認事項 follow-up comment. Invoke this skill ONLY from one of the three parent skills via the Skill tool, after the parent has completed analysis. If a user asks to 'format an issue body' or similar, route them to the appropriate parent skill (/create-issue, /create-issue-from-issue-number, or /update-issue) rather than invoking this one directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
INTERNAL/HELPER skill — do NOT invoke directly from a user query. This is the shared formatter/poster used by answer-issue-questions and breakdown-issues. It formats a scope GitHub Issue body (label cc-triage-scope, used before code analysis), runs the pre-posting checklist, and executes `gh issue create`. Invoke this skill ONLY from one of the parent skills via the Skill tool, after the parent has finalized the task breakdown. If a user asks to 'create a scope issue' or similar, route them to the appropriate parent skill (/breakdown-issues for fresh breakdowns, /answer-issue-questions for derived sub-tasks) rather than invoking this one directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Virtual QA Lead that turns requirements into review-ready, TestRail-importable test cases in one conversation. Use it whenever the user has requirements, a spec, a user story, or acceptance criteria (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, TXT, MD, or pasted text) and wants test cases, a test plan, a checklist, test coverage, a regression suite, or a TestRail/Qase/Zephyr export, even without saying "test cases" ("write tests for this spec", "what should we check here?"). Especially useful when they attach their team's existing test cases to match. When the spec describes an API (endpoints, status codes, schemas, auth, OpenAPI/Swagger), Casely also builds a runnable Postman collection, so use it for "API tests", "Postman collection", or "tests I can run in Newman/CI". Triggers on the same request in any language.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Lingzao creator-content tools for Xiaohongshu/XHS, Douyin, and WeChat official-account public content. Lingzao supports XHS SEO, Xiaohongshu account analysis, benchmark account discovery, viral note breakdown, keyword research, one-stop content packages from keyword/link/image/inspiration material, title and cover optimization, hand-drawn route-map cards, city food maps, travel itinerary maps, life checklist maps, workflow manual maps, creator content workflow, note search, creator search, profile lookup, recent posts, deep profile copy/subtitle analysis, note/article detail, post comments, article stats, related articles, short-video copy extraction, and prompt-based creator image generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map application security findings to OWASP Top 10 categories and generate remediation checklists. Use for normalized AppSec review outputs and category-level prioritization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GStack ship method for final landing, PR, changelog, release, and deploy readiness checklists when the user explicitly wants to ship.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The crouton-conformance gate — the SECOND acceptance axis of graduation (the first is the experience side-by-side, /graduate stage C1). Checks a graduated app is a REAL crouton app — CLI-scaffolded, real collections, consumes the correct packages without reinventing them — by composing the existing probes (frontend-review, a11y, e2e-smoke, typecheck) plus crouton-structural checks, then renders a required, signed-off checklist on the graduation PR. Use at /graduate stage C2, or when asked "is this app crouton-native", "run the conformance gate", "check graduation conformance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full SEO audit for rtk-ldp landing pages — JSON-LD schemas, OG tags, meta, robots, titles. Outputs a structured pass/fail checklist with score.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security review checklist for Convex functions, auth logic, public queries, admin routes, webhooks, uploads, components, and AI-generated code. Use when reviewing code that touches user data, PII, or access control, or before any deploy of an app with auth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security review checklist for Convex functions, auth logic, public queries, admin routes, webhooks, uploads, and AI-generated code. Use when reviewing code that touches user data, PII, or access control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Static analysis checklist for Convex backends covering 72 rules across security, performance, correctness, schema, architecture, configuration, and client-side patterns. Use when writing, reviewing, or auditing Convex code. Trigger on mentions of "convex-doctor", "health score", "static analysis", "anti-patterns", "audit convex", or before shipping backend changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security review checklist for Convex functions, auth logic, public queries, admin routes, webhooks, uploads, components, and AI-generated code. Use when reviewing code that touches user data, PII, or access control, or before any deploy of an app with auth.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security review checklist for Convex functions, auth logic, public queries, admin routes, webhooks, uploads, and AI-generated code. Use when reviewing code that touches user data, PII, or access control.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Static analysis checklist for Convex backends covering 72 rules across security, performance, correctness, schema, architecture, configuration, and client-side patterns. Use when writing, reviewing, or auditing Convex code. Trigger on mentions of "convex-doctor", "health score", "static analysis", "anti-patterns", "audit convex", or before shipping backend changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Authentication patterns: session vs JWT vs OAuth comparison, provider selection (NextAuth, Clerk, Supabase Auth), security checklist, and common mistakes. Use when implementing auth, reviewing auth flows, or choosing auth providers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。