1,137 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Audit Azure Blob and ADLS storage accounts for public access exposure, weak or long-lived SAS tokens, missing encryption at rest, disabled HTTPS-only traffic, and outdated TLS versions using the azure-mgmt-storage Python SDK.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auditing Terraform infrastructure-as-code for security misconfigurations using Checkov, tfsec, Terrascan, and OPA/Rego policies to detect overly permissive IAM policies, public resource exposure, missing encryption, and insecure defaults before cloud deployment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically audit AWS S3 bucket permissions to identify publicly accessible buckets, overly permissive ACLs, misconfigured bucket policies, and missing encryption settings using AWS CLI, S3audit, and Prowler to enforce least-privilege data access controls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for finding observability gaps in PostHog itself — significant event volumes the team isn't tracking, custom events with no insight or dashboard coverage, insights pointing at events that have stopped firing, dashboards missing related context, critical events with no alerts. Watches the event-stream-vs-saved- inventory delta as the team's product evolves and emits findings recommending new insights, dashboard additions, or alerts when gaps clear the confidence bar. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for PostHog projects using revenue analytics. Watches the derived revenue product for upstream failures (Stripe sync stalls, capture regressions), config drift (missing subscription property, currency mix surprises, broken Stripe↔person joins, deferred-revenue gaps), and goal-miss escalations. Emits findings only when they clear the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Focused Signals scout for PostHog setup health. Reads the project's active health issues — the deterministic findings of PostHog's own health checks (no live events, outdated SDKs, missing reverse proxy, absent web vitals, ingestion warnings, failing data-warehouse models, and more) — and decides which are genuinely worth surfacing. Unlike a one-signal-per-issue push, it bundles kind-clusters into a single finding, weights by real blast radius (cross-referencing actual event volume and reach), and prioritizes issues an agent can resolve via the MCP. Emits only above the confidence bar; otherwise writes durable memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet — no dependencies on other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Toggle between light and dark mode in Cursor's browser, screenshot both states, and flag missing token mappings or contrast issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use Cursor's browser aria snapshots to audit a page for accessibility issues — missing labels, broken tab order, contrast, and ARIA misuse.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepares statistical reports for clinical trials following CONSORT 2025, SPIRIT 2025, ICH E9(R1) estimands, and FDA 2023 covariate adjustment guidance. Covers Table 1 generation, analysis populations (ITT/FAS/PP/Safety), the 5 ICH E9(R1) intercurrent-event strategies, MMRM under MAR (mmrm), reference-based MI (rbmi J2R/CR/CIR), Permutt tipping-point sensitivity, and Rubin's-rules vs frequentist variance debate. Use when preparing regulatory submissions, defining estimands, or implementing missing-data sensitivity analyses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive toolkit for preparing ISO 13485 certification documentation for medical device Quality Management Systems. Use when users need help with ISO 13485 QMS documentation, including (1) conducting gap analysis of existing documentation, (2) creating Quality Manuals, (3) developing required procedures and work instructions, (4) preparing Medical Device Files, (5) understanding ISO 13485 requirements, or (6) identifying missing documentation for medical device certification. Also use when users mention medical device regulations, QMS certification, FDA QMSR, EU MDR, or need help with quality system documentation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate the success criteria for a task or question, then review work against them. Given a task, goal, or open-ended question, decompose it into scenarios, evaluation perspectives, and fine-grained weighted YES/NO criteria using the Recursive Expansion Tree (RET) method; if work is supplied, score it criterion-by-criterion and surface what is missing or could be better. Use when asked to self-review or check your own work, judge whether a task is done well or completely, build a definition-of-done or completeness checklist, create an evaluation rubric or grading criteria, score or grade answers to a question, set up an LLM-as-judge rubric, or when the user mentions self-review, completeness check, success criteria, evaluation criteria, scoring rubric, Qworld, or the RET algorithm.