「quest」の検索結果

Legal research on a specific question — case law, statutes, regulatory guidance. Use when asked to "research this legal question", "what does case law say", or "find the relevant statute".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for structured logging (Pino, Winston), error tracking (Sentry), log aggregation (Axiom, Datadog), request correlation, and GDPR-compliant log management / Panduan ahli untuk logging terstruktur (Pino, Winston), pelacakan error (Sentry), agregasi log, korelasi request, dan manajemen log sesuai GDPR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Power Platform ソリューションの全体アーキテクチャを設計する。Copilot Studio / Power Automate / Code Apps / Copilot Managed Runtime / Power Pages / AI Builder の使い分け判断、コンポーネント選定、統合パターンを決定する。社内向け画面は利用者のライセンス（Power Apps Premium か、Copilot Credits の従量課金か）と利用頻度をヒアリングし、Code Apps と Copilot Managed Runtime を使い分ける。構成が確定したら、実装着手前に admin スキルで環境チェック（既定環境ではないか・マネージド環境・Code Apps / MCP の有効化・セキュリティ ロール）と DLP 事前チェック（使用コネクタがブロックされていないか・Business / Non-business が混在しないか）を実行して結果をユーザーに提示する。Agent 365 の AI チームメイトを採用する場合はライト実装（PoC）と本格実装（private リポジトリ + CI/CD + Agent Evals）を AskUserQuestion で選ばせ、Git ホスティング（GitHub / Azure DevOps Repos / その他）も確定してから実装へ進む。外部の文章を読むエージェントではプロンプト インジェクション対策を設計段階で工数に含める。

Creates GitHub Pull Requests with automated validation and task tracking. Use when user wants to create PR, open pull request, submit for review, or check if ready for PR. Analyzes commits, validates task completion, generates Conventional Commits title and description, suggests labels. NOTE - for merging existing PRs, use github-pr-merge instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methods for assessing what people actually eat — 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaires, diet diaries, biomarkers, duplicate-plate studies, and controlled feeding. Covers the relative strengths and biases of each instrument, how to choose among them for a given question, and how to interpret results in the presence of measurement error. Use when a user wants to estimate population-level intake, individual-level intake, or evaluate the plausibility of a dietary claim that depends on how intake was measured.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Catalog of informal fallacies with definitions, canonical examples, and detection heuristics. Covers relevance fallacies (ad hominem, straw man, red herring, appeal to authority, appeal to emotion), presumption fallacies (false dichotomy, complex question, begging the question), ambiguity fallacies (equivocation, amphiboly, accent), causal fallacies (post hoc, slippery slope, correlation-causation), and statistical fallacies (hasty generalization, cherry-picking). Use when evaluating arguments for rhetorical or informal reasoning errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate intelligence briefings for the planning dashboard. Use this skill whenever a request file appears in `.planning/console/inbox/pending/` whose `type` field starts with `intelligence.` (refresh_briefing, triage_finding, snapshot_diff, investigate_section, dismiss_finding). The skill reads the per-project KB at `.gsd/intelligence/intelligence.db`, synthesizes a briefing with a causal hypothesis + acknowledged uncertainty + confidence label and ranked moves, then writes the result back to the KB. Always trigger this skill for these request types — do not generate briefings manually.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides pull request creation and review, including posting findings, controlling scope, readying work for review, and splitting work into a stacked-PR chain.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maximum control over AI image generation — write structured VGL (Visual Generation Language) JSON that explicitly controls every visual attribute. Define exact object placement, lighting direction, camera angle, lens focal length, composition, color scheme, and artistic style as deterministic JSON instead of ambiguous natural language. Use this skill when you need reproducible image generation, precise control over scene composition, or want to convert a natural language image request into a structured JSON schema for Bria FIBO models. Triggers on requests for structured prompts, controllable generation, VGL JSON, deterministic image descriptions, or Bria/FIBO structured_prompt format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured code review covering style, readability, and security concerns with actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests or merge requests to identify issues and suggest improvements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route requests to summarize files, URLs, images, inline text, or multiple sources. Select the requested format and preserve evidence, exact counts, uncertainty and source coverage through summarization, synthesis and agent-result relay.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Python web and API development enforcing strict route/domain/data layer separation, Pydantic v2 strict request-response models, edge-resolved auth, and async-safe HTTP clients. Use when working with FastAPI, Starlette, Django, Flask, HTTP endpoints, request models, authentication flows, async handlers, or any Python web framework task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or validating GitLab CI/CD and automatic release lifecycles, inspecting pipeline and job state read-only, composing non-interactive merge-request commands, or setting up protected refs and release credentials. Also covers reusable components and inputs, GitLab Functions, gitlab-ci-local, glab command composition, and GitLab Flavored Markdown. For pipeline execution or retry requests, provide inspection and command drafting while leaving execution to the operator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting a new feature, gathering requirements for an unfamiliar domain, refining a vague idea into actionable scope, or when a user request is ambiguous or underspecified. Conducts SAM Stage 1 discovery — structured requirements gathering through user discussion, asking WHO/WHAT/WHEN/WHY and never HOW. Produces the ARTIFACT:DISCOVERY document containing feature requirements, NFRs, goals, anti-goals, references, and resolved questions. Supports backlog item self-initialization via a

