「review」の検索結果

Review whether the PR description is review-ready and consistent with the diff (Why/What, impact, tests, linked issues).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies standard AI review policy guidelines for downstream (test/QA) phase reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

River Review のメインエントリポイント。 レビュー依頼の intent classification → 専門 skill 選択 → 実行 → finding verification → feedback classification → fixture / reference / suppression への還元までを束ねる improvement-loop orchestrator。

セキュリティ観点の通常レビューエージェント。 基本的なセキュリティチェック、認証・認可設計、プライバシー設計の個別スキルへルーティングする。 repository / subsystem の明示的な security audit は river-review-security-audit へ委譲する。

Reviews mobile code for production bugs across Flutter, native Android, native iOS, React Native and Kotlin Multiplatform, including KMP source-set and host API contracts. Covers lifecycle, concurrency, UI state and native boundaries with file:line evidence. Use for a code review, PR, project audit, quality check or /reis-mobile:review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with comprehensive review full review

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow, 연구부터 논문까지, 연구 주제 설정부터 논문 완성까지, 논문 전체 워크플로.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dispatch code-reviewer subagent to review implementation against plan or requirements before proceeding

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Professional code review with auto CHANGELOG generation, integrated with Codex AI. Use when you want professional code review before commits, you need automatic CHANGELOG generation, or reviewing large-scale refactoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publication, complete paper workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コード品質の最終確認。Skill: code-review (built-in) で correctness bug を検出 → main agent が findings を修正 → lint/ty 静的解析 → 条件付きで security-reviewer / critic を spawn (security 関連変更 or plan/requirements.md がある時のみ)。「品質チェックして」「品質ゲート通して」「レビューして」「コードを確認して」「PR 出す前にチェック」「セキュリティ大丈夫？」「コード見て」で発動。

Structured 3-phase peer review of a diff or PR — intent, issues by severity, then pointed merge-readiness questions and a verdict. Use for general code review. Not for AI workflow self-fix-and-edit (ai-systems-review) or no-edit devil's-advocate threat models (adversarial-challenge). Phase 3 asks questions only; it is not the adversarial-challenge skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs comprehensive FiveM resource security, performance, and compatibility audits. Detects backdoors, RATs, SQL injection, event exploitation, NUI vulnerabilities, dupes, crash/DoS vectors, npm and build-chain supply chain attacks, and malware patterns across ESX, QBCore, QBox, ox_lib, and ND_Core frameworks, on both GTA V Legacy and Enhanced builds. Use whenever a FiveM/cfx resource is being reviewed — even if not explicitly asked — including: audit FiveM script, review FiveM security, optimize FiveM resource, check FiveM performance, FiveM code review, review Lua script security, audit ESX resource, audit QBCore resource, audit QBox resource, check for exploits, FiveM vulnerability scan, GTA V Enhanced migration check, resmon optimization, or asking whether a leaked, cracked, nulled or unknown-origin script is safe to run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates code against Apple's App Store Review Guidelines. Use this skill when reviewing iOS, macOS, tvOS, watchOS, or visionOS app code (Swift, Objective-C, React Native, or Expo) to identify potential App Store rejection issues before submission. Triggers on tasks involving app review preparation, compliance checking, or App Store submission readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever SQL, ORM/jOOQ code, schema or migrations, indexes, N+1, or database load are in play, even without the word "review" — delegates the performance review of the current branch diff to the sql-performance-reviewer agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review the current changes for the CWE classes Peephole enforces, as a checklist including the absence-of-guard classes regexes cannot catch. Use when the user says /sec-review or asks for a security review of recent code before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Legal-contract review desk (Busabase App-in-Skill) for NDAs, MSAs, DPAs, and SOWs. Use when the user invokes $kelly-legal-contracts or /kelly-legal-contracts, mentions legal, 法务, contract review, 合同审阅, NDA, MSA, DPA, SOW, redlines, clause playbook, legal intake, issue list, or wants a Busabase-backed review desk where a human legal reviewer approves, revises, or blocks agent-prepared contract issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-Entity Disclosure Tracker App-in-Skill — a Busabase review workspace that helps a compliance/IR team assemble and track a standardized disclosure package per financing vehicle (fund/SPV), across a generic onshore origination entity, an offshore fund-manager entity, and a listing/exchange venue. Use when the user invokes $kelly-disclosure-tracker or /kelly-disclosure-tracker, wants to review disclosure checklists, vehicle readiness, cross-entity reconciliation flags, or reviewer notes across multiple financing vehicles. Review workspace only — it never files anything or calls any external system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when timeline.json exists and the user asks to review the rough cut, critique the edit, or generate review_report.yaml and review_patch.json.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a reviewer subagent against uncommitted local changes, a named branch, or a GitHub PR. Local and branch modes write a review file plus a summary to disk. PR mode posts the findings as a PENDING GitHub review for the user to inspect and submit through the UI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate the success criteria for a task or question, then review work against them. Given a task, goal, or open-ended question, decompose it into scenarios, evaluation perspectives, and fine-grained weighted YES/NO criteria using the Recursive Expansion Tree (RET) method; if work is supplied, score it criterion-by-criterion and surface what is missing or could be better. Use when asked to self-review or check your own work, judge whether a task is done well or completely, build a definition-of-done or completeness checklist, create an evaluation rubric or grading criteria, score or grade answers to a question, set up an LLM-as-judge rubric, or when the user mentions self-review, completeness check, success criteria, evaluation criteria, scoring rubric, Qworld, or the RET algorithm.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and rank an entire SCF round end-to-end from a CSV export. Supports Open Track, Integration Track, and RFP Track with track-specific scoring dimensions. Reads submission data directly from an Airtable CSV, auto-detects columns, categorizes, runs parallel batch reviews, cross-batch calibration, and final ranking. All output is markdown. Use when you have a CSV export of an SCF Build Award round and need to review, score, and rank every submission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。