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end clinical trial analysis workflow from CDISC SDTM/ADaM loading through ICH E9(R1) estimand-driven primary analysis to CONSORT 2025 regulatory-compliant reporting. Covers data preparation, FDA 2023 marginal vs conditional logistic regression, categorical tests with Boschloo, modern HTE/subgroup methods, missing-data sensitivity (MMRM, reference-based MI, Permutt tipping point), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), survival analysis (Cox/RMST/competing risks) when applicable, and Table 1. Use when performing a complete analysis of clinical trial data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically discover life science APIs online, create ToolUniverse tools, validate them, and prepare integration PRs. Performs gap analysis to identify missing tool categories, web searches for APIs, automated tool creation using devtu-create-tool patterns, validation with devtu-fix-tool, and git workflow management. Use when expanding ToolUniverse coverage, adding new API integrations, or systematically discovering scientific resources.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tells you what CARLA on UE 5.5 (branch ue5-dev) cannot do that UE 5.8 (ue58-dev) can, so you do not attempt an unsupported workflow there — no Autoware integration, no ROS 2 middleware choice (FastDDS only), no DLSS or ray-traced-lens camera, no OFPA large-map mount so Town12/13/15 load black, and a few missing World/Actor methods. Also states what is identical, so the ue58 skills can be used directly for everything else. Use when working against a 5.5 checkout, when a ue58 skill's step has no counterpart, or when deciding whether a feature request is possible on 5.5 at all.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit the project's agent / LLM instruction files for vague rules, missing examples, drifted compliance, and mechanical-enforcement opportunities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bootstrap a complete .github/workflows/ set for a new project: CI (build/test/lint), CD (workflow_dispatch with env choice + OIDC + ECR), security-scan (gitleaks + dependency scan + CodeQL), and optional database-migration. Use this skill when the user wants to add GitHub Actions CI/CD to a project that does not already have it, or when they want to add missing workflows alongside existing ones.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify and avoid Adobe-specific anti-patterns: using deprecated JWT auth, not caching IMS tokens, ignoring Firefly content policy, missing async job polling, and leaking p8_ secrets. Real code examples with fixes. Trigger with phrases like "adobe mistakes", "adobe anti-patterns", "adobe pitfalls", "adobe what not to do", "adobe code review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan an AEM Edge Delivery Services page for WCAG 2.1 AA accessibility violations and generate specific fixes. Identifies missing alt text, heading hierarchy issues, link text problems, color contrast concerns, and EDS-specific accessibility patterns. Use when fixing accessibility issues, preparing for compliance audits, or remediating WCAG violations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn character reference images into reusable, rigged voxel 3D assets for Blender and Three.js through an imagegen turnaround and user-approval workflow. Use when Codex needs to preserve a character's likeness across front, side, and back views; create or revise Minecraft-like cube-headed models; prevent missing rear hair or clothing; split features between block geometry and face/clothing textures; generate GLB and editable .blend files; add walk/smash-compatible rigid-part pivots; or diagnose why a voxel conversion is not recognizable.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debrief a finished Otameshi Tenshoku trial from the employer's side: set the observed facts against the completion criteria agreed before the start, keep expectations added afterwards, second-hand or off-the-job observations and the company's own late or missing support apart, settle the hours actually worked separately from any evaluation, and draft feedback to the candidate that states facts, support gaps and what happens next without promising a hire or continuation the company has not decided. Use when a hiring manager, recruiter or small-business owner wants to review a trial, decide what to tell the candidate, or work out the settlement after a shortfall; do not use to judge the candidate's aptitude or predict a hire, to cut pay or demand unpaid rework because of dissatisfaction, to compare candidates, or to send the feedback, pay, or update records on the user's behalf.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check the working conditions of a Japanese job offer item by item against the conditions an employer states in writing, compare the offer letter or 労働条件通知書 with the job posting and what was said in interviews, and separate what is confirmed in writing from what is still only verbal. Use when a user has received an offer, a working-conditions notice, or an employment contract and wants to know what is missing, what conflicts with earlier statements, and what to confirm before the acceptance deadline; do not use to rule on whether the terms are lawful, to decide whether to accept or decline, or to contact the employer on the user's behalf.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a paper draft objectively and strictly. Identifies logic gaps, missing proofs, structural issues, and research weaknesses. Reviewer mode. Use for "analyze this paper", "find weaknesses in draft". 旧名 review-analyze。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect articulation gaps in documents using 5W analysis and provide concrete improvement suggestions. Identifies what's missing in explanation, not what's wrong. Default runs detection + improvement; use --check-only for detection only. 旧名 check-articulation。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。