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activates Standard of Excellence enforcement for the current session. Load before starting any task to apply completion standards: finish the whole thing, fix the root cause, ship the complete working result. Blocks partial solutions, workarounds, deferred threads, and invented content limits when the permanent solve is within reach. Triggers: 'do the whole thing', 'boil the ocean', 'standard of excellence', 'finish it completely', before starting any implementation, refactoring, or multi-step task where partial output is a risk. Does NOT apply to: read-only queries, one-line typo fixes, pure knowledge questions, or single-output summarize requests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, provision, import, route, update, and verify Vapi phone numbers through the public API. Use for Vapi-hosted US PSTN numbers, explicitly requested SIP addresses, Twilio/Vonage/Telnyx or BYO carrier numbers, secure credential handling, assistant or squad routing, area-code requests, outbound limitations, and phone-provider troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interviews a researcher in rounds until an idea, design, or draft has no unexamined decision — numbered questions, each with why it matters and a recommended answer, facts looked up rather than asked, and settled decisions written to a file. Stages are idea (topic or hunch to a falsifiable question and contribution claim), design (estimand, identification, sample and power, measurement, analysis plan, pre-registration, venue), and defend (reviewer objections to a finished design or draft). Use when the user says "grill me", asks to stress-test or poke holes in an idea, design, or plan, asks what they are assuming, or brings an idea that is not yet a design. --plan grills software or process plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draws out a founder's or expert's point of view: what they believe about their market that others don't, the hot takes they'd defend, the stories behind them, and their taste. Generates interview questions, works from answers, a live call or existing content, and ends with ranked One Big Idea candidates for thought leadership and positioning. Triggers: "expert POV", "founder POV", "one big idea", "OBI", "contrarian beliefs", "what makes our founder different", "thought leadership foundation", "founder interview questions". Feeds /positioning and /tov-guidelines. Not for writing posts or articles, and not for brand voice rules (use /tov-guidelines).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organizational Development Manager (R31): guides the subject from an organizational change request (self/team/organization) to a concrete first step from SE/SM/PE. Step 0 — system type classifier (MIM.M.030, 7 questions). Step 3 — routing-table (MIM.M.031).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure whether a change made the tree simpler, on numbers rather than impressions — line counts, branching, coupling, interface width, rule count, standing exemptions and model-visible prose — across one diff or a whole stack of pull requests. Use before claiming a pass reduced complexity, when deciding which pull request in the stack added the machinery, and to read a function's branch count, which no v2 gate reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Launch and collect independent Codex sessions (gpt-6-luna at high, xhigh or max; gpt-6.1-sol at low to xhigh) for bounded parallel work, from Claude Code or from Codex: one manifest, one detached launcher, one report a session, a drain while it runs, and a retry of the sessions that ended without a report. Owns the Codex transport when another skill sets the questions, as whole-run-investigation does for its lanes. Use when the operator asks for Luna or Sol sessions, a swarm, many sessions, a reasoning effort, a Codex subagent from Claude Code, or a later collection of reports. Tell a request to launch from one to wait and collect.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-provider deliberation panel for COMPLEX, multi-view questions — architecture, strategy, market research, and codebase sweeps. Runs a 4-stage deliberation across the provider fleet (diverge → contrarian red-team → adversarial verify → cited synthesis), the same multi-perspective rigour the plan-gate already applies to plan reviews, generalised to arbitrary questions. Use when one model's answer isn't enough and you want convergence THROUGH disagreement + verification, not a single opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a PR description following the repository's pull request template. Use when the user asks to create, draft, or generate a PR description for a pull request. The skill automatically locates the PR template in the target repository and fills it in based on the git diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US cybersecurity firms — pen-testing/red team, security audits, vCISO, SOC 2 readiness, incident response, managed SOC, IAM, cloud security, and AppSec. Triggers on "find me a pen-testing firm for our SOC 2 audit", "shortlist three vCISO services for our healthcare-tech startup", "we need an incident response retainer", or "pull contact info for these 8 security firm domains", even when described indirectly (we got breached, prepare us for the compliance audit, get us SOC 2 ready). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip in-house security hires, "how do I patch CVE-X" or "configure firewall Y" DIY questions, security-product reviews (CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne, etc.), generic security knowledge questions, consumer/personal security advice, non-US firms, individual freelancers and bug-bounty hunters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。