「decisions」の検索結果

Analyze build vs buy decisions for AI solutions. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-build-vs-buy related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gathers information from multiple sources in parallel, compares what they say, flags where they agree or conflict, and delivers a clean synthesis with a confidence rating for each finding. Useful for making evidence-backed decisions, when evaluating competing claims, during due diligence on a vendor or market, and for building research briefs before strategy sessions. Use when the user says "research this", "synthesize multiple sources", "compare sources", "research report", "what does the evidence say", "gather information on", or "deep dive into".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end meeting workflow skill. Pre-meeting: research attendees, build agenda, prepare talking points, create pre-read. Post-meeting: process notes into action items, draft follow-up emails, log decisions, update project notes. Useful for preparing for important calls, during post-meeting processing, when following up with attendees, and for building a running decision log. Use when the user says "prepare for meeting", "meeting prep", "process meeting notes", "meeting follow up", "meeting machine", or "prep for my call".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a feature or code change made by Claude is complete and the developer wants to confirm they actually understood it before shipping. Triggers on "handoff", "quiz me", "comprehension check", "did I understand this", "verify I read the code", "test my understanding", or after finishing a feature when the developer wants to take ownership of AI-written code. Also triggers on requests for an interactive or clickable quiz ("interactive mode", "let me answer with the mouse", "mode interactif", "je réponds à la souris"). Quizzes the developer on WHERE the logic lives (file/function) and WHY decisions were made (trade-offs, behavior, debugging), with the number of questions scaled to the size of the change. Multiple-choice questions are clickable by default (asked through `AskUserQuestion`) and fall back to typed answers. Points to file:line on wrong answers, allows one retry, then reveals the answer, and ends with a score plus the weak areas to re-read. Conducts the quiz in the developer's language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Server management principles and decision-making. Process management, monitoring strategy, and scaling decisions. Teaches thinking, not commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform triangulated cognitive research combining SQLite memory, GitHub 10k+ stars patterns, and ToT DAG benchmarking before critical architectural decisions. Automatically triggers subagent research escalation when confidence is low (<0.70). Keywords: research, benchmark, github, memory, triangulation, grounding, best-practices, escalation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the model's ROLE_TYPE is orchestrator and needs to delegate tasks to specialist sub-agents. Provides scientific delegation framework ensuring world-building context (WHERE, WHAT, WHY) while preserving agent autonomy in implementation decisions (HOW). Use when planning task delegation, structuring sub-agent prompts, or coordinating multi-agent workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

North star guidance for the agent-resources project. Use this skill to understand project context, get inspiration for development decisions, and resolve uncertainty about feature priorities or design choices. Reference when asking 'why does this project exist?' or 'what should we optimize for?'

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct structured interviews with the user. Use when multiple decisions need user input: ask ONE question at a time, wait for response, record answer, then proceed to next question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze context and decide on continuation via Stop hook. Use when determining if work should continue, analyzing completion status, making continuation decisions, or implementing the Two-Claude pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master coordinator for the founder. Filters noise, owns cross-functional processes, enforces consistency, routes decisions, and positions outputs for impact so the founder can think clearly. Doesn't own any function owns the space between all of them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Market Research Specialist. Use to analyze target markets, ICP segments, demand patterns, competitive terrain, and strategic whitespace for founder decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a pull request or contribution deeply, explain it tutorial-style for a maintainer, and produce a polished report artifact such as HTML or Markdown. Use when asked to analyze a PR, explain a contributor's design decisions, compare it with similar systems, or prepare a merge recommendation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply behavioral science and mental models to revenue (cuan) decisions, prioritized using a psychological leverage and feasibility scoring system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when important product, technical, or founder decisions need to be captured as durable context with rationale, tradeoffs, and follow-up implications.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Super Base Context — project doc loader & synchronizer. Triggers even without explicit "load docs"/"sync docs." READ MODE — load architecture/modules/coding/decision docs when work references project state: code work (write/modify/remove); design (features/APIs/schemas/architecture); review (modules, past solutions); tech selection; ADR research; migration/refactor planning; performance/security analysis; tests; code reviews; any spec/plan/design/ADR referencing project. WRITE MODE — NET DELTA vs. last doc sync: additions/modifications/REMOVALS/deprecations of previously-synced code or decisions (docs revert: delete BCU file/ADR), AND rollbacks. User signals: sync docs/done/ready to commit/pre-commit/record decision. Auto-fires before final task-completion reply. WRITE MODE does NOT fire on: brainstorming, generic/read-only Q&A, in-session try-and-undo with no net change, already-synced.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. (gstack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Upper Echelons Theory (Hambrick and Mason, 1984) to analyze how top management team characteristics — demographics, experiences, values — shape strategic choices and organizational outcomes. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate TMT composition effects on strategy, predict strategic direction from leadership profiles, assess whether managerial discretion enables or constrains executive influence, or when they ask 'does leadership background matter for strategy', 'how does TMT composition affect decisions', or 'why did this management team make that choice'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply real options analysis to value managerial flexibility embedded in investment decisions. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate projects with significant uncertainty and flexibility, assess the value of deferring or expanding investments, compare traditional NPV with expanded NPV, or when they ask 'should we wait to invest', 'what is the option to abandon worth', or 'why does NPV undervalue this project'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply governance theory to analyze multi-level, network, and collaborative governance arrangements beyond traditional government. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate public-private partnerships, analyze multi-stakeholder governance structures, compare governance models across sectors, or assess institutional arrangements for collective decision-making — even if they say 'who governs this', 'public-private collaboration', or 'how are decisions made across organizations'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the Modigliani-Miller theorem to analyze capital structure decisions and identify when financing choices affect firm value. Use this skill when the user needs to evaluate debt-equity tradeoffs, assess the impact of leverage on firm value, understand tax shield benefits, or when they ask 'does capital structure matter', 'should we take on more debt', or 'what is the optimal leverage ratio'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Dunning's OLI Paradigm (Eclectic Theory) to evaluate foreign direct investment decisions based on Ownership, Location, and Internalization advantages. Use this skill when the user needs to decide whether to invest abroad, choose between FDI modes (wholly-owned subsidiary, joint venture, licensing), or explain why a firm internationalizes through FDI rather than export or licensing.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。